Obama Eligibility/Forgery Lawsuit Headed to Newest Member of Supreme Court

“GORSUCH’S FIRST TEST”

by Sharon Rondeau

(Apr. 14, 2017) — On Tuesday, The Post & Email provided an update on an Obama eligibility lawsuit filed by former presidential candidate Cody Robert Judy to which he recently added new information of a criminal nature, requesting that the judge reconsider his previous dismissal of the case.

Initially filed in July 2014 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, Judge Ted Stewart dismissed Judy’s claim of having sustained financial injury as a result of the presidential candidacy of Barack Hussein Obama based on Judy’s belief that Obama is constitutionally ineligible to serve as president of the United States.

The case is based on the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, Clayton Act and federal civil rights laws and names Obama, the DNC and Organizing for Action (OFA) as defendants.

Judy’s eligibility challenges stem from Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution, which states that the president and commander-in-chief must be 35 years of age, have been 14 years a resident in the United States, and a “natural born Citizen.”

While issues of citizenship have become arguably murky since the Constitution was ratified and as Congress has passed legislation in that arena, Judy and a number of constitutional scholars believe that the “natural born Citizen” requirement was meant to restrict the chief executive to only those bearing sole allegiance to the country through a two-generational citizenship test.

Since he first challenged Obama and Sen. John McCain in 2008 on the issue of presidential eligibility, Judy has said that a candidate must have been born in the United States to two U.S.-citizen parents.  To support the contention, Judy has pointed to the different requirement in the Constitution for U.S. representatives and senators, who need be only “a Citizen.”

Both prior to and following Obama’s ascension to the national political stage, credible sources reported him as born in Kenya or Indonesia.  Obama has himself claimed a father who was never a U.S. citizen.

Judy believes that as an ineligible candidate, Obama harmed Judy’s presidential campaigns of 2008, 2012 and 2016.

By June 2015, the case had made its way from federal district court to the Tenth District Appellate Court to the U.S. Supreme Court. In late September of that year, the high court denied Judy’s request for in forma pauperis status without comment despite the lower two courts having approved it.

On December 15, 2016, an investigator who conducted a lengthy probe into Obama’s proffered identity documentation gave a third and final press update revealing that two forensic analysts, both considered experts in their respective disciplines, had conducted their own examination of the long-form birth certificate image posted on the White House website by the Obama regime on April 27, 2011. Amplifying upon a video presentation featuring nine points of forgery on the Obama image apparently taken from the birth certificate of a person born in Hawaii the same month and year, Mike Zullo explained that neither analyst was aware of the other’s work, but both reached very similar conclusions to his own, announced in two press conferences in 2012.

Zullo’s investigation was commissioned by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) in August 2011, then headed by Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio, at the request of 250 of his constituents.  Zullo found that both Obama’s long-form birth certificate and Selective Service registration form are fraudulent.

Judy perceived the revelations from the December presser to be worthy of submission in his case based upon a provision in the Sherman Anti-Trust Act encompassing criminal violations.  According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC):

The penalties for violating the Sherman Act can be severe. Although most enforcement actions are civil, the Sherman Act is also a criminal law, and individuals and businesses that violate it may be prosecuted by the Department of Justice. Criminal prosecutions are typically limited to intentional and clear violations such as when competitors fix prices or rig bids. The Sherman Act imposes criminal penalties of up to $100 million for a corporation and $1 million for an individual, along with up to 10 years in prison. Under federal law, the maximum fine may be increased to twice the amount the conspirators gained from the illegal acts or twice the money lost by the victims of the crime, if either of those amounts is over $100 million.

In a previous interview, Judy told The Post & Email that the law allows him “to take a criminal complaint directly to a judge, bypassing a federal grand jury and a prosecutor.”

On Monday, April 10, Stewart denied Judy’s Motion for Reconsideration of the case on the basis that he “dismissed all claims against Defendants” previously and they were not required to submit a response to the allegations.

