by Sharon Rondeau

(Jun. 4, 2019) — Late Tuesday afternoon, The Post & Email noted that a reader from the Fox News Channel opened our second article on Friday night’s “Freedom Fridayradio show in which host Carl Gallups made a number of striking revelations.

Since 2012, Gallups has closely followed and reported on what became a 5+-year probe into the “long-form” birth certificate image posted at whitehouse.gov in 2011 said to represent Barack Obama’s original birth record form Hawaii.

In November, lead investigator Mike Zullo said that high-ranking White House officials received a “cursory briefing” on the evidence gathered from the probe which declared the “long-form” image a “computer-generated forgery” after six months of investigation.

During the second half of the show, Gallups said, referencing the birth certificate evidence:

I can tell you that right now, as I’m speaking, there are meetings taking place…between high-level folks who are getting all of this information…big people, who are somebodies, right now, in the Trump administration and under the Trump administration and in the Trump years…one of these meetings is taking place right now as I’m speaking.

Earlier in the show, Gallups drew connections between government surveillance reported to Zullo and then-Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph Arpaio by a confidential informant; the report produced by Special Counsel Robert Mueller on Russian election interference and alleged “collusion” with members of the Trump campaign; and the long-form birth certificate image.

Gallups claimed that the “hacking” attributed to Russian operatives by Mueller’s team was not conducted by Russians, but rather, by U.S. intelligence agencies using software with the ability to alter origination IP addresses designed by the confidential informant, Dennis Montgomery, when he worked for the NSA and CIA.

As with the entire mainstream media complex, Fox News Channel has avoided the topic of the forgery other than for satirical or ridiculing comments or pejorative references to “birthers.”

Greg Gutfeld, a co-host of “The Five,” which airs weekdays at 5:00 p.m. ET, has jocosely referred to Barack Hussein Obama more than once as “Kenyan-born,” which, in fact, was reported by the AP in 2004 as Obama sought a seat in the U.S. Senate.

Gutfeld has placed the “fakeness” of the birth certificate image in the category of “conspiracy theories.”

Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires that the president and commander-in-chief be a “natural born citizen,” which most Americans understand to mean, at a minimum, “born in the United States.”

In 1875, the U.S. Supreme Court stated in an opinion in a case about women’s voting rights that it was “never doubted” that a person born in the United States to U.S.-citizen parents is considered a “natural born Citizen.” As for “other” circumstances, such as a person born in the country to non-citizen parents, the court said it was unsure.

In addition to the Associated Press, NPR, the Honolulu Advertiser, and several other sources reported Obama as having been born in the country of Kenya or Indonesia and not the state of Hawaii.  A 1991 biography prepared by Obama’s then-literary agent stated that he was “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.” After Breitbart revealed the promotional brochure in which the biography appeared, the literary agent, now working at a different firm, claimed that the discrepancy was “nothing more than a fact checking error by me.”

Even with that discovery, Breitbart prefaced its reportage with a “Note from Senior Management” stating:

Andrew Breitbart was never a “Birther,” and Breitbart News is a site that has never advocated the narrative of “Birtherism.” In fact, Andrew believed, as we do, that President Barack Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, on August 4, 1961.

Yet Andrew also believed that the complicit mainstream media had refused to examine President Obama’s ideological past, or the carefully crafted persona he and his advisers had constructed for him.

It is for that reason that we launched “The Vetting,” an ongoing series in which we explore the ideological background of President Obama (and other presidential candidates)–not to re-litigate 2008, but because ideas and actions have consequences.

It is also in that spirit that we discovered, and now present, the booklet described below–one that includes a marketing pitch for a forthcoming book by a then-young, otherwise unknown former president of the Harvard Law Review

It is evidence–not of the President’s foreign origin, but that Barack Obama’s public persona has perhaps been presented differently at different times.

