Spread the love


by Sharon Rondeau

(Jun. 15, 2018) — This evening, Obama birth certificate lead investigator Mike Zullo will be Carl Gallups’s guest on his “Freedom Friday” radio program beginning at 5:00 PM EDT/4:00 PM CDT to discuss, among other things, an article published by Yahoo! News on Thursday about the birth certificate image from a former Obama adviser’s point of view.

Update:  Zullo will appear during the second hour of the show, not the first, as was previously reported.  The show begins at 5:00 p.m. EDT/4:00 p.m. CDT; Zullo will begin at 6:00 p.m. EDT.

The article, titled, “The inside story of Obama’s birth certificate and the birth of fake news,” quotes from a “memoir” written by Obama Communications Director, Assistant to the President and Senior Advisor Dan Pfeiffer, who asserted that the image said to represent Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate from Hawaii, later found to be fraudulent by a criminal investigation, is authentic.

“The claim that Obama wasn’t born in the United States — the so-called birther conspiracy — first cropped up during the 2008 presidential campaign, when the then Illinois senator was campaigning in Iowa. The story originated in conspiratorial emails that were forwarded by fringe groups in an effort to undercut Obama’s candidacy,” wrote Yahoo! Senior Editor Dylan Stableford.

[Editor’s Note:  The above-cited article contains expletives, quoting Pfeiffer.]  The article clearly is an attempt to ridicule the “birther conspiracy,” the name given by the mainstream media to anyone asking questions about Obama’s eligibility while also labeling questioners “racist.”

While the author contends that “the mainstream media mostly refused to amplify it,” meaning the questions about Obama’s eligibility which arose in 2007, he does not include the fact that The Honolulu Advertiser, NPR, MSNBC and Obama’s own biographer all reported him as having been born in a foreign country, either Indonesia or Kenya.

Stableford erroneously described the Obama “short-form” birth certificate image, posted by the White House only after the “long-form” was made public on April 27, 2011, as a “Certificate of Live Birth” when it is identified as a “Certification of Live Birth.” In fact, it is the long-form image that bears the title, “Certificate of Life Birth.”

The promo to Pfeiffer’s book, set to be released on Tuesday, is written from a political standpoint, calling Obama “a decent and thoughtful president” who was “succeeded by a buffoonish reality star.”

Pfeiffer is said to contend in the book that the term “fake news” came into existence on the day the long-form image was released.  In an archive of Pfeiffer’s blog post that day featuring the image and a press conference Obama gave directly after its release, Pfeiffer himself called the questions surrounding Obama’s birthplace and constitutional eligibility to serve as president “a fake issue.”

Stableford does not report that after the birth certificate image was posted, a number of experts went on-the-record to say that it was a poorly-crafted forgery. Those analyses ultimately led to the launching of a criminal investigation into the image’s origins by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO), then led by Sheriff Joseph Arpaio.

Arpaio delegated the task to his Cold Case Posse, consisting of former professional law enforcers and attorneys. After several days of analysis, the group found that it could not clear the document as authentic.

A five-year investigation then ensued which the mainstream media virtually ignored or misreported. At a third and final press conference held on December 15, 2016, Zullo revealed that two forensic analysts, working separately, on different continents and without knowledge of one another, arrived at very similar conclusions to his own: that the “long-form” birth certificate image is a “computer-generated forgery.”

For his part, Arpaio, who turned 85 on Thursday and is running for the U.S. Senate from Arizona, said in several television interviews that the long-form birth certificate image bearing the name “Barack Hussein Obama” is “a fake document.”  Arpaio has also said that the results of the investigation show that Obama would not be qualified to work at the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, which Arpaio led for 24 years.

Ironically, it was Donald Trump who first questioned Obama’s bona fides in a public way early in 2011, when he was considering challenging Obama for the White House the following year.  Without presenting any evidence or citations, Stableford claimed that in publicly questioning Obama’s eligibility, Trump “was trying to generate publicity for his NBC reality show, ‘The Celebrity Apprentice.’”

The Yahoo! article quotes Pfeiffer as having described Obama in his book as “an American citizen” but not a “natural born Citizen,” a requirement appearing in Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution solely for the president and commander-in-chief.

Stableford additionally misspelled the name of Obama’s then-White House Counsel, Robert Bauer as “Bower” throughout, including quoting that which Pfeiffer reportedly wrote in his book.

