by Sharon Rondeau

(Apr. 20, 2022) — In a Rumble broadcast posted Wednesday, former New York City Mayor and former personal attorney to President Donald J. Trump Rudy Giuliani called out the U.S. media for its “Iron Curtain of censorship” in regard to a laptop computer belonging to Joe Biden’s son Hunter, which in the fall of 2020 Giuliani provided to The New York Post as evidence that the Biden family had profited handsomely from its dealings in foreign countries over perhaps a matter of decades.

The laptop contained emails demonstrating that then-Democrat presidential candidate Joseph R. Biden, Jr. had used his influence as vice president to enrich his family, apparently relying on Hunter to facilitate business agreements with communist China, Ukraine and Russia.

On October 19, 2020, Giuliani told Fox Business’s Maria Bartiromo that “the hard drive, when viewed completely…is a damning piece of evidence, not just against Joe Biden but against a number of members of his family, and what it shows is…a 30-year conspiracy in which his son, his brother, several other relatives would act as bagmen, meaning they collect the money, and at least half of it would go back to Joe, sometimes more…”

Further referring to the elder Biden, Giuliani said the laptop’s contents showed “the guy was going to be in business with Chinese communists and he’s running for president…It’s outrageous!”

At the time, Giuliani called the American media “corrupt” for censoring The Post‘s story and claiming it “debunked” or a “possible disinformation campaign” without any independent investigating. The social-media giants Twitter and Facebook censored The Post‘s reporting, with The Washington Post claiming The New York Post published “the falsehood, advanced by Trump, that the ‘elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who was investigating the company,’” referring to Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company which made Hunter a Board member at a salary of $83,000 a month with no experience in the field while his father was Barack Obama’s vice president.

That salary was reduced by half “two months after his father ceased to be vice president,” The New York Post reported last May.

In 2018, Joe Biden himself told a Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) gathering that he did, in fact, pressure then-Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko to fire prosecutor Victor Shokin, who later spoke publicly about his dismissal.

Late last month, The Washington Post and The New York Times, which also disputed the original report, have since admitted that the Hunter Biden laptop evidence is authentic.

Giuliani’s email on Wednesday introducing his newest video reads, in large part:

The American public has experienced the worst censorship in our life times for over five years.

Remember when 51 former CIA employees signed a letter saying the Hunter Biden Lap Top was Russian disinformation. They knowingly lied to you. MSM and big tech colluded not to allow The NY Post story out which exposed the Biden families deep ties to Communist China.

Thankfully, the truth is coming out on the Biden Crime Family just as the truth is slowly coming out about the 2020 election. You just need to know where to look because it is being heavily censored.

We watch in awe as Elon Musk tells the world he values freedom of speech and he wants to take over Twitter so that can occur. This is the first of many battles to regain our civil liberties and our rights under the constitution.

“Proof” of the Biden family’s money-laundering, Giuliani said in his broadcast, is contained in the documentation he obtained while in Ukraine prior to the 2020 U.S. presidential election and before he obtained the laptop.

Giuliani lauded journalist John Solomon, who later founded JusttheNews, for his reporting on the subject at The Hill, while observing that most major media ignored the story. “That was the first really across-the-board, major censorship of the [sic] most of the mainstream media except for John Solomon’s Hill and to some extent, Fox News and Newsmax and OAN, did not cover it, didn’t cover the facts…,” Giuliani said.

In a recent interview with The Ohio Star, Solomon is quoted as having said of the fallout from his reporting of the Hunter Biden story, “We get called conspiracy theorists, we get all these things, and then history has evolved. Hunter Biden did do things wrong, whether they’re criminal or not, the U.S. attorney will – but he’s been under investigation – at the time I and Peter Schweizer and others were being attacked. Everything we were saying was not only true, it was actually worse than we were saying.”

Giuliani observed that the media later shaped the coronavirus narrative by promoting vaccines above any type of treatment to include the FDA-approved hydroxychloroquine, which both Giuliani and Trump said they took at different times during the pandemic. “Exactly why that was covered up, I think, is a whole scandal of its own and a really shocking one about profiting from the vaccine and not wanting treatment,” Giuliani commented. “This is the first time we’ve had a major illness and nobody looked for a treatment for it; we waited for a vaccine, a vaccine that only partially works. There are treatments for this illness, and they were suppressed.”

At 13:03 in the video, Giuliani remarked he is still “shocked” by the media’s “covering up” of Joe Biden’s deficiencies, including his alleged “dementia.”

Social-media companies also “canceled the president,” Giuliani remarked at 17:00, “because they didn’t like what he was saying about the election being stolen.” He contrasted that to Hillary Clinton’s claim that the 2016 election was “stolen” from her and former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams’s claims that she should have been declared the winnter in 2018 over now-sitting Gov. Brian Kemp.

