Spread the love


by Sharon Rondeau

(Jan. 26, 2018) — On Friday afternoon, the Fox News Channel’s host of “Justice with Judge Jeanine” Jeanine Pirro wrote in a tweet that “FBI under Jim Comey turned into political operation.”  She then asked, “Anyone surprised?”

Pirro included a link to a Fox News article by Brooke Singman on the topic of the perceived politicization of the law-enforcement agency as evidenced by text messages exchanged between two high-level FBI employees recruited to serve on  Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller’s “Russia” investigation.

Special Agent for Counterintelligence Peter Strzok and FBI attorney Lisa Page were reportedly romantically involved and exchanged tens of thousands of text messages over at least 18 months, some of which appear to show a bias in favor of then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and dislike for Donald Trump.  At least one text message indicates that then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch had foreknowledge that Clinton would not be criminally charged for mishandling classified information on her private email server while Obama’s Secretary of State.

Strzok was one of the agents who interviewed Clinton just before then-FBI Director James Comey exonerated her in a press conference on July 5, 2016, to the surprise of many, including within the agency.

Recent reportage indicates that Page may have leaked internal FBI information to The Wall Street Journal just before the November 8, 2016 presidential election.

Singman’s article begins:

Newly revealed texts between Trump-bashing FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page show the “fix was in” during Hillary Clinton’s email probe in 2016, Republican lawmakers say.

Obama claims that he was born in Honolulu, HI on August 4, 1961 at the Kapiolani Medical Center for Women & Children, but neither that hospital nor any other in the country or world has claimed to be his birthplace.  Throughout his adult life, various news sources have reported his birth as Kenya or Indonesia in addition to Hawaii, and both The Washington Post and the AP have related conflicting life narratives for the former White House occupant and U.S. Senator.

Given that the FBI undoubtedly knew about but refused to investigate the uploading in 2011 of a “computer-generated forgery” to the White House website said to represent Barack Hussein Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate, The Post & Email responded to Pirro’s tweet with:

Ironically, on her January 6, 2018 show, Pirro had confronted Democratic strategist David Goodfriend with a disarming, “Have you ever seen a long-form?” after Goodfriend claimed that President Donald Trump is “bonkers” for claiming that Obama “was never a citizen,” meaning “a U.S. citizen.”

Trump had been the first high-profile person to openly question Obama’s constitutional eligibility early in 2011, which Trump believes was a catalyst in the release of the “long-form” image posted at whitehouse.gov on April 27 of that year.

Despite several industry experts having declared the image an abject forgery almost immediately, the mainstream media, including Fox News, refused to report or investigate the claims.

One week after surprising Goodfriend with her out-of-the-blue question, on January 13, Pirro hosted former Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph Arpaio, who commissioned the birth certificate investigation which determined, after an exhaustive five years and consultation with two well-known forensic experts, that the birth certificate image  is a forgery.

During the week preceding his appearance on “Justice,” Arpaio had declared himself a candidate for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by Sen. Jeff Flake at the end of his term, which ends in early January 2019.

Pirro first asked the former lawman why he launched a Senate run at the age of 85, to which Arpaio responded that he intends to support Trump’s agenda and represent the people of Arizona if elected.  The interview turned to the subject of illegal aliens, on which Arpaio was perceived by many to have taken a stringent position during his 24 years as Maricopa County sheriff.

She then asked Arpaio for his “thoughts” on why or how a false missile-attack warning had been issued by someone within the State of Hawaii’s government that morning.  Arpaio responded by disparaging Hawaii government as it  government “during a certain investigation on a fake, fraudulent government document, they can’t even solve that case; they don’t even want to look at it…”

Pirro quickly denied Arpaio’s claim, falsely telling Arpaio and her audience that the birth certificate had been “filed” and “solved.”  She did not say where or with whom the image was allegedly “filed” or what had been “solved.”

When Arpaio continued to press the birth certificate issue with Hawaii as a bad actor, Pirro responded that she would continue to “push back on that,” then hastily redirected the interview back to the topic of illegal immigration.

While a local Fox affiliate reported one year ago that the Fox News Channel monitored the third and final press conference on the birth certificate investigation given by lead investigator Mike Zullo on December 15, 2016, FNC failed to report the results:  that two forensic analysts on two different continents using respectively different approaches arrived at the same conclusion as Zullo had nearly five years before:  that the long-form birth certificate image touted as a scan of a certified copy from the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) cannot possibly be genuine.

As it has for the last nearly-six years, the mainstream media continues to obscure the matter of the birth certificate forgery and marginalize anyone questioning Obama’s background or birthplace as a “birther.”

For the last two months, as the news of a politicized FBI, Justice Department and the surveillance of the Trump campaign under highly questionable circumstances has emerged, Zullo has been appearing regularly on radio shows to discuss how the “Deep State” may have been instrumental in creating and promoting the birth certificate as authentic “with the intent to deceive” an unsuspecting American electorate.

On January 18, Zullo predicted on the Bill Martinez Live! show that in regard to the truth about the birth certificate image, the “dam is going to break.”





Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Kraig Koller

    I don’t believe that, “blanket pardon”, thing would work. The scope of the effects of what Congress failed to do is HUGE. Here is one example, which would happen thousands of times over.

