AND RECEIVED AT U.S. SUPREME COURT
by Sharon Rondeau
(Apr. 16, 2017) — On Sunday evening, the plaintiff in a lawsuit alleging financial damages and criminal activity reported that his appeal from the U.S. District Court in Utah to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday received a case number on Friday.
On Thursday, Judy filed appeals with both the Tenth Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court by way of its newest associate Justice, Neil Gorsuch.
The lawsuit, which was twice dismissed by U.S. District Court Judge Ted Stewart, alleges that because of his constitutional ineligibility to hold the office of president, Barack Hussein Obama financially injured plaintiff Cody Robert Judy, who was himself a Democrat presidential candidate in 2008, 2012 and 2016.
“Just saw this today. The Notice of Appeal has reached Denver’s 10th Circuit and been designed a Case Number,” Judy wrote in a Facebook message to The Post & Email early on Sunday evening. “I didn’t know they would give me a Case No. so fast.”
(All document photos courtesy of Cody Robert Judy.)
The appeal now appears in the federal pacer.gov system under Case 14-00093:
The reference of “IFP” as to “Fee Status” indicates “in forma pauperis,” meaning that Judy does not have the means to pay customary court fees.
Justia.com has posted its own update:
First filed in July 2014, Judy’s case invoked the Clayton Act and Sherman Anti-Trust Act as its basis, alleging a conspiracy among Obama, the Democrat National Committee (DNC), and Organizing for Action (OFA) to deprive constitutionally-qualified candidates the opportunity to run in a level playing field.
In an interview published on March 29, Judy related that anti-trust laws allow for the submission of evidence of alleged criminal activity in a civil case directly to the presiding judge.
Judy asked Stewart to reconsider his case after submitting evidence made public on December 15, 2016 by Maricopa County Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo revealing that two forensic analysts arrived at similar conclusions as to Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate.
On April 27, 2011, an unknown party or parties posted an image said to be a scan of a certified copy of Obama’s detailed birth record from the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH). However, within hours, experts declared it a poor forgery.
A five-year investigation by Zullo caused him to conclude that the image is a “computer-generated forgery,” with which the two forensic analysts agreed.is a “computer-generated forgery.”
Since 2008, Judy has contended that Obama is not a “natural born Citizen,” as is required by Article II of the Constitution for the president and commander-in-chief.
In 2008, dozens of plaintiffs challenged both Obama and Sen. John McCain on the presidential eligibility issue without success, with the matter of legal “standing” often invoked by the courts resulting in dismissal.
In 2011, however, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion suggesting that a presidential candidate could challenge another candidate prior to the election and be presumed to have “competitive standing.”
Judy frequently posts updates on the case as well as commentary on eligibility, political and other constitutional issues on his blog.