Bill O’Reilly Aids and Abets Hawaii Department of Health Law-Breakers


by Sharon Rondeau

Bill O’Reilly says he has a research team which has found that Obama was born in Hawaii and that the image purported to be Obama’s birth certificate is authentic. On April 12, 2011, O’Reilly showed the image of the Certification of Live Birth, which contains no signature, no hospital, and no identification of his parents

(Apr. 13, 2011) — On April 12, 2011, bloviator and faux commentator Bill O’Reilly referred to “internet spin” and the importance of honesty in regard to reporting on Barack Hussein Obama, then proceeded to lie about the law in the state of Hawaii which governs the availability of records.

O’Reilly has tried to marginalize Donald Trump, along with fellow Fox News show host Glenn Beck, on the issue of Obama’s original, long-form birth certificate.  O’Reilly claimed that Trump’s reason for speaking out was that he “wanted attention.”  Beck and O’Reilly then discussed whether or not they “could vote” for Trump, and Beck stated that Trump is making him “uncomfortable” and that the document Trump released is “worse than Obama’s.”

How could that be true?  At least it had a seal and two signatures.  Nothing Obama has released contains that.

Hawaii statute 338-16 states that in lieu of a certified copy of a record, a verification letter stating that an event took place can be obtained by “any applicant.”  The Post & Email knows for a fact that a researcher has been trying for over two years to obtain a verification letter about Obama’s birth, and the Hawaii Department of Health has refused to produce it.

Hawaii statute 338-13 reads:

(a) Subject to the requirements of sections 338-16, 338-17, and 338-18, the department of health shall, upon request, furnish to any applicant a certified copy of any certificate, or the contents of any certificate, or any part thereof.

(b) Copies of the contents of any certificate on file in the department, certified by the department shall be considered for all purposes the same as the original, subject to the requirements of sections 338-16, 338-17, and 338-18.

(c) Copies may be made by photography, dry copy reproduction, typing, computer printout or other process approved by the director of health. [L 1949, c 327, §17; RL 1955, §57-16; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-13; am L 1978, c 49, §1]

Moreover, the Hawaii Department of Health’s website states that a copy of a government record can be obtained as long as the person requesting it has a “direct and tangible interest” in the record and that “Certified copies of these records may be issued to authorized individuals and used for such diverse purposes as school entry, passports, Social Security participation, driver’s licenses, employment, sports participation, survivor’s benefits, proof of property rights, and other needs.”

However, the Hawaii Department of Health has now broken the law by denying the issuance of a long-form, original birth certificate to a man born and residing in Hawaii.

Dr. Chiyome Fukino, former Director of the Department of Health, stated on April 10, 2011 to MSNBC that copies of an original birth record are no longer issued.  As of last month, however, such copies were issued, and one was supplied from a Hawaii resident to The Post & Email via reader and writer Miki Booth.

Amended birth certificates are also provided under certain conditions, including for people born “in a foreign country” as well as children born outside of Hawaii.

O’Reilly claimed that the Hawaii Department of Health’s statement that Obama’s original vital record is on file there proves that Obama was born there.  However, he has ignored the following:

AllAfrica article, paragraph 11, which states “Little wonder then why Kenyan-born Barack Obama, America’s first Black President,…”

Members of the Kenyan Parliament stating on the record that Obama was born in Kenya (a pity that Greta Van Susteren’s “On the Record” has not reported this to the American people, instead of saying “I don’t agree with you on this whole birther issue” and failing to investigate Trump’s claim that Obama’s grandmother has stated that he was born in Kenya);

This statement with audio that a member of the Luo tribe and “Barack Obama, a Kenyan citizen” might be elected the U.S. president;

The headline here announcing “Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate”;

NPR stating that Obama was born in Kenya;

Obama’s own wife describing Kenya as Obama’s “home country”;

The Nigerian Observer identifying Obama as “Kenyan-born”;

This article from Indonesia Matters stating exactly where in Kenya Obama was born.

Grandma Sarah Obama stating that Barack Hussein Obama II “passed through” her hands.

