Obama Decries “People Making Stuff Up”

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

by Sharon Rondeau

(Jul. 18, 2018) — As CNN reported, on Tuesday, former White House occupant Barack Hussein Obama spoke at the 16th Nelson Mandela Annual Lecture in Johannesburg on the topics of “democracy,” “strongman politics,” human rights, and “climate change.”

Many news outlets equated Obama’s remarks, made five years after Mandela’s death a day before what would have been his 100th birthday, to a response to President Donald Trump’s private meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin followed by a press conference on Monday.

CNN, which does not attempt to disguise its dislike of Trump and his administration, called the Trump-Putin press conference “humiliating.”  “Like those moments in US-Russia summit lore, the events that unfolded Monday are likely to have significant and unpredictable political and geopolitical reverberations in the United States and around the world,” CNN’s Stephen Collinson wrote on Tuesday.

Reactions to the presser included former CIA Director John Brennan’s terming it “treasonous“; former Congressman Joe Walsh calling Trump a “traitor”; and Fox & Friends co-anchor Abby Huntsman accusing Trump of “throwing your own people and country under the bus.”

Huntsman’s father, Jon Huntsman, is Trump’s ambassador to Russia.

U.S. Senate candidate from Utah Mitt Romney, who Trump endorsed for president in 2012 and for his current Senate run, called Trump’s responses to questions from the press about alleged Russian interference “disgraceful.”

A myriad of left-leading commentators agreed that Trump’s remarks wherein he said he believed the findings of the U.S. intelligence community that Russia “meddled” in the 2016 election while also taking into account Putin’s denial of it were “un-American,” perceiving that Trump had taken Putin’s side on the issue.

Other than Fox & Friends on Wednesday morning, none in the media appeared to recall that in March 2012, Obama had told then-Russian President Dmitri Medvedev in a whispered conversation caught on a “hot mic” that he would “have more flexibility” in his dealings with the Kremlin on the topic of missile defense after the 2012 election.

Obama had reportedly asked Medvedev for “more space” before making any new commitments to the Kremlin.  At the time, The New York Times called Obama’s “hot mic” remarks with Medvedev a “moment of political candor.”

One of the apparent points of contention in Trump’s remarks on Monday was that in response to a reporter’s question, Trump had said of alleged Russian interference, “I don’t see any reason why it would be Russia.”

On Tuesday, however, Trump issued a correction from the Roosevelt Room at the White House stating that he misspoke and meant to say, “I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be Russia.”

Trump’s correction has generally not satisfied the media, including CNN.

During the presser, Trump reiterated his claim that there was “no collusion” between his campaign and the Kremlin during the 2016 election cycle, an allegation under investigation for approximately two years, first under the FBI and later overseen by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

In his remarks in South Africa Tuesday, Obama stated on the topic of climate change, “You have to believe in facts. Without facts there’s no basis for cooperation. If I say this is a podium and you say this is an elephant, it’s going to be hard for us to cooperate.”

He continued:

People just make stuff up. They just make stuff up. We see it in the growth of state sponsored propaganda. We see it in internet fabrications. We see it in the blurring of lines between news and entertainment. We see the utter loss of shame among political leaders where they’re caught in a lie and they just double down and they lie some more. It used to be that if you caught them lying, they’d be like, oh man — now they just keep on lying.

Neither the media nor Obama himself has addressed the posting of an image said to be a replication of his “long-form” birth certificate from Hawaii which was found by a 5+-year criminal investigation to be a “computer-generated forgery.”

On many occasions, lead investigator Mike Zullo has raised questions, against the backdrop of his findings of forgery and fraud, as to Obama’s life narrative and “aliases.”  His Selective Service registration form was also found to be fraudulent.

No mainstream outlet has investigated independently Zullo’s findings.

While Obama derided “Internet fabrications” and “political leaders” for finding themselves “caught in a lie” and then “lying some more,” the birth certificate forgery remains in the Obama White House archives online, with no apparent hard copy provided to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) as an official presidential document.

