Dr. Corsi: Obama Birth Certificate “Back on the Table”

“CIA DISINFORMATION”

by Sharon Rondeau

(May 17, 2020) — At approximately 2:00 PM EDT on Sunday, author and podcaster Dr. Jerome Corsi responded to a comment in his Twitter feed alleging “a list of people killed to hide the truth about OBL and his son,” referring to the Al Qaeda terrorist Osama bin Laden.

In response, Corsi tweeted, “The truth about Bin Laden Will now come out including hoe Obama timed the Abbottabad Raif to cover up the fake birth certificate he released a few weeks earlier. The Obama fraud is in the process of being exposed. Treason, we dare call it.

In an interview approximately 45 minutes later with this writer, Corsi clarified that the “long-form” birth certificate image was released by the Obama White House on April 27, 2011 and the alleged raid on bin Laden’s hideout in Pakistan occurred on May 2.

Corsi is author of “Where’s the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President” published in May 2011, among numerous other titles.

He also told us, “The birth certificate issue’s back on the table, so let’s pound it a little bit.”  When we asked his reason for saying that, Corsi responded:

Enough is coming out about Obama now where a wider group of the American people are seeing the fraud, and I think these recent revelations about the unmasking and Gen. Flynn and then the stunt that Obama played when he tried this dog whistle, giving a little speech that got to Judge Sullivan that it would be a good idea to have some court hearings with Obama wanting to get Flynn for perjury, and that was taped, and the law enforcement authorities, I’m sure, taped it too, so Obama punked himself. Now that they’re seeing this, that he is still deeply invested in the Gen. Flynn case, I think the American people are saying, “A lot of the things said about Obama are true.”  I believe that the fraud is up and the American people are beginning to see through a lot of things they had not perceived before.

Donald Trump survived impeachment; the Democrats were so desperate to get him out of office that they ran hoax after hoax. Now I think it’s clear that Obama was involved in a coup d’etat.  The central theme of my book, “Coup d’État,” is that Obama directed the coup d’etat against Trump and he and Hillary Clinton were Traitor #1 and Traitor #2.  Additionally, when people realize that, they also begin to realize that the birth certificate was a fraud.

Now that I have a source, Boris, who created “The Boris Files,” — I’ve done a lot of reporting on him; we’re doing the videos — he says that bin Laden was not killed in the Abbottabad raid, but he was captured.  According to Boris, he was brought to Benghazi and tortured.  I can’t verify whether that’s true or not, but the claim has some merit to me because of the very suspicious circumstances under which bin Laden was supposedly buried at sea and how few people were witnesses to it.

I’ve been suspicious of the helicopter incident that killed the SEAL team, and so many of these incidents do not fit together, and that’s why I question the Obama narrative on Osama bin Laden being killed. They say they have DNA, but you can get DNA from a living person.

The timing of it — just a few days after the release of the birth certificate — is too convenient, because I was charging almost immediately that the birth certificate that was released was very suspicious and a fraud.  First of all, it was an electronic document. They’ didn’t have electronic documents in 1961.  The whole composition of the document looked as if it had been faked, and that was ultimately proved by Sheriff Arpaio and Mike Zullo.

My view, even at the time, was that Obama was doing his version of “wagging the dog,” that the Abbottabad raid would close the issue on the birth certificate because Obama did not want the accusations of fraud that were developing seriously investigated.  So they brought out this document; the mainstream media all applauded and declared the issue was over; they wanted to end it whether or not the fraud was continuing.  And the raid was, I believe, in part designed to do that.

“Do you have a source who told you that that happened?” The Post & Email asked.

No, that’s my own conclusion on this simply from observing it and understanding politics, studying for years how Obama worked.  The Obama administration was much more about manipulation of a compliant press than anything to do with substance.

They failed with Russiagate, then they failed with UkraineGate; now they’re trying VirusGate. It’s the same thing all over again. I’m writing at Corsination.com that I’m concerned that this could be a bio-attack and COVID-20 could be around the corner.  These manipulations of the mainstream media by this Deep-State crowd which Obama exemplifies have not gotten over the fact that they didn’t get to complete their fundamental transformation of America into a socialist, New-World-Order state with Hillary Clinton’s coronation.

“Have you spoken with any Washington insiders who have indicated that they are now making a connection between the birth certificate and the information coming out through transcripts and other things?”