O’Reilly, Beck, Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, and many other highly-paid commentators have ignored this evidence that Obama was not born in Hawaii, and Donald Trump is the sole voice demanding answers.


Print Friendly

Tags: , , , , , ,

Categories: National

37 Responses to Bill O’Reilly Aids and Abets Hawaii Department of Health Law-Breakers

  1. Grandma

    Saturday, April 16, 2011 at 9:42 PM

    We are boycotting O’Rielly the traitor on other blogs! We are going to get him where it hurts him the most ….His ego by getting his ratings lower then CNN! So spread the word! Lets Roll………….

  2. Barbi Dee

    Saturday, April 16, 2011 at 6:28 AM

    Sent o’liar a congratulatory EMail! “Pull up Obamas birth announcements on computer, enlarge it. The naked eye can see EVERY small a is different, other letters do not match and are out of proportion. There is no typewriter or printer capable of those tricks. (especially not in 1961). U were so brilliant to DESTROY your career for a highly visible forgery—–and your newest CRAZY CANARD about the Conn SS# was outstanding! The FRAUDSTER supposedly has 65 documented lies. Perhaps U can defend the other 63.”

  3. Jon Carlson

    Thursday, April 14, 2011 at 7:04 PM

    O’Reilly is another speaker of Fifth grade level English, that is Broken English typical of foreigners. And’s, But’s, Or’s, just phrases, plenty of pauses, simple words used incorrectly, horrible grammar, use of Big Words to impress but wrong meaning.

    Big booster of 9/11 being a act of Muslims, not a US Navy and the Bush administration production.. O’ Reilly, not his real name, now goes where the Nazis are losing it, the missing Obama birth certificate and an infinite number of fake photos and altered, forged documents all with the claimed birthdate August 4, 1961..

    His interview with foreigner Obama shows it all. Looks and acts like a German, blue eyes, bald, with obnoxious manners to boot::

    Alleged mother Stanley Anne Dunham is still alive at age 68 although killed off in the Obama Story at age 52 of a type of cancer Michelle and his claimed sister Maya Soetoro disagree on. Neither can agree on his hospital of birth. No matter. His alleged mother wasn’t there.

    Stanley Anne was born November 29. 1942 making her age 17 at the claimed conception of Obama claimed to have born August 4, 1961. Also she was in high school in Washington at the time Class of 1961. Her birth state Kansas had a school attendance cutoff date of August so she wasn’t Class of 1960 and off to Hawaii that year.

    You can add O’Reilly to our collection of foreigners who speak Broken English:

    GHW Bush B Bush B Clinton H Clinton B Obama
    John Howard W Buffet Alex Jones R Murdoch T Blair
    Volcker Bernanke Greenspan K Rove J Roberts
    Hamburg (FDA) J Boehner N Pelosi J Kerry GW Bush
    T. Geithner, R Mueller, B O’Reilly

    America is in ruins.

  4. jim renn

    Thursday, April 14, 2011 at 2:30 PM

    You can bet your bottom dollar that there is a clause in his overpaid contract that stipulates he will abide by company policy or he will be terminated. He’s protecting his sorry lying ass. You can bet he knows the truth just as we do. Do these fools not realize that when the country implodes from the fraudulent usurpers intentional destruction that they’re going down with it? It’s amazing how blinded they are by the almighty dollar.

  5. Miriam Mata

    Thursday, April 14, 2011 at 10:16 AM


    Have you read this?

    “…..Cronin resigned from his position in December 2009 amid the controversies plaguing the Hawaii elections office and Obama’s OCON saga. Sources say that he was not forced to resign but evidence shows a pattern of circumstances under Cronin’s management in which his “autonomous” approach to managing election procedures may have violated Hawaii election laws. He faced at least two lawsuits challenging the manner in which he made decisions about election procedures, deadlines and vending contracts. However, Cronin’s resignation is suspicious because it occurred immediately after the OCON controversy went public in Fall of 2009. The public exposure of the OCON documents revealed that the Elections Office, under Cronin, had violated Hawaiian election laws by failing to properly document and record the chain of possession of these legal documents. The order of records and filing date of Obama’s Hawaiian OCONs with the Office of Elections remains unknown, even to this day….”