    Let’s say constituents visit a member of Congress who did nothing to stop Obama from being sworn-in, in spite many red flags that he should have been thoroughly investigated before being allowed to be Commander-in-Chief of America’s military. Instead, the Congressperson did/said nothing and lied to those who contacted them about the Obama fraud, and they did this for years, covering for Obama’s fraudulent presidency. The Congress member says when confronted by the loved ones of someone killed or injured in battle in America’s military, after having been sent there by a known fake Commander-in-Chief who the Congressperson knew was not legitimate, “I’m sorry that happened, but I got a pardon from Trump on that issue”. Something tells me that simply would not work. The loved ones are not going to say, “Well, OK I guess”. That is just one reason of thousands why you can’t just let people off the hook who knowingly did not do their job, violated their sworn oath to the Constitution and literally gave America’s government and her military to the enemy.

    Members of Congress all received a “Sheriff’s Kit” explaining Obama’s proven forged birth certificate and thousands of other pieces of evidence via fax, phone calls, letters, emails, and ever personal visits…..and they blew all of that off because they knew it was too late to get out of the treasonous act they had committed without severe consequences. They allowed and protected Obama while he pretended to be Commander-in-Chief for 8 years, and they and others complicit in his usurpation still protect him today….and tomorrow. What happened and the effects of what happen extend far and wide and cannot be “fixed” by a presidential pardon. A library could be filled which books defining events which happened during the Obama charade and the consequences of those events, all because people whose job it was to prevent the usurpation of America’s presidency failed to do so. Of course there are many other people involved, in addition to the failed Congress, who are complicit in the Obama fraud. Obama was protected from impeachment or a real investigation from the moment he was sworn in….and he is still protected by the many complicit in his usurpation, as is anyone who could lead to him. This is done to protect those complicit. It began in January 2009, the minute Obama was allowed to be sworn in and today it is still ongoing. Trump’s election created a panic among those complicit in the biggest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people.

  2. Let’s assume the democrat, chicago political machine claimed they had something on any one in congress, would use it against them if they investigated obama before, during and after his holding office.
    President Trump can grant a blanket pardon for all of congress for them to be deposed.
    Remember obama used this tactic to get elected in chicago the first time he ran.
    Come on people, this is too easy.

  3. treason_ fighter,

    The moment Congress allowed Obama to be sworn in as the putative president they violated their sworn oath to protect the Constitution from her enemies, both foreign and domestic…..as they literally gave America’s government and her military to the enemy. From that moment until today Congress, both parties, and others complicit in the Obama fraud protect Obama to protect themselves. They could not “undo” that moment in 2009 when Obama was sworn in and they had done absolutely nothing to prevent it. They blackmailed themselves and believed the only way out of their treasonous act was to protect Obama’s fake legitimacy, and that is what they did for the 8 years of Obama’s fake presidency….and most are still doing. That complicity made Jeff Session a bad choice for AG.

  4. Americans are being forced to accept the “mainstream media” narrative and the disparagement of those who even question Obama’s birthplace as “birthers”. This is a sickening nightmare that has extended itself for almost 10 years. It seems that no matter how many alarms go off Congress and those who should be interested in getting to the bottom of all this will not wake up.I do think they are beginning to smell the coffee but that they think American’s will soon forget and all will be swell if they just ignore the facts long enough.

  5. Knowledge says try him for treason, ignorance says he’s just fine as America’s first black president (“because that’s who we are”).

    Knowledge says he will never possess the NBC PEDIGREE of 1789 nor will he ever possess the “AMERICA FIRST” PHILOSOPHY OF 1789, ignorance says we don’t care about 1789 or the ancient “U.S. Constitution”.

    Knowledge says he is fraught with fraud, ignorance says “open border inclusion” is better than “incrimination discrimination”.

    Knowledge projection is The P&E, ignorance protection is CNN

    Inconvenient knowledge vs willful ignorance 08-28-08- TODAY

    Knowledge is power in the minds of We the People, ignorance is power in the hands of U.S. Government forgers.

    When the ID-knowledge of TRUMP=ZULLO=RONDEAU=TAITZ is unleashed onto humanity, the carefully narrated ignorance of NEVER-ID NEVER-presIDent SOETORO-OBAMA II will evaporate overnight. This 10-year crime of nationally syndicated ID-ignorance is now ready for prime time…knowledge TRUMPs ignorance.

  6. Fox news is no friend of the birthers. O’ Reilly called us “Pinheads”, Smith used derogatory terms, now Jeanine has joined the club. Fox news is keeping a distance from the Obama usurpation. Albeit, not as far from it at the likes of CNN and MSNBC and their cadre of “fake news” purveyors. Muslim interests own a full 6% of Fox news which has offices in Dubai,UAE.

    Dubai, UAE is where Obama has a mansion in which he plans to live, should he ever have to flee the US. Dubai has no extradition treaty. Obama is constitutionally barred from being President and I don’t say that because he had two terms already. I say that because he is NOT a “Natural Born Citizen” of the U.S. Obama is ineligible to be President.,given the legally established definition of NBC determined by SCOTUS in cases such as the Venus; Minor v Happersett; Shanks v Dupont and Wong Kim Ark. A “Natural born citizen is one born in the United States TO PARENTS who are BOTH US CITIZENS”