Not that I can see, but certainly, it’s an active subject and discussion on Twitter.  There’s a large segment of the American population thinking about it. I don’t think you’re going to see it in the mainstream media except to again ridicule those of us who are thinking about it as “conspiracy theorists.”  When you see people like me being called “conspiracy theorists,” just think “CIA disinformation”; that’s all it is. The lie is their cover story which they have fabricated in order to distract you from the understanding of what really happened.

Regarding Obama’s background, Corsi told us:

Nothing about Obama’s life story, starting with his nativity mythology, has ever been able to be fully documented.  That should be a clear sign of an intelligence-agency-created legend, and no one has yet been able to dissuade me from the belief that Obama’s life is an intelligence-agency disinformation campaign after the fact; that he was a hardcore socialist or communist who came up through Saul Alinsky organizations and has supported all of his life communists or socialists; and that he was raised, at least culturally, in Islam, which he attempted to deny. In 2008 I wrote Obama Nation with nothing but a further elaboration of the intelligence-agency legend that had been created to explain his life in a way to mask the truth.  The information that is available is contradictory, and all of this is the clear signs of a disinformation campaign.

Sorting through to the truth may be difficult, especially after years, but what you can conclude is that Obama is not who he says he is, or the creation of this disinformation story would not have been possible.  His life would be documentable; it would be able to be verified.  It wouldn’t have all of these missing documents, holes, and contradictory stories…it goes on and on and on.  In future generations, when the full exposure of this Deep-State corruption becomes known more completely — and I predicted that Mueller would fail; Mueller failed — and I predicted there would be a Trump counter-attack that’s just really now getting going, with Grenell the major engine of it; not Barr, Grenell — and I predict that by Election Day, the American people will understand that it was a treasonous coup d’etat, and traitors number 1 and 2 were Obama and Hillary.  I don’t really know which one was #1 and #2, but it doesn’t really matter.

Corsi likened the bin Laden raid to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, about which he wrote in “Who Really Killed Kennedy?: 50 Years Later: Stunning New Revelations About the JFK Assassination.”

Regarding who might have created the Obama birth-certificate forgery, Corsi opined, “Finding out those identities, while it’s intriguing to establish responsibility, they are also part of this disinformation campaign to get you to go down these rabbit holes where you’re discredited.  The real story is that it doesn’t fit together.  The real story is if there was a birth certificate, why did the Hawaii Department of Health, where Mike Zullo showed up with law enforcement from Arizona, refuse to show him documentation?  That’s the story.”

“Mike Zullo said, ‘There never was a birth certificate for Obama,'” The Post & Email commented, to which Corsi replied, “That’s the logical conclusion.”

 

38 Responses to "Dr. Corsi: Obama Birth Certificate “Back on the Table”"

  1. Glen Day   Sunday, May 24, 2020 at 8:50 PM

    As DPH Chairman, Brian Schatz authored the state’s Democrat Party OCON for Obama without including the legally required language that Obama was constitutionally eligible to be President. Schatz won the Lt. Governorship by a wide margin after two years of remaining silent about his part in the OCON controversy.

    Schatz now serves as the senior United States Senator from Hawaii, a seat he has held since 2012. Governor Abercrombie appointed Schatz to replace Senator Daniel Inouye after Inouye’s death.

    So, did Schatz perform his duty with honor, upholding the rule of law over partisanship? In the People’s Republic of Hawaii, one learns that if you want a career in politics, you must keep your head down, your mouth shut, and your ears open. That is just what Schatz has done, and he has been rewarded.

  2. James Carter   Sunday, May 24, 2020 at 1:25 PM

    “This information qualifies Sen. Barack Obama’s and Joe Biden’s names to have appeared on the Hawaii ballot.” – Kevin Cronin, Hawaii Chief Election Officer, 12/18/2008 Letter (to unknown addressee)

    Here’s the entire paragraph from which that statement was excerpted:
    “Enclosed is a copy of the official certifications of nomination from the Democratic Party of the United States and the Democratic Party of Hawaii stating that their nominees are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution. This information qualifies Sen. Barack Obama’s and Joe Biden’s names to have appeared on the Hawaii ballot.”

