IN A SECOND TERM, WOULD TRUMP INVESTIGATE OBAMA’S “DOCUMENTS?”
by Sharon Rondeau
(Feb. 26, 2020) — On Wednesday afternoon, citizen researcher, blogger and retired Navy Commander Charles F. Kerchner, Jr. tweeted to President Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, his thoughts on the “Deep State” and any potential probe the president might order into the findings that Barack Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate and Selective Service registration form are fraudulent.
“One of [the] major reasons the Deep State is after Trump is because he was questioning Obama’s pres[idential] eligibility & missing birth certificate,” Kerchner tweeted to Giuliani, who has been researching what he alleges is massive corruption involving the Obama regime, Ukraine, China and possibly other countries.
“Trump was labeled a Birther,” Kerchner noted in his tweet. “They fear Trump will some day investigate Obama key forged ID docs…”
Over a period of months in early 2011, Trump publicly called for Obama to release his original birth record to prove his constitutional eligibility to serve as president, leading the White House on April 27 that year to post an image said to represent Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate from Hawaii.
During the Obama years, The New York Times and other mainstream outlets as a bloc adopted and applied the term “birther” to anyone questioning Obama’s birthplace or eligibility, including Trump. Many Americans harbored doubts as to Obama’s eligibility in response to conflicting articles, many from the very same newsrooms, reporting Obama as having been born in Indonesia or Kenya and not Hawaii, as he claims.
Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires the president and commander-in-chief to be a “natural born Citizen,” a term the Founders did not define. Many Americans understand it to mean “born in the United States.” Others believe that the citizenship of the candidate’s parents is equally important to his or her birthplace.
The term “birther” continues to be invoked to this day by those on the political left.
A 5+-year criminal investigation which ensued after the release of the long-form image determined beyond the standard of probable cause that the image is a “computer-generated forgery” and Obama’s purported Selective Service registration form a “hard-copy forgery.”
During the 2016 presidential election cycle, advisors to the Trump campaign were confronted, unknowingly, by operatives seeking information while secretly recording their conversations, actions confirmed by a lengthy report released by the U.S. Justice Department’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) in December. In separate reports, Inspector General Michael Horowitz examined the decisions made and not made within the FBI and Justice Department in 2016, when the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” probe of the Trump campaign was reportedly launched. Horowitz’s investigations generated a number of criminal and administrative referrals against certain Special Agents and high-ranking FBI officials.
An unknown number of individuals within the federal-government bureaucracy, referred to by many as the “Deep State,” appears to have worked to thwart the former business mogul’s presidency and effect his removal from office, an effort which proved unsuccessful on February 5 when Trump was acquitted of two Articles of Impeachment brought by the U.S. House of Representatives.
Regular readers of this publication have expressed similar sentiments to Kerchner’s concerning the “Deep State” and its purported fear of investigations Trump might undertake in a second term.
Prior to reaching out to Giuliani, Kerchner tweeted messages to Trump and his son, Donald J. Trump, Jr., referring to The Post & Email’s article published Tuesday evening reporting that a one-time law clerk to a federal judge who unexpectedly dismissed an Obama “eligibility” lawsuit in 2009 is now an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Washington. It was after Judge David O. Carter’s hiring of the young attorney that Carter abandoned his previous expressed intent to allow the plaintiffs to discover whether or not Obama was constitutionally eligible to serve.
The law clerk, Siddharth Velamoor, had been hired from the law firm Perkins Coie, which has long represented the Democrat National Committee (DNC) and defended Obama against numerous civil suits challenging his eligibility during his first term.
Perkins was also involved in conveying unsubstantiated claims to the FBI that a Trump Tower computer was communicating with one at the Russian Alfa Bank in apparent furtherance of the narrative that the Trump campaign was coordinating its efforts to win the election with Russian operatives.
A 22-month Special Counsel investigation, which some believe was the “insurance policy” invoked by former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and former FBI attorney Lisa Page in text messages, determined that neither the Trump campaign nor any American conspired with Russia to alter the results of the election.