  6. Miriam Mata

    Thursday, April 14, 2011 at 9:17 AM


    No I do not know how to get in touch with that lawyer. I found this link that might help
    you at


    Thursday, April 14, 2011 at 8:05 AM

    The far worst danger that is happening here to all citizens of America is that the very same people who swear oath to serve and protect the Constitution of the United States of America are now ignoring Constitutional Law and its amendment process. They are just simply rewriting the U.S. Constitution to suit their needs as they go along and that is far more dangerous than having the current usurper in the White House.

  8. Bob1943

    Thursday, April 14, 2011 at 8:04 AM

    When there was a so-called battle between Fox News, I believe it’s been over a year ago now, and the Obama regime, the Obama regime clearly won and Fox has been protecting Barry even more than they were before the public “battle”. After that time Fox News began doing more damage to conservatives than all the liberal networks combined because many conservatives still believed in Fox and accepted their slowly but surely becoming just another Obama regime mouthpiece without question. Anything anti-Obama you see from Fox now is nothing more than “controlled opposition”, allowed to give the impression that the entire main stream media isn’t in the tank for Obama, but doing him no harm.

  9. MichaelN

    Thursday, April 14, 2011 at 4:45 AM

    @Miriam Mata

    Miriam, do you have contact details for Jack Maskell?

    I read what he sent to Congress and he is WRONG when he said …

    “As explained by the Supreme Court of the United States over the course of a number of years, it is well settled from common law Principles of jus soli (“law of the soil”) extant in England and the Colonies at the time of Independence, etc, etc”

    The English common law referred to by the SCOTUS in Wong Kim Ark case, was with reference to Lord Coke’s report of Calvin’s case where Calvin was adjudged a ‘natural born subject’, Coke said….

    “There is found in the law four kinds of ligeances: the first is, ligeantia naturalis, absoluta, pura, et indefinita, and this originally is due by nature and birthright,”

    i.e TWO qualities to make a natural born subject of the English sovereign, i.e. ‘nature & birthright’

    “Calvin the Plaintiff naturalized by procreation and birth right…”

    Again, TWO qualities to make a ‘natural born subject’

    Coke goes further to say that without the parent father (wives took the subject/citizenship status of the husband) being a subject/citizen, that the child is NOT A SUBJECT, even if born jus soli (in the land)

    “that issue is no subject to the King of England, though he be born upon his soyl, and under his meridian, for that he was not born under the ligeance of a subject…”

    The chief justice in the SCOTUS Wong Kim Ark case, cherry picked that children of aliens born in England are considered ‘natural born subjects’ and ran with that, but the chief justice (Horace Gray – appointed by & beholding to the usurper Chester Arthur) failed to mention these statements (quoted here) of Lord Coke, which clearly show that it was jus soli (born in the land) AND jus sanguinis (born of the parent) that was required to make a ‘natural born subject’.

    In England, an alien visiting England, was considered a ‘subject’, and if he was not considered a subject, then a child born of that alien, even if born in England was NOT born a subject.

    As you can see Jack Maskell has been misled by relying on the error of others to form his erroneous opinion and subsequently he ill advises the Congress.

    According to the English common law it took TWO qualities to make a natural born subject.

    Not one! …………. not only jus soli!

    Both jus soli and jus sanguinis (born in the land to citizen parents) is what was required.

    It is important to contact Jack Maskell and get him to offer his explanation as to what Coke meant by the statements that I have quoted here.

    It would be good to have his written response.

    I have already put this to other legal authorities, many failed to respond, but one who did, acknowledged that there is a problem with the way the English common law has been misrepresented over the years.

  10. Charles1934

    Thursday, April 14, 2011 at 2:07 AM

    O’Reilly has sold his soul to Obama. He’s a modern day Pharisee, a full size hypocrite. He does more damage than Chris Matthew and so does Fox than MSNBC.

