One Thing is certain about Obama

AND NATIONAL SECURITY REQUIRES ITS RECOGNITION

by John Charlton

(Oct. 17, 2009) —  The internet has a way of attracting attention to the most peripheral of stories and facts; but in the case of the stories surrounding Barack Hussein Obama this is even more true, because so little is known for certain about the man, of whom U.S. Senator Joe Wilson (R) of South Carolina said, “You lie!”

It’s important not to lose focus on reality by giving too much attention to theories, speculation, or rumours.

Let’s cut through the fluff, then, and first list what we don’t know.

WHAT IS NOT CERTAIN ABOUT OBAMA’S STORY

1) We are not certain that his legal name is “Barack Hussein Obama”. In the election his supporters chided everyone for calling him by that name. They insisted it was “Barack Obama”. But an Indonesian reporter found his school registration in that country, and his name appears there as, “Barry Soetero.”  A former U.S. Ambassador to the Vatican, who was one of his professors at Harvard University, remarked, “I knew him as ‘Barry’; the first time I heard “Barack”, was when he ran for the Presidency.”  His friends at school in Hawaii also knew him by that first name.  The image of a Certification of Live Birth (COLB), which his Campaign put on the internet — which has never been authenticated either by a licensed expert or by any Hawaiian official — says his name is “Barack Hussein Obama II”.

2) We are not certain on which day or at which hour he was born. Not because of the claims of his opponents, but because of what he himself has said:  at the international conference in the Caribbean in the spring, he said he was 3 months old when the Bay of Pigs incident occurred — therefore indicating he was born in January of 1961.  At a rally in New Hampshire during his run for the Presidency, he told a crowd that he was born at 1:06 PM.  The COLB that his campaign puts forward claims he was born on Aug. 4, 1961 at 7:58 PM.

3) We are not certain if he was born at a hospital or not; or at which hospital. We are not certain at which hospital because his sister Maya and various news agencies have claimed he was born at Queen’s Hospital; but he claims he was born at the Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women & Children in Honolulu, Hawaii.  Yet, while children such as the Nordyke twins, who were born Aug. 5, 1961 in the same town, have a long form hospital vault certificate, which is sufficient to prove that they are U.S. Citizens; Dr. Fukino of the Hawaiian Department of Health affirmed on July 27, 2009, that she has seen his “original vital records”, in the plural, on which basis she claims him to be a “natural-born American citizen”.  The multiple nature of documents leads researchers to believe that Obama was not born in a hospital, but at home; and that several documents were submitted to establish this fact.

4) We are not certain of the spelling of his father’s first name. The University of Hawaii retains his father’s registration records, and these indicate it is spelled “Barack”; a paper written by his father for a journal in Africa lists his name as “Barak”; his friend Mr. Omolo, from youth, says it is spelled “Barrack”, and a host of African newspapers spell it the same way.

5) We are not certain in which country he was born. Some newspapers say he was born in Indonesia, some in Kenya, some in Hawaii. Some researchers believe he was born in Canada.

6) We are not certain if his parents married or when they met. In his biography he says his father and mother met in Russian language class; but that course did not begin until December, 1960; and if his birth day was Aug. 4, 1961, they had to meet sometime around Saturday, Nov. 4, 1960. Their marriage certificate has never been published or discovered.

7) We are not certain if he was adopted by Mr. Lolo Soetero. Yes there is a school record in Indonesia, but no record of any adoption has been found in the U.S.A.; though, the divorce filing for his mother and Mr. Soetero indicate him as a child of the marriage, strangely enough.

8. We are not certain if he ever had a U.S. passport before he was a U.S. Senator. Considering that he had multiple citizenships, from childhood, he could have, but we just don’t know.

9. We are not certain if he requested financial assistance as a foreign student at the University of Hawaii, Occidental College, Columbia University or at Harvard University. We don’t know simply because he has refused to release all such records; and those institutions also have refused.

10. We are not certain how or when he got his SSN or if it is a legitimately issued number. Researcher Susan Daniels found that it was issued sometime in the period of 1977-1979, when Obama was a student in Hawaii. The only problem is, that it appears to have been issued in the State of Connecticut, and to be the SSN of someone who is 104 years old, at the present.

11. We are not certain when he began to claim to be born in Hawaii, or when he stopped claiming to be born in Kenya. This is the conclusion of the testimony of a classmate and numerous news articles, never corrected or refuted by his Campaign.