Perkins Coie co-founder Robert Bauer, who served as Obama’s first White House counsel, defended the “long-form” birth certificate image as authentic while ensuring that Obama did not display the “document” when he gave a press conference later that morning.
Six weeks after the image was posted, Bauer resigned as White House counsel and returned to Perkins Coie. Last March, he wrote an editorial published at The Atlantic claiming that Trump’s questioning of Obama’s eligibility amounted to “birtherism” and “racism.”
The former detective who conducted the investigation into the long-form image and Selective Service form, Mike Zullo, reported 18 months ago that two U.S. intelligence agents informed him that it is “an open secret” in Washington, DC that Obama was not born in the United States. Additionally, last spring Zullo said that the investigation discovered “collusion” between the Obama regime and media executives to quash any reportage of the birth-certificate issue.
Looking for all of your news in one place? Try Whatfinger, your one-stop aggregator of news, opinion and everything else.
Jeff Harrison,
Thanks, and I am one of those who has posted the same basic reason for years why Congress and all complicit in Obama’s usurpation of the presidency will not go after Obama the fraud.
This was posted at Gateway Pundit this morning and I have posted over 10,000 comments there over the last few years. The site owners never comment on even the possibility of Obama being an illegitimate president….but they also never stop me from discussing it. I have over 39,000 up-votes on my comments at GWP, almost all are on the subject of The Obama Fraud. Here is my latest comment, posted on 3-7-2020. It is in response to more evidence about the coup attempts to remove President Trump from office:
My comment:
IMO if available evidence meant anything inside of America’s government and/or complicit main stream media we would never have had 8 years of the Globalist/ Deep State installed ineligible, identity fraud Muslim plant Barack Hussein Obama. If the planned in 2008 after Obama cover of Hillary Clinton had not lost to the “birther” Donald Trump in 2016 we would not have the fear and panic driving all complicit in The Obama Fraud to try to remove President Trump from office. No other elected Republican would have been feared like President Trump and we would have had “normal” Uniparty disagreements still heading for the same ultimate Uniparty goal. However, no other Republican would have won in 2016…..by design….even the Deep State could not control Donald Trump….They are afraid of the truth about Barry finally being fully revealed and acted on and they fear President Trump more than they hate him. Fear is a stronger motivation for irrational and extreme actions and words than even extreme hatred. At this point those complicit in effectively giving America’s government and her military to the enemy and its still on-going cover-up are still winning and staying out of prison……..and the final outcome remains uncertain………………….
roberted
8
The GWP thread is located here:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/03/breaking-exclusive-we-caught-the-mueller-team-in-massive-lie-roger-stone-was-right/
P.S. The U.S. Congress and Senate were complicit in not upholding their oath of office.
They were mute and took no action to eject Obama. Numerous citizens have contacted them over the years of Obama’s usurpation. These citizens went to their offices, made phone calls, send letters and faxes and etc. Mike Volin had a team of volunteers who went to D.C. and contacted both houses. Numerous evidence from many sources both nationally and
overseas has been presented and “still” both the media and both houses remained mute.
Many, many regular citizens and those of high stature have investigated and presented
evidence, published books and articles, done interviews and the needle didn’t move. Those that have made efforts can sleep well at night for their efforts. It is my opinion Obama and others who were complicit will be held accountable in the future. And Trump will be behind it. Many readers know this, but this is being submitted for new viewers.
Hannity, O’Reilly, and Foxy TV are full of offal. All of these chums were not only mute on the usurpation of Obama, they were hostile to anyone who questioned Obama’s claims or
credentials. Didn’t fox TV and other media distribute memos to hosts to not discuss Obama’s shortfalls?
I recall Hannity snapping on a caller who questioned Obama’s credentials. And didn’t Foxy TV at the last minute cancel an interview with Lt. Zullo who was to discuss the investigation into fake Obama? On 07/18/2012 I recall Trump on a show with Hannity in which Trump was
thumping Obama’s credentials and Hannity was mute. Fair and balanced reporting! Not!
