by Sharon Rondeau
(Oct. 22, 2021) — In his opening monologue Thursday night, Fox News host Sean Hannity recited a litany of factors impacting the U.S. economy under the Biden regime, including a crisis in supply chains; inflation; a “looming recession;” violence in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s takeover in mid-August; and Biden’s “rigid vaccine mandate” applying to federal employees and ostensibly to all U.S. companies with 100 or more employees.
Hannity pointed out with video evidence that during the presidential campaign, Biden pledged never to issue a COVID-19 vaccine mandate. Nevertheless, Biden has taken to blaming “the unvaccinated” for an increase in cases over the summer.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has reported that vaccinated individuals can not only experience COVID-19, but also transmit it to others.
“Why is there no other option, like many states and localities have adopted?” Hannity asked of the mandates. “…We’ve had that debate, and for whatever reason, I don’t know, millions of Americans are willing to lose their job, lose their benefits, abandon their retirement, because that’s how strongly they believe in their position. Many of these people have rare conditions that forbids them from getting the vaccine. [sic] Others have natural immunity, and they believe the science of natural immunity.”
He referenced a study from Israel which is yet to be peer-reviewed, reporting that “800,000 people…it seems natural immunity is better than the vaccine.”
“Time will tell; let’s follow the science,” Hannity concluded.
As a result of looming vaccination deadlines for many public and private employees, Hannity said, even more damage will be done to the flailing economy as jobs are shed. He suggested that “a simple option” would be to administer a “weekly” COVID test to those who decline to take the vaccine.
Hannity also questioned why the Biden regime does not promote monoclonal antibodies, a treatment found to be highly effective in COVID-19 patients, including former President Donald Trump.
Reportedly, the federal government is regulating the distribution of such treatments sent to the states, causing Florida to run short of its anticipated supply last month.
Notably, Hannity did not mention what could be the most widespread rationale for Americans’ rejection of the vaccines: more than 700,000 adverse events, including more than 16,000 deaths believed to be associated with vaccine administration, and nearly 25,000 permanent disability cases reported, according to government statistics.
The number of reported adverse events is said by several sources to be between 1% and 10% of the actual numbers of such incidents based on a 2011 Harvard Pilgrim Health Care study completed for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Attorney Thomas Renz, who represents plaintiffs in two lawsuits opposing the vaccines filed earlier this year, claims that whistleblower reports show that the number of vaccine-associated deaths is more than four times that which appears in the VAERS database.
Not only is the government not releasing accurate numbers, Renz claims, but it has also suppressed the use of therapeutics which some physicians say they have used effectively with thousands of COVID patients.
According to two physicians, dozens of members of Congress requested and were given the decades-old ivermectin for COVID. Ivermectin is an FDA-approved therapeutic for parasitic infections which is recommended by the CDC for all “refugees” entering the U.S. from “all Middle Eastern, Asian, North African, Latin American, and Caribbean” nations.
Biden’s mandate does not apply to Congress, the federal judiciary, or their staffs.
As if in lockstep, the media and social media have rushed to discredit the use or prescription of therapeutics to include censorship of medical professionals who report success with them and “fact-checking” of social-media posts funded, at times, by Facebook itself.
Some of those hospitalized as a result of the virus are subjected to denial of “basic human rights,” including requested therapeutics, according to Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet, whose foundation is working to assist patients’ families in their quest for legal redress and the administration of alternative therapeutics.
McCullough has objected to the government medical establishment’s failure to provide safety advisories on the vaccines and the disbanding of the Data & Safety Medical Board to monitor reports of adverse events. An October 11 inquiry sent to three representatives at the National Institutes of Health by The Post & Email about the existence of a DSMB for coronavirus vaccines received no response.
On July 2, 2020, the Trump administration announced “Operation Warp Speed” with the purpose of producing COVID vaccines in an abbreviated time frame along with “diagnostics and therapeutics.” When vaccine distribution began last December, Americans’ expectations were high that the vaccines, as with others developed for smallpox and measles, would bring an end to the pandemic which disrupted the world economy, physical and mental health, and children’s education.
According to several sources, including Dr. Peter R. Breggin, vaccines for the SARS virus, of which COVID-19 is one, were in development years ago, and the major pharmaceutical companies seized upon the opportunity to mass-produce them for a world traumatized by the fear of a deadly virus which had already reportedly claimed millions of lives.
According to some sources, there is no fully-approved COVID-19 vaccine in the United States. All three currently in use — Moderna, Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) — remain under Emergency News Authorization (EUA). On August 23, the FDA issued a preliminary Biologics License Application (BLA) approval for the Pfizer “Comirnaty” vaccine which by some accounts is not yet available in the United States.
Under a 2005 federal law, manufacturers of products issued under an EUA cannot be held liable for alleged resulting injuries; those fully licensed by the FDA do not retain that protection.
“Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first COVID-19 vaccine,” the press release reads. “The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty (koe-mir’-na-tee), for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older. The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA), including for individuals 12 through 15 years of age and for the administration of a third dose in certain immunocompromised individuals.”