While the article claims, quoting Pfeiffer, that Obama directed Bauer and then-advisor David Plouffe to obtain his “long form” birth certificate, the American public was told that Perkins Coie Attorney Judith Corley, Obama’s then-personal attorney, was the individual who traveled to the Hawaii Department of Health to obtain two certified copies thereof.

Stableford reported that Obama “address reporters” on the afternoon of April 27, 2011, when in fact, he spoke publicly about the release of the birth certificate image shortly after 9:30 AM EDT.

New:  One of the topics Zullo plans to discuss is the Congressional Research Service (CRS) memos published between 2009 and 2011 about which legal scholar Joseph DeMaio wrote four thought-provoking analyses which can be found here:

Part 1:  https://www.thepostemail.com/2012/02/20/of-presidential-eligibility-doubling-down-and-linguistic-torts-part-1/

Part 2:  https://www.thepostemail.com/2012/02/22/of-presidential-eligibility-doubling-down-and-linguistic-torts-part-2/

Part 3:  https://www.thepostemail.com/2012/02/24/of-presidential-eligibility-doubling-down-and-linguistic-torts-part-3/

Part 4 (conclusion):  https://www.thepostemail.com/2012/02/26/of-presidential-eligibility-doubling-down-and-linguistic-torts-conclusion/

DeMaio’s related work can be found here.

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. A lot of hard work by honest minded people went into this exposure. Thank you as being a faithful reporter of the facts from the beginning Post and Email.

  2. History revisited to those who may not remember on the one subject that Mike Zullo and Carl Gallups were talking about, the first CRS Memo. This is how the first CRS Memo surfaced to the public (which was circulated secretly to members of Congress in the spring of 2009) in response to the Kerchner et al vs Obama and Congress et al lawsuit. It was leaked to Atty Mario Apuzzo by a congressional staffer who thought he should know about it since he was bringing the lawsuit against Obama, Congress, and others and it was working its way through the appeals court on the way to the Supreme Court. See: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/members-of-congress-memo-what-to-tell.html and https://www.scribd.com/doc/41131059/crs-congressional-internal-memo-what-to-tell-your-constituents-regarding-obama-eligibility-questions Subsequent to the reveal of the secret first one, which circulated secretly to members of Congress so they were all on the same page in responding to constituents communications about the hue and cry about Obama’s lack of constitutional eligibility, two additional ones were created for Congress. And it is correctly stated that these CRS Memos were full of misinformation to the members of Congress and by commission and omission. But imo most members of Congress if at not all in both political parties were quite willing to use the misinformation to hide behind and duck the issue of confronting Obama’s lack of Article II constitutional eligibility. The FIX was in on this subject by both political parties: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2010/01/24/i-believe-the-fix-was-in-for-the-2008-election-and-the-cover-up-is-still-going-strong-the-perfect-storm-for-a-constitutional-crisis/ The 2nd and 3rd were made public immediately. Subsequent to Atty Apuzzo getting the copy via a FedEx package and his blogging about it on his blog, it was then picked up a few days later by World Net Daily and published to a wider audience. CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) – ProtectOurLiberty.org

  3. I’d like to see more things written up and folks commenting about Nancy Pelosi and others who “vetted” obama by signing off on a form. I can’t remember the other ladies name who signed off on it also.
    Nancy Pelosi needs to be held accountable before she turns into a vegetable, (it appears that’s how she’s going to end up by the way she’s acting).

  4. “Congress protects Obama to protect themselves”. Since I starting saying that in 2009 a lot more people in addition to Congress are also protecting Obama to protect themselves. All complicit in the mother of all crimes against America’s citizens and her Constitution are desperately trying to get Trump out of office, some by their actions, and others by their refusal to act.

    The is why so many people who I admire for openly trying to reveal Obama’s fraud over the years could not be allowed to be successful, no matter what evidence they showed, or how much of their time and money they invested,……….even if it was absolute proof………they were going to be stopped to prevent the truth about Barry from taking down the entire Deep State………When this finally breaks wide open, they will all be heroes in the battle to restore the Constitution and the rule of law to America’s government.

  5. P&E Thanks for your continued coverage of the fraud of Obummer. You have been steadfast.

    Many other news services had ceased covering this huge issue. Indeed, I hope you’ll do a
    followup article on this evenings show with Gallup and Zullo. As usual, please note the
    links to the radio show.

    Your articles are helpful to me for I print them out to fully study them to get greatly informed
    when I share this information with others.

    P.S. When this issue of fake Obummer blows, it will be noted that the P&E was most faithful.