On Tuesday, Judy told The Post & Email that under 28 U.S. Code § 2101, he can petition the U.S. Supreme Court on the matter within a specified time frame.  On his blog on Thursday, he announced that he will send an application for hearing to newly-seated U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch.

Graphic courtesy Cody Robert Judy

Judy explained how he arrived at Gorsuch:

“In my case, Justice Sotomayor is in charge of the Tenth Circuit. However, in my last case at the U.S. Supreme Court, 14-9396, I made the motion to have Sotomayor and Kagan recuse themselves.  Sotomayor is the one who denied my application for in forma pauperis.  I think that was inexcusable and a great disservice to poor people throughout the United States.  They’re basically saying, ‘You have no right to justice because you’re poor.’ I think everyone in America, except maybe the very rich, should be appalled at that.  It needs to be a way to galvanize people throughout the United States.

“In the Supreme Court rules, it says that if a justice is unavailable for any reason – and the reason that I would cite for Sotomayor not being available is her lack of impartiality on my in forma pauperis application – it goes to ‘the next available justice.’

I think I would be prejudiced to have to go to Sotomayor after she blatantly discriminated against me and after I’ve already filed a motion for Kagan and her to recuse themselves.  The motion is still open, and it is not docketed on 14-9396.  It’s a secret within the Supreme Court; the public does not see it.  I have it on my Scribd account where you can verify it.

The law says that the next available justice would be the junior justice.  In Kagan’s case, she was the solicitor general for Obama.  A lot of people said she was involved in eligibility lawsuits, but I didn’t find that.  However, she was definitely involved as a senior adviser and counselor in defending Obamacare.

The next junior justice is Gorsuch.  So this is a big story on Gorsuch’s first test.  He can make a ruling or refer it to the whole court if he chooses.

The inroad to the Supreme Court is really important, and I can do it without filing a Writ of Certiorari, which requires making 11 copies and a lot more money.  I can make it about a five-page thing and send three copies.

What I’m going to do is ask Gorsuch to overrule the denial of the in forma pauperis decision.  The justices can do that; Gorsuch can grant a stay or issue an order that a federal court judge has to file and sign the Order to Show Cause.

This will explain to the Supreme Court that new evidence has come to light describing a crime involving election fraud and fraud upon the public which requires the U.S. Supreme Court.

Congress’s job is to make laws, not serve as a court.

I think we need help on this.  We need everyone involved; this is the last case.  If people could send $2.00, that would really help.


Editor’s Note:  The application to Gorsuch can be read here.

20 Responses to "Obama Eligibility/Forgery Lawsuit Headed to Newest Member of Supreme Court"

  1. Kurt   Monday, April 17, 2017 at 7:19 PM

    Hey GregNH,
    Neither is a birth certificate listed as a requirement of presidency.

  2. Cody Judy   Sunday, April 16, 2017 at 5:12 PM

    Notice of Appeal also reached Denver’s 10th Circuit & has been assigned a Case Number #Birther #LegalNotice @BarackObama
    http://www.thepostemail.com/2017/04/14/obama-eligibilityforgery-lawsuit-headed-newest-member-supreme-court/

    Picture Included on Tweet

    https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/853715779820240896

    This in essence fortified the Appeal both Conventional as well as Unconventional with the Application to Justice Gorsuch in #SCOTUS

  3. JONATHAN DAVID MOOERS   Sunday, April 16, 2017 at 9:51 AM

    First, thank God that the American public has Sharon Rondeau’s website herein to keep this all-important eligibility issue alive, bathed in Light, and prepped for surgery.

    Second, thank God for Cody Judy et al since 08-28-08 to the present time, for keeping the lights on this eligibility-ineligibility issue. Thank you all, fellow Knowledge Patriots (“birthers”), this Easter Sunday 2017!

    Now, after going over all the comments herein, it seems to me that oldsailer84 has the best approach…GO PUBLIC and take the OFFENSIVE!

