Justice Department Seeks Out One-Time Obama Eligibility Judge

“HE’S EITHER THE PRESIDENT OR NOT”

by Sharon Rondeau

(May 3, 2019) — On Friday afternoon, a reader from the U.S. Justice Department was logged as having accessed an article from 2010 about U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter, who continues to preside in the Central District of California.

The article, written by citizen researcher David F. LaRocque and titled, “The strange case of Judge David O. Carter,” reported on a lawsuit challenging Barack Hussein Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president which Carter had originally expressed interest in hearing but in a sudden about-face, declared the court as “lacking subject matter jurisdiction” (page 4 of 30).

The article reflected that an appeal of Carter’s order, dated October 29, 2009, granting the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, was filed with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

In his order, Carter concluded, in part:

Plaintiffs have encouraged the Court to ignore these mandates of the Constitution; to disregard the limits on its power put in place by the Constitution; and to effectively overthrow a sitting president who was popularly elected by “We the People”–over sixty-nine million of the people. Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction. Respecting the constitutional role and jurisdiction of this Court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the ultimate reflection of patriotism.

“When the plaintiffs and their attorneys learned that the district court judge assigned to the case was Judge David O. Carter, they were elated and greatly encouraged,” LaRocque wrote. “Judge Carter is a graduate of both UCLA and the UCLA School of Law, and a highly experienced and respected jurist. Judge Carter has a background as a criminal prosecutor and as a professor at several institutions, including the University of California at Irvine, where he has received the school’s Distinguished Professor Award three times. He also lectures frequently at judicial conferences worldwide, and at the California Judges College, the Judicial Criminal Law Institute, and the Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference.”

Reporting on Carter’s military background and awarding of a Purple Heart and Bronze Star for his heroic actions in the Vietnam War, LaRocque continued:

To the plaintiffs in Barnett v. Obama, Judge David O. Carter seemed like an answer to their prayers. How could they ask for a more perfect judge? In a case which required a combination of an extraordinary judicial temperament, demonstrated courage, and unquestioned loyalty to the United States Constitution, Judge Carter seemed to have all of these qualities in abundance. Moreover, since there were strong indications of serious criminal acts of election fraud in the events leading up to the conclusion of the 2008 presidential election, it was felt that Judge Carter (given his prosecutorial background) was likely to share the plaintiffs’ desire to see the case heard on its merits, and that he would insure that an appropriate judicial environment was maintained to insure that would happen.

The first hearing in the case was held in the federal courthouse in Santa Ana, CA on July 13, 2009 with Judge Carter presiding. Interested citizens lined up early outside the courthouse for security screening. After a lengthy delay, the courtroom was finally opened for seating.  This writer was an eyewitness to the proceedings.

The lawsuit combined two actions, one represented by Atty. Orly Taitz and the other by then-Atty. Gary Kreep, over their objections. “The respective attorneys finally agreed to combine the cases under protest after a private discussion also witnessed by this writer during a lengthy recess but failed to resolve their differences,” LaRocque wrote.

In 2012, Kreep was elected a judge for the Superior Court of San Diego County, Office 37.  He was defeated in his 2018 re-election bid.

Obama’s eligibility first became an issue in 2007, after credible, mainstream reports surfaced during the course of the campaign that he was born outside of the U.S.  Obama’s life narrative states he was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961 to a U.S.-citizen mother and British-citizen father who never became a U.S. citizen.

Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires that the president and commander-in-chief be a “natural born Citizen.” While not expressly defined in the founding document, it is generally understood that a candidate for president cannot be a naturalized citizen, meaning he or she was born in another country.

Some constitutional scholars go farther to say that a candidate must of been born in the United States to to US-citizen parents to avoid any chance of foreign allegiance given a clause added to Article II at the suggestion of Founding Father John Jay, who became the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court:

Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government, and to declare expressly that the Command in chief of the american army shall not be given to, nor devolved on, any but a natural born Citizen

Reports of Obama’s foreign birth have never been reconciled with his claim of a birth at the Kapiolani Medical Center for Women & Children in Honolulu. The hospital has never confirmed Obama’s birth there, citing “privacy” laws.

At the time of the Taitz/Kreep suit, a citizen uploaded a “description” of the action to Scribd:

The uploader then reproduced an article from WND dated July 13, 2009 titled, “Eligibility arguments to get court hearing” by Bob Unruh. The article begins:

In what ultimately could prove to be a turning point in the legal challenges to Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president, a federal judge in California has planned a hearing on the merits of a federal court case raising those questions.