In light of the mainstream media’s blackout of the issue, Zullo has conducted numerous interviews with Carl Gallups on his “Freedom Friday” radio show, The Hagmann Report, the Bill Martinez Live radio show, and this publication.

Thus far, neither Congress, the FBI nor the Justice Department has been willing to launch an investigation into Zullo’s conclusions, which are supported by two forensic document analysts working independently and from different disciplines.  In a press conference marking the end of the investigation, Zullo and then-Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph Arpaio, who authorized the investigation, said they would provide all of their evidence to federal authorities, much of which has not yet been made public.

According to Zullo, while still in Congress, Walsh had promised to take action on the birth certificate findings but reneged on his pledge.

16 Responses to "Obama Decries “People Making Stuff Up”"

  1. Richard   Monday, July 23, 2018 at 8:11 AM

    Sharon,
    There are those in Wash DC that make sport of any that believe the US constitution and the Declaration are active and followed documents for guidance in representing the men and woman of America.
    The document they refer to is the Treaty of Peace and its own words allows all doors of deceit to be opened for their self-serving need$.
    The Definitive Treaty of Peace 1783
    It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States of America….
    Article 1:
    His Brittanic Majesty acknowledges the said United States, viz., New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, to be free sovereign and independent states,…
    If we won the war and plenary independence then why is the KING arch-treasurer and prince elector of the United States of America, and why were the people not recognized as free, sovereign and independent?
    For proof of England’s interference and the fact of the status and capacities of arch-treasurer is presently in full force, affect and effect
    Why and how does the FEDERAL RESERVE claim ownership of all American people and their land?
    Why did the DEFENSE DEPARTMENT and TREASURY 1789 lien the same, thereby giving validity to the ownership claims?
    Why is that lien also legal tender for 28 quadrillion, and where did that legal tender go?
    Why, and under what authority, were all Americans declared to be enemies of their own country in 1933?
    Search for the 1933 pdf from the FEDERAL RESERVE for proof of this fact.

    Know the enemy’s rules to counter them. MAXIMS OF LAW AND EQUITY-THE FOUNDATION OF ANY LEGITIMATE AND LAWFUL SOCIETY
    From a wrong no contract can arise.
    False in one thing, false in all things.
    It is a fraud to conceal a fraud.
    Fraud and deceit should benefit no one.
    Fraud and justice never dwell together.
    Fraud lies hidden in general expressions.
    Fraud is most hateful to law.
    He truly acts fraudulently who, observing the letter of the law, eludes its spirit.
    Right and fraud never dwell to­gether
    A maxim is so called because its dignity is chiefest, and its authority the most certain, and because it is universally approved by all.
    Once a fraud, always a fraud.
    That which is not valid at the beginning, improves not by lapse of time.
    What otherwise is good and just, if it be sought by force and fraud, becomes bad and unjust.
    Time cannot render valid an act void in its origin.
    That which is not good in its principal, will not be good as to accessories or consequences.
    In default of the law, the maxim rules.
    A mandate of an illegal thing is void.
    Remove the foundation, the work falls.
    Things grounded upon an ill and void beginning cannot have a good perfection.
    Void things are as no things.
    When the foundation fails, all fails.

    Please know the veterans of America have sacrificed life, limb and family. This has caused children of past and present generations to suffer without fathers in their lives day to day, thereby distorting social structures and slowly transforming the foundation that blessed us. Help us help you help the veterans and their families to receive what was promised and what should be to correct the abuse that has been laid upon them by the persons claiming to care aka POLITICIANS.

  2. Robert Laity   Sunday, July 22, 2018 at 11:42 AM

    Lew, Insofar as Obama’s BC would have a direct bearing on federal lawsuits involving disputes of his bona-fides as a constitutionally eligible “President” ,the recording of it in an archivable medium is required by law. The proffering of the document, by Obama, as alleged proof that federal law and policy with regard to presidential elections was complied with makes it “appropriate for preservation”. Failure to archive such evidence would constitute spoliation of evidence in a lawsuit forbidden by both the F. R. Crim. Procedures and 18USC. Also see the Presidential Records Act of 1978 requiring ALL presidential papers to be archived.

