by Joseph DeMaio, ©2022    

Joe Biden addresses the public regarding Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Feb. 24, 2022 (Screenshot: The Washington Post

(Feb. 26, 2022) — If in the 2020 general election – falsely touted by some to be “the most secure in the nation’s history,” a claim yet to be validated – you voted for President Trump, this offering is not directed to you. 

On the other hand, if you voted for the Goofball at 1600 or did not vote at all – and for which omission you should be ashamed – read on, because you need to answer this question: “Are you happy now?”  Few, but more than zero, who voted for the Goof actually read The P&E…, but they…, know…, who…, they…, are.  And so does your humble servant.

The question is not merely academic.  As a result of your actions – coupled with however many fraudulent ballots ended up being included in the final “popular vote” count – you are personally responsible, along with all others who voted similarly, for burdening the Republic with by far the worst Commander-in-Chief since 1789.  And that is only after his first 13 months at the helm.

The Goof’s manifest stupidity and outright mendacity with regard to all things important to the nation will be writ large – and in vibrant neon – in future history books.  Assuming, of course, that history books are still allowed publication after he and his censorial apparatchiks finish their work.

From his policies eradicating the southern border; to his disgusting and treasonous rout from Afghanistan, emboldening tyrants worldwide to dare actions which were unthinkable when a president with a backbone was in office; to his horrifically incompetent conversion of the nation from energy independence to energy dependence on hostile foreigners, including the Butcher of Ukraine; to his birthing of inflation rates not seen in 40 years; to his incoherent and deadly mishandling of the Wuhan pandemic…, his short occupancy of the Oval Office is accurately characterized as an uninterrupted series of one abject failure after another. 

Again, Goofball enablers: Are you happy now?

As discussed here, his removal by impeachment has become a national imperative.  He is too cognitively compromised to even understand that he should resign, so it’s either Section 4 of the 25th Amendment or impeachment.

Source: Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute

Allowing him even one more day and one more visit to the ice cream parlor is becoming far too risky.  Remember: he has access to the nuclear football…, seriously.  Yikes. Granted, Kamala Harris is likely constitutionally ineligible to serve as president.  But if the Supreme Court doesn’t care, why should anyone else care? 

On the other hand, if the past 13 months of “Let’s Go Brandon” is any indication of the types of perils yet to blossom if he remains in office – e.g., China’s ambitions regarding Taiwan – even a blind Martian should be able to see: he needs to go. 

The evidence mounts that we have already endured two constitutionally-ineligible presidents – Chester A. Arthur and Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. – so it is unlikely that the Supreme Court, the Constitution notwithstanding, would balk at ratifying Harris’s succession to the office if the Goof were removed.  Tell me again that the Supreme Court is independent and apolitical.  Harris as President, at least until she too became the subject of an impeachment, would be preferable to the marionette from Delaware.  But that is another story.

Recall what the SUC (“Second Usurper in Chief, Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.”) said about the Goof: “Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to &%#@ things up.”  That is one of the very few cranial nuggets coming from the SUC with which any sentient being should agree. 

Again, your humble servant asks those who voted for the clown: Are you happy now?       

Join the Conversation

13 Comments

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Boy oh boy! I would love to ask that ? of one of my neighbors. This person put up an actual billboard in his front yard. It was of Trump in diapers crying. I had to pass it everyday and had to stop myself from stopping to knock it down. It was on a very visable crossroad. I don’t know the name but would love to know what he thinks now! I console myself by saying he is a moron and way beneath me!

      1. How is anyone way ahead?

        Arthur served as vice president and president; Obama served as president for two terms; Harris presently serves as the vice president. If they were not natural-born citizens, they would not have served.

      2. But you are way behind US Courts which ruled Obama a natural born citizen. BTW their decisions apply to VP Harris.

        I’m personally satisfied with President Biden’s performance. At least he hasn’t sold any F-52s to Norway. Lol

        And GDP grew at 5.7% for 2021. Trump never got above 3% .

    1. From the author:
      ———————–
      “Vice President Harris and Presidents Arthur and Obama are all natural born citizens because they were all born in the United States.” On the eligibility issue, there are few to be more pitied than the willfully uninformed.

