Obama Eligibility/Forgery Lawsuit: Judge Says Defendants Not Required to Respond to Criminal Allegations

“IN LEAGUE WITH THE DEFENDANTS”

by Sharon Rondeau

(Apr. 11, 2017) — On Monday evening, the pro se plaintiff in a presidential-eligibility lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah informed The Post & Email that Judge Ted Stewart issued an opinion dated April 10, 2017 denying his Motion for Reconsideration.

The case challenged not only Barack Hussein Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president amid claims of financial injury, but also informed the court of evidence that crimes appear to have been committed in connection with Obama’s tenure.

A one-page document (shown at right), Stewart’s opinion states that because he dismissed the case previously, he is doing so again.

As explanation, Stewart wrote, in part, “…The Court previously denied Plaintiff’s Motion for Service of Process and dismissed all claims against Defendants. Therefore, it was unnecessary for the Court to await a response from Defendants before deciding the Motion.”

Since 2008, Judy has contended that Obama does not meet the “natural born Citizen” criterion set forth in Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution. A presidential candidate himself in 2008, 2012 and 2016, in 2008 Judy filed lawsuits against Obama and Sen. John McCain, Obama’s general-election rival.

Judy maintains that the Constitution’s “natural born Citizen” clause requires the nation’s chief executive to be born in the United States to two U.S.-citizen parents.

Obama claims a birth in Honolulu, HI on August 4, 1961 to a U.S.-citizen mother and British-citizen father who never naturalized as an American.  McCain was born in Panama to two U.S.-citizen parents, one of whom was serving as a U.S. Navy Admiral at the time.

Judy’s dual claims that neither met the constitutional requirement were dismissed by the courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court.

In July 2014, Judy filed a new lawsuit under the Clayton Act, Sherman Anti-Trust Act and Civil Rights Act violations alleging that as a constitutionally-ineligible candidate, Obama had caused financial injury to his own candidacy.  The case was presented to Stewart after Judge Bruce Jenkins recused himself for an unspecified reason.

In response to Jenkins’s recusal, Judy then commented:

Yesterday, July 24th, 2014 I received notice that the originally assigned senior Judge Bruce S. Jenkins recused himself by an order he originated. This Order was not pre-empted with a Motion for Recusal by me or the Defendant(s) in the case.

To my knowledge this has never happened before in any case to date which in some way involved Obama’s qualifications, or injury due to the ineligibility, qualification, or occupation of the Office of the President involving Obama in a plea for the Court’s due process for injury in a Civil Rights and Federal Act violation Complaint associated with the allegations asserted by myself as a Presidential Candidate in the presidential election race(s) 2008, 2012, 2016.

In June 2015, the case reached the U.S. Supreme Court with an application to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning that as a citizen of very modest means, Judy is not able to pay the customary filing, copying and postage expenses.

While both the U.S. District Court and Tenth District Court of Appeals had granted Judy’s request for in forma pauperis, the U.S. Supreme Court, without elucidation, denied it in late September of that year after reconvening from its summer recess.

The high court, however, could have issued its opinion much earlier, Judy said, as he was told by a court clerk that the justices continue to review cases during the months of July, August, and September when they are not in session.

In a recent two-part series published at The Post & Email, Judy detailed developments in the case, which included his informing Stewart in late January, under U.S. criminal code, that new evidence had come to light amplifying his claim that Obama was constitutionally-ineligible to serve as president.

Judy’s Motion for Reconsideration was followed by an Order to Show Cause on February 27, which noted that the court had issued its denial ruling prematurely.

On March 28, Judy filed a Notice for Decision/Judgement informing the court that the Defendants’ deadline to respond to his Motion for Reconsideration was due within a few days, prompting Stewart’s response issued on Monday.

The new evidence Judy presented to Stewart was gleaned from a December 15, 2016 press conference given by Mike Zullo, who led a five-year investigation into an image posted at whitehouse.gov said to be a scan of a certified copy of Obama’s long-form birth certificate.  Zullo, who in 2012 had declared the image a “computer-generated forgery,” revealed that two highly-acclaimed forensic analysts with no knowledge of each other arrived at conclusions very similar to his own based on “nine points of forgery.”

Zullo worked under the auspices of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO), commissioned by then-Sheriff Joseph Arpaio.  A former detective, Zullo initially led the sheriff’s Cold Case Posse in the probe, later completing all of the extended investigative work alone.

“The court filed its response to the Motion for Relief of Judgement too quickly, which is why I filed the Motion for Reconsideration.  Basically [in Monday’s ruling], the judge was saying, ‘Yes, we did respond too quickly, but the defendants were not required to respond anyway,'” Judy said of the opinion.

