U.S. Justice Department Accesses Obama “Eligibility” Article

JUDGE’S FORMER LAW CLERK NOW AT THE DOJ

by Sharon Rondeau

(Feb. 25, 2020) — Just after 3:30 p.m. EST on Tuesday, a reader logging on to The Post & Email from a “United States Department of Justice” IP address accessed an article from 2010 detailing the progress of a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Judge David O. Carter presiding, with the purpose of discovering whether or not Barack Hussein Obama was constitutionally eligible to serve as the nation’s chief executive.

The article, titled, “The strange case of Judge David O. Carter,” was written by citizen observer David F. LaRocque, who attended a hearing in the case on July 13, 2009.  At the time, LaRocque recounted, Carter indicated that the question of the eligibility of an elected president is a valid one, and after numerous disappointing rulings in similar cases elsewhere, the plaintiffs were encouraged that the question as to Obama’s eligibility might at last be heard on its merits.

The lawsuit, initially filed in California state court by Atty. Orly Taitz on January 20, 2009, named then-California Secretary of State Debra Bowen as defendant and presented two questions:

Does the burden of proof lie with the Petitioner to prove standing and evidence lack of qualification by a candidate/President elect, where election officers rely on a candidate’s declaration? OR Does the CONSTITUTION amend. 20 place the burden of proof on the President elect to provide objective government certified witnessed proofs, with election officers under oath to challenge, examine and declare that the President elect has or has not qualified, enforceable by petition for redress of grievances?

and

Should the “natural born citizen” presidential qualification be interpreted expansively to expand civil rights under the 14th Amendment? OR Should it be interpreted restrictively as an essential guard against tyranny by ensuring the Commander in Chief has only had undivided allegiance to the U.S.A., to safeguard the Constitution and the Republic?

Obama’s failure to produce a “long-form” birth certificate and other identifying documents during his presidential campaign, among other factors, led to the plaintiffs’ contention that he did not meet the presidential eligibility criterion of “natural born Citizen,” as Article II of the U.S. Constitution requires.

Questions as to Obama’s eligibility arose after he declared himself a presidential candidate in February 2007 as a first-term, little-known U.S. Senator from Illinois.  Previously, Obama had said publicly that he harbored no plans to run for president without completing his six-year term.

As The Post & Email has chronicled since 2009, a myriad of conflicting but credible reports identified Obama’s birthplace as Kenya or Indonesia and not Hawaii, as he claims.

Between 1991 and April 2007, Obama’s own literary agent reported him in a biographical sketch as “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.”  As Breitbart News reported in May 2012, the biography was changed to say that Obama was “born in Hawaii,” with the then-former literary agent claiming the “error” was due to her inexperience and her failure to “fact-check.”

In June 2008, an image appeared at a number of websites, including Obama’s campaign website, purported to be his “birth certificate” from the State of Hawaii. The image prompted a number of questions as a result of its blacked-out certificate number, reference to his father’s race as “African” and the lack of a doctor’s signature and other details normally found on a more comprehensive birth record.

In October 2008, Obama campaign surrogate and former New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson told reporters in Spanish that Obama is “an immigrant.”

Less than four months after acknowledging the plaintiffs’ questions about Obama’s eligibility and pledging a swift resolution, Carter reversed himself and dismissed the case. In his summary of the events, LaRocque observed that Carter’s decision was made after his hiring of a new law clerk from the mega-firm Perkins Coie and an October 5, 2009 hearing in which Carter’s demeanor was markedly changed.

“Once the hearing commenced, a change in tone became immediately apparent,” LaRocque wrote. “It seemed that Judge Carter was much more skeptical of the plaintiff’s [sic] case, and noticeably more adversarial in his exchanges with Attorney Taitz. In an affidavit regarding this hearing which I provided in connection with the August 11 appeal, I stated that ‘I thought (the) change in Judge Carter’s demeanor from one hearing to the (October 5) hearing…was striking and quite surprising.’ Another affiant made a similar statement in her affidavit: ‘After the hearing a large group of people met outside and declared that we couldn’t believe the change in the judge’s demeanor. One of the gentlemen, who said that he had known Judge Carter for a long time, stated that he had never seen him like that before.’”