    Even during the fingertip accessible Internet-age of information, some 320,000,000 American citizens have been robbed anew each day of intellectual property that is always rightfully theirs, that being, the full ineligible identity of a presidential candidate and an incumbent president and a living ex-president, namely, Barry Soetoro-Obama. RELEASE OUR FULL RIGHTFUL KNOWLEDGE FROM ITS HERETOFORE GOVERNMENT-MANUFACTURED PRISON!

    It is time to rise up from subjects to Citizens and look down on our crony government for robbing us daily of something that was/is always ours, being, the full identity of Barry Soetoro-Barack Obama II.

    The passive suspects and active criminals in this case are millions of minions called “U.S. Government”. That’s right, our entire tax-paid-for pension-paid-off “necessary evil” U.S. Government. Our government today is much like Disney’s Fantasia “Sorcerer’s [Soros’]Apprentice” and it is in need of wholesome Citizen intervention and supervision to correct it, to limit it, to punish it as necessary.
    EXHIBIT A: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUcyb5pmUKI

    Let that supervision begin with Cody Judy’s PUBLICALLY BROADCAST ATTACK on the Supreme Court. We won’t look up to these souls in black robes, rather, we will look down on them…ALL OF THEM. In this case, the Citizens are the honest ones who continue to seek their tax-paid-for knowledge that is always rightfully theirs, and the Supreme Court Justices are the dishonest ones right from the get-go…so dishonest, in fact, that they should all be arrested and prosecuted for LIES BY OMISSION 08-28-08- TODAY, should they not?!

    So, God be with you, Cody, and all Knowledge Patriot websites and tunnel vision television outlets and Sharyl Attkission and Larry Klayman and Tom Fitton and Michael Zullo and Orly Taitz and Sharon Rondeau and LTC Lakin and many many other fellow Knowledge Patriots, who must now be alerted and mentally weaponized, like Minutemen heading for Lexington Green for a shot heard ’round the world, to fully assist you!

    Don’t attempt to go it alone, wherein, our crony U.S. Government will do all that it can to keep this case in a sealed perfunctory vacuum. THIS CASE MUST BE FULLY PUBLICIZED ANY WAY IT CAN, AND ALL AMERICAN CITIZENS, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THEY LOVE OR LOATH BARRY SOETORO-OBAMA, ARE MADE ITS PARTICIPATORY STAKEHOLDERS BECAUSE EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM, ALL 320,000,000 OF THEM, ARE MADE TO REALIZE THAT THEY WERE/ARE BEING ROBBED EVERYDAY OF SOMETHING THAT IS/WAS ALWAYS RIGHTFULLY THEIRS, BEING, THE FULL INELIGIBLE IDENTITY OF THEIR OWN “PRESIDENT” WHOM OUR U.S. GOVERNMENT ALLOWED TO ROB OUR NATIONAL SPIRIT VIA A CONSTITUTIONALLY NULL AND VOID PERIOD OF INTERRUPTION 08-28-08 – 1-20-17!

  4. Cody Judy   Saturday, April 15, 2017 at 11:16 PM

    If you would like to help Cody you can do so here
    Cody Judy Contribution Page
    Direct Link
    PayPal safe/secure
    http://codyjudy.us/information/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

    Please see Cody Robert Judy’s websites:

    http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/
    http://www.codyjudy.us

    Great Comments “All Respected” for the Truth they represent in Time. Each is True, but the question is for how long? As the future changes so the Truth of some dissolve into the mirage of the desert.

    @JonathonDavidMoores interesting thoughts about computer generated algorithms for Justice and how we all face truth & consequences for our actions and our silences.

    @JeffreyHarrison – Ultimately I am left as you insinuated to do the work God has called me to do alone and to do it boldly. Thank you, if we had only the Past to guide us of course Birther would lay down and pay homage to the King and his Court for we would have saved yourselves for ever thinking we had a prayer of a chance otherwise against the Royalty crowned of and by the Media.

