Zullo Recaps Missing Records from National Archives the Week of Obama’s “Birth”


by Sharon Rondeau

Obama’s purported “short-form” birth certificate claims he was born on August 4, 1961 and that the birth was “filed by registrar” on August 8, 1961, a narrative Obama birth certificate investigator Mike Zullo has refuted.

(Jun. 17, 2018) — During the third segment of the June 15 “Freedom Friday” radio show, host Carl Gallups opened by quoting from a June 10 article at RealClearPolitics.com contending that the Obama regime failed to turn over “tens of thousands of government records” to the National Archives, as is legally required when a president leaves office and by Obama’s own hand.

The article, written by Thomas Lipscomb, begins:

In the middle of directing the difficult task of transferring the historically important records of the Obama administration into the National Archives, the archivist in charge, David Ferriero, ran into a serious problem: A lot of key records are missing.

A first-rate librarian, Ferriero has been driving a much-needed digital overhaul and expansion of the National Archives over the nine years of his appointment. This will greatly improve the ability of digital search locally and remotely, as well as accessing the files themselves.

To support this effort, in 2014 President Obama signed the Presidential and Federal Records Act Amendments. For the first time electronic government records were placed under the 1950 Federal Records Act. The new law also included updates clarifying “the responsibilities of federal government officials when using non-government email systems” and empowering “the National Archives to safeguard original and classified records from unauthorized removal.” Additionally, it gives the Archivist of the United States the final authority in determining just what is a government record.

Gallups had just finished expounding on the Justice Department’s inspector general’s report released Thursday which revealed, among other things, that former FBI Director James Comey used a private email address to conduct government business at least part of the time.  Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and Obama’s first EPA Administrator, Lisa Jackson, were earlier discovered to have used personal email addresses to carry out the government’s — and therefore the people’s — business.

Lipscomb included Barack Obama in the list of government officials using private email addresses, as it is now known that he was “one of 13” to have communicated with Clinton over her private email system while she served as his secretary of state.

Obama’s name was first obscured by the FBI in a document release and labeled a “senior government official.”  In an interview with CBS on March 7, 2015, just after Clinton’s use of the private server was first reported by The New York Times, Obama said he learned about it “the same time everybody else did, through news reports.”

Lipscomb used as the foundation of his article “the accumulation of recent congressional testimony” which he said “has made it clear that the Obama administration itself engaged in the wholesale destruction and ‘loss’ of tens of thousands of government records covered under the act as well as the intentional evasion of the government records recording system by engaging in private email exchanges.”

Given that, Lipscomb further wrote, “Clearly, America’s National Archives is facing the first major challenge to its historic role in preserving the records of the United States. What good is the National Archives administering a presidential library, like the planned Obama library in Chicago, if it is missing critical records of interest to scholars? And what’s to prevent evasion of the entire federal records system by subsequent administrations to suit current politics rather than serve scholars for centuries to come?”

Obama’s presidential “center,” not “library,” is expected to cost upwards of $200 million to taxpayers, and the National Archives will reportedly have no involvement because of its announced completely digital format.

Gallups then focused on the National Archives as it pertains to the five-year criminal investigation conducted by his guest, former detective Mike Zullo, into an image posted at whitehouse.gov said to be a scan of a certified copy of Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate from the State of Hawaii.

The image was released on April 27, 2011, which then-Obama Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer now calls the day on which “fake news” was born.  Quoted in a Yahoo! News article published the same day as the inspector general’s report, Pfeiffer’s “memoir” to be released on Tuesday is said to have devoted a chapter to telling “the inside story of Obama’s birth certificate.”

As The Post & Email reported, the article is replete with erroneous statements.

Zullo’s investigation found early on that the birth certificate image is fraudulent, constructed in a number of layers with telltale signs of forgery.  At a December 2016 final press conference on the discoveries made over more than five years, Zullo further revealed that two forensic analysts, without knowledge of the other and located on two different continents, conducted their own examinations of the image and reached the same conclusion.

Gallups recalled for the audience that Zullo’s investigation had included obtaining rolls of microfilm of airline manifests stored by the National Archives to include 1961, the year Obama was reportedly born.  Of that year, Zullo said, “Lo and behold, the microfilm containing that month of August, from the date of August 1st to August 10th, is completely blank, and it starts again on August 11th.  Reportedly Obama’s birth date is August 4th, and the acceptance date of his birth certificate — purported birth certificate at the State of Hawaii — is August 8th.”

Zullo said that when he “asked and asked and asked questions of the National Archives” as to why the entries for those ten days were missing, the “head librarian” eventually said “that they could no longer speak with us; that we would have to go through their attorneys.”

“So they lawyered up,” Gallups said.  “I guess the head librarian over there thought she needed a lawyer because I’m asking her, ‘How could this be blank, and 685 other reels, there’s not a glitch?'” Zullo replied.

In a new revelation, Zullo said that the date of “August 4th” is “actually the arrival date; it’s not a birth date.”

It is well-known that the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that the president be a “natural born Citizen” is interpreted to mean, at a minimum, that a presidential candidate must have been born in the United States.