Several weeks later, Carter dismissed the suit, a decision which Taitz appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Of Carter’s abrupt about-face, LaRocque wrote, “To say that the Barnett plaintiffs were stunned on hearing this news is putting it mildly. This astonishing new development was not only unbelievable; it was incomprehensible. How could this happen in America? On the face of it, this surprising action by Judge Carter was so far outside the norm of appropriate judicial conduct that it seemed unimaginable. It even gave off an odor of corruption and manipulation of the judiciary that was so out of character with what we knew of Judge Carter that one had to wonder – what was the nature of the pressure that was brought to bear on Judge Carter that he would even entertain such a course of action?”

The DOJ reader on Tuesday searched the article under the tag “Siddharth Velamoor,” Carter’s new law clerk at the time. Velamoor is now an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Washington, a position he has held since at least 2017.

Fast-forwarding to late 2010, when then-businessman Donald Trump began stridently demanding that the White House release Obama’s original birth certificate to prove his eligibility, on April 27, 2011, the White House released what it said was a certified copy of Obama’s “long-form” birth record to much media fanfare.

Later that morning, Obama himself hosted a brief press conference at which he said, “As many of you have been briefed, we provided additional information today about the site of my birth. Now, this issue has been going on for two, two and a half years now. I think it started during the campaign. And I have to say that over the last two and a half years I have watched with bemusement, I’ve been puzzled at the degree to which this thing just kept on going. We’ve had every official in Hawaii, Democrat and Republican, every news outlet that has investigated this, confirm that, yes, in fact, I was born in Hawaii, August 4, 1961, in Kapiolani Hospital.”

The “briefing” to which Obama referred likely was an off-the-record session provided to reporters shortly before, during which then-White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer said that Obama would not be “holding” the document while delivering his remarks that morning.

When a reporter challenged Pfeiffer with the claim that he released only “a photocopy” of one of two purported certified copies of Obama’s original birth record, Pfeiffer responded, “It has a seal on it.”

Also present at the time was then-White House counsel Robert Bauer, a co-founder of Perkins Coie, who returned to the firm just six weeks later.

In an editorial dated March 4, 2019, Bauer recounted his role in procuring the more “long-form” birth record from the Hawaii Department of Health as part of the “consequences” of Donald Trump’s alleged “racism.”

The Obama White House archives continue to show documentation outlining the dispatching of Judith Corley, then of Perkins Coie and serving as Obama’s personal attorney, to the HDOH, purportedly to obtain the two certified copies of Obama’s birth record.

Within hours of the White House’s revelation on April 27, experienced computer-graphics professionals reported numerous anomalies in the image.

In August 2011, at the request of 242 of his constituents, then-Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph Arpaio commissioned former detective and then-lead investigator of Arpaio’s “Cold Case Posse” Mike Zullo to conduct what Arpaio believed would be a short review of the image to “clear the president.”

However, Zullo was forced to inform Arpaio that the image was problematic and could not be considered genuine. A 5+-year investigation ensued in which Zullo, working virtually alone, declared the birth-certificate image a “computer-generated forgery.”

Also found fraudulent is Obama’s purported Selective Service registration form.  As for the birth-certificate image, Zullo has reported that the investigation found no indication of a “raised seal,” as Pfeiffer and NBC News’s Savannah Guthrie claimed.

Zullo brought the investigation to its conclusion in December 2016 with a third and final press conference during which he revealed that two forensic analysts, each examining the image from a different discipline and unaware of the another, reached conclusions similar to Zullo’s own.  The media noticeably failed to report the striking findings or their potential ramifications.

Prior to the March 2019 conclusion of the Special Counsel “Russia collusion” investigation, which turned up no evidence of an FBI-alleged conspiracy between 2016 Trump advisors and Russian operatives, Perkins partner Michael Sussmann was noted to have met with then-FBI General Counsel James Baker to allege communication between a Trump Tower computer and the Russian Alfa Bank, an allegation which also was never substantiated.

Sussman was previously an attorney for the Justice Department.

While representing the Democratic National Committee (DNC), Perkins was responsible for acting as a conduit for the transfer of funds from the Hillary Clinton campaign/DNC to the private firm Fusion GPS to commission opposition research on Trump and Russia.  Fusion accomplished the task through then-FBI source and British citizen Christopher Steele.  The now-infamous “dossier” was used to obtain four FISA surveillance warrants on former Trump campaign adviser Carter W. Page, the latter two of were deemed by the U.S. Justice Department and FISA Court to have been the results of faulty evidence supplied by the FBI.