Once bestowed with the honorarium of “America’s Mayor” as a result of his response during and after the 9/11 terrorist attacks on New York City, Giuliani visibly came under investigation last year when his mobile devices were seized by the FBI to reportedly obtain information on “his business practices” and “lobbying efforts” with Ukraine, according to ABC News.

In June 2020, Rolling Stone described Giuliani as being in a state of “free fall.” “The past few years on the national stage have left his reputation in tatters,” RS wrote, “marked in history for his role in the Ukraine extortion scandal that got a president impeached. He has seemed, at times, unstable and incoherent, contradicting both himself and the president in wild appearances on cable news, while spinning a web of conspiracy theories with Joe Biden at the center.”

Giuliani was also widely ridiculed for having sought to prove that Trump won the 2020 election as the press reported that Biden had gained more than a sufficient number of electoral votes to become the 46th President of the United States.

Trump’s claims of a fraudulent 2020 election appear to be supported by preliminary findings from investigations conducted in Wisconsin and Arizona, two of the “swing” states where Trump and Giuliani claimed organized, widespread election violations occurred.

Video and cell-phone data collected by the non-profit from five “swing” states appear to reveal “mules” depositing multiple ballots in outside drop-boxes, many of which were established in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic wherein many voters chose to avoid the crowds of Election Day.

In January, a Wisconsin judge declared drop-boxes “violate state law and cannot be used in the upcoming midterm elections.”

An investigation remains ongoing in Georgia into possible “ballot harvesting” and another into Fulton County‘s election processes, with the media continuing in its attempt to convince the public that Trump’s claims of fraud are “baseless.”

Unbeknownst to most Americans, more than $400 million was given to the “non-partisan” Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) by Mark Zuckerberg’s foundation, the Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative, purportedly to “help” in the administration of elections in urban areas. In late December 2020, The Amistad Project director Phill Kline gave a press conference reporting that the “injection of hundreds of millions of dollars into the election — $500 million of which came from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg — violated state election laws and resulted in an unequal distribution of funding that deprived voters of both due process and equal protection.”

Kline’s ensuing report appears to have been largely removed from the internet.

Some of the Zuckerberg-CTCL money was distributed to five large Wisconsin cities, reported a special counsel appointed by the state legislature, violating the state’s election bribery law. Given that and other irregularities, Special Counsel Michael Gableman, a retired Wisconsin Supreme Court judge, suggested legislators consider decertifying the electors who cast their votes for Joe Biden at the Electoral College on December 14, 2020.

The Post & Email observes that U.S. media censorship began much earlier than the emergence of the Hunter Biden story, after a little-known U.S. Senator from Illinois known as Barack Hussein Obama, II declared his presidential candidacy on a frigid Chicago day in early February 2007.

When potential voters began asking voicing concerns about Obama’s background and constitutional eligibility to serve, the media rushed to his defense to the point of silencing questioners and publishing uncorroborated information.

Inconsistencies which arguably would have raised, at a minimum, curiosity as to a candidate’s eligibility or fitness for office were explained away as a “fact checking error” or stated in Spanish and overlooked by the media.

Beginning in 2010, then-businessman Donald J. Trump, who would succeed Obama after eight years in office, openly questioned Obama’s eligibility given numerous reports he was born in Kenya or Indonesia and not Hawaii, as Obama claimed. In questioning Obama’s bona fides, Trump referred to the requirement in the U.S. Constitution mandating that the president be a “natural born Citizen.”

Very publicly and during a spate of interviews, Trump demanded that the White House release Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate to purportedly prove he was born in the United States.

In June 2008, the Obama campaign reportedly released an image of a “short-form” birth certificate lacking such details as his parents’ place of birth, the delivery physician’s signature and height and weight of the baby.

While not “canceled” in the sense of the current meaning of the word, for his efforts Trump was repeatedly ridiculed as a “conspiracy theorist” and given the dubious label of “leader of the ‘birthers,'” signifying those questioning the official Obama birth narrative of a birth in Honolulu, HI on August 4, 1961.

On April 27, 2011 following more than three months of Trump’s demands, the Obama White House posted what it said was a scan of a certified copy of Obama’s original “long-time” birth certificate obtained from the Hawaii Department of Health. Directly following the release, Trump expressed doubt as to its authenticity and pledged to launch an investigation.

In August of that year, Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff Joseph Arpaio agreed to launch his own probe into the birth-certificate image in response to concerns expressed by more than 200 of his constituents that their votes in the upcoming 2012 election would be disenfranchised if, in fact, the image proved to be contrived. Arpaio delegated the task to then-Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo, a former detective and former private investigator.

With rare exceptions, the mainstream media ignored the story, including when Zullo reported at a March 1, 2012 press conference that investigators found probable cause to believe the image a “computer-generated forgery.”