12. We are not certain if he is a KGB agent or not. Tom Fife’s testimony and the evidence of his numberous contacts with Marxists and Socialists throughout his life, beginning with Frank Marshall Davis, the KGB lead agent in Hawaii during his youth, seem to indicate that he was. Some have suggested he was a CIA operative, but his multiple SSNs exclude that, according to Rev. Sam Sewell, who has experience in Military Intelligence.

13. We are not certain if Obama at birth was a U.S. Citizen.  This is because if he was born outside the U.S.A., his mother, not being yet 19 years of age, could not transmit her U.S. Citizenship to him, according to the laws of the time.

WHAT IS CERTAIN

What is certain is 1 fact; it’s not speculation; it’s not a conspiracy theory; it’s not based on rumor or the allegations or speculations of his opponents or supporters.  It’s a fact he proclaims every day, and asserts about himself in his biography, Dreams from My Father.

1) We are certain  that his father is Barrack Hussein Obama, Sr., a man who was a subject of the British empire on Aug. 4, 1961, and a transient alien in the U.S.A..

WHAT THIS 1 FACT PROVES

2) This one fact proves that according to the British Nationality Act of 1948, that — let’s call him by this name for the sake of ease — Barack Hussein Obama II was at birth a British subject.

3) And this conclusion in law, in turn, proves that he is not a natural born citizen of the United States of America; because according to 4 rulings of the Supreme Court, a natural born citizen is, “one born in the country of parents who are citizens,” and since his claimed father was a British subject, not a U.S. Citizen, even if Obama is a U.S. Citizen, he is not a natural born citizen. (It is important to note that “natural born” is a legal term, “natural-born” can be used also for the medical term, of a natural birth without caesarean insection).

4) And this conclusion, in turn, proves that he is not eligible to hold, accept or retain the office of President of the United States, on account of the absolute prohibition in Article II, Section i, paragraph 5, of the U.S. Constitution, that the president be a “natural born citizen.”

5) And this conclusion, in turn, proves in law that Barack Hussein Obama is not the lawful president of the U.S.A., and that none of the laws he signs, the appointments he makes, or the actions he takes are binding in law on anybody.

6) And this establishes that in law he is a usurper, a pretender, and not the lawful Commander-in-chief of the U.S. military.

7) And this proves, beyond the shadow of doubt, that the U.S.A. is currently in its greatest Constitutional Crisis.

So don’t get confused by speculation, rumor, or conspiracy theories.  This 1 fact and its consequences in law are all that is necessary to act as a concerned citizen, and to vote accordingly, to march on Washington, D.C., or to justify his immediate and peaceful arrest by lawful authorities in any jurisdiction.

0 Responses to "One Thing is certain about Obama"

  1. Lisa   Friday, November 13, 2009 at 3:37 AM

    To: Follow the Constitution: that would be “natural born citizen” without the hyphen which has indeed been defined by the Law of Nations and affirmed by the Supreme Court. “Natural-born” with the hyphen refers to a vaginal delivery as opposed to c-section.

    Hi Mr. Charlton,

    Thank you for the opportunity to share this.

    I’m not an expert by any means but complaints read just like business reports: the facts as you know them, set out in a logical format.

    —————-
    Mr. Charlton replies: Lisa this is great! I have posted the rest of your comment as its own news article:

    http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/11/13/how-to-file-a-criminal-complaint-with-the-fbi/

    adding only some small clarifications, and my own editor’s note at the end.

  2. Pingback: Editorial: Nov. 11, 2009 — Bring up the Second Line! «

  3. Lisa   Monday, November 9, 2009 at 3:21 AM

    The problem with the web is that everyone ‘publishes’ and then assumes the whole world will find and read the essay. Not true, and trust me the FBI does not google-search for criminal complaints that it can investigate.

    So now that we know Justice Carter has dismissed Orly’s eligibility case, my question to all of you is: how many of you have typed out the inconsistencies and the lies surrounding the Soetoro-Obama eligibility issue and his unconstitutional, Treasonous activity in the White House and taken it to your local FBI office as an official criminal complaint?

    You are a tax-paying citizen and have every reason to believe that a foreign-born domestic enemy has usurped the highest office in our country, insist on an investigation and collect as many business cards/ names as possible for follow up.

    Find your local FBI:

    http://www.fbi.gov/contact/fo/fo.htm

    It’s obvious that the administration is perfectly happy ignoring the public. To confront the accusations would force discovery. The FBI doesn’t need permission for discovery . . I just pray we have at least one honest agent left!

    ——————
    Mr. Charlton replies: Can you give us some links on how one files a criminal complaint, and how to write one up. This is important knowledge every citizen should know. If you like write it up as an article, and I will publish it at the Post & Email.