Looking for all of your news in one place?  Try Whatfinger, your one-stop aggregator of news, opinion and everything else.

 

 

 

 

 

 

12 Responses to "U.S. Justice Department Accesses Obama “Eligibility” Article"

  1. Randy Disher   Sunday, March 1, 2020 at 11:24 AM

    I think many people misinterpreted Judge David Carter’s politeness shown to the obviously inept Orly Taitz as some kind of legal agreement. He had the US Attorney hold Taitz’s hand and actually walk her through serving her complaint, something she was not able to do on her own. That never meant Judge Carter agreed with the merits of the case. He is a former US Marine, Vietnam veteran and Purple Heart recipient. The idea that “someone got to him” is just nonsense.

  2. CDR Kerchner (Ret)   Friday, February 28, 2020 at 8:25 PM

    Many of the judges were and are part of the Deep State. This newspaper ad graphic illustrates what legal cases from constitutional conservative petitioners were up against. See: : https://www.scribd.com/doc/58789325/We-Have-a-Criminal-and-Forger-in-the-White-House-20110627-issue-Wash-Times-Natl-Wkly-pg-5 And if any wavered from the Deep State path and desired outcome, then they were back channel gotten to … as happened with Judge Carter case, in the opinion those who witnessed and attended that case’s hearings and noticed a sudden about face in his demeanor from one hearing to a later one. The Deep State has its web and tentacles deeply implanted and intertwined in the Administrative State, the Legislative Branch, the Judicial Branch, the Major Media, Academia, and elsewhere. It is entrenched everywhere in the very deep swamp in DC and from there has its tentacles nationwide. And as for the media’s role in spewing out its objectives, just watch CNN, MSNBC, NBC, etc., and you can see it in action everyday via broadcasters and guests thereon. But definitely there are many judges nationwide who are part of the deep state making rulings regularly to subvert our constitution and President Donald Trump.

  3. CDR Kerchner (Ret)   Friday, February 28, 2020 at 6:37 PM

    As I recall, the original UnDeadRevolution wordpress site, the one with an image of George Washington kneeling, was run by a group of sociology major girls as a social engineering project and experiment as part of one of their classes in the University of Connecticut sociology department. That is the same department where the notorious OBOT RealityCheck worked. A member of the group secretly disclosed that information to Attorney Mario Apuzzo and I at one point in time and warned us not to trust the people running the UnDeadRevolution site. What we were told was that it was run as a social engineering experiment to make it look like a conservative patriot site but was really being run to infiltrate and learn more about what people on the constitutional conservative were up to via back channel communications ultimately made by/from readers to the site operators. This was one of those type of social engineering projects like the CIA runs, i.e., front ops that do not reveal what they are really up to. That is what I recall from memory as I am typing this. If I am wrong, I will stand corrected, when it is shown I am wrong as to what I remember. As they say, beware of Greeks bearing gifts! With any new person(s) contacting people who were long active in this battle it is as Reagan said, trust but verify. Since I believe the CIA was involved with protecting Obama, it is one of their standard m.o.’s to dispatch infiltrators into the enemy ranks to try and find out what is going on and/or set them up. Look at what the CIA’s Brennan and the FBI did to Trump. Just sharing some memories as I recall them as I type this.

  4. Spencer Dixon   Friday, February 28, 2020 at 5:58 PM

    The rulings by Carter and Mahili were appealed — each all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. No higher judge expressed disagreement with Carter’s and Mahili’s rulings.

    Did the Deep State get to all those judges as well?

  5. James Carter   Friday, February 28, 2020 at 12:28 PM

    Someone also got to Georgia Administrative Law Judge Michael M. Malihi who, after denying Obama’s motion to quash Plaintiff’s subpoena to appear with evidence of his eligibility to be on Georgia’s 2012 general election ballot, dismissed the case.

  6. Gary Wilmott   Thursday, February 27, 2020 at 11:03 AM

    I also attended both of the aforementioned Judge Carter hearings. No question in my mind someone got to the judge in the interim.