In an interview on Tuesday, he told us:

What we have now is a judge to whom I have reported a crime from Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse report from neutral forensic investigators who have nothing to do with Mike Zullo or the sheriff.  We have me going to the court reporting a crime under the two Acts which give me the ability to report a crime, submitting it as new evidence, and the judge refusing to acknowledged the substantial evidence warranting the court’s investigation or trial.

This is a case that shows the judge is in league with the defendants.

The court’s purpose is to bring the evidence to a trial jury or to convene a grand jury.  The judge has a lot of options here.  With the Order to Show Cause that I gave him, the judge had the right to tell the defendants, “Hey, you have to respond to these allegations.”  It gave him a blank line to give them so many days.  The judge had the ability to serve the defendants and give them another 20 days, just like a summons.

This really puts the judge in a compromised position as far as a crime.  This is misprision of felony.

 In Part 2, The Post & Email will reveal Judy’s plan going forward and identify jurists whose names will undoubtedly arise.

8 Responses to "Obama Eligibility/Forgery Lawsuit: Judge Says Defendants Not Required to Respond to Criminal Allegations"

  1. Darrel   Sunday, April 16, 2017 at 8:28 PM

    Mike Zullo to appear on Gallup’s show in very near future with breaking news.

    Volin went to Washington in March.

    Vips with perfect standing are lining up.

    It won’t be long now. Obama will be impeached.

  2. Cody Judy   Thursday, April 13, 2017 at 11:46 AM

    BIRTHER BLOOD MONEY – Spilling Blood for Justice.

    Never wanted to be a person or Politician whose words were weak compared to Actions. Hoped I’ve never asked anyone to do as I say, and not do as I do.

    Since the Action in Court Reported by The Post & Email I would like to thank the 2 modest donations I’ve received.

    Unfortunately it doesn’t cover even Postage and so I have covered the rest with 8 donations of blood. Saving lives with Plasma donations that pay modestly on a credit card that I can then use as cash for Postage.

    https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/852541744184819713

    It seems to me giving my blood for Justice saves lives both ways and modestly provides a way without excuse to donate a little bit.

    When you believe what your contributing towards is a worthy cause, and who says Seeking Justice isn’t a worthy cause, even President Trump publicly prayed for in the USA to be a place for Justice, who is left with an excuse?

    Jesus Christ noticed the ” Widows Mite” in ST. MARK 12:42-44 that she gave not of her increase, but of what she survived on. Oh that we were also noticed under the Heaven’s?

    If you go to a #BIOMAT USA and donate for the first time, mention my name, Cody Robert Judy, and I will receive a $50 dollar referral bonus.

    Thank you again for the 2 modest donations I have received since January 2017- Every dollar counts!

    CRJ
    Contribute on PayPal safe/secure
    http://www.codyjudy.us

    codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011

  3. JONATHAN DAVID MOOERS   Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 9:27 PM

    WALTER WHITE:

    Your comments herein lead me to believe you are a supporter of the Theft Left, content to trip up Cody Judy on legal technicalities and lead the read completely away from the central theme altogether: syndicated lawlessness.

    Why?

    Did you miss my 8 FACTS listed below? Can you disprove them and dissolve their firmness and their starkness away with verifiable counter-facts? If you can not, or will not counter them, THEY STAND ON THEIR OWN AS FACTS.

    You and I and all human beings likely have so much in common…we breath the same air, we must eat/sleep/excrete, we have the same organs et al…but when you, and many others, hear these four words, we likely part company completely: “Obama’s FORGED birth certificate”.

    Am I right? Comments?

  4. Stephen Hiller   Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 3:06 PM

    I think Hillary summed it up best when she said, “at this point, what difference does it make?” …
    Please do not be offended by my sarcasm: I mean no insult. But Pres. Trump is trying to undo Obama’s directives one at a time when it could ALL be done in one-fell-swoop. So I have to ask again ( since this one-fell-swoop will never happen ), at his point, what difference DOES IT MAKE ???

  5. Walter White   Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 2:18 PM

    There are so many things wrong with this article. A plaintiff can’t issue an Order to Show Cause. Only courts can that and this court didn’t. Judy is trying to convince the court to open his dead case based on supposed “new evidence”. The so called “new evidence” has nothing to do with why his case was dismissed in the first place. The so called “new evidence” is nothing but speculation from Zullo that no one takes seriously.

    The Cold Case Posse has been disbanded and Mike Zullo has been terminated from any affiliation with the MCSO in any capacity. The investigation is over.

    Judy’s case was a civil case and not a criminal complaint. He never served anyone properly and that it why the court tossed it out as frivolous. The court had no need to wait on anyone to toss this silly motion for reconsideration or whatever he wants to call it.

  6. Cody Judy   Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 1:42 PM

    @JefreyHarrison – Thank you, I appreciate that! You are absolutely correct. Without Justice we are all subject to “injustice”. I really do not know anyone who is happy with the latter regardless of political affiliation.