  4. Lisa C.   Sunday, November 8, 2009 at 8:07 PM

    We also know little-to-nothing about his health. He was the only presidential candidate who refused to provide a complete medical review. While the media called him “young”, he was, in fact, a 40-something heavy smoker of over 20 years. That should be considered a health issue and would have for any other candidate his age. Now his current, alarming, weight loss is being downplayed by the media as well. But any other president with the same pattern would be under a health scrutiny.

  5. Pingback: Editorial: Nov. 8, 2009 — The U.S. House just fired the shot-heard-round-the-world «

  6. Pingback: Judge David O. Carter betrays the Nation! «

  7. Jim Frado, Sr.   Sunday, October 25, 2009 at 10:04 PM

    The foregoing is one of the most concise reports to date. It is difficult that the Democratic Party would allow Oboma to spend the thousands of campaign dollars to keep his records sealed. Under common sense he should be proud to produce his records to prove himself unless he has something to hide. His comments about the United States to foreign countries certainly has not been those that proud Americans appreciate. The time to conclude this matter is well long past. The Court needs to move more quickly to do so. There cannot be anything anymore important at this time. God Bless America

  8. Pingback: Twitter Trackbacks for 1 Thing is certain about Obama « [thepostnemail.wordpress.com] on Topsy.com

  9. btw   Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 2:37 PM

    “…There is NO NEED TO GET Mr. OBAMA’S BC (Birth Certificate) TO PROVE HIS INELIGIBILITY TO BE POTUS ACCORDING CONSTITUTION…”

    For a proof ot this statement please go to a short introduction (in connection with Joy Behar Show on CNN of 10/13/09)

    http://joybehar.blogs.cnn.com/2009/10/13/queen-of-the-birthers/ (see my comment of 10/14/09 at 10:37 pm ET)

    or immediately to this post:

    http://www.restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=2783.msg12853#msg12853

  10. Follow the Constitution   Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 12:36 PM

    If you download the Jefferson’s manual this is the case cited under Article II, Sec 1 which is the pdf page numbers 67 & 68

    The pdf file is 34mb and has 735 pages. Every single section of the constitution cites court cases that pertain to each section.

    http://www.archive.org/details/constitutionjeff014670mbp

    Under Article II, Sec 1. they specifically cite one case on this which is Supreme Court Case….

    Inglis v. The Trustees of The Sailors’ Snug Harbor, 3 Pet., 99.

    This goes into a lot of detail over citizenship

  11. Observer   Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 10:52 AM

    The question is … is how do we get such an outline before a judge? The courts/judges all appear to be completely without a clue on Constitutional eligibility. And the more that is presented to them only seems to serve to befuddle them more. Have we not put the emphasis on the most important point, already established and not in need of discovery – that is the British citizenship at birth and the logic of such still possibly being the case to this day?

  12. jtx   Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 10:09 AM

    An excellent post, John! keep up the good work.

    Gee – do you think the :President” Obama would lie???

  13. Leon Brozyna   Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 9:23 AM

    Good points all. All we have to go by are the odd COLB (odd, in that it only reflects data that has been filed by the registrar but not yet accepted) and his book’s narrative of his father being Obama Sr., a British/Kenyan citizen. There is much hidden by this Mystery Messiah.

    As for odd birth certificates that may appear which have the same date and time of birth as the Hawaiin COLB, I remain highly skeptical. Remember that in 1961 there was no internet, cell phones, direct dialing of overseas phone calls, faxes, etc. The world of 1961 was not as connected as it is today. Consider the logistics of communicating the birth details. So if the birth happened in Kenya, the facts would take awhile to get out, even if one of the parents waited the hours it would take to have an overseas phone call booked. And I can’t picture Ann Dunham rushing from her hospital bed to get to a telegraph office to send off a telegram with the birth details to her folks in Hawaii.

    If only Judge Carter would order discovery so we can find out who this Mystery Messiah is ~ and is not.

    Leon Brozyna
    CW2, USA (Ret)

  14. Follow the Constitution   Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 8:12 AM

    What 4 supreme court rulings state the meaning of natural-born citizen???
    ———–
    Mr. Charlton replies: I added the link; if you are a man of truth, read the citation I linked to, under the “4 rulings”, and research those cases; do a google search and you can find the full text of each, in which you will find the term “natural born citzen”. Read it for yourself.

  15. yo   Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 8:00 AM

    very nice summarization!

  16. jerry brickson   Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 5:16 AM

    We need to get this fraud out of the Presidency ASAP.
    I really do believe he is some foreign agent out to destroy the USA !!!!! Thank God a California Judge is taken this to trial.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.