When The Post & Email contacted the National Archives in April 2016 about the transfer of electronic data from an administration to the Archives, we received in response a Congressional Research Service (CRS) document dated December 31, 2014 titled, “The Presidential Records Act: Background and Recent Issues for Congress.”  We were specifically referred to the section titled, “Maintaining Electronic Records” by Jessica Owens, Archivist, Presidential Materials Division.

CRS Report on The Presidential Records Act

10 Responses to "Zullo Recaps Missing Records from National Archives the Week of Obama’s “Birth”"

  1. Ed Sunderland   Monday, June 18, 2018 at 10:22 AM

    I had Mike Zullo on speakerphone talking about the missing records at the National Archives with my Congressman Michael Burgess and an assistant. Mike related the story in my quest to get some kind of investigation going into the records being tampered with.

    The investigators were Jerome Corsi and another guy whom I spoke with one the phone. Things were tense then and couldn’t get him on a radio show but he said he was so disgusted with the entire occurrence he didn’t want to do anything more. He said it was blatantly obvious the records were gone and government was corrupt..

    It also proved the Sheriff’s phones were tapped because the conversations leading up to the disappearance of the records were specific with dates—–the dates missing from the National Archives. I wonder if there are records the perps missed????????

  2. thinkwell   Monday, June 18, 2018 at 1:16 AM

    Ted Cruz may be a born citizen (but that is in serious doubt as no proof of such has been presented – many believe that his mother become Canadian by the time Ted was born) since he was supposedly born to an American mother, but to an alien father in an alien land. Thus, at best, he is merely a statutory born citizen who only is a citizen at because of a relatively recent statute that gave American citizen mothers the right to pass along citizenship. Regardless, the Constitution requires that all new presidents (and VPs) be natural born Citizens, i.e., a citizen by inherent natural whose de facto citizenship requires no law (unlike a statutory born citizen, whose citizenship depends wholly upon the artifice of law or statute).

  3. Gary Wilmott   Sunday, June 17, 2018 at 10:43 PM

    Malfunction? How convenient. You know what is even more convenient? Being able to destroy government records from the National Archives and knowing that you will not be held accountable.

  4. Sharon Rondeau   Sunday, June 17, 2018 at 8:58 PM

    Thank you!

  5. Geordie Keating   Sunday, June 17, 2018 at 8:16 PM


    Here is the archived copy from April 17th, 2012


  6. Sharon Rondeau   Sunday, June 17, 2018 at 8:00 PM


  7. Geordie Keating   Sunday, June 17, 2018 at 7:50 PM

    From the NARA February 6th, 2012 letter to Dr. Jerome Corsi.

    “Looking at both the camera negative and positive copies of these rolls, it is apparent that at the time of the filming, multiple cards were fed through a document feeder, became bunched
    together, and subsequently were shot on top of each other, thus obscuring the images underneath. Apparently, no quality control was done at the time of filming to check for these errors. Consequently, it is difficult to determine whether or not images of cards for the period August 2 through August 7 exist on Roll 184. If they do, they are unreadable.”

    There is also this statement in the letter.

    “Passenger arrival records for the above dates were filmed by the INS in August 196l; the original paper records were not retained.”

    So the original error occurred in 1961 and the NARA took possession of the microfilms in 1996.

  8. Sharon Rondeau   Sunday, June 17, 2018 at 6:21 PM

    Apparently not. Where is your evidence of such?

  9. Geordie Keating   Sunday, June 17, 2018 at 6:08 PM

    “Zullo said that when he “asked and asked and asked questions of the National Archives” as to why the entries for those ten days were missing, the “head librarian” eventually said “that they could no longer speak with us; that we would have to go through their attorneys.”

    Didn’t the NARA explain that it was a card reader malfunction during the 1996 creation of the microfilm?

  10. Bob68   Sunday, June 17, 2018 at 3:25 PM

    “It is well-known that the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that the president be a “natural born Citizen” is interpreted to mean, at a minimum, that a presidential candidate must have been born in the United States.”

    Thanks for another reminder that the candidate who came in second in the Republican primary, Rafael “Ted” Cruz is not Constitutionally eligible, even by the minimum, (and wrong), interpretation of, “natural born citizen”. Cruz almost certainly will run again and many will want the Canadian born Cruz to win, (Cruz also did not have two citizen parents), JUST to put the final nail in the coffin of the requirement to be born in the United States. The two citizen parent requirement was already successfully ignored by Obama, whose handlers in 2007 thought born in Kenya would be a tough sell so they changed his claimed birthplace to Hawaii, and scrubbed everything else…..but they missed a few things, at least one for as long as 17 years. The two citizen parent requirement they just blew off and called people names who said that was a requirement. It worked, and Cruz, if he is ever sworn in as president, would finish off the born in the United States requirement.

    Great article and the efforts of the Obama regime now are going to be to destroy any records they do not want to be seen…..and it appears there will be no consequences for doing this.
    Spending money on a fraudulent lie-brary to house the lies of ineligible, identity fraud con-artist is an insult to our nation and all who recognize the Obama fraud as the complete sham it is. Obama will continue to manipulate and make-up whenever he wants to claim happened during his fake presidency, just as he did with the rest of his life story.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.