A “fact-check” on the issue by USA Today reads, in part:
Once the FDA approves vaccines, companies are permitted to market them under brand names, according to Scott Pauley, a press officer for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Manufacturers may also then advertise their shots.
Because hundreds of millions of Pfizer doses were manufactured before the FDA’s full approval, some vials administered now may not have a Comirnaty label. But that doesn’t change what’s in the shot.
As with the proven forgery of Barack Obama’s long-form birth certificate by a five-year forensic investigation and the fraud employed in multiple states during the 2020 election, the media has maintained a virtual blackout on reports of adverse events to the COVID-19 vaccines. Rather, some media personalities have promoted the vaccines in what appear to be free advertisements for the manufacturers.
In contrast in July, Fox News’s Tucker Carlson Channel interviewed the mother of a previously-healthy, now-13-year-old girl who became permanently disabled after taking the vaccination during a clinical trial with her parents’ consent.
The morning show “Fox & Friends” has also aired a limited number of interviews with individuals describing severe side effects from the injections.
Updated, 12:39 p.m. EDT
communism/fascism is alive and well thanks to the devildemocommiecrats and their deep state globalist gop establishment allies!!!!!!!!! The few republicans that honor their oath of office are kept down by the vast majority of TRAITORS in the party!!!!!!!!!!
Question: What is the common denominator of COVID-19 and the Obama presidency?
Answer: They both are a deadly man-made (not natural) virus with the goal of destroying the United States of America.
We are seeing the evaporation of the Rule of Law… and it’s replacement with an interpretation of “what the meaning of ‘is’… is…” [Clinton]
Truth narratives… repeated over and over… are usurping TRUTH itself. We cannot remain silent. These lies must be revealed for what they are. “Stand therefore… having your loins gird about with truth…” Ephesians 6
What is the proof that Obama’s birth certificate was forged?
Well, for just one reason, the group of 9 separate items which align perfectly with the same group of 9 separate items on Johanna Ah’Nee’s Hawaii birth certificate.
Who says, and why is it unusual that birth certificates originating from the same source are similar?
Google it, or better yet, DuckDuckGo it.
Searches on those two sites do not reveal any information as to why it would unusual if birth certificates originating from the same source were similar.
So it is easy to conclude any similarities are not evidence of anything nefarious, regardless of who might have made this odd claim.
Quote;
Quote from article:
“As with the proven forgery of Barack Obama’s long-form birth certificate by a five-year forensic investigation and the fraud employed in multiple states during the 2020 election, the media has maintained a virtual blackout on reports of adverse events to the COVID-19 vaccines. ”
Hannity and the others who refused to speak out on Obama’s proven forged birth-certificate and other documents feared being called racist if they questioned Obama’s legitimacy, and more importantly, losing their highly paid jobs. “Birther” was a name they wanted to avoid, although in reality it is a compliment.
The success of Obama’s usurpation of America’s presidency prompted many others who are not Constitutionally eligible to be America’s president to also run for president. I don’t remember them all, but a couple are Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
Until Obama, every elected president of the United States met the eligibility requirements of the Constitution. The apparent loss of the original meaning of NBC by ignoring it has resulted in giving America’s government and her military to her enemies to do whatever they want from the highest levels of government. Not much different than signing surrender papers after the loss of a conventional war.
A great example is Obama’s immediate weakening of America’s military by replacing officers who do not agree with him.
The reason for NBC for America’s president is to help prevent having a president and commander-in-chief of America’s military with allegiance to other than the United States. Obama provided massive empirical evidence of why the founders required natural born citizen…….and even today with his influence on Joe Biden and his ineligible V.P., (chosen by Obama), he still does………….
Sometimes crime does pay, especially in politics………….
Chester Arthur’s parents unquestionably were not U.S. citizens at the time of his birth, and no one contemporaneously questioned his eligibility on this basis. (Arthur was not an elected president, but he was elected as vice president, and the vice president also must be a natural-born citizen.)
Correct, that’s why I said, “elected president”.
Whether Arthur was an elected or elevated president doesn’t change that his eligibility was challenged during his presidency.
No one contemporaneously questioned Chester Arthur eligibility on that basis because no one except Chester Arthur contemporaneously knew that his parents unquestionably were not U.S. citizens at the time of his birth.
That’s not accurate: Hinman’s book, published during Arthur’s presidency, discussed Arthur’s parents and their citizenships.
Hinman claimed Arthur was born in Canada and that’s reason he was not not eligible, not the citizenship of his parents.
Hinman discredited himself by supporting another claim that Arthur was born in Ireland and didn’t come to the United States until he was fourteen years old.
Exactly: Hinman claimed Arthur was ineligible because Hinman believed Arthur was not born in the United States.
Hinman was aware that Arthur’s father was not born in the United States. And Hinman provided no evidence that Arthur’s father had naturalized before Arthur’s birth. But Hinman never argued that Arthur was ineligible because Arthur’s father was not a U.S. citizen at the time of Arthur’s birth.
Regardless, Arthur’s eligibility was challenged during his presidency. And there still has been no attempt to explain how the circumstances of Arthur’s becoming the president are relevant to whether his presidency was challenged while he was in office.