Obama Eligibility/Forgery Lawsuit Appeal Docketed by Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

AND RECEIVED AT U.S. SUPREME COURT

by Sharon Rondeau

Screenshot from Cody Robert Judy’s Twitter timeline on Sunday evening

(Apr. 16, 2017) — On Sunday evening, the plaintiff in a lawsuit alleging financial damages and criminal activity reported that his appeal from the U.S. District Court in Utah to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday received a case number on Friday.

On Thursday, Judy filed appeals with both the Tenth Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court by way of its newest associate Justice, Neil Gorsuch.

The lawsuit, which was twice dismissed by U.S. District Court Judge Ted Stewart, alleges that because of his constitutional ineligibility to hold the office of president, Barack Hussein Obama financially injured plaintiff Cody Robert Judy, who was himself a Democrat presidential candidate in 2008, 2012 and 2016.

Just saw this today. The Notice of Appeal has reached Denver’s 10th Circuit and been designed a Case Number,” Judy wrote in a Facebook message to The Post & Email early on Sunday evening.  “I didn’t know they would give me a Case No. so fast.”

(All document photos courtesy of Cody Robert Judy.)

Notice of appeal filed with U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
Proof of delivery of Cody Robert Judy’s appeal to U.S. Supreme Court

The appeal now appears in the federal pacer.gov system under Case 14-00093:

The reference of “IFP” as to “Fee Status” indicates “in forma pauperis,” meaning that Judy does not have the means to pay customary court fees.

Justia.com has posted its own update:

First filed in July 2014, Judy’s case invoked the Clayton Act and Sherman Anti-Trust Act as its basis, alleging a conspiracy among Obama, the Democrat National Committee (DNC), and Organizing for Action (OFA) to deprive constitutionally-qualified candidates the opportunity to run in a level playing field.

In an interview published on March 29, Judy related that anti-trust laws allow for the submission of evidence of alleged criminal activity in a civil case directly to the presiding judge.

Judy asked Stewart to reconsider his case after submitting evidence made public on December 15, 2016 by Maricopa County Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo revealing that two forensic analysts arrived at similar conclusions as to Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate.

On April 27, 2011, an unknown party or parties posted an image said to be a scan of a certified copy of Obama’s detailed birth record from the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH). However, within hours, experts declared it a poor forgery.

A five-year investigation by Zullo caused him to conclude that the image is a “computer-generated forgery,” with which the two forensic analysts agreed.is a “computer-generated forgery.”

Since 2008, Judy has contended that Obama is not a “natural born Citizen,” as is required by Article II of the Constitution for the president and commander-in-chief.

In 2008, dozens of plaintiffs challenged both Obama and Sen. John McCain on the presidential eligibility issue without success, with the matter of legal “standing” often invoked by the courts resulting in dismissal.

In 2011, however, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion suggesting that a presidential candidate could challenge another candidate prior to the election and be presumed to have “competitive standing.”

Judy frequently posts updates on the case as well as commentary on eligibility, political and other constitutional issues on his blog.

6 Responses to "Obama Eligibility/Forgery Lawsuit Appeal Docketed by Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals"

  1. Cody Judy   Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 6:17 PM

    @Poul “I’m afraid”

    I’m sure the “original Citizens” of the Constitution mentioned in Article II, Section I, Clause 5 ie. ‘Citizens at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution”, were also afraid they would lose, and be hung for Treason against the Crown as subjects rather then Citizens of a New Nation.

    The question to ask is did ‘fear’ stop them?

    George Washington’s 1780’s Quote serves me well in times of uncertainty

    “I am sure there never was a people, who had more reason to acknowledge a divine interposition in their affairs, than those of the United States; and I should be pained to believe, that they have forgotten that agency, which was so often manifested during our revolution, or that they failed to consider the omnipotence of that God, who is alone able to protect them.”

    Men have called me every name in the book, and I have suffered for 8 years at the point of the sword as an Article II Patriot. I have lost many battles myself some 15 Court Cases, but still a still small voice has urged me on.

    You may discern it as you will.

  2. Cody Judy   Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 6:05 PM

    Re: Gary “Birthers” & the “Senate Judiciary”

    You are correct the the House and Senate have the ability to convene Courts according to Article I, Section 8, Clause 9 “To convene Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court”, if my memory serves me correctly. The Senate Judiciary Committee is not a Court I have ever heard of?

    In fact John McCain had a non-binding senate resolution (U.S. Sen Res 511 Text of Res.
    [ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/sres511/text ]
    ) commissioned for him from that same old good ole boy club he was a member of, however it was of course “non-binding” meaning it never went to the House of Representatives. Thus even with Sen. McCain we saw that the Senate doesn’t have all that power you insinuate they do.

    The Senate becomes jury and judge, except [in the case of presidential impeachment trials] when the chief justice of the United States presides. The Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached official is removal from office.

    Never being qualified for the Office of the President, “impeachment trial” was never the answer, because you can’t impeach he who is not qualified. Amendment 14 Sec 3 does state those who have taken an oath holding office committing treason may be “removed as a disability”

    USC 14th Amendment Sect 3. [ No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.]

    Again, Tribunals may be conducted but they are inferior to the supreme court.

    Why do you suppose that is? Your slang of “Birther” is disrespectful to Article II Patriots who honor the Constitution. Shall you be called the after-birth, placenta, or amniotic sac representing the bag of water that is disposed of after birth of absolutely no Constitutional Principle or use?

    The Supreme Court belongs to the Judicial Branch which is a check upon the Executive Branch trying such things as high crimes and misdemeanors. I think it’s very appropriate when theft of identification, falsification of identification, falsification of long form birth certificates are the tools of defrauding the Elections of the United States of America.

    You probably recall the Supreme Court in the counting chads election of GWB v. Gore?
    Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000).

    Now the only question left is why you think defrauding elections and falsifying identification should be allowed in the office of president, and not called a usurpation?

  3. GARY   Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 1:14 PM

    The Senate Judiciary is the only court that has the power to do anything about the Birther issue yet people keep wasting time and money in US Article II Courts. No one to date has ever been able to figure why Birthers do this

    Why have Birthers wasted almost 10 years filing these cases with US Courts when U.S. Courts had no power whatsoever to remove Obama from office and have no power whatsoever to disturb the twice finding by joint sessions of Congress that Obama met all criteria to serve as President and was the lawful President of the U.S.

    I do not believe that anyone will ever figure out why Birthers kept going to courts about this and I do not believe that Birthers will ever tell anyone why they kept going to courts about this.

  4. Poul   Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 11:13 AM

    I’m VERY afraid this going NOWHERE, sorry !!!

  5. Stephen Hiller   Monday, April 17, 2017 at 10:22 AM

    I am sure glad Mr. Judy didn’t have to file with the 9th Circuit Court. It would have been dead in the water for sure.

  6. Harold van allen   Monday, April 17, 2017 at 1:41 AM

    USDC dcd 17-cv-517

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.