    We reach into history for guidance of the future at times. I’m recalling Pontius Pilate state of judgement and his wife counselling him for his own eternal welfare in ST.MATT 27:19
    [When he was set down on the judgement seat, his wife sent into him, saying, have thou nothing to do with that just man: for I have suffered many things this day in a dream because of him.]

    Yes, I have seen Judges of bad judgement whose flesh corrupted as their judgement rotting with gangrene because of their unrighteous judgements; having it to be swiped off by the knife as their eternal reward.

    I’ve lost over a dozen Cases to more Judges who tinker with their lots like playing cards on a warm summer day, but that day has never been my Focus. Eternity has been.

    In my dream last night Obama himself showed up. I greeted him as Mr. Obama and shook his hand. He’d showed up at the shin-dig I was at, and all were pleased to be seeing him. He was much taller than I I asked him how Tahiti was, as we drifted apart on our mounts? And he gave a ” Thumbs down” as it was nothing like the United States of America.

    The point I’m making is this. We never know how a judgement might come about or the Timing of it, but it is ours to know “Justice in Truth” from “Corruption” as easily as night and day if we search it and pray with real intent up in it.

    I suffered in solitary confinement for nearly 4 years with guards telling me my cause was frivolous and wholly incredible, but God told me different. He said, hold on… Spring is coming. They are wrong. It proved True.

    Yes, Faith is so important and your own personal relationship with God to do the things you do. That is why I ask for help, but leave it at the line. I make no guarantees, don’t want one either. I’m comfortable, very comfortable with every action I’ve taken as the right action in the Big Picture – Sandune to Sandune.

    The Oasis may not be in this life, but it’s there. Sweet Justice, after a bitter road.

  5. Jeffrey Harrison   Saturday, April 15, 2017 at 8:08 PM

    Cody, do whatever you to do in the time frame you deem best. Many say you can’t do this or that.
    Really, most of the negative ones have virtually no skin in the game. In your actions who knows
    what victories are at hand? Even failures or setbacks at first can and do sprout later victories.

    It took Edison numerous attempts to get the light bulb correct. You have to play the cards you
    have as best as you can in the time frame that you have. Many of us have your back. Move
    boldly.

  6. Gary   Saturday, April 15, 2017 at 2:22 PM

    There is a thing in this country called “Separation of Powers”.

    All three branches of government operate under the theory that the other two branches are acting in good faith.

    It is and will always be the opinion of the Judicial Branch (the courts including the Supreme Court), that the Legislative Branch (Congress), acted in good faith when they twice determined that Obama legally held the office of President of the United States, hence absent a request from the Legislative Branch (Congress), to the Judicial Branch the (Supreme Court), the Supreme Court will never get involved in this issue and will continue to “avoid that one” as Clarence Thomas has already stated and to dismiss all Birther cases without comment

  7. GARY   Saturday, April 15, 2017 at 2:06 PM

    A joint session of Congress has twice confirmed that Obama was legally holding office. No US Court will ever become involved in this issue.

    Besides, lets say the Supreme Court or some other court were to rule that Obama illegally held office. You still have the congressional determination that Obama legally held office undisturbed, hence, the court ruling would mean nothing and this is why the court will not become involved in the first place.

    Like all the other cases, the Supreme court will simply dismiss this case without comment

  8. ELmo   Saturday, April 15, 2017 at 12:02 PM

    Cody Judy,
    Please don’t take offense at the opinion expressed in my earlier post. I have nothing but admiration for those of you who have done the heavy lifting. I only hope in our (really your) haste, we don’t create a precedent that we didn’t seek and that we will then have to live with. I certainly don’t condemn you, or anyone who worked harder than I, for their efforts.
    God Bless All who Spoke Up or donated or Worked in other ways to “preserve protect and defend” our Constitution (that is now only barely alive).
    May God Bless America
    ELmo

  9. JONATHAN DAVID MOOERS   Saturday, April 15, 2017 at 10:22 AM

    Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.

