A CHANCE FOR REAL “TRANSPARENCY”
by Sharon Rondeau
(May 8, 2020) — With the exposure of Obama-regime officials‘ duplicity in implying in public forums and on cable TV that President Donald Trump could be a “Russian asset” while admitting privately they had no “direct evidence” of “collusion” justifying the years-long, multi-million-dollar FBI and Special Counsel investigations, it may soon be the time for the Trump administration to launch a long-overdue probe into the image posted on the White House website in 2011 said to represent Barack Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate.
From the 5+-year investigation into the issue by former detective Mike Zullo working under the authority of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO), Americans who are awake and aware know that the image was proven an abject forgery, an assessment with which two highly-credentialed document analysts concurred in separate analyses and reports.
To the public’s knowledge, no one has ever been questioned about how, why or by whom the birth-certificate forgery was created and the information it was intended to obscure.
Since it appears Obama himself was involved in the intercepted phone calls between his former DIA Director, Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn (Ret), who Trump chose as his national-security adviser following the 2016 election, it would be appropriate to question him not only about the FBI’s entrapment of Flynn three days into the Trump administration, but also what the FBI, CIA and DNI knew about the creation of the fake government “document” bearing Obama’s purported name.
Based on the rapid uncovering of documents in the Flynn case demonstrating breathtaking government misconduct, Attorney General William Barr is more than capable of getting to the truth about the birth-certificate forgery, another “hoax” perpetrated on the unsuspecting American people.
Democrats insist that “no one is above the law,” but do they mean it when the tables are turned?
The forgery of the Selective Service registration form of the then-Democratic presidential nominee in September 2008 also needs to be probed and exposed for the federal crime that it is and which no other American could commit without facing a criminal charge.
By his own statement on the morning of the long-form’s release, Obama is implicated in the creation of a forgery “with the intent to deceive.” Had he been called to account then, the national nightmare the American people have witnessed over the past 3½ years, at great cost and out of nothing more than Democrats’ inability to accept the will of the voters, would never have taken place.
“It’s treason; it’s treason,” Trump said during on-camera remarks from the White House Thursday after the news of the Justice Department’s withdrawal of the charge against Flynn was reported. Is it not also “treason” when a cabal of political hacks, many of the same who insisted Trump “colluded” with the Russians, propelled a foreign-born, ineligible candidate into the White House with the intent to “fundamentally transform the United States of America”?
It is not a stretch to consider that the same thugs who “sent” FBI Special Agents Peter Strzok and Joe Pientka to conduct a West Wing interview of Flynn outside of recognized standard protocol and perpetrated a hoax against the Trump administration also know something about the production of fake documents to cover for their figurehead “president.”
After what was done to Trump, Papadopoulos, Flynn, Manafort, Carter Page, Roger Stone, Michael Caputo and countless others, is the forgery of a few “government documents” difficult to believe?
And what about the media’s role in the lies and cover-up?
“We’re draining the swamp,” Trump told Friday’s Fox & Friends co-hosts, along with the FBI, Justice Department and other government agencies. If Americans vote accordingly in November, that process could be furthered and real “transparency” as to the origins of the “computer-generated forgery” still residing in the White House archives realized.