Tag: usurpation
-
Simandle's 4 strikes against the U.S. Constitution
RULING IN KERCHNER VS OBAMA, TO DIMISS CASE CRITIQUED legal analysis and critique by an anonymous patriot (Oct. 22, 2009) – Federal Judge Jerome B. Simandle’s ruling to grant the govt.’s Motion to Dismiss, in the case Kerchner vs. Obama, is not only a clear violation of the laws of the country but also a…
-

SCOTUS: 'We the People' possess supreme authority
EARLY RULING FROM COURT UPHELD POWER OF THE PEOPLE by John Charlton (Oct. 22, 2009) — Among the early documents which explain the authority of We the People is the ruling of the Supreme Court of the United States in 1819, in the case McCulloch v. Maryland (4 Wheat. 316 1819), wherein Chief Justice Marshal…
-
CDR Kerchner, "On the Sovereign and Sovereign Immunity"
ARGUES FOR RIGHTS OF ‘WE THE PEOPLE’ AS ONLY CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDY TO NATIONAL CRISIS by John Charlton (Oct. 20, 2009) — Commander Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., U.S. Naval Reserve (Retired), issued a public statement today in favor of the sovereign rights of the citizens of the United States against governmental usurpation as the unique and…
-
Present Dangers warned against Long Ago
THE ANTI-FEDERALIST PAPERS, SPEAK TO THE NATIONAL CRISIS by John Charlton (Oct. 12, 200) — It is often said that those who remain ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it. In the present national crisis, this could not be more true. To get a better sense of the danger of usurpation of office, power…
-
D.C. Code on Quo Warranto explains McCain's Candidacy
LITTLE KNOWN PROVISION WOULD PROVIDE STANDING TO LOSER by John Charlton (Oct. 8, 2009) — On March 3, 1901, the U.S. Congress passed the law which established the Quo Warranto chapter of the current 1940 version of the D. C. Code. The District of Columbia Code is the official registry of laws pertaining to legal…
-
Quo Warranto in the District of Columbia Code
From time to time The Post & Email will reprint in their entirety, pertinent laws and statutes which are in the news. Such is the Quo Warranto Statute in the District of Columbia Code, following the on-line debate that has arisen from actions in the case Barnett vs. Obama. The following is the current version…