    The enclosed certification of nomination from the Democratic Party of Hawaii did not, repeat DID NOT, state that their nominees are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.

    https://moniquemonicat.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/hawaii-response.pdf

    Furthermore, perhaps most of all, the HDOH confirmed that neither the DPH nor the DNC ever requested a copy of Obama’s vital (birth) records or a “Letter of Verification” that Obama was born in Hawaii.
    https://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/09/09/dnc-and-hdp-did-not-request-obama-records/
    https://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/09/16/no-letter-of-verification-for-hdp-or-dnc/

    The latter two beg the question: On what basis did the Democratic Party of the United States determine that Obama was eligible to serve under provisions of the United States Constitution in lieu of the fact that the Democratic Party of Hawaii did not.

  3. Sharon Rondeau   Sunday, May 24, 2020 at 11:02 AM

    But that doesn’t make the birth certificate genuine.

  4. Dennis Becker   Sunday, May 24, 2020 at 10:22 AM

    John Kerry’s 2004 OCON from the DNC did not include an eligibility statement.

    This shows us that a statement on eligibility was not required from both the DNC and the HDP.

    This is exactly what HRS § 11-113(c)(B) requires a statement from the appropriate official.

    The only part of the law requiring a statement from both the national and state parties is HRS § 11-113(c)(C). The 2008 submittals include both.

    Beyond that there is only one person who can determine if the submittals met HRS § 11-113(c) and that is Hawaii’s Chief Election Official. In his December, 2008 letter, he said they did.

  5. Gary Wilmott   Sunday, May 24, 2020 at 3:05 AM

    The reason this story will never die is a simple one. The truth and the facts are on our side; the true patriots and constitutionalists.

  6. James Carter   Saturday, May 23, 2020 at 9:12 PM

    “Do the 2008 OCON statements include a statement of Constitutional eligibility from the appropriate official per HRS § 11-113(c)(B)? Unless someone can show that the head of the DNC is not an appropriate official, the answer is yes there is.”

    The 2008 Democrat Party of Hawaii (DPH) OCON does not. One of the 2008 Democrat National Party (DNP) OCON’s does but the other one does not. Which of the latter was produced first is anyone’s guess but since they both have the same misspelling, “though” instead of “through”, it’s a sure bet that the statement of Constitutional eligibility was either added or deleted, depending on which version was produced first. Reportedly the one which does was only sent to Hawaii.

  7. Dennis Becker   Saturday, May 23, 2020 at 7:26 PM

    “stated by then-HDP Chairman Kevin Cronin”

    Kevin Cronin was not the HDP chairman. He was the Hawaii Chief Election Officer. As such he is the only one who determines if the submittal by a political party meets the Hawaii ballot requirements. As he said in his letter:

    “This information qualifies Sen. Barack Obama’s and Joe Biden’s names to have appeared on the Hawaii ballot.”

    BTW, in 2004 the DNC’s OCON for John Kerry did not include the eligibility statement.

    https://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/09/10/2004-dnc-cert/

  8. Sharon Rondeau   Saturday, May 23, 2020 at 6:15 PM

    Obots know this, but the point is that the HDP changed the standard wording, as stated by then-HDP Chairman Kevin Cronin, on its own nomination certificate, omitting reference to the U.S. Constitution in regard to “qualified.” Regardless of whatever arguments people come up with, we all know the birth certificate is a fake.

    https://moniquemonicat.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/hawaii-response.pdf
    https://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/09/09/certificate-of-nomination-summary/
    https://www.scribd.com/document/37528165/2000-2004-2008-Democratic-Party-of-Hawaii-Certifications-of-Nomination-for-Presidential-Candidates

  9. Jigsaw St. John   Saturday, May 23, 2020 at 4:46 PM

    “Watch it”

    Watched it and it leads to some questions:

    Do the 2008 OCON statements include a statement of Constitutional eligibility from the appropriate official per HRS § 11-113(c)(B)? Unless someone can show that the head of the DNC is not an appropriate official, the answer is yes there is.

    Do the 2008 OCON statements include a statement from both the DNC and HDP on the time, date and place of the nomination of the candidates per HRS § 11-113(c)?
    Yes, they do.

    Do the 2008 OCON meet the requirements of HRS § 11-113(c)? According to the apperance of Obama’s name on the 2008 ballot, it would appear the answer is yes.

    One other question:

    Is Hawaii the only state that requires a Constitutional eligibility statement from the political parties?