Previous remarks by James and Robert have excellent points.
Since Fox News, specifically Sean Hannity, claims to be transparent they should make what they did to vet Obama public. Anything less belies transparency.
March 5, 2020: Sean Hannity made a claim on air that “We [Fox News] vetted Barack Obama” and that no one else did. If they actually did “vett” Obama they did a very bad job of it. I recall fox news personality Bill O’Reilly saying “Birthers are pinheads”. Shepard Smith called those looking for the truth on Obama’s lack of bona-fides, “Crazy”. Hannity himself cancelled appearances on Fox news of persons who were prepared to offer proof of Obama’s fraud.
The 2008 Presidential election was immutably FIXED and the fix was bi-partisan. Neither John McCain or Barack Obama were Natural Born Citizen[s] of the United States.
I would find it highly unlikely that Trump doesn’t have a plan (in place) to bag Usurper Obama and the Deep state that assisted “Barry”. Also, didn’t Trump state that he had sent his own
investigators to Hawaii and stated “you’ll never believe what they found”! Further, I recall seeing a picture of Trump with Sheriff Arpaio at the time Obama was being investigated, I can’t help but sermize that they both shared information and evidence of Obama’s fraud.
For insurance purposes I recall Zullo stating evidence had been put in a safe place should a
member be “harmed”. Also, if I recall correctly if a member was harmed, evidence would be
released. Likewise, I would expect Team Trump to have had a similar and current plan in place. Trump has made many remarks of Obama’s “fakeness”. CNN politics had an article
entitled 14 of Trump’s most Outrageous ‘birther’ claims — half after 2011 .
https://www.cnn.com/2016/09/09/politics/donald-trump-birther/index.html
I have no idea when Trump may take-out Obama, but I expect it to happen at some time.
“qui tam ball starts rolling. Or maybe not…”
Isn’t there a statutory bar to filing a qui tam action under the False Claims Act in a case like this?
Specifically if the false claim was publicly disclosed by the news media (31U.S. Code § 3730(e)(4)(A)(iii)).
The Post & Email has run numerous stories on this subject.
D- I felt the same way as you but What picture?
John Durham certainly has been given sufficient and sustained ongoing notice of standing to have Durham task force challenge the espionage under cover of law and the judidiary to follow the Clinton-Foundation Sorus Obama Biden sabotage of USA federal and state elections since at least 1992 following the money laundering through the Ukraine based intellegence cyber-criminal state agencies and NGOs and private cyber-tech corporations.
All facts point to an illegitimate impostor 2008-2016. Look at the first Executive order Barry signed, (Robert Bauer) was the attorney at the time. Prior, JB Williams uncovered the breach in protocol of nomination DNC paperwork (Pelosi). From there, it goes cover – up all out. Today, I received a Judcial Watch monthly report. Guess the names of all the players from Soros funded groups that want to change the voting requirements for America, Brennan, Elizabeth Warren (daughter), etc.
In addition, why can’t we get the names of the Secret Service agents who know the open secret of Barry Soetero being a non-citizen. This Republic is due for a genuine hero to step up and stand in the gap and expose the fraud. Please understand, ALL contributors to this issue way back, are Patriots and worthy of the highest honor as loving God, country, and the American founding.
However, we are tired of being labelled “without standing”. This fraud of the century, must be reconciled. A major official of prominent stature must stand up and be counted, resolute, undaunted, committed, and sacrificial to the higher calling “for such a time as this”. Follow the conviction of heart. Where are the Fox News commentators? the Congress? Dan Bongino? Peter Schweitzer? Victor Hansen? Greg Jarett?
Is the love of money and ratings squelching discernment to do the right thing overriding the moral value of Hannity, Tucker, Ingraham? Remember, Hannity cancelled Zullo just before his interview. National exposure is paramount to the awareness of ALL citizens of the scam against our Republic.