    The egregious condition of fraudulent elections by an Constitutionally Unqualified Candidate who we are paying in retirement is a gross and shameful state of manipulated coercion that reduces Americans to subjects rather than Citizens of our Republic.

    The poor suffer most. I thank every one for their laudable contributions of time and talent you are most apart of. May God help us.

    CRJ
    http://www.codyjudy.us

  7. JONATHAN DAVID MOOERS   Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 10:42 AM

    Thank you, everyone on this site, for keeping the lights on!

    “Obama II” has escaped prison for ID-felony because millions of minions called “U.S. Government” have colluded together 08-28-08- TODAY to cover-up the full truthful identity of “Obama II”. That would be these protected “Obamacrats” et al: http://www.thepostemail.com/2017/04/09/america-hard-fix/

    The American public does not want to believe it has been duped 08-28-08- TODAY.

    Virtually all blacks violently oppose accepting that “America’s first black president” is actually false advertising for “America’s first muslim-mulatto non-president”.

    The nationally syndicated courts do not want to subpoena “Obama II” and fully identify him so EVERY SINGLE COURT IN USA HAS COLLUDED TOGETHER TO ENSURE THAT SOME 320,000,000 AMERICAN CITIZENS WILL BE ROBBED ANEW EACH DAY OF THEIR INALIENABLE RIGHT-TO-KNOW, THE FULL IDENTITY OF ” OBAMA II”.

    The quisling for-profit propaganda press does not want to damage their revenues by sleuthing and broadcasting the full identity of “Obama II”.

    The only suit “Obama II” looks good in is a lawsuit.

    But even with “Sheriff Kits” handed to Congressmen, hundreds of lawsuits initiated (and thwarted), oceans of 1NF0 and ventertainment blogs generated, books written, Trump’s broadcast challenges, Zullo testimonials et al, over the past 8 years, it seems, responsible national leaders and private folks on Main Street USA do not want to surrender their pride, or possibly their livelihoods, to the full internalized knowledge that their own nation was harmed and humiliated by a U.S. Government-sponsored Muslim Brotherhood infiltrator-traitor called “Barry Soetoro-Obama II”.

    12-7-41 9-11-01 08-28-08

    How do we now stop the fail time and jump start the jail time on this potentially “universe shattering” matter?

    Think, and ye shall find.

    First, PUBLICIZE THESE 8 INDISPUTABLE FACTS, that stand each day like granite obelisks, all over America:

    ARREST BARRY SOETORO-OBAMA FOR ID-FELONY AND TREASON

    FACT 1: 1789 http://constitutionus.com/

    FACT 2: 08-28-08 http://canadafreepress.com/2009/williams091209.htm

    FACT 3: http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/birther%20case%20list.pdf

    FACT 4: http://www.wnd.com/2012/08/officer-imprisoned-for-challenging-obama-tells-his-story/

    FACT 5: 4-27-11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QM2GJn6hpJE

    FACT 6: http://www.wnd.com/2014/05/trump-obama-rejected-50-million-for-birth-records/

    FACT 7: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuhF-Ok3djI

    FACT 8: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-115

    WHILE THESE 8 FACTS, YOUR FACTS, CAN NOT LIE AND DIE, ONLY FACT FIGHTERS CAN LIE AND DIE!

    Second, Knowledge Patriots (“birthers”) now challenge the supposed “good guys”: query the internalized Obama-knowledge of Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney et al; challenge/out “No Spin” Bill O’Reilly to convert to Bill O’Reality and broadcast Obama’s full identity; do the same for the good investigative reporters Sharyl Attkisson et al; challenge Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch to issue FOIA’s to secure 17 identity documents listed in Item 207 A- Q herein: http://www.carlgallups.com/zullo-affidavit.pdf ; why does Judicial Watch only attack the symptoms and, its sister, Freedom Watch, attacks both the symptoms and the source, namely, “Obama II”? Inform and encourage “good cops” Donald Trump and AG Sessions to arrest “Obama II” and clear the way to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN = DEMO DEMOCRATS + RENOVATE AMERICA.

    Knowledge is power within the minds of We the People; ignorance is power in the hands of ID-forgers and other truth-traitors.

    TO DO: Empower all private Citizens with 8 FACTS herein and challenge the “good guys” to fully UNMASK “Obama II”.

    KEEP THE LIGHTS ON!

  8. Jeffrey Harrison   Tuesday, April 11, 2017 at 10:10 PM

    Cody, I am in awe of you for your persistence. You are getting your story out and informing citizens about the fraud of Mr. Obama. While the courts have waived your claims and evidence, you have kept on going. For that, I am thankful. You have and are fighting this crime, not only for yourself but for all Americans.

    Many others of us are still in the fight, too, doing what we can. Indeed, I encourage you to continue to stay in the fight. I, like others, will continue to fight…that Obama is held accountable for his fraud.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.