  10. James Carter   Saturday, May 23, 2020 at 2:56 PM

    “I would like to see the video that Robert Laity describes, but it doesn’t appear at the link provided. Perhaps there’s another link?”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXFwqUi3zR0

    DNC 2008 OCON sent to 49 states at the 0:10 mark
    DNC 2008 OCON sent only to Hawaii at the 1:16 mark
    DPH 2000 OCON at the 4:14 mark
    DPH 2004 OCON at the 5:13 mark
    DPH 2008 OCON at the 6:22 mark

    Watch it and weep.

  11. Douglas Fredluss   Saturday, May 23, 2020 at 2:08 PM

    I would like to see the video that Robert Laity describes, but it doesn’t appear at the link provided. Perhaps there’s another link?

  12. Robert C Laity   Saturday, May 23, 2020 at 5:42 AM

    Fredluss, the Hawaii Dem. Committee did indeed reject Obama. That video remains available on you tube if you would expend a little energy and search it.

  13. James Carter   Friday, May 22, 2020 at 12:06 PM

    Colonel Lakin, Sir,

    God Bless You and Your’s.

    “This We Will Defend”

    US Army SP5
    Vietnam Veteran
    Son of WWII, Korea and Vietnam Veteran

  14. Terrence L Lakin   Friday, May 22, 2020 at 12:30 AM

    Wonderful read and great thread of comments! 10 plus years of prayers and admiration for Sharon, Dr. Corsi, CDR K and many others that keep the fight for truth alive. Always had faith the truth would out, and that light of truth is sure getting brighter. Love you all!!

  15. Scott e   Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 6:27 PM

    Time to round up the usual suspects ?
    Aloha means hello and goodbye…

  16. Douglas Fredluss   Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 1:34 PM

    Robert C. Laity wrote: Democratic Party of Hawaii refused to certify Obama. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXFwqUi3ZR0

    That video is “unavailable.”

  17. James Carter   Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 11:07 AM

    “All that previous years tell us is that the state of Hawaii’s Chief Election Official will accept a statement of eligibility from the state party. It does not tell us if they will or will not also accept the statement only from the national party.”

    No, that is not all that previous years, and 2008, tell us…not by a long shot. 2000, 2004 and 2008 tells that out of the six “Official Certificate Of Nomination” (OCON) forms submitted to the Chief Elections Official of Hawaii by the Democrat Party of Hawaii and Republican Party of Hawaii, the 2008 Democrat Party of Hawaii’s OCON was the only one which did not comply with HRS § 11-113(c)(B).

    “Has the Chief Election office ever been asked?” Why don’t you ask him? And while you’re at it, ask him what he and Obama talked about when Obama was in Hawaii visiting his ailing grandmother.

    As Chair of the 2008 DNC Convention, Nancy Pelosi signed two different “Official Certification Of Nomination” forms — one with and one without the verbiage required by HRS § 11-113(c)(B) and, as far as has been determined, submitted the one with said verbiage to the Chief Elections Official of Hawaii only. Why? What did she know about Obama that made him eligible per the U.S. Constitution that the Democrat Party of Hawaii didn’t know?

  18. Robert C Laity   Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 6:25 AM

    Lew Harper. The Hawaii DNC rejected Obama as being ineligible. That’s when Pelosi lied about Obama being constitutionally qualified. She is complicit with Obama’s treason and espionage against the USA. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXFwqUi3ZRO

  19. Robert C Laity   Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 6:16 AM

    Lew Harper, Democratic Party of Hawaii refused to certify Obama. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXFwqUi3ZR0

  20. Robert C Laity   Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 6:07 AM

    Lew Harper, The Birth certificate that Obama proffered is a forgery. Verified immutable fact. Obama’s purported father Barack Obama,Sr. was never a U.S. Citizen. Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen. You have no leg to stand on. Obama is a phony. An NBC is one born IN the U.S. to parents who are both U.S. Citizens themselves.-Minor v Happersett, USSCt. (1874) and five other SCOTUS precedents.

  21. Michael Volin   Wednesday, May 20, 2020 at 11:25 PM

    Not surprised to see this is still in the news in fact it never made it out of the news. It periodically comes up conveniently when the fake news media wants to create a diversion or call the investigators racist or nut jobs or looney tunes, how convenient. Notice that is there only rebuttal to whatever the news is. It’s obvious that there is a problem not only with Obama’s birth certificate there is a problem with entire shady past.

    Mike Volin
    http://www.wheresobamasbirthcertificate.com
    570 284 7477

  22. Lew Harper   Wednesday, May 20, 2020 at 8:08 PM

    “Precedent by the Democrat Party and Republican Party of Hawaii established that it is the state party, otherwise why would they have?”

