by Sharon Rondeau

(Jun. 18, 2018) — Approximately halfway through the third segment of his Friday evening interview with radio host Carl Gallups, Obama birth certificate investigator Mike Zullo shifted from speaking about microfilm entries missing from the National Archives records surrounding Barack Hussein Obama’s purported birth date to detailing the refusal of the Selective Service System (SSS) to allow him to view a paper copy of Obama’s Selective Service registration form.

The form, along with the “long-form” birth certificate image posted on the White House website in April 2011, was found to be a forgery within six months of Zullo’s embarking on the five-year criminal probe. On March 1, 2012, Zullo stated at the first of what would be three press conferences that there was probable cause to believe that the birth certificate image is a “computer-generated forgery” and that signs of forgery were apparent in the Selective Service registration form.

One of the indicators to which Zullo pointed is a two-digit year stamp when 17 other forms from the same era obtained through a FOIA request demonstrated four-digit year stamps.

In 2008 and 2009, respectively, citizen requesters received two different versions of a “DLN” printout accompanying the release of Obama’s purported Selective Service registration form.

When in late March 2012 then-Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph Arpaio wrote to then-SSS Director Lawrence Romo with a request to view the original paper document or a certified copy, SSS Associate Director of Public and Intergovernmental Affairs Richard S. Flahavan informed him that the information was transferred to microfilm and the original paper document “destroyed.”

Flahavan had responded that the agency did not possess “the original, authentic Selective Service registration form for Barack Obama from July 29, 1980.”  According to a WND report dated May 10, 2012, Flahavan asserted that “it was destroyed in 1980.  Per agency policy and practice, when a Selective Service System record is created from the registration card, the card is microfilmed and the paper card is then destroyed. This has been our policy for more than 30 years.”

“We really are convinced the Selective Service card was another fraudulently-created document,” Zullo told Gallups on Friday, “…and when we were pressuring Selective Service and requesting to come down and visibly see the card, after a month or so they got back to us and told us they no longer have the card; the card has been destroyed; everything has been put on microfilm.  It’s really not that difficult to go create a reel of microfilm and insert another card – and this is what it looks like – and then you destroy everything.”

Referring to the previously-discussed article published in RealClearPolitics on June 10 reporting that the Obama regime failed to turn over “tens of thousands of government records” to the National Archives, Zullo asked Gallups rhetorically, “Who’s allowing this?  Who’s allowing them to go in there and destroy government-privileged documents?  Why would you be doing that?  If you’re doing everything upright, you don’t destroy anything…”

As Gallups observed, the article’s author, Thomas Lipscomb, specifically pointed to former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Obama, and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as having used private email addresses with the purpose of effecting “the intentional evasion of the government records recording system.”

Gallups then opined that given the workings of what is now known as “the Deep State,” Arpaio and Zullo had “no one” to whom they could take their evidence that the birth certificate and Selective Service form are fraudulent.  “We didn’t know about the Deep State; there really was no Deep State…” Zullo responded, referring to the investigational findings declared in March 2012.  “We just knew that something was terribly wrong, and when we deliberated what do with this, there was nowhere to take it, so the move here was to sit on it and wait, and we’re still waiting.”

Gallups observed that the man who first publicly questioned Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president and demanded that the White House release Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate to prove that he was at least born in the United States won his way through a crowded field of 17 “Deep State” Republican contenders and went on to win the 2016 presidential election.  Of exposing the “birth certificate” fraud, Gallups told his audience, “Just wait, folks.”

In response, Zullo said, “That whole birth narrative is nothing more than a story. His birth certificate is not a birth certificate; I’ve said that a million times.T here is no corroborative evidence that Barack Hussein Obama’s father was indeed Barack Obama. There is no corroborative evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham was in fact his mother.  There are no eyewitness accounts.  There are no hospital records.  You have a narrative, a story that was being told and the manufacturing of direct evidence — a phony PDF file — to bolster that narrative.  So that’s what they’re doing.”


Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. It was my understanding that only men registered for Selective Service – has question #2 (“sex”) always been there? That seems weird to me.

