When Will There Be a “Reckoning for the Media” about the Obama Birth Certificate?

IS THE FORGERY THE ULTIMATE “FAKE NEWS?”

by Sharon Rondeau

(Mar. 11, 2019) — On ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday, the network’s Senior National Correspondent, Terry Moran, told guest host Martha Raddatz that it will be a “huge” development if Special Counsel Robert Mueller finds no evidence of “collusion” between the Trump campaign and Russia leading up to the 2016 presidential election.

“If Mueller, after two years comes back and says, ‘I don’t have the evidence to support that charge,’ that’s a reckoning,” Moran said.  “That’s a reckoning for progressives and Democrats who hoped that Mueller would essentially erase the 2016 election. It’s a reckoning for the media. It’s a reckoning around the country if, in fact, after all this time there was no collusion.”

Moran posted on his Twitter account a clip of the interview with Raddatz which he shared with ABC Chief Justice Correspondent Pierre Thomas.

The interview continued with the host and guests agreeing that “other things” could be discovered as a result of the two-year investigation, now reportedly coming to a close. Amid much speculation in many political circles, it has been claimed by some that Mueller, who employed a team of between 13 and 17 prosecutors with left-leaning political views since his appointment in mid-May 2017, has discovered no evidence of Russian “collusion” among Trump associates.

Mueller assumed the probe from the FBI after the agency’s then-director, James Comey, was fired upon the recommendation of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

Allegations of “collusion” arose after the Hillary Clinton campaign, in coordination with the DNC, funneled money to mega-law firm Perkins Coie to then commission opposition-research firm Fusion GPS to procure political “dirt” on Trump from alleged Russian sources.  What became known as the “Russia dossier,” compiled by former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele, was later used by the Obama Justice Department and FBI to obtain surveillance warrants on 2016 Trump foreign-policy advisor Carter Page.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) was never informed that the material provided as “evidence” to support the alleged need to monitor Page’s communications was a product prepared for Trump’s political opponent.  Page has not been charged with a crime.

Mueller has, however, through a federal grand jury, indicted 37 individuals and entities, 25 of whom are Russian and will likely not be successfully prosecuted in the United States for lack of an extradition agreement with that country.  One of the Russian entities is defending itself against the charges in the U.S. courts.

Crimes other than collusion were identified, with former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort sentenced last week to 47 months in federal prison for tax evasion and other financial crimes. A judge in another jurisdiction is expected to issue a separate sentence for Manafort this week.

A number of former Trump campaign associates, such as George Papadopoulos and Rick Gates, accepted plea agreements for allegedly lying to the FBI during the course of its investigation.

Since regaining the majority in the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2018 midterm elections, Democrats have vowed to pursue a myriad of investigations concerning Trump’s business dealings prior to his inauguration and to prove that at some point in time, he has committed crimes encompassing “obstruction of justice, corruption and abuse of power.”

Reportage over the last two years by Sara A. Carter (saraacarter.com) and John Solomon of The Hill indicates that the Obama National Security Agency (NSA) was monitoring the communications of Americans in what former Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew McCarthy described as a “massive abuse of the government’s foreign-intelligence-collection authority.”

Further, in April 2017, Carter and Solomon, then working together at Circa News, reported that Obama national security adviser Susan Rice “accessed numerous intelligence reports during Obama’s last seven months in office that contained National Security Agency intercepts involving Donald Trump and his associates.”

Jerrold Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, claimed in a March 3 ABC News interview, “It’s very clear that the president obstructed justice. It’s very clear – 1,100 times he referred to the Mueller investigation as a witch hunt, he tried to – he fired – he tried to protect Flynn from being investigated by the FBI. He fired Comey in order to stop the Russian thing, as he told NBC News. He’s threatened – he’s intimidated witnesses. In public.”

Leading congressional Democrats have also said that despite mandated confidentiality surrounding Mueller’s report, its “findings are too big to be swept under the rug.”

On March 4, Nadler issued document requests to 81 individuals currently or formerly associated with the Trump administration, the 2016 campaign, or the 2020 re-election effort. “By initiating the wide-ranging demand for documents, the Judiciary Committee signaled it is creating its own insurance policy in the event that all of Mueller’s findings are not made public and it finds the kinds of evidence that would be grounds for removing Trump from office,” Politico reported on March 4. “Public hearings and closed-door interviews based off the materials will begin in a matter of weeks, a senior Democratic committee lawyer said.”

