Tag: US Supreme Court
-

Corporate Personhood: Constitutional Doctrine Without Constitutional Text, Part III
by William L. Kovacs, ©2026 (Aug. 10, 2026) — Part III — Citizens United and the Rise of Corporate Political Power From Artificial Entity to Political Actor. The decisive step in the evolution of corporate political power came with Citizens United. The case did not hold that corporations could make unlimited direct contributions to candidates.…
-

Supreme Court should not let Climate Lawfare Set US Energy Policy
by Paul Driessen, ©2025 (Dec. 6, 2025) — Climate lawfare is a Big Business. State, county and city lawyers have filed some 30 lawsuits, alleging that oil companies misrepresented the impacts of their products and caused billions of dollars in climate and weather damages. After being approached by EarthRights International, Boulder and Boulder County, Colorado joined…
-

State Courts Should not be Writing US Climate Laws
by Paul Driessen, CFACT, ©2024 (Sep. 29, 2024) — Earth’s climate has changed numerous times over the past half-billion years. But activists claim any recent or future changes result from fossil fuel use and agricultural practices. Those activities raise still minuscule levels of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide (0.04, 0.0002 and 0.00003 percent of…
-

Why Do Pennsylvania’s County and State 2020 Election Data Not Match?
by Sharon Rondeau (May 26, 2023) — On May 3, the Research Group of the non-profit, non-partisan organization Look Ahead America (LAA) published a report revealing discrepancies between Pennsylvania’s county- and state-level 2020 election results which thus far have not been reconciled, explained, nor even widely disseminated to the public. The report was LAA’s second…
-

Tennessee Case Challenging “Pandemic” Executive-Branch Actions Docketed at U.S. Supreme Court
by Sharon Rondeau (Feb. 13, 2023) – A case begun in the Chancery Court for Hamilton County, TN in October 2020 challenging the authority of Gov. Bill Lee and the local health department to restrict citizens’ movements due to the declared coronavirus emergency has been docketed at the U.S. Supreme Court for a February 24,…
-

Are You Happy Now?
by Joseph DeMaio, ©2022 (Feb. 26, 2022) — If in the 2020 general election – falsely touted by some to be “the most secure in the nation’s history,” a claim yet to be validated – you voted for President Trump, this offering is not directed to you. On the other hand, if you voted for…
-

U.S. Supreme Court Updates Harris Eligibility Case Docket
by Sharon Rondeau (Jul. 10, 2021) — The U.S. Supreme Court has acknowledged receipt of a petition for rehearing in the case of Laity v. Harris, 20-1503, which claims that former U.S. Senator from California Kamala Harris is not eligible to serve as the nation’s vice president. An observer noted that the Court posted the…
-

Exclusive: Laity Provides Supreme Court Filing Challenging Harris’s Eligibility
by Sharon Rondeau (Apr. 25, 2021) — The Post & Email has received a copy of a submission made to the U.S. Supreme Court by Petitioner Robert C. Laity requesting a writ of certiorari regarding his challenge to Kamala Devi Harris’s constitutional eligibility to serve as the nation’s vice president. According to the Legal Information…
-

Sidney Powell Files New Cases at Supreme Court
by Sharon Rondeau (Dec. 12, 2020) — Between late Friday night and early Saturday morning, Atty. Sidney Powell tweeted that she has filed new cases at the U.S. Supreme court which will “prove massive #fraud” in the November 3 elections. Powell’s announcement came hours after the court declined to docket a case arising in Texas…
-

The DACA Rule, the 110-MPH Fastball and the Fate of the Electoral College
“LEGISLATING FROM THE BENCH” by Joseph DeMaio, ©2020 (Jun. 22, 2020) — Many of the more significant and impactful U.S. Supreme Court decisions in the recent past have been decided on sharply divided 5-4 or 6-3 opinions, including cases such as National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (the “Obamacare” case) (5-4) and more recently,…
-

“US Senate” Reads Article Calling Out Schumer, Congressional Democrats
“NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW” by Sharon Rondeau (Mar. 5, 2020) — Within an hour of The Post & Email’s publication of an editorial excoriating Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for his comments directed by name to two U.S. Supreme Court justices on Wednesday, a member or staffer of that chamber accessed the article.…
-

The Schumer Assault
“HE SHOULD BE EXPELLED” by Joseph DeMaio, ©2020 (Mar. 5, 2020) — This is not – nor should it be – even a close call: at minimum, Chuck (“watch-yer-back, pal”) Schumer must be expelled or censured by the Senate. Expulsion won’t happen, of course, because like impeachment, that requires a two-thirds vote of the Senators,…
-

Comment On The Comments
WHO IS, AND IS NOT, A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN? by Joseph DeMaio, ©2019 (Aug. 5, 2019) — Your faithful servant’s recent post here – raising the question of whether Mr. Andrew Yang is eligible to the presidency as potentially failing the “natural born Citizen” criterion of Art. 2, § 1, Cl. 5 of the Constitution…
-
Citizen Contacts U.S. Supreme Court on “Pattern of Usurpations” by Presidential Candidates
WHAT IS A “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN?” by Sharon Rondeau (Jul. 12, 2019) — As he has in the past, New York State citizen Robert Laity on Friday sent a letter to U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts, copied to all members of that body, captioned, “Usurpations of the Presidency by fraud and subterfuge;…