    Ailes has sold out American conservatives. He must have reached an “understanding” the first time he had a closed door meeting with the Obama machine a few years ago. Alas.

    Have they respect for the Constitution? Anyone ignores the eligibility has no respect for the Constitution and therefore deserves no respect from we the people and all the freedom loving people in the whole world.

  11. Barbi Dee

    Thursday, April 14, 2011 at 1:11 AM

    Tonight on The Factor–o’liar said “Obama Sr. got his son the Conn SS card when he was living in Connecticut”! Sent o’liar an EMail—-”Obama Sr. lived in Mass in the 60s while attending Harvard–not Conn! Around 1978 when Conn issued a SSN to a person born in 1890 (one of 39 numbers The President of the US uses) Obama Sr. was long back living in Kenya and Obama Jr in Hawaii! What stories will u aurhenticate for the other 38 verifiable illegal SSNs”? Can we start a class action lawsuit against THE LIAR for defrauding the public?

  12. MJ

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 9:29 PM

    WTH happened to O’Really? He is a WUSS. He worships this imposter.
    These people that constantly attack us think this is some type dang conspiracy, and it isnt.
    This CREEP has NO evidence, of anything- and O’Really on his show even said himself, O has NO LFBC. Amongst all the rest, even Or’Really offered ZERO re. Hu$$ein.
    **This is not a joke**.
    And it makes me furious that people would think we are just ‘picking on Obama’ in a time where the nation is crumbling and vastly due to the USURPER.

  13. Texoma

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 9:17 PM

    The conservatives have not spoken up because of two reasons: McCain and Jindal. McCain is not a natural born citizen (although probably eligible due to not having been born with a foreign allegiance) and Jindal is not a natural born citizen, and he was born with a foreign allegiance (India, due to the citizenship of his parents).

    Then we have Marco Rubio, who was born in Florida to parents who may not have been US citizens at the time of Marco’s birth. Conservatives and Republicans have their reason to remain quiet on this issue, and politics and winning elections are more important than defending the Constitution.

  14. HG

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 8:50 PM

    If obama is exposed O’Reilly will cite “civil unrest” and “national security” as the reasons he knowingly deceived his viewers. His real reasons are more selfish.

  15. kittycat77

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 7:28 PM

    Throughout the years that this mess has happened, and at first it scared me so much because I couldn’t understand why the conservatives were NOT speaking up on this subject, I figure that they don’t really care about the constitution. For one thing, why do they seem to remain so ignorant? It doesn’t make sense to me at all. If they studied all of the issues, they would figure out it’s so.

    Then at first Sarah Palin spoke out, also Michele Bachmann (sp?) spoke out, and later they stopped speaking about it. What gives here, folks? Something is not right.

    Well, because they won’t speak out about it, I don’t uphold them anymore. It just is not a good thing that they had bravery at first, then later turned away from it. That tells me their true character.

    I just hope that Donald Trump don’t let them take him down, and he stays on top of it all and studies the issues.

  16. Bill

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 6:37 PM

    I can’t believe people are still listening to the PIN HEAD, (O’REILLY)?!?!?

  17. Steph F

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 6:04 PM

    O’Reilly has repeatedly demonstrated sheer arrogance and his decline in viewership is a reflection of the dissatisfaction shared among concerned Americans. Keep emailing, tweeting, calling and writing talk show hosts who are listening. Radio talk show host Mike Gallagher is responsive, as are many other level-headed conservatives.

  18. Miriam Mata

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 4:46 PM

    Very good article. Thanks
    Do you know if any Constitutional lawyer answer this report by

    Jack Maskell that was sent to Congress.

    I replied at this article

    TODAY’S QUESTION: Why do you believe President Obama’s citizenship is still being discussed?