At a final press conference on the investigation held on December 15, 2016, Zullo reported that two forensic analysts working separately, unaware of each other, and located on different continents examined the birth certificate image and reached similar conclusions to his own.  As a local Fox affiliate broadcast the presser in real time, one of its assigned reporters said, “We also know this is being picked up by Fox News Channel. They’re watching this as well, so this is going national whatever we’re going to find out…”

Contrary to the reporter’s prediction, FNC pushed back against the allegations of fraud and forgery on several subsequent occasions.   When Arpaio raised the issue with Judge Jeanine Pirro early last year, Pirro quickly said the issue was “solved” and attempted to return to the initial discussion of a “missile alert” sent in error to approximately one million Hawaii residents and to the topic of “immigration.”

On her show one week before, Pirro had herself raised the subject of “a long-form” to a Democratic strategist.  On January 14, 2018, The Post & Email reported, “Although last week Pirro asked Democrat strategist David Goodfriend on-air if he had ‘ever seen a ‘long-form,’ clearly taking him by surprise and sending him into peals of nervous laughter, she was clearly unwilling to discuss the investigation that Arpaio commissioned which determined early on that the birth certificate image is a ‘computer-generated forgery.’”

In April, Zullo said he discovered “collusion with media executives” “not to talk about the birth certificate.”

Last August, Zullo reported that two U.S. intelligence agents informed him that it is “an open secret” in Washington, DC that Obama was born outside the United States.

On Friday, Gallups said:

We’ve caught, let me just say, other American intelligence agencies…through an informant that built the software. Mike Zullo traveled to Washington, DC, talked to two insiders in the intelligence community that he’s known for a long time…who said, “Yes, the guy who’s talking to you built that software, and yes, he knows what he’s talking about, and yes, it is used to hack into anywhere they want to.”  He also showed Mike Zullo how that same software was used to hack into Hawaii Department of Health and the historical records at the University of Hawaii, and then a few weeks later, oop! magically appears a long-form birth certificate which we now know was built from the ground up, and those urls, Mike Zullo revealed, came from the CIA using the hacking material and sent it through CIA urls…

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. To Jim Delaney, Mike Zullo has met with congress 4 times and Daryl Issa who at the time was the head of the Congressional Judiciary Committee who told him to go pound sand. The first TV interview with the Maricopa Country Sheriff’s office turned into a blood bath where the media attacked the Sheriff and Mike Zullo. They have had several media events but they were all local sort of like the news of your local burger joint getting closed down for food poisoning. I personally had Mike Zullo on speaker phone discussing the missing National Archives information with Congressmen Michael Burgess.

    Mike and the Sheriff have been all over but the main stream media refuse to discuss it to this day. We know he’s a fake and fraud but just like Sandy Hook but they don’t want to talk about their complicity to this massive fraud that will expose their apathy toward the citizens of this country. On top of that they are all spineless which is why I refuse to watch broadcast news.

    So they have tried to get the word out and we have too person to person and radio show to radio show. Now all the people are in place to make something happen and that is what we seek currently.

    I have been in contact with retired intel people who still refuse to speak out on what they know which tells me there are few patriots in the US Intel operations and the federal government. A few retired like Bill Binney and a few others are speaking out but in large part they are keeping their loyalty to the fraud. This is why these alphabet soup federal agencies like the CIA, NSA, FBI, EPA, BLM, TSA, FEMA, DARPA and others are not to be trusted, not constitutional and should all be shut down.

  2. The Court in Minor (a unanimous decision) did not say that they were “unsure” whether or not citizens born in the US without reference to their parents citizenship status. They said they were in “doubt”. There is this one standard and it is the highest standard decided unanimously by the highest court in our nation., one born in the US to parents who are both US citizens themselves. Any deviation from a standard makes that deviation foreign to said standard.

  3. A document that is said to be a photocopy of President Barack Obama’s biography as it appeared in the 1991 Harvard Law Review Year Book, reads as follows:

    “Barack Obama, the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review, was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii. The son of an American anthropologist and a Kenyan finance minister, he attended Columbia University and worked as a financial journalist and editor for Business International Corporation. He served as project coordinator in Harlem for the New York Public Interest Research Group and was Executive Director of the Developing Communities Project in Chicago’s South Side. His commitment to social and racial issues will be evident in his first book, Journey in Black and White.”