    All that previous years tell us is that the state of Hawaii’s Chief Election Official will accept a statement of eligibility from the state party. It does not tell us if they will or will not also accept the statement only from the national party.

    Has the Chief Election office ever been asked?

  23. James Carter   Wednesday, May 20, 2020 at 4:49 PM

    “Did Sheriff Arpaio or Mike Zullo ever even attempt to obtain a court order or subpoena ? If not why not?”

    If you want to know, why don’t you ask them?

    “The law required a statement from “the appropriate official” of the party. It does not say if that is the state or national party.”

    Precedent by the Democrat Party and Republican Party of Hawaii established that it is the state party, otherwise why would they have?

  24. Lew Harper   Wednesday, May 20, 2020 at 12:08 PM

    “Perhaps not if Zullo had a court-issued subponea to allow him to examine Obama’a vital records.”

    Only if it was from a Hawaii State or Federal Court.

    Did Sheriff Arpaio or Mike Zullo ever even attempt to obtain a court order or subpoena ? If not why not?

    “it most definitely was a violation of Hawaii laws for the Democrat Party of Hawaii to submit …did not contain the verbiage “under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution” in its certification statement.”

    That is a debatable point. The 2008 Hawaii law read as follows:

    HRS § 11-113(c): All candidates for President and Vice President of the United States shall be qualified for inclusion on the general election ballot under either of the following procedures:

    (1) In the case of candidates of political parties which have been qualified to place candidates on the primary and general election ballots, the appropriate official of those parties shall file a sworn application with the chief election officer not later than 4:30 p.m. on the sixtieth day prior to the general election, which shall include:

    (A) The name and address of each of the two candidates;

    (B) A statement that each candidate is legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution;

    (C) A statement that the candidates are the duly chosen candidates of both the state and the national party, giving the time, place, and manner of the selection.

    The law required a statement from “the appropriate official” of the party. It does not say if that is the state or national party.

    Who is “the appropriate official” of the party?

    HRS § 11-113(c)(B) does not specify if the statement on eligibility must be by the state party.

    Does the statement by Pelosi meet the requirements of HRS § 11-113(c)(B) and thus no other statement was necessary?

    HRS § 11-113(c)(C) specifies that a statement by both the national and state parties must list the time, place and manner of the nominations.

    Did both the national and state parties make those statements?

    HRS § 11-113(c) specifies statement be made by “the appropriate official” of the party without specifying who that is.

    Does the Chief Election official (Kevin Cronin) make the determination of whether or not the certification of nomination met HRS § 11-113(c)?

    Is there any evidence that the Chief Election official rejected the Official Certification of Nomination for Obama?

    Has anyone ever attempted to obtain copies of correspondence from Hawaii’s Chief Election Official and the DNC or the state party?

  25. James Carter   Tuesday, May 19, 2020 at 7:55 PM

    “Would it be a violation of Hawaii laws for the DOH to have allowed Zullo to examine the birth certificate without following the proper legal process?”

    Probably. Perhaps not if Zullo had a court-issued subponea to allow him to examine Obama’a vital records.

    However, it most definitely was a violation of Hawaii laws for the Democrat Party of Hawaii to submit an Official Certification Of Nomination to the Chief Elections Officer of Hawaii which did not contain the verbiage “under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution” in its certification statement.

  26. 2discern   Monday, May 18, 2020 at 7:20 PM

    From the start, postings and articles to ask legitimate vetting questions of Barry Soetero have never been addressed on any cable or network news. Simple qualifiers like- why are all your records sealed? Why do you have a CT SS # ? Why is the Selective Service registration date stamp the only one in the world with a two digit (’80) USPS fake inverted 8 on the form? Why did Loretta Fuddy (Hawaii Health Dept) die in a soft water landing off Maui with 8 others totally safe? Why did Quaryle Harris die after viewing Barry’s college records as he was employed by Brennan’s security company? Why did he (Barry) have Bauer (Perkins Coie) as Attorney blocking every case (man was Orly Taitz busy) that denied standing?

    WE could go on…but, why was Mike Z. cancelled in the green room on Hannity? Why was there a vendetta against Arpiao? Why all this intensity about M. FLynn? Ah, maybe the secrets are coming out. Mike Z. has stated all roads lead to Brennan. So, the biggest dilemma still unaddressed in the Secret Service, when will the “well known open secret” of Barry Soetero being illegitimate be disclosed? Who are the real traitors? People who are complicit or the ones committing the fraud?