  19. Mairi

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 3:42 PM
    “SUBJECT: Dunderhead
    For the record, you are a pinhead about the eligibility issue. You need to interview Mario Apuzzo or Commander Charles Kerchner (Ret.)
    First, if Barack Senior is Barack’s daddy on the original B/C, Barack is NOT eligible, doesn’t matter where he was born….even if in the Oval Office. “Dual citizenship and divided allegiances,” anyone? (Interview the two EXPERTS and be REALLY “Fair and Balanced” as you TRY to claim you are.)
    Second, if Barack Senior is NOT daddy on the original B/C…….somebody’s been prevaricating….
    Third, if the B/C does NOT show a birth IN Hawaii………GOD Help us!
    Anyway you slice it…….Barack Soebarkah/Soetoro LOSES!

    Just adding my two cents to the pathetic escapades of Bill-Blow Baggins.

  20. Birdy

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 3:39 PM

    I don’t think that the media types, like O’Reilly, are merely ignorant of the facts. They are actively trying to shape public opinion away from questioning Obama’s past and his lack of eligibility. This is not just innocent ignorance. O’Reilly and others want the public to stop questioning Obama’s eligibility. Why?

    Whatever their reason, they are wrong. Revealing the truth is always the best policy in the long run. Coverups never turn out well. It is the media’s job to use their resources to investigate relentlessly to uncover the truth that others are trying to hide. Where is our fourth branch of government that is supposed to protect us? Have they all gone away? Do we now have a quasi-state run media?

    Thank heaven for the new media – the Internet, the Web, blogs, and forums. Who knows, maybe an Egypt style revolution lies in our near future.

  21. Tom the veteran

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 2:05 PM

    It’ll be very interesting to see what letter’s he reads on-air tonight from last nights viewers!?!?!?

    I’m sure he got a ton of e-mails and I’m curious to see if anything is mentioned about Obama’s Kenyian father.

    Tonight will probably be the last time I watch O’Reilly

    For God and Country

  22. ELmo

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 1:15 PM

    The best way (IMO) to deal with O’Reilly is, stop watching him. Ratings are his GOD. When I viewed him on a daily basis, he was always comparing the ratings for Fox (and especially “The so-called Factor”) to CNN and Lou Dobbs. Stop watching!! – let his ratings drop – like Glenn Beck’s did. That’s the best way to deal with O’Reilly and his arrogance in my opinion.

  23. AuntieMadder

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 12:49 PM

    Hawaii statute 338-16 states that in lieu of a certified copy of a record, a verification letter stating that an event took place can be obtained by “any applicant.” The Post & Email knows for a fact that a researcher has been trying for over two years to obtain a verification letter about Obama’s birth, and the Hawaii Department of Health has refused to produce it.

    Considering that people like Fukino have been appointed or hired to direct the Hawaii Dept of Health, a verification letter from the HI DOH wouldn’t verify anything except that someone from HI DOH sent a letter.
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: The letter is supposed to refer to the event referenced.

  24. Thomas Morato

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 12:46 PM

    When did O’Reilly become Fox’s factcheck.lies propaganda outlet.

    I believe Bill may have just lost 70% of his viewers.

    The government and the media are in full damage control mode, saying anything and everything to cover their lies over the last 2 years. You can expect the harder Trump pushes, the harder they will push back.

    The folks behind Obama will not let this issue gain traction, unless of coarse it somehow ultimately politically or financially benefits them.

  25. Rosemary

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 12:42 PM

    Sent this article to Mr. O’R. telling him I was very disppointed in the way he handled his Fact or Fiction segment of his show and how he accepted what the Hi DOH told his researchers but failed to provide any kind of explanation nor substantiation. I just want to know the truth and nothing but the truth… help us O Lord. Also, its time that our Pres. started to answer all of these questions HIMSELF and the media stop speaking for him with all of their assumptions and blind words of acceptance. Thank you.

  26. Miki Booth

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 12:33 PM

    Are you in Kailua? I’m from Kaneohe but live in OK now.

  27. kailuagirl

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 11:50 AM

    The media conglomerates have adhered to and followed an attack, isolate, then demonize the “birther’s” tactic. These tactics have, for the most part, worked to delay and greatly confuse the core matters involving the BHO + NBC = USURPER realities.