    If the 1991 Harvard Law Review Year Book is true, then Obama was born in Kenya which would prohibit him from being President of the United States.

    A copy of a document on the Internet isn’t proof of anything, but some of those 1991 Year Books must be laying around somewhere waiting to be found by a good researcher.

    Miriam Goderich, the literary agent who claims she wrote the description for the Dystel & Goderich agency that listed Barack Obama as born in Kenya. When confronted with the discrepancy of Obama’s birth place (Kenya vs Hawaii), she quickly claimed that listing Obama’s birthplace as Kenya was “nothing more than a fact checking error.”
    Author Steve Bowman, who was represented by the same agent in the mid 90’s, stated he was instructed to write his own bio in the third person which he did. Authors and journalists know this custom. After all, who knows more about the author than the author?

    Whoever wrote the Obama bio, (Obama, Goderich or some ghost writer) Obama must have provided the information needed otherwise how would the writer know what to include and say?

    Though claiming Obama’s Kenyan birthplace was a mistake, the booklet continued to maintain that claim until after he was a U.S. Senator. “Goderich doesn’t explain why or how a “fact checking error” could persevere for sixteen years, in three different versions of Jane Dystel’s Website and four different versions of Obama’s biography.

    The literary agency updated the bio in June 1998 and the part about Obama’s Kenyan birth was there.

    The text was updated in February 2005, after Obama became a Senator. Kenya was still his birthplace.

    An April 3, 2007 a change to the bio still stated Obama “was born in Kenya.”

    Between April 3 and April 21, 2007 Obama determined “born in Kenya” didn’t serve his aspirations. Obama’s bio, on the Dystel & Goderich Website, was edited a fourth time to state, “born in Hawaii”.

    The booklet was confirmed to be authentic by Richard Bellsey, who told Breitbart.com the booklet was a project he had worked on. Jay Acton claims that it is unlikely Obama wrote the biography for the booklet, but he was “probably” approached to approve the content describing his life.

    In the April 3, 2007 version, the booklet stated:

    “BARACK OBAMA is the junior Democratic senator from Illinois and was the dynamic keynote speaker at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. He was also the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review. He was born in KENYA to an American anthropologist and a Kenyan finance minister and was raised in Indonesia, Hawaii, and Chicago. His first book, ‘DREAMS FROM MY FATHER: A STORY OF RACE AND INHERITANCE’ has been a long time New York Times bestseller”

    But in the April 21, 2007 version was changed and stated:

    “BARACK OBAMA is the junior Democratic senator from Illinois and was the dynamic keynote speaker at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. He was also the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review. He was born in HAWAII to an American anthropologist and a Kenyan finance minister and was raised in Indonesia, Hawaii, and Chicago. His first book, ‘DREAMS FROM MY FATHER: A STORY OF RACE AND INHERITANCE’ has been a long time New York Times bestseller.”

    Two weeks after the April 21, 2007 version, Obama announced his run for president.

    The booklet clearly shows Obama knew his bio contained false and misleading information about his birth place. Yet for 16 years he did nothing to correct the record. Was it because he was running for President and needed to be a natural-born Citizen, born in Hawaii, USA, to be eligible for the job? One of his birth locations is clearly false. But which one? Was Obama lying about his birth in Kenya, or lying about his birth in Hawaii?

  4. Hmmm. And when will this all come to a head; when will Zullo and company and the “somebodies” fearlessly speak out publicly. IF they got the goods on Obama, then why the stony silence? Is there at least an itsy bitsy chance this matter will be resolved one way or the other? Frustrating. Perhaps as Obama comes under greater suspicion over his nefarious participation in Emailgate and the Russia Collusion Delusion, fear will miraculously morph into honesty and courage? Stranger things have happened, I suppose.

  5. While listening to Andy of Total Eclipse (youtube) today, he makes a quick comment about Tom Clancy, alluding to his demise, that he had barry’s real bc. Nothing more, but it captured my attn. Now today I see your article regarding subject of bc. Hope these are signs that the phoney bc & the man it’s connected to will finally be exposed