According to attorney Orly Taitz, who is working on multiple cases alleging Obama is a “usurper” because he doesn’t meet the constitutional requirement that only a “natural born citizen” can be president, U.S. District Judge David O. Carter ruled in a hearing today that her case will move forward.

The hearing was on her motion for a default order against Obama, because although Taitz said she notified him of the action, Obama’s attorneys did not make an appearance.

Her complaint was filed against the president on Jan. 20, the day of his inauguration, over his actions before he became president.

Taitz has told WND if her motion for default is granted she immediately would request access to Obama’s birth records and other documentation that could determine his eligibility to occupy the Oval Office.

In his article, LaRocque cited statements from the July 13, 2009 transcript in which Carter said of Obama, “He’s either the President or not” and “I mean, if he’s not President, he shouldn’t be President; if he is, he should be.”

No court in the nation, including the U.S. Supreme Court, has ever heard oral argument to discover whether or not Obama was constitutionally-eligible to serve as president.

In April 2011, the White House produced what it said was a PDF from a certified copy of Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate from the Hawaii Department of Health in an apparent effort to demonstrate his eligibility to serve in advance of the 2012 election.

Within hours and days after its presentation to the world, a number of American graphics experts declared the image fraudulent.  Their reports gave rise to what became a 5+-year criminal investigation into the long-form image, which early on found it to be a “computer-generated forgery.” Also declared fraudulent at a March 1, 2012 press conference was Obama’s purported Selective Service registration form, which lacked the four-digit year appearing in 17 other authenticated Selective Service registration forms of the era.

Discrepancies in Obama’s life story published by mainstream sources have never been explained.

The probe’s chief investigator, Mike Zullo, has said that the U.S. intelligence community was involved in the perpetration of the long-form image as authentic in the person of then-CIA Director John Brennan.

Despite the media’s ridicule of anyone doubting Obama’s claimed life story, Zullo has said that his investigation showed that “There is no original certificate; there never was.”

The evidence gleaned from the probe is reportedly in the hands of high-level Trump administration officials.

As a result of growing evidence coming to light that the Obama regime may have “spied” on the 2016 Trump presidential campaign, Attorney General William Barr has said he plans to investigate whether or not surveillance on Trump campaign advisor Carter Page was “adequately predicated.” Several opinion writers and commentators have said that those in the intelligence community or federal government, sometimes referred to as “the Deep State,” who may have been involved are increasingly fearful of what Barr might find.

A petition launched Wednesday at whitehouse.gov asks the Justice Department, of which Barr is the head, to “investigate the past president’s Birth Certificate, Selective Service Registration and Social Security number.”

 

8 Responses to "Justice Department Seeks Out One-Time Obama Eligibility Judge"

  1. Bruce Steadman   Sunday, May 5, 2019 at 9:42 AM

    “The First Time I Heard of Barack”, Essay by Tom Fife — November 20,2008

    Excerpts:

    ……………………………………….

    “What if I told you that you will have a black president very soon and he will be a Communist?”

    The out-of-the-blue remark was met by our stares. She continued, “Well, you will; and he will be a Communist.”

    It was then that the husband unsuccessfully tried to change the subject; but she was on a roll and would have nothing of it. One of us asked, “It sounds like you know something we don’t know.”

    “Yes, it is true. This is not some idle talk. He is already born and he is educated and being groomed to be president right now. You will be impressed to know that he has gone to the best schools of Presidents. He is what you call “Ivy League”. You don’t believe me, but he is real and I even know his name. His name is Barack. His mother is white and American and his father is black from Africa. That’s right, a chocolate baby! And he’s going to be your President.”

    She became more and more smug as she presented her stream of detailed knowledge and predictions so matter-of-factly – as though all were foregone conclusions. “It’s all been thought out. His father is not an American black so he won’t have that social slave stigma. He is intelligent and he is half white and has been raised from the cradle to be an atheist and a Communist. He’s gone to the finest schools. He is being guided every step of the way and he will be irresistible to America.”

    ……………………………….

    She rattled off a complete litany. He was from Hawaii. He went to school in California. He lived in Chicago. He was soon to be elected to the legislature. “Have no doubt: he is one of us, a Soviet.”

    ………………………………..

    https://rense.com/general84/brck.htm

  2. Robert Laity   Sunday, May 5, 2019 at 12:13 AM

    Marlene, Even AFTER Obama took his oath, he STILL was NOT a “sitting President”. He was a non bona-fide phony and imposter at the onset. “There is NO ‘President’ Obama”- http://www.thepostemail.com/09/17/2010/there-is-no-president-obama.