A Justice Department Inspector General’s report issued last June found that two former high-ranking FBI officials discussed an “insurance policy” to be activated in the event that Trump won the election over Clinton. Some close observers now believe the “insurance policy” was the continuation of the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign by Mueller at Rosenstein’s request.

House Democrats intend to eventually vote on Articles of Impeachment, Politico reported Monday, although they have not yet identified the “high crimes and misdemeanors” required by the Constitution for such an action to commence.

On Sunday’s broadcast, Moran additionally commented that “Democrats have to worry they don’t look like they’re just throwing anything against the wall and hope it will stick and get back to the old type of politics. If they want to beat Donald Trump, beat him. Beat him on the issues, beat him on politics. Don’t beat him with investigations.”

An issue arguably equal to or even more significant than the outcome of the Russia “collusion” investigation is the “fake news” coverage of the April 27, 2011 release of an image uploaded to the White House website said to represent Barack Hussein Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate from the state of Hawaii.

Ironically, Donald Trump, then a business and real-estate mogul known around the world, publicly demanded in a number of media interviews that the White House release documentation proving that Obama was constitutionally eligible to serve as president.  Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires the president to be a “natural born Citizen,” which most Americans believe signifies, “born in the United States,” at a minimum.

For an undetermined number of years, Obama has claimed he was born in Honolulu, HI on August 4, 1961, although no Hawaii hospital has confirmed the claim. Mysteriously, a number of mainstream-media reports initially wrote that Obama was born in either Kenya or Indonesia, with some quietly altering their articles later to say he was “born in Hawaii.”

Considered a taboo subject beginning in 2007 with Obama’s first presidential campaign, media such as the Associated Press and The Washington Post have never explained why they reported Obama’s life narrative differently than he himself has. The statement that he was “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii,” made in a biography circulated by his then-literary agent between 1991 and 2007 was hastily explained away as a “fact checking error” on the agent’s part once made public.

However, Obama and wife Michelle have said his “home country” is, in fact, Kenya and not the United States.

Once the image was released, Trump, who was considering a presidential run himself at the time, said there would be “many people looking at it,” including “experts,” while stating that he “hoped” the image was “real.”  “I hope it checks out beautifully,” he said.

“I’m taking great credit,” Trump continued in an ad hoc interview following his exit from his personal helicopter after hearing the news, for the White House’s release of the image.  “People asked me for my birth certificate, and I gave it two days later.”

Within hours of the image’s release, however, a number of experts declared it a poorly-created forgery, eventually prompting the launch of a 5+-year investigation concluding the image to be a “computer-generated forgery.”

The mainstream media barely covered the dissemination of the evidentiary findings gathered by Arpaio’s “Cold Case Posse” in three separate press conferences, with some choosing to attack the messenger, lead investigator Mike Zullo. Over the life of the investigation, Zullo reportedly received credible threats against not only his person, but also his family.  According to Zullo, at least one member of the media provided him with a sworn affidavit describing threats he or she received after beginning research on Obama’s background.

When Zullo reported at the final press conference on December 15, 2016 that two forensic analysts, each without knowledge of the other and working from different disciplines, reached similar conclusions to his own, the media either avoided reporting or mischaraterized the new development, choosing instead to stress that Arpaio’s investigation had come to a close as a result of his loss in the November 2016 election.

The mainstream media has persisted in reporting that Obama was “born in Hawaii” without having conducted its own independent investigation, similar to recent events in which it has rushed to judgment in an apparent attempt to advance a particular narrative. At least two members of the legacy media, The Washington Post and CNN, now face respective $250 million lawsuits arising from their hastily-drawn-and-reported conclusions not supported by the evidence.

The media has proven again and again its carelessness and avoidance of performing the due diligence once expected of it.

According to Zullo in November, “very, very high, high, high-level White House officials have had a cursory briefing of the information that we garnered about the certificate.” In what could be interpreted as another ironic twist, the individual occupying the Oval Office at the moment has been known to call out the media for “fake news” on an almost-daily basis over the last two years on a myriad of issues.

With agenda-driven reports and a dearth of objective facts now the norm in the media, Americans have yet to discover why the “long-form” birth certificate image was repeatedly affirmed to represent something which Zullo said does not exist.

As with the procuring of the Russia dossier, Perkins Coie placed itself in the middle of obtaining the alleged certified copies of Obama’s long-form birth certificate, according to Obama White House Counsel Robert Bauer, founder and former senior partner at the firm.

