McCullough, Malone Attend CPAC, Allege Government “Scientific Fraud”

by Sharon Rondeau

(Mar. 5, 2022) — On Friday morning, a segment of an interview posted on gab.com of Drs. Peter A. McCullough and Robert W. Malone depicted the two physicians, who have long been outspoken in their criticism of the government’s response to the COVID-19 “pandemic,” accusing federal health agencies of committing “scientific fraud.”

Their full remarks were made to Veronika Kyrylenko of The New American while they attended the Conservative Political Action Committee (CPAC) in Orlando, FL last week, at which McCullough additionally was a speaker on February 26.

McCullough is a cardiologist, epidemiologist and internist who developed one of the earliest COVID-19 treatment protocols and was consequently terminated from two university teaching positions and sued by a former employer based on an error made by an interviewer last July.

Malone holds nine original patents on mRNA vaccine technology dating back to the late 1980s and spent his career developing vaccines.

Both physicians have become frequent guests on radio, television and internet-based broadcasts and are virtually ubiquitous on social media with reports and studies of adverse vaccine reactions and other COVID-related news.

On December 13, McCullough interviewed with “The Joe Rogan Experience” in a three-hour broadcast which reportedly garnered more than 40 million views. Similarly, Malone was Rogan’s guest on December 30 in a broadcast which reportedly gained 50 million views; Malone was banned from Twitter at approximately the same time.

McCullough is host of “The McCullough Report” on AmericaOutLoud every Saturday, while Malone writes copiously on his Substack blog. Both men have traveled extensively over the last year to speak at various events about what they see as the risks of the COVID-19 vaccines which the government has failed to reveal to the American public and the world.

Documents held by Pfizer, one of the vaccine manufacturers, are now being released by court order and show that the company was aware of a myriad of adverse reactions, including death, in clinical trials. Nevertheless, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has continued to say that the vaccine products are “safe and effective.”

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) presently contains nearly 25,000 reports of deaths believed to be connected to COVID-19 vaccinations and more than 1.1 million adverse-event reports as of February 25, 2022. The number of reported deaths exponentially exceeds those reported from all other vaccines combined since VAERS’ inception in 1990.

McCullough has expressed his belief that there was a “premeditated” plan among government agencies to suppress information on early treatments in order to promote COVID-19 vaccines exclusively.

On February 21, Presidents’ Day, Malone noted, The New York Times issued an article titled, “The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of the Covid Data It Collects.”

“Withholding scientific data constitutes scientific fraud,” Malone told Kyrylenko. “…If I was to publish a study in which I had a large body of epidemiologic data and I decided to only publish part of it because I wanted to advance some agenda, I would be guilty of scientific fraud. The paper would be withdrawn, I would be kicked out of my academic institution; I would be guilty of scientific fraud. That’s what this is…” Malone said.

Kyrylenko, who interviewed Malone at his Virginia farm in early November, asked the two physicians why they were in attendance. “I’m here to meet people and to — I’m increasingly moving into public policy, and this is the place to be right now to understand what’s going on and where we need to go in the future,” Malone responded.

As for McCullough, “I was invited to speak, and I’ll be on the stage in a few minutes now. I can tell you, I’ve been drawn as a doctor to come forward and work with our political leaders for solutions. I think we’ve learned: doctors cannot sit on the sidelines.”

With a small laugh, Kyrylenko then asked if they would attend a Democratic National Convention (DNC) meeting if asked, to which they responded in the affirmative. Both, however, said they were “center” or “center-left” voters prior to COVID-19 but have found that the principle of “medical freedom” aligns more closely with the Republican Party.

“This disease has been politicized and it shouldn’t have been,” Malone said.

McCullough said in the event of a pandemic response, “one person” should not be placed in “operational” or “visual authority” but rather, “doctors to work in teams” should take a leadership role.

Malone was to participate in a panel discussion, he said, the following day, on “basically the government controlling health care and what’s wrong with that.” “Politicians” are now directing health care policy, he said, along with NAIAD Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, who he placed in the same category, and mandating a “top-down” medical system “favored by Big Pharma” but “not the kind of medical care the American people want.”

Notably, Fauci has been absent from the public eye since The Times published its article.

As for the CDC’s withholding of data on vaccinations, “breakthrough” infections and hospitalizations, McCullough said, “They have a lot of data to go over, and they owe America an explanation on safety. There is a prevailing view in the CDC and the FDA, who are the official sponsors of the vaccine program, and the prevailing view is that the vaccine will not be effective until everybody takes it, and not just once, but in a repetitive, serial fashion, and I can tell you that prevailing view in my personal estimation is flawed.”

McCullough has maintained that the adverse events associated with the vaccines should have been sufficient for the CDC and FDA to “shut down” the program shortly after its rollout.

Malone indicated he believes a time of reckoning has arrived for the nation’s public health employees who were aware of the withheld information and spoke to The Times anonymously. “That article was powerful if you look through it,” he said. “…What’s going on is criminal, in my opinion.”

“There are going to be legal consequences,” he responded to Kyrylenko’s question, “and I believe they have a choice, these government employees that have been participating in hiding this data. They can either be defendants or they can be witnesses…”

“The reluctance to release information on a biological product that every American is being asked, if not mandated, to take — the reluctance to do so should make everyone concerned,” McCullough said. He then referenced Sen. Ron Johnson’s January 24 “A Second Opinion” hearing in which two attorneys, Thomas Renz and Leigh Dundas, presented data obtained from three identified military whistleblowers showing that adverse events in the military increased alarmingly in 2021 over the five-year period 2016-2020.

“Let me be crystal clear,” Renz had said. “These vaccines are injuring and sometimes even killing our military, and those in the public that are buying the ‘safe and effective’ marketing. These numbers prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt.”

In September, White House occupant Joe Biden mandated COVID-19 shots for all service members, with those declining later facing involuntary separation and other negative consequences.