  27. Lew Harper   Monday, May 18, 2020 at 11:47 AM

    “Just as birtherism made no sense but became a totem of the MAGA crowd”

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/05/18/this-is-why-trump-is-back-attacking-obama/#click=https://t.co/LQsTF9k0ti

  28. Lew Harper   Monday, May 18, 2020 at 9:55 AM

    “The real story is if there was a birth certificate, why did the Hawaii Department of Health, where Mike Zullo showed up with law enforcement from Arizona, refuse to show him documentation?”

    Isn’t this the important part “law enforcement from Arizona”?

    Aren’t there requirements that need to be met if officers from one jurisdiction want records from another jurisdiction?

    Would it be a violation of Hawaii laws for the DOH to have allowed Zullo to examine the birth certificate without following the proper legal process?

    Nice edit button!

  29. Bob68   Monday, May 18, 2020 at 8:45 AM

    A list of reasons why I don’t believe Obama’s raid on Osama’s purported compound actually killed Osama. Just my opinion and evidence from the internet……..
    I believe Osama had been dead for years before his claimed death in the raid:
    1. Convenient timing to get the focus off Obama’s badly forged birth certificate and to give him a boost for the upcoming 2012 election.
    2. The network TV interruption to announce the claimed killing of Osama happened half-way through the season’s final show of Donald Trump’s “The Apprentice” and wiped out the last half and the selection of the season winner. (I saw that one when it actually happened).
    https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/osama-bin-laden-news-pre-183969
    3. At least one person present at the raid said the badly shot-up body claimed to be Osama looked way too young to be Osama.
    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/seals-first-hand-account-of-bin-laden-killing/
    4. A few news articles I read on the net after the raid mentioned that Osama used “Just for Men” hair coloring on his hair and beard, although the only picture we were shown of Osama at the compound was of a gray haired old man from the back and slightly to the side, sitting in a rocking chair watching TV. I believe the person killed may have been Hamza, Osama’s youngest son…………..
    https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/news/885892/osama-bin-laden-used-just-for-men-to-dye-his-beard-black/
    5. The Prime Minister of Pakistan said she had proof Osama died years earlier. She was killed a few months after making that statement:
    https://www.wanttoknow.info/a-Pakistani-Prime-Minister-Osama-bin-Laden-Dead
    6. Osama’s youngest son, Hamza, was said to be at the compound but escaped. My theory is it was Hamza who was killed and tossed in the ocean. For years it was reported that Hamza was alive and preparing to avenge his father’s death. That never happened and not long ago it was reported Hamza was dead…..perhaps because it was about to be openly determined he was no longer alive, contrary to claims? I don’t know much about DNA but if it was taken from Osama’s son….. I assume it would be a close match? President Trump reported Hamza had been killed, but that was from reports he received. I may be wrong…..but I believe Hamza died at the compound instead of escaping as was said at the time of the raid. Just my opinion……
    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/trump-confirms-osama-bin-laden-s-son-hamza-killed-u-n1054471
    7. The planning for the raid was done by John Brennan and Obama’s handpicked Navy Admiral McRaven. Brennan and McRaven spent time together in Colorado on the planned raid and both attended the same college. I’m not sure if they were at the college at the same time, but I believe they may have been. McRaven defends John Brennan and slams President Trump:
    https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/8/17/17715014/john-brennan-security-clearance-mcraven-bin-laden-trump
    https://heavy.com/news/2018/08/william-mcraven/
    8. The death of Seal Team Six ……who I believe may have been getting too close to the truth. This is from Michael Savage, whatever you think of his credibility:
    http://www.truthandaction.org/michael-savage-seal-team-6-assassinated-executed/
    …I did a little research not long after the claimed raid and hope this will help others with a starting point to look into the things I found. Most of what I found years ago is still available on the internet, or can perhaps be accessed by using the “Wayback Machine” I hope a real investigation and research into this is on-going………………….. What I did not find which was previously on the internet was a long article detailing Brennen and McRaven and their preparation for the Osama raid…….
    …..It all seemed fishy to me from the get-go…….IMO It needs much more real and in-depth investigating……………….we need absolute proof it was done as claimed, considering who the claims came from and the criminality many of them are showing in going after President Trump……..
    Bob 68……….