  2. I’m so darn tired of all the efforts to prove, or disprove, that “Barack Hussein Obama” was a natural born American citizen.
    Of course, HE WAS NOT!
    What about you, Barry Soetoro aka Soebarkah?
    You, “Obama”/Soetoro, were a CIA (likely with others) created Manchurian candidate whose mission was to take over and destroy the constitutional democratic republic of our founding fathers, the United States of America.
    Can you say TREASON?
    Tom Arnold.

  3. The “Obama” postal stamp was not only 2 digit but it was inverted and off center. The only one of its kind in the history of US Selective Service registrations! Just another brick in the wall of fraud.

  4. Geordie: Glad to see you visited my collection and browsed through it. As to that particular document with Obama’s SSN it is a real document provided by the SSS system. Someone, I don’t remember who, back then submitted a request to the SSS for a letter of proof that they were in the SSS system. They pretended to be Obama as I recall in making the request. The person used Obama’s SSN but had it sent in his name to some address which the person making the request used. The purpose of this per the person who did it, as I recall, was to prove that Obama was using a CT SSN. As I recall there was some talk of the person who did this being prosecuted but I don’t think they ever were. Probably, maybe because the prosecution would have brought unwanted publicity in the main stream media about Obama using an SSN for CT when it was a state he never lived in. That is what I recall about that document.

  5. I went to CDR’s link and found a mystery.

    This image:


    shows a Selective Service card with Obama’s name but the return address and the “Last Action Date” have been redacted.

    But the Postnet bar code is still visible and it shows an address of

    6730 Connaught Dr Colorado Springs CO 80908-3034

    I don’t think this is Obama’s as he never lived at that address nor has it ever been associated with him.

    This may just be a red herring someone put out to fool people. I would discount it.

  6. CDR Kerchner thanks for all your efforts. I have followed your efforts and appreciate everything you have done. Like you, many of us are still fighting the fight to hold Obama and others that are involved accountable. With Trump in the White House and Lt. Zullo still sharing new and updated info the fight has yet to be won. Now more than before, we can still bag Obama…

    A couple of years ago I went up to a friend of mine who was working as a Mail Clerk (with
    over 25 year) at the window/counter of the Postal Service and asked him about the PICA stamp and asked if they were a “2” digit number. He looked puzzled at first. Then I explained that Obama’s Selective Service Form had only two numbers on it. He stated it should have had “4” digits.

    While I have been employed at the USPS for some 20 years as a custodian and have
    seen PICA stamps while cleaning, all that I have seen have “4” digits for the year stamp.
    Whoever used a “2” digit stamp on Obama’s card earned the grade of “-F” for not doing
    their homework.

  7. My collection of evidence showing that virtually all of Obama’s key life event docs are either forged, stolen, altered, back-dated, sealed from view, or are missing: http://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists I and others have been battling to expose the fraud and constitutionally ineligible Obama since the summer of 2008. Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, Valerie Jarrett, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and others need to go to jail for blocking the federal investigation of the validity of Obama life docs as demanded in various lawsuits which were turned away via technicalities such as standing and political question and Sheriff Arpaio’s five year investigation into the forged long-form BC PDF document and the back dated draft registration card. Our constitutional republic dodged a rhetorical fatal bullet if Donald Trump and not won the electoral college and Hillary would have got elected. The election of Donald Trump foiled a deep-state Cloward-Piven Strategy inspired attempt to change our republic forever into a socialist elitist Wash DC dictatorial nightmare. Trump has a lot of work to do to reverse the 8 years of damage done by Obama and his marxist comrades, cronies, and fraudsters. CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) – ProtectOurLiberty.org

  8. The RealClearPolitics article references “the accumulation of recent congressional testimony,” but it doesn’t specify whose testimony, or on what topic.

    Like President Reagan said, “Trust but verify.” But it is impossible to verify without knowing the sources.

  9. Zullo explained the “80” stamp.

    Has he explained where they got the USPO stamp for the Makiki Station Post Office in Honolulu?

    Those have to be extremely rare as the USPO became the USPS in 1971 and the old stamps continued to be used but were phased out and replaced in the 1980s.

    So to find one from the Makiki Station would be difficult.