Response for columnist Joseph DeMaio:
“Dan Bongino was with the Secret Service under Presidents G.W. Bush and Barack Obama. As for the question of “standing” to bring an eligibility action, does anyone know if Bongino reads the P&E? If so, maybe he remembers this post (https://www.thepostemail.com/2020/01/30/is-another-qui-tam-action-the-answer/) and a new qui tam ball starts rolling. Or maybe not…”
Federal Judge Any Berman Jackson writes that she can only rule within the confines of the Constitution, and I suppose that means stripping a US citizen of their First Amendment, reminiscent of what Army Judge Col. Denise R. Judge Lind did to LTC Terry Lakin in his kangaroo Court Martial.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 2018 February Van Allen v. Mueller
HAROLD WILLIAM VAN ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT MUELLER, et al., Defendant.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (5 Feb, 2018)
Case Information
CITATION CODES
ATTORNEY(S)
JUDGES
AMY BERMAN JACKSON United States District Judge
Less …
VAN ALLEN V. MUELLER
AMY BERMAN JACKSON United States District Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff Harold William Van Allen has filed a pro se complaint against 19 named defendants that include Special Counsel Robert Mueller, President Donald Trump, Vice President Mike Pence, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the Chief Justice of the United States and several judges from the U.S. District Court and U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Compl. [Dkt. # 1]. The complaint consists of a single paragraph:
Regarding executive authority over all federal and state chief judiciary proposed “Trump-Pence Executive Order(s)” ordering SCOTUS Chief Judge John Roberts to cease avoiding and immediately define US constitution language “natural born citizen” CINC/POTUS eligibility of all living former presidents (JE Carter, GHW Bush, GW Bush, WJ Clinton, BH Obama, DJ Trump and all living so confirmed federal judicial nominees regarding their past and current judicial authority (quo warranto) NYS statewide federal and New York State elections 1992 (H Ross Perot), 1997 (Robert L Schulz), 1996 (H Ross Perot electoral college delegate), 1997 (Constitutional Convention Question), 1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, and now 2017 (Constitutional Convention Question) – New York based Hillary R. and William J. et al Clintons’ espionage – unauthorized transfer and storage of electronic classified documents on private non-secure non-government URL/ISP/server(s).
Compl. ¶ 1. Based on this paragraph, it is unclear what relief plaintiff seeks from this Court, and whether this Court has the authority to hear the case.
“Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. They possess only that power authorized by Constitution and statute, which is not to be expanded by judicial decree. It is to be presumed that a cause lies outside this limited jurisdiction, and the burden of establishing the contrary rests upon the party asserting jurisdiction.” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994) (internal citations omitted). Furthermore, “‘[i]t is axiomatic that subject matter jurisdiction may not be waived, and that courts may raise the issue sua sponte.'” NetworkIP, L.L.C. v. FCC, 548 F.3d 116, 120 (D.C. Cir. 2008), quoting Athens Cmty. Hosp., Inc. v. Schweiker, 686 F.2d 989, 992 (D.C. Cir. 1982). Indeed, a federal court must raise the issue because it is “forbidden – as a court of limited jurisdiction – from acting beyond [its] authority, and ‘no action of the parties can confer subject-matter jurisdiction upon a federal court.'” Id., quoting Akinseye v. District of Columbia, 339 F.3d 970, 971 (D.C. Cir. 2003). A district court may dismiss a complaint sua sponte pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3), when it is evident that the court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction. See Evans v. Suter, No. 09-5242, 2010 WL 1632902 (D.C. Cir. Apr. 2, 2010), citing Hurt v. U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir., 264 F. App’x 1 (D.C. Cir. 2008).