  30. Robert Laity   Monday, May 18, 2020 at 7:11 AM

    I doubt that Osama was killed in the manner claimed by Obama. Obama is a Muslim himself, a member of the muslim brotherhood himself. Obama said that he would “Stand with muslims if the political winds turned ugly” (paraphrased)). Obama is a usurper,fraud,traitor and spy.

    I participated in a U.S. Navy interment at sea. There are strict rules on how to proceed. I doubt that non veterans and non-Americans are eligible to be buried at sea by the U.S. Navy.

    That said, HOW would an enemy of the U.S. be eligible for such honors? Obama would have had to ignore the law. The U.S. claim is that no country wanted Osama’s remains. Do people actually believe that?

    Furthermore, there have been claims that Osama died in 2001 of Kidney failure in addition to Obama’s claim that he WAS killed in a raid., that his body was taken to Dover.

    In any event, history shows that ten years earlier, in 2001, several media outlets were saying that Osama was dead. See: “Evidence shows Osama Bin Laden died in 2001”

    https://newspunch.com/evidence-shows-osama-bin-laden-actually-died-in-2001

  31. Robert Laity   Monday, May 18, 2020 at 6:21 AM

    In a conversation with Laura Ingraham on Watters World (Fox News) this weekend last., Jesse Watters conjectured that Obama’s involvement in the coup attempt against President Trump was on a “Personal” level. He told Ingraham that it “May have been because of Trump having questioned Obama’s Birth Certificate”.

  32. Robert Laity   Monday, May 18, 2020 at 6:17 AM

    An NBC is one born in the U.S. to Parents who are both U.S. Citizens themselves.-Minor v Happersett, USSCt. (1874) (9-0)

  33. Robert C Laity   Monday, May 18, 2020 at 6:15 AM

    If one gets over the mistaken idea that mere birth in the United States suffices to make someone a “Natural Born Citizen”., people would be able to SEE clearly that Obama is simply NOT an NBC. Again, an NBC is one born in a country to parents who are both citizens of that country. The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously affirmed this definition in Minor v Happersett when they wrote that an NBC is one born in the U.S. to parents who are both U.S.Citizens themselves. Virginia Minor was a Natural Born Citizen.

  34. Douglas Fredluss   Monday, May 18, 2020 at 12:56 AM

    When Mike Zullo went to the Hawaii Department of Health, did he have a search warrant or court order?

  35. thomas arnold   Monday, May 18, 2020 at 12:23 AM

    Millions of Americans, including some of the most powerful, respected, and influential people in our country, know the TRUTH about “Obama” but are not willing to EXPOSE him. I find this to be very disheartening (maybe, in some cases, misprision). I’m afraid there is something intrinsically wrong in our society. I think I have a good idea what (and who) it is.
    I KNOW WHO STARTED THE CRISIS OVER A DECADE AGO AND WHO IS STILL ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN CARRYING IT OUT TODAY. Believe it when I say that most people look the other way because the culprit is “Barack Hussein Obama.” People believe that he was our “first Black president.” The truth is that he was never a “real” president (not a natural born American citizen) and that he was not our first Black president- Abraham Lincoln, known by some as “Africanus,” was. This deception is what the American people, of all different races and political persuasions, must come to grips with!
    “Obama,” with the backing of his thugs and co-conspirators, very likely is the GREATEST FRAUD and CON-MAN in world history. And, he apparently is going to get away with it! So much for the old adage that no one is above the law! At least that’s what “Obama” himself always said!

  36. CDR Kerchner (Ret)   Sunday, May 17, 2020 at 11:30 PM

    More information about Obama’s forged birth documents and other forged documents here: https://www.scribd.com/lists/3166684/Obama-s-Birth-Cert-Other-Key-Docs-Draft-Reg-Card-Forged-Expert-Reports CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) – http://www.ProtectOurLiberty.org

  37. Bob68   Sunday, May 17, 2020 at 8:27 PM

    Speaking of things finally coming out, check out this article at Townhall and especially the comments. A couple of comments there are mine using the name “roberted”:
    https://townhall.com/columnists/wayneallynroot/2020/05/17/obama-and-me-how-i-knew-obama-was-a-bad-guy-before-anyone-else-n2568928
    I was told “going there” would eventually happen but it would take a long time and, the extreme long time and discussions of everything but what I consider to be important is very depressing…..but there is no reason to give up now………,,,,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.