  7. Joe Gallagher   Thursday, February 27, 2020 at 8:05 AM

    Bob68. I just looked at the dates again on the article which was written from the original research done in 2008 and then republished and “protected” by ZAPEM on January 10, 2009 because there were attempts to scrub it from the Internet. But even before I read the article, I saw the “short form” of Hussein’s BC… “The Certification of Live Birth” and I thought to myself, “That’s fraudulent.” Then the “long form” … “The Certificate of Live Birth” … was produced because Hussein and his myrmidons knew President Trump was suspicious. Now, I’m thinking, I’m only 9 years older than Hussein, and I know what a “copy” of a Certificate of Live Birth appears. It’s a photo copy-reverse-image, meaning “black and white,” … background is black and the lettering is white. That’s how they were produced in those days. “Let Justice be served, though the Heavens may fall!”

  8. Bob68   Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 8:41 PM

    Joe Gallagher
    Thank you for that link. It cannot IMO be a real secret to anybody who has paid attention to Obama and Donald Trump for years why the panic over the election of the “birther” and now President Trump occurred. A crime so far too big to be prosecuted, and even too big to be fairly discussed was committed in 2009 when the ineligible Barack Hussein Obama was allowed to be sworn-in as America’s putative president. From that day until today the name of the game has been cover-up because effectively giving America’s government and her military to the enemy is not something anyone wants to deal with…..even the “good guys” within the federal government. President Trump himself remains an unacceptable threat to all complicit in the Obama fraud because they cannot be sure that at some point President Trump will not fully reveal and act on The Obama Fraud. IMO in 2008 Hillary was selected to be the much needed after Obama cover president. She failed at that extremely important task and that resulted the panic we are still watching………….the outcome remains uncertain, but I believe the Globalist/ Deep State cannot be effectively defeated without this issue being openly taken on and the actual truth made available to America and to the world………..

  9. Joe Gallagher   Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 5:38 PM

    From the “Undead Revolution.” http://www.undeadrevolution.wordpress.com: “Obama Knew He Wasn’t He Wasn’t Eligible For POTUS.” I fell out of my chair after reading this article the first time. Then read it again, twice more, I was in such disbelieve. Barack Hussein Obama is the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American People … and sadly, John McCain knew it.

  10. CDR Kerchner (Ret)   Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 2:28 PM

    I just tweeted this to Rudy Jiuliani along with a link to Sharon’s article: “IMO one of major reasons the Deep State is after Trump is because he was questioning Obama’s pres eligibility & missing birth certificate, aka Trump was labeled a Birther. They fear Trump will some day investigate Obama key forged ID docs, the BC and draft reg card.” It may be a seed of thought he has already considered. But maybe not. Thus, I sent him the seed of thought about how vicious the Deep State has been and why they vehemently fear Trump … for his respectful consideration, if he has not already considered that point. One would think they would know this. But maybe not. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

  11. Bob68   Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 9:04 AM

    Can the media talking heads, even the conservative ones, really be so ignorant they cannot link the actions and words of private citizen Donald Trump to Obama’s lack of a legitimate birth certificate and the intense hate, (fear), of now President Trump? My opinion is……most of them have known this for years and either wanted Obama’s presidency, legitimate or not, or have been told not to mention it……or they have chosen not to because doing so now would assist in uncovering the truth about Barry. Some unwittingly became complicit. The last thing the many complicit in the Obama fraud ever want to see happen, even those complicit in “only” the cover-up, is the truth about Barry being fully revealed and acted on. This would include, of course, those actively complicit back to 2007 or even earlier, like Nancy Pelosi and John Brennan, etc., and the many complicit by doing/saying nothing to prevent Barry from being sworn-in back in 2009 and/or in the still on-going and now panicked cover-up.
    The crime of being complicit in effectively giving America’s government and her military to the enemy is so HUGE and affects so many people both in America and around the world that so far no one in government with the ability to do anything will even speak of it, let alone act. This is sometimes said to be because of fear of, “riots in the cities”. Compared to what is likely to happen in America’s future if the truth remains covered forever, that fear is nothing…..but it is used as an excuse for some, members of Congress for example, who are complicit in The Obama Fraud and ignore overwhelming evidence and remain in denial………mostly IMO to protect number one….themselves……

  12. CDR Kerchner (Ret)   Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 12:28 AM

    The Perkins Coe law firm name seems to be connected to a lot of dots in the various life narrative issues for Obama and the various scandals involving Obama and the DNC during Obama’s time in the Oval Office. I’m sure I’m not the only one who has noticed that over the last 10+ years.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.