    However, now, with the rapidly evolving: TRUMPER’S, the media types are finding the gig is not going down so easily, or smoothly. Entire “careers”, as of this moment, are being gutted as a result of the decision to participate in the BHO charade. Bill & all of the media ilk, remain in media fantasy camp believing they are able to smile into the camera- wave their collective magic wands, and all of us TRUMPER’S will poof- disappear. NOT!

  28. Toria

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 11:50 AM

    I agree with ELmo, and also add Greta to the Faux Group of yellow journalism, opinionated talk hosts.

  29. Miki Booth

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 11:43 AM

    Excerpt from my soon-to-be- released book: Memoirs of a Community Organizer from Hawaii.

    Mahalo, Miki

    Where does O’Reilly get off insisting that Obama is a Christian? Just because he says so? His statement that he is a Christian was only made recently because of increasing poll numbers of people believing he’s a Muslim. There are videos on YouTube where Obama has countless times voiced his “Muslim faith.” “My Muslim faith,” he has repeated over and over. Does O’Reilly saying he’s a Christian cancel out all the times Obama has claimed to be Muslim? And his church, arguably black liberation theology, Trinity United Church of Christ, which is “A congregation with a non-negotiable commitment to Africa” and “a congregation working towards Economic Parity.” Does that sound like a christian church in the tradition of American values? Obama never lived the Black American experience unlike fellow parishioner, Oprah Winfrey. However, like Oprah Obama commits himself to Africa as an elitist who gained status through American exceptionalism.
    O’Reilly can say anything he wants and we never have a chance to challenge his rhetoric. If I had a chance to give an opinion on his suck-egg interview I would have wanted to know why he didn’t ask Obama why he hates us. Why does he hate white America and especially tea party activists? Huh, ask him that why don’t you? Why does he lecture us on civility but calls us “tea-baggers.”

  30. Lloyd in California

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 11:28 AM


    Sent the link to this to O’Reilly. I doubt he will read it, he has become too big and it is now beneath him. He just confirms what I have felt for a very long time, arrogance and dismissal. O’Reilly demonstrates every day that he only hears what is already between his two ears, nothing else penetrates. Maybe if everyone who reads P&E sends it to him, it will get his attention.

    I love the P&E for its very informative articles. Please keep up the great work.
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: Thank you. The truth is out that Fox News has hidden and then falsified Obama’s history. Investigative journalism is not simply saying that something is so. These people are paid millions of dollars to spout propaganda to the American people to keep Obama in office. No wonder that Atty. Orly Taitz says that our media is worse than that of the former Soviet Union.

    Semper Fi

  31. Redd

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 10:54 AM

  32. ELmo

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 10:52 AM

    O’Reilly’s credibility is “0″ in my estimation. I quit watching O’Reilly, Beck and Shephard Smith a long time ago (as soon as they started bashing birthers for asking valid questions about the ongoing violation of America’s most sacred document). They are Apologists not Journalists – I refuse to give them power by responding to their assertions and pseudo-investigations. They are lost – they have told us where they stand and they don’t stand with us.

  33. RacerJim

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 10:48 AM

    Bye bye billie bob boy.

  34. California Birther/Dualer/Doubter

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 10:30 AM

    Emailed this to pinheaded Bill: So much for Fox News’ “we report, you decide” mantra when you told your viewers what is true and what is false about the past of a man who Donald Trump says may be unconstitutionally serving as president.

  35. yo

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 10:05 AM

    There are only two solutions, imo.

    Vote for people who will investigate, or go Egypt on the administration.

    The current strategy that most republicans have adopted, which is vote for people who promise not to investigate eligibility, and they try to convince them to change their minds after they are elected and investigate Obama, will not work in my opinion.

  36. stormyweather

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 9:56 AM

    O’Reilly the bloviator in chief!

  37. jacqlynsmith

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 9:22 AM

    O’REALLY is a media whore of the worst kind…..pretends to be on the side of “we the people”….all the while scamming us! Time for us to rise us and call him out on a daily basis….stop supporting the LIEberal mouthpiece who is in Barry’s pocket…..why do you think he is the only one to land an interview with the FRAUD….it’s because he won’t ask the hard questions and he is all about SPIN!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>