“NOTHING MORE THAN A STORY”
by Sharon Rondeau
The form, along with the “long-form” birth certificate image posted on the White House website in April 2011, was found to be a forgery within six months of Zullo’s embarking on the five-year criminal probe. On March 1, 2012, Zullo stated at the first of what would be three press conferences that there was probable cause to believe that the birth certificate image is a “computer-generated forgery” and that signs of forgery were apparent in the Selective Service registration form.
One of the indicators to which Zullo pointed is a two-digit year stamp when 17 other forms from the same era obtained through a FOIA request demonstrated four-digit year stamps.
In 2008 and 2009, respectively, citizen requesters received two different versions of a “DLN” printout accompanying the release of Obama’s purported Selective Service registration form.
When in late March 2012 then-Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph Arpaio wrote to then-SSS Director Lawrence Romo with a request to view the original paper document or a certified copy, SSS Associate Director of Public and Intergovernmental Affairs Richard S. Flahavan informed him that the information was transferred to microfilm and the original paper document “destroyed.”
Flahavan had responded that the agency did not possess “the original, authentic Selective Service registration form for Barack Obama from July 29, 1980.” According to a WND report dated May 10, 2012, Flahavan asserted that “it was destroyed in 1980. Per agency policy and practice, when a Selective Service System record is created from the registration card, the card is microfilmed and the paper card is then destroyed. This has been our policy for more than 30 years.”
“We really are convinced the Selective Service card was another fraudulently-created document,” Zullo told Gallups on Friday, “…and when we were pressuring Selective Service and requesting to come down and visibly see the card, after a month or so they got back to us and told us they no longer have the card; the card has been destroyed; everything has been put on microfilm. It’s really not that difficult to go create a reel of microfilm and insert another card – and this is what it looks like – and then you destroy everything.”
Referring to the previously-discussed article published in RealClearPolitics on June 10 reporting that the Obama regime failed to turn over “tens of thousands of government records” to the National Archives, Zullo asked Gallups rhetorically, “Who’s allowing this? Who’s allowing them to go in there and destroy government-privileged documents? Why would you be doing that? If you’re doing everything upright, you don’t destroy anything…”
As Gallups observed, the article’s author, Thomas Lipscomb, specifically pointed to former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Obama, and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as having used private email addresses with the purpose of effecting “the intentional evasion of the government records recording system.”
Gallups then opined that given the workings of what is now known as “the Deep State,” Arpaio and Zullo had “no one” to whom they could take their evidence that the birth certificate and Selective Service form are fraudulent. “We didn’t know about the Deep State; there really was no Deep State…” Zullo responded, referring to the investigational findings declared in March 2012. “We just knew that something was terribly wrong, and when we deliberated what do with this, there was nowhere to take it, so the move here was to sit on it and wait, and we’re still waiting.”
Gallups observed that the man who first publicly questioned Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president and demanded that the White House release Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate to prove that he was at least born in the United States won his way through a crowded field of 17 “Deep State” Republican contenders and went on to win the 2016 presidential election. Of exposing the “birth certificate” fraud, Gallups told his audience, “Just wait, folks.”
In response, Zullo said, “That whole birth narrative is nothing more than a story. His birth certificate is not a birth certificate; I’ve said that a million times.T here is no corroborative evidence that Barack Hussein Obama’s father was indeed Barack Obama. There is no corroborative evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham was in fact his mother. There are no eyewitness accounts. There are no hospital records. You have a narrative, a story that was being told and the manufacturing of direct evidence — a phony PDF file — to bolster that narrative. So that’s what they’re doing.”