    ELmo might be right to hold back on approaching the SCOTUS herein….but for how long?

    Knowledge Patriots (“birthers”) rushed to get 100,000 signatures for Terry Lakin, but fizzled at about 6,000 signatures in 30 days on whitehouse.gov. Shouldn’t Knowledge Patriots have garnered 100,000 commitments-to-sign from veterans groups et al BEFORE we initiated the whitehouse.gov campaign to “free Terry”? Now what?

    At age 68, I now know that any decision left in the hands of flawed human sinners, including the game-faced black-robbed SCOTUS bunch, will be rendered based first and foremost on personal consequences to themselves…truth and citizenship borders be damned.

    We would likely fare far better, in this originalist-seeking case, if all SCOTUS rulings were rendered by emotionless sinless robots programmed with algorithms and analogs to search all America’s previous legal judgments and all existing laws on the books. Peers or programs, law or flaw?

    The forever laws of Nature, such as gravity at 32 ft/sec/sec equally administered anywhere on planet Earth, versus the flimsy, repealable, contemporary, convenient laws of man.

    And once engaged at SCOTUS, we will likely see a rapid travesty of legions of tax-paid-for liars-for-hire and pimps of Lady Justice (= crony government attorneys) work vigorously against the Founding Fathers and the Funding Taxpayers. Would they even subpoena Barry Soetoro-Obama, Junior?

    So, can each of the Justices be approached FIRST by investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson, Atty. Larry Klayman, Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch and investigator LT Mike Zullo for a face-to-face interview to determine what reasoning each Justice uses, if anything, to counter our seasoned evidence of “Obama’s forged birth certificate”, Obama’s forged Selective Service Form and Obama’s stolen Social Security Number, And how they would respond to these linked observations of reality called “FACTS”:

    FACT 1: 1789 http://constitutionus.com/

    FACT 2: 08-28-08 http://canadafreepress.com/2009/williams091209.htm

    FACT 3: http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/birther%20case%20list.pdf

    FACT 4: http://www.wnd.com/2012/08/officer-imprisoned-for-challenging-obama-tells-his-story/

    FACT 5: 4-27-11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QM2GJn6hpJE

    FACT 6: http://www.wnd.com/2014/05/trump-obama-rejected-50-million-for-birth-records/

    FACT 7: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuhF-Ok3djI

    FACT 8: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-115

    And, finally, can said initial-info-interview with each Justice secure a clear response to this over-arching ethical question:

    Do you believe that all 320,000,000 American citizens have an inalienable right-to-know, a practical need-to-know (for voters et al) and a patriotic duty-to-know (security-cleared Commander-in-Chief before sending soldiers to war) the full identity of any presidential candidate and any incumbent president and any living ex-president at any time? Why or why not? http://www.carlgallups.com/zullo-affidavit.pdf

    Is there a stature of limitations on truth and treason?

  10. oldsailor84   Saturday, April 15, 2017 at 10:15 AM

    …………..and now you know why I made the statement in my last communication that the Cody Judy case would soon be in the SCOTUS. Those in the SCOTUS who conspired against Judy’s action should face public hearings regarding their criminal behavior……….and their resignations should be demanded. This would be both Sotomayer, and Kagan. This screams for absolute, and TOTAL PUBLICITY.

  11. Cody Judy   Saturday, April 15, 2017 at 9:10 AM

    Here’s the direct Contribution Page for those who can help

    Cody Robert Judy Contribution
    PayPal safe/secure
    http://codyjudy.us/information/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

    @JeffreyHarrison – @RosemaryWeidman Thank you !

    @ELmo re: ” rushing forward and getting beat before a more conservative court is in place.

    You have to understand there are time or statute limitations required by law, and standing requirements by law. ” Failure to prosecute a case” is a legal dismissal tactic that basically means you can’t wait around with a Bear trap for someone for years and years while you have everything your going to have.

    It would be nice if the US Supreme Court were seen as non-political , and Obama’s Intelligibility Case was not such a circus and political firestorm of punlic derision and conjectures.