In late January, after Zullo confirmed that he and an associate, radio host Carl Gallups, were recently approached to write a book  about the investigation, Zullo told Gallups:

It’s in the early stages; I don’t really want to speak too much to it. But I will tell you that I really do believe that this issue is going to come up again.  I can’t tell you when, but I know.  It is still out there; it is still talked about; the media still runs their propaganda psy-ops campaign with that birth certificate….That fraudulent document was the vehicle to put someone in the White House whose allegiances were somewhere else; I think that’s very easy for everyone to see…These issues are going to have to be resolved at some point in time.

 

 

13 Responses to "When Will There Be a “Reckoning for the Media” about the Obama Birth Certificate?"

  1. DALE   Sunday, September 15, 2019 at 11:08 PM

    It amazes me how many ignor this….media in particular…even with ALL the evidence. What are people afraid of by responding to the multi years of investigation by Mike Zullo and Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Obama’s birth certificate posted on the White House website? It’s the old double standard and Hillary and her leftists minions being above the law. I have some startling news for lying / corrupt Hillary and her gang of obstructionists___NONE OF YOU CAN ESCAPE GOD’S JUDGEMENT!!! Luke 8:17 “For nothing is secret, that shall not be made manifest; neither any thing hid, that shall not be known and come abroad.”

  2. Thomas W Arnold   Tuesday, March 12, 2019 at 7:52 PM

    FBI/DOJ charges bribery, fraud, etc, in bogus college admissions.
    So, what about falsifying documents and fraudulently using them to become president of the United States and commander-in-chief of our country’s men and women in the armed forces?
    Oh, I guess that doesn’t count! Too big and embarrassing to prosecute! I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again- “Obama” is at the root of virtually all of our nation’s problems today. The usurper SET A FINE EXAMPLE for us all, didn’t he! I never thought that I would stoop to say this, but- why don’t you read the recently released book entitled “The Sick Treasonous Truth Surrounding Barack Hussein Obama.” Also, another excellent book (in my opinion, one of the most important pieces of literature of our time) entitled “Imposters in the Oval Office.” Anyway, I’m sick and tired of the amorality, the immorality, the disgusting cowardly media, and the public malfeasance in our government especially law enforcement at the federal level today. Our constitutional republic is being destroyed from within, and it may be too late to remedy the problem. You better hope to God that I’m wrong. Thomas W Arnold, tomwarnold@yahoo.com

  3. Glenn Harrison   Tuesday, March 12, 2019 at 6:34 PM

    P.S. Indeed, the lame stream media will be discredited and/with disgraced and have tons of egg on their faces. Who knows, perhaps this could reset media on a true and proper path.

  4. Glenn Harrison   Tuesday, March 12, 2019 at 6:24 PM

    A reckoning and a backlash toward usurper Obama is possible and probable. Surely, with Trump in the White House can anyone consider that Barry sleeps well at night and that during the day he doesn’t fret multiple times that his days of freedom and/or of life are in jeopardy because of usurpation? Further, to the best of my knowledge, the clock is always ticking for there is no time limit for usurpation. Moreover, the maximum penalty here is death.

    Trump has claimed to have sent his own investigators to Hawaii and made a statement “you’ll
    never guess what they found”. Further, Trump has made many statements over several
    years about Obama’s “noted” fraud. Sheriff Arpaio’s and Lt. Zullo’s evidence and updates
    have been given to Trump. Therefore, when it is time for Trump to “pull the grenade pin”
    then Barry faces the music, gets arrested and charged or flees the country… Further,
    should this occur can all of Barry’s signed laws/bills be terminated?

    There could be a great future event here for America and a big “Win, Win”. And never
    again should we elect an usurper… Perhaps Lady America will learn her lesson here.

  5. Gary Wilmott   Tuesday, March 12, 2019 at 5:14 PM

    The media control the narrative. They are the number one enemy of the people because they report only what they want. Truth and the American people be damned.

  6. Liz   Tuesday, March 12, 2019 at 1:51 AM

    Obama’s fake birth certificate and the deportation of millions of illegals are always on my mind..Living in California where there is more illegals than citizens I think for safety reasons President Trump never mentions deportations..BUT it has to happen at some time I think it will happen in Trump’s second term. I have files that go back 15 years on Jerry Brown, Feinstein, Boxer, Pelosi etc. The democrats keep committing more crimes so we can’t address the decades of crimes they’ve committed…My patience is long gone….

