PLAINTIFF: OBAMA “STILL ON THE PAYROLL”
by Sharon Rondeau
(Apr. 23, 2017) — On Friday, plaintiff and former presidential candidate Cody Robert Judy filed an “Appearance of Counsel” in his lawsuit against Barack Hussein Obama, the DNC, and political action committee Organizing for America.
After a dismissal of the case was issued by U.S. District Court Judge Ted Stewart on April 10, Judy appealed to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals when Obama happened to be vacationing on the French Polynesian island of Tahiti.
Obama recently returned to the United States and plans to give an address at the University of Chicago on Monday morning. The topic on which Obama will reportedly concentrate is “community organizing,” something for which he became known from his time in Chicago during the mid-1980s.
The speech is reported by ABC News to be “invitation only” for in-person attendees but will be live-streamed on the Internet.
Although claiming a birth in Honolulu, HI, Chicago has also been called Obama’s “home town.” While living in the Hyde Park section, Obama was first elected to public office as a state senator. In 2004, he was elected by overwhelming numbers to be the junior U.S. Senator from the state of Illinois.
On Sunday, ABC reported that “Three people were killed and at least 24 others have been wounded in shootings across Chicago since Friday evening.” Violence in Chicago escalated sharply during Obama’s eight years in the White House, part of which occurred under the mayoral leadership of Obama’s former Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel.
Although pledging to finish his term without contemplating a run for the presidency, Obama changed course in early 2007, when he announced his candidacy for the White House from Springfield, the birthplace of Abraham Lincoln.
Judy’s lawsuit bases its claims on the Clayton Act and Sherman Anti-Trust Act, which can include alleged criminal violations on the part of the defendants and can be presented directly to a judge rather than a prosecutor or grand jury.
Since 2008, Judy has maintained that Obama does not meet the definition of “natural born Citizen” as required for the president by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution. Since August 2008, dozens of lawsuits have been filed seeking to disqualify Obama or to simply determine his eligibility given that his father was never a U.S. citizen.
Thus far, no public servant has undertaken the task. In 2010, U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas laughingly told Rep. José Serrano during a hearing that the high court was “evading” the question of what it means to be a “natural born Citizen.”
Along with the Tenth Circuit, Judy’s case has also been appealed to U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch.
Originally filed in July 2014, the case made its way to the Supreme Court once before, in June 2015, but was quashed when Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor denied Judy’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. Judy found Sotomayor’s decision surprising given that the two lower federal courts had approved that status.
In late January, Judy refiled the case with the U.S. District Court, including new information released by then-Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff Joseph Arpaio’s office and specifically, by criminal investigator Mike Zullo, regarding his 5+-year probe into the long-form birth certificate image placed on the White House website on April 27, 2011.
Commissioned by Arpaio at the request of more than 250 constituents, the investigation took Zullo to Hawaii on two occasions and to Washington, DC on several occasions, where he attempted to enlist the help of current and former congressmen in exposing the evidence he had collected showing that the birth certificate image is a “computer-generated forgery.”
Also found fraudulent by the investigation is Obama’s Selective Service registration form which was released to FOIA requesters in two different versions.
At a final press conference on December 15, 2016, Zullo revealed that two forensic analysts approaching the birth certificate image from different disciplines reached very similar conclusions to his own: that the image cannot possibly represent a real, paper document.
A former NSA and CIA contractor, Dennis Montgomery, said to possess extraordinary software skills, also reportedly declared the image “not genuine” after performing his own forensic analysis of it.
Despite the new information indicative of federal crimes having been committed in the forgery of government documentation bearing Obama’s name, Stewart remained unmoved and dismissed Judy’s Motion for Reconsideration on April 10 with the justification that “…The Court previously denied Plaintiff’s Motion for Service of Process and dismissed all claims against Defendants. Therefore, it was unnecessary for the Court to await a response from Defendants before deciding the Motion.”
When The Post & Email asked Judy the significance of the document, he responded:
The significance of this Appearance of Counsel paper is it in fact acts as Service upon the Defendants Officially in the Tenth Circuit. For all intensive purposes if Obama doesn’t respond, they should hold him in Default.
In the past they have acted as his lawyer, but I really think it had a lot to do with his being in Office. People really need to understand that he is making the wage of a Cabinet Member… just like Hillary Clinton’s wage as Secretary of State. Remember the ire in the public about her? Where is it for Obama when he’s STILL on the payroll?