      1. Are the “willfully uninformed” those who cannot acknowledge that Arthur and Obama served as president (and Arthur also served as vice president) and Harris currently is the vice president?

        1. Reply from the author:
          —————————
          Included within the “willfully uninformed” are those who are intellectually unable to distinguish between lawfully holding an office and unlawfully usurping that office.

          It also includes those who cannot rationally explain (1) the rationale for the “grandfather clause” in Art. 2, § 1, Cl. 5 of the Constitution; (2) the documented reliance by the Founders on De Vattel and the principles of The Law of Nations, including § 212 thereof; (3) the manifest errors and omissions of Justice Gray in his flawed Wong Kim Ark opinion; and (4) the ellipsis chicanery of the Congressional Research Service in its several “now-you-see-it-now-you-don’t” memoranda and reports on the “natural born citizen” issue.

          The question of who is or who is not “willfully uninformed” aside, the Goofball at 1600 — despite being a natural born citizen — is an unmitigated disaster who still needs to be removed from office. Remember that nuclear football thing….

        2. The “willfully uninformed” are those who believe that as long as you weren’t caught going 100MPH in posted 25MPH zone you weren’t speeding.

          The “willfully uninformed” also are those who believe that every Corvette is also a red convertible Corvette simply because a few courts/judges have said so.

        3. There is no indication Arthur and Obama were usurpers, as they duly appeared on ballots, duly were elected, duly were sworn into office, and completed their terms. (Arthur, of course, was elected only as vice president and later elevated.) The same with Harris, as she similarly received the most electoral votes, as certified by the former vice president, and was duly sworn in. And the main competing candidates for the offices held by Arthur (English), Obama (McCain, Romney), and Harris (Pence) never asserted they were ineligible.

          The grandfather clause existed to make eligible those who originally were citizens of British America, and therefore could not have been natural born citizens of the United States, a country that didn’t exist at the time of their births.

          There’s no evidence the Framers relied on Vattel when drafting the natural born citizen clause.

          Disagreement with the ruling in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark doesn’t mean it is not binding or can otherwise be ignored.

          An ellipsis in a government agency’s report in no way impacts who is eligible to serve.

        4. DeMaio said, “It also includes those who cannot rationally explain (1) the rationale for the “grandfather clause” in Art. 2, § 1, Cl. 5 of the Constitution”

          Justice Joseph Story (nominated to the Supreme Court by President Madison) explained the “grandfather clause”:

          “§ 1473. It is indispensable, too, that the president should be a natural born citizen of the United States; or a citizen at the adoption of the constitution, and for fourteen years before his election. This permission of a naturalized citizen to become president is an exception from the great fundamental policy of all governments, to exclude foreign influence from their executive councils and duties. It was doubtless introduced (for it has now become by lapse of time merely nominal, and will soon become wholly extinct) out of respect to those distinguished revolutionary patriots, who were born in a foreign land, and yet had entitled themselves to high honours in their adopted country.“

          https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a2_1_5s2.html

          The members of the American colonies became “natural born citizens” on July 4th, 1776, as explained by Justice William Johnson (nominated to the Supreme Court by President Thomas Jefferson) in his dissenting opinion in Shanks v DuPont.

          “It is the doctrine of the American court that the issue of the Revolutionary War settled the point, that the American states were free and independent on 4 July, 1776. On that day, Mrs. Shanks was found under allegiance to the State of South Carolina as a natural born citizen to a community”

          https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/28/242/

          What the author of this piece forgets is that to the Founders native born and natural born meant the same thing. As shown by St. George Tucker,

          “That provision in the constitution which requires that the president shall be a native-born citizen (unless he were a citizen of the United States when the constitution was adopted,) is a happy means of security against foreign influence, which, where-ever it is capable of being exerted, is to be dreaded more than the plague.”

          https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a2_1_1s18.html

        5. It isn’t speeding if no one was speeding. An accusation that someone sped is not evidence of speeding.

          No judge ever made a ruling about Corvettes of any color.