  7. Christopher Farrell   Tuesday, March 12, 2019 at 1:41 AM

    Leonard Daneman has done the most impressive and extensive work on the subject of the Article II legal term ‘natural born citizen’ and all those above should examine Daneman’s legal research.
    Leonard has been very ill recently and is suffering greatly. All those within the Body of Christ who have stood firmly in defense of the Constitution–that is to say ALL of the Constitution including the Article II natural born citizen clause–should join me in praying for Leonard Daneman. Nobody has put in more intensive labor in this battle than he has.

    May God strengthen and heal Leonard and comfort him; in the Lord Jesus’ name I pray. Amen and amen.

    Thankyou Leonard

  8. Nikita's_UN_Shoe   Monday, March 11, 2019 at 9:50 PM

    Disclaimer: I am not a Constitutional expert by any means. Any corrections to my comments will be appreciated.

    Early-on in my research about what or who a natural born Citizen is, the factors of “born on U.S. soil to two U.S. citizen parents” sure enough was easy to write and at first blush, was easy to comprehend. But, I quickly learned that that definition was not the Cracker Jack prize – at least for me. Well, that early-on definition surely sounded simple enough, but then the candidacy for the presidency of U.S. Senator John S. McCain, III, came upon the scene and that muddied-up my thought process.

    I knew from the get-go that Obama was never qualified, even if he may have been reported as been born under the porch of the White House. That’s a given. And, now I believe for the 2020 election, we have a U.S. Representative Tulsi Gabbard, representing the State of Hawaii who was born in American Samoa, reportedly born to two U.S. citizen parents. This is a similar scenario, in my view, as was John S, McCain, III. The same notion that I mentioned for Obama applies double for Kamala Harris – not eligible for the presidency under any circumstance. Clear as white wine.

    In order to put things into perspective and to iron-out the complexities of who is and who is not a natural born Citizen, I had to take a vacation and go fishing (deep thought) for a while. While on that vacation, I watched the beautiful sunset one evening and continued to stare towards the West for several hours thereafter into the darkness and then it finally dawned on me (after reading many paragraphs from Mario Apuzzo, Esq. http://puzo1.blogspot.com and from contributors to The Post & Email) that the U.S. only has two basic types of citizens:
    1.) Natural born (U.S.) Citizens.
    2.) Statutory (by law) (U.S.) citizens.

    There are no other kinds.

    Within the two above types of U.S. citizens and again listed below, birth location and quantity of parents are to be listed. But first, in order to clear up the muddy waters, I will not use the word “soil”, because – well, soil muddies up the waters. Here’s what I will use in lieu of “soil” – born in the continental 48 States, Washington D.C., Alaska, and Hawaii, and abbreviated as: ”in the U.S.A.” The “in the U.S.A.” phrase is more concrete and does not include every conceivable place overseas, whether a U.S. possession or not. For example, the Panama Canal Zone, Canada, and American Samoa are not “in the U.S.A.”, past or present.

    Two basic types of citizens:
    1. ) Natural born Citizen = born “in the U.S.A.” to two U.S. citizen parents (only type that qualifies for all Constitutional offices).

    2.) Statutory = plain vanilla U.S. citizen, awarded by law (only qualifies for Article I or U.S. Supreme Court offices)
    Sub-type a. Born in the U.S.A to a minimum of one U.S. Citizen parent and one foreign citizen parent.
    Sub-type b. All persons not born “in the U.S.A.” and these persons may have either one or two U.S. citizen parents. These persons may acquire U.S. citizenship through the instructions given by immigration laws, but nothing in any of those laws cites that these persons are awarded a “natural born Citizenship”.

    Summarized:
    Type 1: A natural born Citizen requires no U.S. law to make a person as such. They are a natural born Citizen due to the law of nature.
    Type 2: A statutory citizen – every one of those U.S. citizens are granted U.S. citizenship through some positive (man-made) law(s). Nothing natural there.

  9. Alexander Gofen   Monday, March 11, 2019 at 8:57 PM

    Thank you again dear Sharon for keeping the imposture crime on the surface. However the title “When Will There Be a Reckoning for the Media about the Obama Birth Certificate?” is naive and limited. It’s extremely naive to expect any reckoning among craftsmen whose craft is prostitution. The more reasonable versions of the title ought to be:

    – When will there be a reckoning about the 2008-2016 imposture for the Pres. Trump?