    The Supreme Court has been approached multiple times already and simply refused to hear and clarify an opinion. Getting to the Court should not take an act of God on such an important national security matter effecting the Elections and Vote of every American.

    That said it’s impossible for me to nominate a Justice. I’m not President, just the same as Mr. Obama was not Qualified under the Constitution. That makes Sotomayor and Kagan nominated by someone with no authority and they are in the Court. Nominated by Obama, they may as well have been nominated by you or me. Its a ridiculous error and you suggest waiting for more damage?

    This is why it’s important and why since 2008 I’ve constantly been doing everything in my power , and with my standing I could possibly do!

    I’m am seriously grieved by the lackadaisical thought processes of putting off the piper till the whole US is being blown to kingdom come because someone decided to put their own to 10 Trillion Dollars in 8 years and the debt comes due.

    It’s is a serious ostrich in the sand technic and it is ruthlessly a disgrace to our future generations.

    No Sir! I have not sit back in my rocker waiting for a Republican Controlled House & Senate for the last 7 years to excuse the greatest disaster ever perpetrated upon Americans and go into the dark night quietly.

    Many in the crowd chose not to and have put everything they had into the cause including our Framers and Founders.

    Should they have waited around just a little longer before founding a Nation? Paying homage to a King, while the grand experiment of the USA was put off a little while longer?

    There were doers and procrastinators, protagonists and antagonist in every generation of time. We all must consider our actions before God.

  12. Marylou Moore   Saturday, April 15, 2017 at 9:03 AM

    How do I contribute?? Please make it easy with a few clicks to use my credit card. :-)

  13. Clark Kent   Friday, April 14, 2017 at 11:12 PM

    Wouldn’t Sotomayer & Kagan have to recuse themselves as they were illegally put in SCOTUS by Barry? Judy needs to hammer this point!

  14. Sharon Rondeau   Friday, April 14, 2017 at 9:58 PM

    Please see Cody Robert Judy’s websites: http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/

    http://www.codyjudy.us/

  15. Rosemary Wiedman   Friday, April 14, 2017 at 9:38 PM

    How do I contribute?

  16. GregNH   Friday, April 14, 2017 at 7:55 PM

    Hey Kurt, A tax return is not listed as a requirement in the Constitution to hold the office of President.

  17. ELmo   Friday, April 14, 2017 at 6:52 PM

    I think It would be better to wait until we have a solid Conservative Court to file this to the Supreme Court. If we lose (and I think we will lose ) precedent will be hard to undo. Count the votes –
    Ginsburg – No, Kagan – No, Sotomayor – No, Breyer – No, Kennedy – No, Roberts (probably – No), Thomas (“we’ve been trying to avoid that one”) – No, Alito- (probably Yes), Gorsuch ? But no matter how Gorsuch votes, this case is lost and it will be hard to overcome the defeat or get another bite at the apple. Better to wait for another Conservative appointment. Cody Judy is a Patriot but I believe advancing this case at this juncture is a mistake. What’s the rush? We’ve waited this long. Ginsburg, Kennedy and Breyer will probably be gone before Trump is.
    I think (at this point) it is better to wait then to rush forward and get beaten at SCOTUS level.
    ELmo

  18. Jeffrey Harrison   Friday, April 14, 2017 at 5:52 PM

    That Judy fellow is like the Energizer Bunny, he keeps on going and going. He just can’t be stopped. He just won’t die. That’s because he is a Constitutional American. To him, right and wrong mean something. Faith and the Constitution by him will be defended. Holding those accountable regardless of their statues, he is not biased.

    Now it is our duty to have Judy’s back. Let’s support him in prayers, funds, and correspondence.

    P.S. Judy, indeed post your contact info, website, etc.

  19. Kurt   Friday, April 14, 2017 at 4:32 PM

    Barack Obama’s birth certificate is under audit. It cannot be shown publicly until the audit is completed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.