    Jerry P., Talk about conspiracy with Russia, it WAS predicted by the Russian, years before 2008, that Obama would be “president’. Also, Obama once made the assertion that his “Uncle helped liberate Auschwitz in WWII”. Fact is, Auschwitz was liberated by the Russians and not the Americans. Common sense deduction leads to one conclusion., Obama’s “Uncle” must have been a RUSSIAN.

  3. marlene   Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 5:02 PM

    Judge Carter lied when he said: “…to effectively overthrow a sitting president…” because BHO was not sworn in yet and therefore was NOT a ‘sitting president.”

  4. marlene   Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 4:58 PM

    While some people have had enough of this, but it isn’t over until it’s over. The problem is that the globalists, Council on Foreign Relations through the Trilateral Commission PUT obama in the White House and they’re not about to let themselves be exposed by a judge in any successful lawsuit. That’s why the initial “investigation” took over 5 years – plenty of time for BHO to continue destroying our country during his second term.

  5. Jerry P   Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 4:49 PM

    I have a paper copy of the story from 2005 where a CIA Russian Embassy worker was fired and became a whistleblower after attempting to dessiminate information he heard at the embassy where a russian woman was telling any American she could that their president in 2008 would be a black man, because at that time, both Russians and Americans found that to be humorous. This story was quickly removed from several websites.

  6. marlene   Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 4:39 PM

    The corruption of the Department of “Justice” is exceeded only by the obama/democrat-controlled corrupt judges who always “about face” to the left from a so-called ‘neutral’ position.

  7. Bruce Steadman   Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 9:09 AM

    Reference: Two links related to the current posted article:

    (1) “Eyewitness at CA eligibility hearing recounts his impressions of Lucas Smith” — The Post & Email, by David F. LaRocque, September 5, 2010 —
    https://www.thepostemail.com/2010/09/05/eyewitness-at-ca-eligibility-hearing-recounts-his-impressions-of-lucas-smith/

    (2) Video – “Lucas Daniel Smith and the Obama Kenyan Birth Certificate” – https://youtu.be/_HLpm43Ffnw

  8. Robert Laity   Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 5:08 AM

    As you know, I have written letters to President Trump outlining the facts that I have accumulated over the last (11) years regarding Obama’s usurpation of the Presidency by fraud, during time of war. I have also, as you know, provided copies of those letters written to Trump, to John C. Demers, U.S. Assistant Attorney General for National Security, Mr. Benczkowski, Assistan U.S. Attorney General, Criminal Division, William Barr, US Attorney General and to General Dunsford, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Usurpation of our Presidency in a time when the U.S. is at war constitutes espionage under Title 10, USC otherwise known as the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Obama is a spy and a traitor under 18USC, Part 1, Chapter 115, Sec. 2381. You may also know that I believe that neither Obama OR McCain were or are Natural Born U.S. Citizens. I outlined my rationale in my book “imposters in the Oval Office” and “There is no ‘President’ Obama” (Post and Email archives). Since Obama, there have been other attempts to usurp the Presidency by Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, both born to Cubans. Cuba is a communist nation at odds with the U.S., to say the least. Cruz once stated that “If Obama can do it, so can I”. Cruz and Rubio as well as Bobby Jindal were all sued by me in 2016. Obama was sued by me in 2012.,the same year I placed him under formal (served Notice upon then AGUS Eric Holder) “citizen’s arrest”. I had served on two Fifth Amendment “Presentment” panels which found sufficient evidence of criminal activity regarding the usurpation of the Presidency to refer to the Judicially empaneled D.C. Grand Jury. Obama is a fraud,usurper,traitor and spy. His crimes have served as a dubious example to many other frauds who are not eligible to be President or Vice-President under the U.S. Constitution. The List is long and growing. There were, so far, two usurpers, Chester Arthur and Barack Obama. BOTH of these were not natural born citizens nor were they alive when the Constitution was signed. Currently we have several other non NBCs attempting what Obama thinks he got away with. Kamala Harris is NOT an NBC and there are others. This must end now. The Constitution mentions that a President and Vice-President must be an NBC and while it did not define what an NBC is,that deficiency has since been resolved by the U.S. Supreme Court in at least four related cases. In one case, referred to in other cases, SCOTUS unanimously stated that those born in the US to Parents who are both US Citizens themselves are Natural Born Citizens. That is precedential and that IS the law.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.