After many twists and turns in what developed into a 5+-year criminal probe, Arpaio and Zullo revealed at their third and final press conference that the initial findings were validated by two forensic document examiners recognized as specialists in their fields.

Rather than investigate, the media attacked the messengers, then promptly ceased to mention the striking claims.

Obama himself made Trump the object of derision at the 2011 White House Correspondents’ Dinner (WHCD) with Trump in attendance, unsmiling. “Donald Trump has been saying that he will run for president as a Republican—which is surprising, since I just assumed that he was running as a joke,” said NBC personality Seth Meyers amid a string of “birth-certificate jokes” and tittering from the “journalists” assembled.

“Say what you will about Mr. Trump; he certainly would bring some change to the White House,” Obama quipped, pointing to a backdrop image of the White House bearing a brightly-colored banner in purple and black.

In April 2019, Zullo observed that “The media is now nothing more than pure propaganda.” Following The Post‘s revelations of the Hunter Biden laptop, Fox News’s Tucker Carlson faulted “the most powerful people in the world” for having “aligned to censor the news,” thereby destroying “the promise of a free press that’s the basis of American democracy.”

However, Carlson’s employer failed to cover the reported forgery of Obama’s long-form birth certificate to the point of silencing Arpaio himself with the specious claim that the issue of forgery was “solved.”

There is now palpable fear that Trump will “steal” or “overturn” the 2024 election.

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. I sense that the main offensive to undo America began with Obama fraudulently slithering into the WH as the re-invented Trojan Horse in 20o9. To epitomize the audacity of this deceptive, lying snake, the other day he came out and condemned all the fake news storytelling that going on. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black, but that’s Obama at his finest. It’s hard to put a finger on what’s behind the continuous onslaught that’s being directed at America, but it’s certain it’s a worldwide agenda, which has now unfolded in the Great Reset. The weakening of America was absolutely necessary to accomplish this agenda. At the expense of wandering a bit, I must say I am also very leery of the new champion who is now all the rage in the news today, Elon Musk. There is something about this guy that makes me believe he is part of the overall DS agenda. What scares me is his matter-of-fact belief that transhumanism is the wave of the new future for mankind. Anything of the kind represents blasphemy since Musk obviously doesn’t believe in the one Triune God. Indeed, he fashions himself to be his own God. He actually believes he can make a new improved version of man that’s better than the one created by God in God’s own image. The arrogance and evil in both Obama and Musk send shivers down my spine. Whether soulless or of otherworldly demonic origins, it is certain in my mind that their actions are clearly anti-human.

  2. Carl Cameron at FOX was all set to do a story on Dennis Montgomery’s claims about government hacking of private citizens information but he dropped it when Montgomery wouldn’t provide proof that his data was real.

    Did Zullo ever release the evidence from the two forensic experts?

      1. You wrote,”With rare exceptions, the mainstream media ignored the story, including when Zullo reported at a March 1, 2012 press conference that investigators found probable cause to believe the image a “computer-generated forgery.””

        A simple Google search finds a number of articles about the March, 2012 press conference. Including;

        CBS News

        The Washington Post

        The BBC

        Dozens of news sites reported on the March 1st, press conferences. Including all the Arizona news sites, the Honolulu Star/ Advertiser, the Christian Science Monitor, ect.

        How is that censorship?

        This one site from March 1st, 2012 even reports that layers are common in PDFs made on a Xerox WorkCenter scanner/copier. Something it would take Zullo four years to admit could happen.

        So they did do initial reports but they didn’t follow it up. And maybe that’s because like the guy (Whet Moser) with Chicago Magazine when they investigated the layers or contacted the Select Service, they found there was nothing to it. And like Carl Cameron when Montgomery couldn’t produce his data, they dropped the birth certificate is a forgery story.

        It may not be censorship, it may just be good investigative journalism.

        Zullo has not helped by concealing the expert reports. Why would news outlets give credence to his claims when other claims by him proved to be false?

        1. Also recall that at the final “press conference” held in December 2016 after Arpaio had been defeated and was a lame duck he and Zullo refused to take a single question. At that “press conference” Zullo abandoned the most significant of his previous theories about forgery and claimed for the first time that the Obama LFBC had been created using the Johanna Ah’Nee certificate as a model. This theory was quickly debunked.

          Zullo admitted that he had hired an Italian forensic firm who concluded that the Obama LFBC PDF file was produced on a a Xerox WorkCentre just as others had posited three years earlier. Again Zullo refused to release any details of the Forlabs’ report.

        2. I had a comment that just disappeared.

          I read Zullo’s comments from 2019. They display a lack of basic understanding of the Xerox scanning process.

        1. Claims about trees and forests are not actually trees and forests; they show only that someone believes in the possibility of trees and forests.