    – When will there be a reckoning about the 2008-2016 imposture and their own treason for the US military and all the US law enforcement agencies?

    – When will there be a reckoning about the 2008-2016 imposture for the remnants of American patriots?

    It makes no sense to pose this (rhetoric) question towards any of the existing parties, the Congress, the Supreme Court because they are criminals in this mega-crime, which must be prosecuted, dismissed, and punished.

    Alas, America in fact is more corrupted and sinful than even the people in the former USSR, because America doesn’t want to know (much less to analyze and repent) about its past crimes – see http://judeochristianamerica.org/JudgmentMoscow.htm

  10. CDR Kerchner (Ret)   Monday, March 11, 2019 at 7:44 PM

    FRAUD IN THE USA (Chapter 1, Part 1): The greatest identity fraud in history — Barack Hussein Obama | by Ron Polland PhD: https://youtu.be/f2-2E65uFHM

  11. Thomas W Arnold   Monday, March 11, 2019 at 4:54 PM

    Amen, Sharon!
    Now, I hear this morning that there is sentiment afoot to PAY REPARATIONS to descendants of slaves. I thought we, as a country, have been rectifying (and properly so) the inhumane, constitutionally incompatible treatment of African Americans for the last 150 years or so. Oh well.
    NOW, ANSWER ME THIS- WHAT ABOUT REPARATIONS/JUSTICE FOR THE THEFT OF OUR COUNTRY’S PRESIDENCY AND ARMED FORCES BY “BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA,” IN A WORD, “TREASON.” “OBAMA” AND HIS BLINDLY OBEDIENT AND FANATIC SUPPORTERS CLAIM THAT HE WAS AMERICA’S FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT, BUT, ALAS, HE WAS NOT, IS NOT, AND NEVER WILL BE. He was/is a foreign-born, undocumented (the forged “birth certificate” and other IDs do not qualify as valid documents!), terrorist-affiliated, serial-criminal, primarily ethnically Arab-American USURPER!
    SO, GUESS WHAT? I JUST WANT EQUAL TREATMENT AND JUSTICE FOR ALL (How’s that for “reparations.” It’s a bargain!). Thomas W Arnold.

  12. Bob68   Monday, March 11, 2019 at 4:21 PM

    Thanks for that article Sharon. I will be sending it and the article, “Democrats, who are you?” to my useless Republican members of Congress. I would suggest going ahead and using, “of citizen parents”, in the description of natural born citizen. Even the Senate resolution claiming McCain to be eligible included the claim that he was born on American soil, and that he was born of citizen parents. Words from the resolution declaring McCain to be eligible:
    Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it: That John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born Citizen under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
    I think the argument on McCain not being a NBC is that he was born in a hospital that was not on American territory. I am not actually sure of the truth in this case.
    After Obama’s handlers changed his reported birthplace from Kenya to Hawaii, we began to hear NBC more commonly defined as born on American territory only, making even anchor babies eligible, an extremely unlikely thing for the framers of the Constitution to have allowed in their decision to limit the office of president and commander-in-chief of the military to natural born citizen.
    The defense of Obama being eligible after his claimed birthplace was changed from Kenya to Hawaii, (it was a little late to change his claimed father), is why born on U.S. territory “only” became more commonly used and recognized as a NBC…….to protect Obama. In 2016 we got several ineligible candidates, including the born in Canada Ted Cruz with a non-U.S. citizen father running against the NBC Donald Trump, fortunately Cruz lost.
    Thanks again for your website and archive of evidence and information of the biggest fraud/criminal act against American citizens and her Constitution in history, which has put our future as a Constitutional Republic and our freedom in serious danger.

  13. CDR Kerchner (Ret)   Monday, March 11, 2019 at 3:42 PM

    Some useful links for newbies reading here (from the FBI, DOJ, Congress or elsewhere) to lists of the evidence of document fraud and life narrative fraud by Obama: https://www.scribd.com/lists/3248475/Kenyan-Gov-Officials-African-Newspapers-Obama-1991-Bio-Barry-Obama-Obama-Family-Mbrs-and-other-Accounts-Reporting-Obama-is-Kenyan-Born and https://www.scribd.com/lists/3166684/Birth-Certificate-and-Other-Obama-ID-Docs-Forged-Expert-Reports

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.