  3. Sharon Rondeau   Sunday, July 22, 2018 at 10:20 AM

    Where is Savannah Guthrie’s document?

  4. James Carter   Sunday, July 22, 2018 at 9:39 AM

    @Lew Harper: One of the ALLEGED two Certified Copies of Obama’s ALLEGED original long-form birth certificate was shown to reporters at the White House press gaggle on April 27th, 2011.

  5. JONATHAN DAVID MOOERS   Sunday, July 22, 2018 at 9:37 AM

    https://www.teaparty.org/barack-obama-says-hes-first-american-president-kenya-foreign-speech-315263/

    BLACK PRIVILEDGE is when Whoopi keeps her show while Roseanne Barr loses hers, when US Rep. Maxine Waters can publicly promote violence against Trump-supporters with relative impunity, when Contempt of Congress AG Holder can get off scot-free and float possibility of running for President in 2020 and when America’s first fake presIDent from Kenya (narrative-named Soetoro-Obama II) can harm and humiliate America for a decade 2008- 2018 and still get full retirement benefits as a nationally recognized subversive fugitive from prescribed Rule of Law, don’t you think?.

    STOP the Constitution Prostitution fail time><START the Common Sense jail time!

    ARREST Obama:::RELEASE America!

  6. Lew Harper   Sunday, July 22, 2018 at 8:55 AM

    It’s in the transcript of the press gaggle.

    There is also the document photographed by Savanah Guthrie.

    That photographed document has a visible round seal which is in the exact same location as the round seal visible on the LFBC PDF.

    It is impossible to print the LFBC PDF and get the paper document photographed by Guthrie. But you can take the document photographed by Guthrie and produce a PDF like the one posted by the White House. The counters of the individual letters prove it.

  7. Sharon Rondeau   Sunday, July 22, 2018 at 7:47 AM

    Were you there?

  8. Lew Harper   Sunday, July 22, 2018 at 1:01 AM

    One of the certified copies was shown to reporters at the press gaggle on April 27th, 2011.

  9. Sharon Rondeau   Sunday, July 22, 2018 at 12:11 AM

    Perhaps there was no hard copy to be archived.

  10. Lew Harper   Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 11:30 PM

    I don’t agree:

    “(A) includes all recorded information, regardless of form or characteristics, made or received by a Federal agency under Federal law or in connection with the transaction of public business and preserved or appropriate for preservation by that agency or its legitimate successor

    as evidence of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations, or other activities of the United States Government

    or

    because of the informational value of data in them”

    A Hawaiian birth certificate would not normally be considered a government record. Certain not under Hawaiian law. Under federal law it is not evidence of the

    organization,
    functions,
    policies,
    decisions,
    procedures,
    operations,
    or activities

    Of the Federal government

    It could possible be considered a record under “informational value of data” contained in the birth certificate but that would probably be up to the Archivist.

  11. Robert Laity   Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 1:07 AM

    Lew, 44USC, (a) (1) (A) “Records include ALL recorded information…received by a federal agency…in connection with the transaction of public business…appropriate for preservation by that agency…as evidence of…activities of the U.S. Government…”

    While the archivist has some leeway in determining whether or not said documentation amounts to “recorded information”, he/she cannot arbitrarily or capriciously make a determination that an obvious document such as a President’s birth certificate is not “appropriate for preservation by that agency”. While a decision of this nature, by the archivist, is “binding”. It would not be unappealable to higher authority should said determination be disputed.

  12. Lew Harper   Friday, July 20, 2018 at 2:08 PM

    44 U.S. Code § 3301 (b) Determination of Definition.—

    The Archivist’s determination whether recorded information, regardless of whether it exists in physical, digital, or electronic form, is a record as defined in subsection (a) shall be binding on all Federal agencies.