Subject matter jurisdiction is lacking where a complaint “is patently insubstantial presenting no federal question suitable for decision.” Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1009 (D.C. Cir. 2009), quoting Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330 (D.C. Cir. 1994). A claim is “patently insubstantial” when it is “flimsier than doubtful or questionable . . . essentially fictitious.” Best, 39 F.3d at 330 (internal quotation marks omitted); see Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528, 536-37 (1974) (“[F]ederal courts are without power to entertain claims otherwise within their jurisdiction if they are so attenuated and unsubstantial as to be absolutely devoid of merit, wholly insubstantial, [or] obviously frivolous . . . .”) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted); see, e.g., Peters v. Obama, Misc. No. 10-0298, 2010 WL 2541066 (D.D.C. June 21, 2010) (sua sponte dismissing complaint alleging that President Obama had been served with and failed to respond to an “Imperial Writ of Habeas Corpus” by the “Imperial Dominion of Amexem,” requiring the plaintiff’s immediate release from a correctional institution).
Although the Court is mindful that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers, see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972); Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. Cir. 2008), it finds that plaintiff’s allegations in the present case present “no federal question suitable for decision.” Best, 39 F.3d at 330. It is true that on the cover sheet filed with the complaint, plaintiff identifies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as the basis for his cause of action. Dkt. # 1-1. But since that statute authorizes the filing of constitutional claims against state, and not federal, officials, Wyatt v. Cole, 504 U.S. 158, 161 (1992), it cannot provide the predicate for subject matter jurisdiction in this case. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss this case sua sponte pursuant to Rule 12(h)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. A separate order will issue.
/s/_________
AMY BERMAN JACKSON
United States District Judge DATE: February 5, 2018
© 2017 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
I have always said that if Obama wanted it to go away, all he had to do was publish legitimate documents. He didn’t. He used it. The most profitable use of the race card in the USA in history.
I find it hysterical that the Obama coverup produced such stupid and obvious forgeries. My 9 year old grandson would have done better documents.
I’ve never cared where he was born. I cared that his formative years were not in America. I was appalled that someone who was so ‘great’ actually had allowed someone to take a picture of him doing an illegal act. His IQ was obviously less than 100 with that one pic.
I hated the cadence he adopted while reading a teleprompter. And surprised he was so tongue-tied when it didn’t work right.
He and Mike, and their prop children, we obviously not only well paid, but laughed uproariously every day for ‘putting a big one over’ on the American nation. They just couldn’t keep that little sneer from showing while in public, either. And probably toast, every night, the utter stupidity of this nation.
Didn’t David Farrar lose his eligibility challenge?
Didn’t Leo Donofrio retire from lawyering after never winning a case?
Back in my 2012 lawsuit against Obama, Leo Donofrio entered what I consider to be the definitive argument as to why Barack is not an Art. II, §1, cl. 5 natural-born citizen, all base of statutory construction.
See: https://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/27/the-dirty-little-secret-of-the-natural-born-citizen-clause-revealed/
My middle name should be “Persistent”. :-)
That’s a great middle name.
Never give up……..this is way too important to let that happen,…..that and the fact The Obama Fraud is so obvious, now more than ever,….keeps me doing what I can to help.
Thanks again CDR Kerchner….and all involved in this most important issue…………..
Obama Demands This Ad Be Taken Down where he disparages Biden . Cease and desist order drafter is none other than law firm Perkins Coie, which has long represented the Democrat National Committee (DNC) and defended Obama against numerous civil suits challenging his eligibility during his first term.
https://videos.whatfinger.com/2020/02/27/obama-demands-this-ad-be-taken-down-cease-and-desist-order-drafter/
Okay. And, let’s get some uncomfortable facts straight.
“Obama” is more representative (much more in an ethnic sense) of being Arab American than he is Black. Our “first Black president?” I don’t think so (besides the fact that he was not a constitutionally qualified real president anyway). Anyone think that “Obama” was more “Black” than Abe “Africanus” Lincoln!
Another misconception (putting it mildly), “Obama” was our first GAY (homosexual) president. It would not be Pete Buttigieg! Does “Obama’s” marriage to Michael (Michelle) LaVaughn Robinson mean that he isn’t gay? Does the fact that they had two children (adopted) prove anything?