  13. Robert Laity   Friday, July 20, 2018 at 5:00 AM

    “People just make things up”- Barack Obama. In the 67 years that I have lived on Earth I have never seen anyone more mendacious, prevaricating and downright dishonest as Barack, Obama aka Soetoro; Sumohadiwidjojo; X. Obama practices his “muslim faith” by frequently utilizing Taqyya. Taqyya is the organizational dispensation given by Islam wherein any muslim is allowed to LIE about his “Muslim faith”. Do “we the people” want to let Obama skate on this issue of usurpation of the Presidency by fraud during time of war? Why would we? As for whether or not Obama’s BC would meet the definition of a federal record, it does. It was proffered, during the normal course of business, by Obama during a time in which he was in de facto Federal government service impersonating the President. All such received ‘presidential’ documents are required to be archived. The law decides what is a federal record. The archivist is responsible for administering the process.

  14. James P. Carter   Thursday, July 19, 2018 at 11:16 AM

    Kudo’s to Sharon et al “birther” stalwarts.

    While some people may not accept the substantive evidence long available in the public domain indicating that the alleged Certified Copy of Obama’s long-form birth certificate is in fact a computer-generated counterfeit/forgery, no objective person cannot not accept proof beyond any doubt whatsoever once available on Obama’s 2008 “FightTheSmears.com” and former White House web-site (now archived) that the alleged Certified Copy of his short-form birth certificate, which his 2008 campaign released to quell questions about his place of birth, is in fact a computer-generated counterfeit/forgery.

    Clicking on the blue “online” link in the 4th paragraph from the end of Sharon’s article above takes you the Obama White House archive of Dan Pfeiffer’s April 27, 2011 presser during which an alleged Certified Copy of Obama’s long-form birth certificate was shown to the public.

    Here is the first paragraph of Dan Pfeiffer’s presser statement in its entirety:
    “In 2008, in response to media inquiries, the President’s campaign requested his birth certificate from the state of Hawaii. The state sent the campaign the President’s birth certificate, the same legal documentation provided to all Hawaiians as proof of birth in state, and the campaign immediately posted it on the internet. That birth certificate can be seen here (PDF)”.

    The last sentence of the above is a blue link which will take you to the archived Obama White House web-site page “birth-certificate.pdf” alleged to depict the birth certificate Dan Pfeiffer referred to above.

    The first clue that the image is not what is alleged to be can be found by scrolling down to the bottom of the page on which the image appears — where you will see that the image, “birth.jpg”, was not sourced from Obama’s campaign headquarters in Chicago (to where the state allegedly sent the birth certificate) but, rather, from Snopes.com’s PUBLIC MESSAGE BOARD (to where ANYBODY can upload an image of ANYTHING).

    The second clue that the image is not what it is alleged to be is that Dan Pfeiffer said that Obama’s campaign requested and the state sent the birth certificate in 2008 — yet other images/photos on DailyKos, FactCheck and Snopes alleged to depict the exact same birth certificate show a 2007 date-stamp on the back-side.

    While I realize a few professional computer graphics experts have found numerous technical problems with the image, I believe those two non-technical problems are enough to declare that the image does not depict what Dan Pfeiffer et al claimed it did.

    That’s been my story from day one and I’m still sticking to it.

  15. CDR Kerchner (Ret)   Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 8:30 PM

    The evidence collection re Obama’s forged ID docs: http://www.scribd.com/lists/3166684/Birth-Certificate-and-Other-Obama-ID-Docs-Forged-Expert-Reports

  16. Lew Harper   Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 1:07 PM

    “with no apparent hard copy provided to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) as an official presidential document.”

    Does the birth certificate meet the definition of a federal record per 44 U.S. Code § 3301?

    Would it be up to the Archivist to decide if in fact it is a federal record per 44 U.S. Code § 3301 (b)?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.