One last thing or two, “Obama,” like it or not, is a serial criminal, to wit, forgery, identity theft, perjury, bribery, murder (?), and, worst of all, “Obama” STOLE the presidency of the United States and command of our armed forces. I call all of that and more TREASON.
For the record, I am NOT a racist. I am NOT intolerant or unaccepting of gays. I am NOT a Republican (I am a registered Independent). I don’t hate anyone and am NOT, despite what the FBI may think of me, a danger to anyone! I am a military veteran and a retired law enforcement officer. And, yes, you can call me a “BIRTHER!” That’s what I call myself, and I am proud of it, because those of us who happen to be “birthers” are absolutely entitled to our views, correct about our views, and, I believe, are American patriots.
God Bless America and help make it even greater. The SICK TREASONOUS TRUTH SURROUNDING “BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA” must be told- the sooner the better assuming it’s not already too late. Amen.
Kerchner et al vs Obama & Congress et al — an overview/table of contents I prepared with a link to full filing early the morning of Jan 20th, 2009 — when you read the filing it’s a good historical overview of what we knew way back then: https://www.scribd.com/document/61221761/Kerchner-v-Obama-Congress-DOC-00-Table-of-Contents-for-2nd-Amended-Complaint
Other legal filings and briefs in that case: https://www.scribd.com/lists/2962335/Kerchner-v-Obama-Congress-Legal-Filings-Other-Cases
Subsequent petition to the U.S. Supreme Court for certiorari which they denied: https://www.scribd.com/document/38506403/Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-filed-with-the-U-S-Supreme-Court-for-Kerchner-v-Obama-Congress
This newspaper ad explains the problem re the three “stooges” institutions which participated in and enabled the cover up and Obama’s fraud to continue: https://www.scribd.com/doc/58789325/We-Have-a-Criminal-and-Forger-in-the-White-House-20110627-issue-Wash-Times-Natl-Wkly-pg-5
I keep working on this Obama fraud issue trying and working in my own way to expose Obama in the hope that someday some controlling authority legal federal government agency will look into the various forged and stolen Obama key ID documents and then the truth will come out and Obama and accomplices will be exposed and punished, including major players in the main stream media. Obama is an example of “Operation Mockingbird” on steroids when it comes to the media. Until that day comes I continue to build and maintain a history of events so that no one in the future can claim that no one knew and/or no one was told.
My middle name should be “Persistent”. :-)
https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?237296722888563-L_1_0-1
These concerns are valid and investigation is warranted. However, as we’ve seen time and again, any investigation into Obama (or any other DC Democrat) would be perfunctory at best and a downright (and probably overt) fraud at worst. In any event, any Truth that was discovered would be covered up. Even if it weren’t covered up, prosecution would be framed as “vengeful” or “racist,” at the very least “concerns” would be raised that it looked like those things and then Barr’s DOJ would decline to prosecute…again. The American people will have no justice regarding the absolute criminal fraud that was the Obama Regime. If you haven’t figured that out by now then there’s no hope at all…
Anybody who has ever opened Obama’s “certificate of live birth” in PhotoShop can see instantly that it is a forgery – and anybody who believes the lies that the anomalies are OCR artifacts simply doesn’t know anything about how image manipulation works.
Yes, in my opinion this is what the Deep State fears. However, it’s also possible one of the reasons the fraud Obama was picked to be installed by the Globalists/Deep State is because they knew that once he was allowed and assisted by Congress, both parties in 2009, to be sworn-in and praised by the Obama media that he would become self-protecting. That happened when Congress, both parties who swear an oath to protect the Constitution, failed to do so and allowed our government and military to be effectively given to the enemy. Backing out of this HUGE criminal act without severe consequences was not possible. I remember being told by a Congressional staff member, I believe in 2009 that “Leadership of Congress had a meeting and decided Obama’s eligibility would not be looked into”. Not too shocking that Pelosi and Reid would make that decision. From the moment in time when Obama was allowed to be sworn-in until today it became job number one of Congress and all complicit in the Obama fraud to insure Obama always remained officially considered a legitimate president. This was evident from the reaction of members of Congress, both parties, to constituents who brought the subject up and sent them evidence of the Obama Fraud. I was told that a few members of Congress initially said they would bring up the subject in Congress……but they never did……..It was too late and the cover-up had to remain locked in place and that IMO was reinforced as necessary by Congressional leadership. Part of that planned in 2008 cover-up was Hillary being elected after Obama.
When that failed and instead it was Obama’s biggest nemesis, Donald Trump, a panic began which has only intensified as the many efforts to remove President Trump from office have failed. Giving up is not something these people are ever going to do so they must be exposed for this usurpation of America’s presidency to be brought to justice……… and for the swamp to be fully drained. IMO no one knows today if that will in fact happen, but as long as Donald Trump is President I believe the possibility exist….and apparently so do the many complicit in The Obama Fraud.
The pushback against Trump (remember it started BEFORE he was elected) by the Deep State and the obedient media is not only linked to the fact that Trump vowed to drain the swamp. More specifically is the FACT that a three person contingent briefed Trump in the spring of 2011 and laid out the evidence of AKA Obama’s identity fraud and lack of constitutional eligibility to be POTUS. Barry and his criminal cabal have been sweating bullets ever since. The media have cheered on the effort against Trump and a large portion of the stupid and ignorant Obama sycophants have lapped up the fake news. Reelection means that Trump will be in a better position to expose the treasonous, anti-American fraud who goes by the name of Barack Hussein Obama.
Manchurian candidate.
Thanks Sharon for this article, and CDR Kerchner for contacting Rudy Giuliani. This is IMO the major reason why the panic to remove President Trump from office and it reveals the absolute necessity of Hillary Clinton becoming the after Obama president. When she failed the many complicit in The Obama Fraud panicked big-time and 3 plus years later the panic has not let up.
It’s time to release the truth on the Globalist/Deep State installation of the fraud Obama, although President Trump may be saving that for his second term. I am hopeful that he does intend to “go there” after being mocked and ridiculed by Obama and others on the “birther” issue. I believe President Trump will and this issue was one of the reasons Donald Trump made the decision to run for president.
In regard to your question, Sharon, the answer is YES!
Just ask John Brennan, James Clapper, Lois Lerner, Jeh Johnson, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Robert Mueller, Michael Horowitz, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Leon Panetta, George Herbert Walker Bush, George W Bush, Nancy Pelosi, Rahm Emmanuel, John Boehner, Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan, Joint Chiefs of Staff preceding the Trump administration, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts Jr, members of The Muslim Brotherhood in the federal government, and other individuals and groups too numerous to mention.
Obama judges Sotomayor and Berman-Jackson both have invalid authority to rule on Trump related litigation and prosecution
Kenyan Gov Officials, African Newspapers, Obama 1991 Bio, Barry Obama, Obama Family Mbrs, and other Accounts Reporting Obama is Kenyan Born: https://www.scribd.com/lists/3248475/Kenyan-Gov-Officials-African-Newspapers-Obama-1991-Bio-Barry-Obama-Obama-Family-Mbrs-and-other-Accounts-Reporting-Obama-is-Kenyan-Born
Here’s hoping Rudy looks into this issue and/or discusses it with Trump and at some point even starts talking about it in public. Here is the link to my various collections of evidence and articles re Obama’s forged and/or stolen key ID documents, newspaper ads run in national newspapers from early 2009 to 2012, various eligibility lawsuits brought against Obama including Kerchner et al vs Obama & Congress et al, Obama’s forged birth documents – the short-form and long-form, Obama’s forged draft registration card, Obama’s use of a stolen SSN from a deceased person who died in CT, and many other lists and collections. Just visit this link and scroll down to the “list” of interest: http://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists Click on my comment user name for more information and links to past and current efforts to expose the fraud and usurper Obama. CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)