Spread the love

JUST HOW DEEP AND WIDE IS THE CORRUPTION?

by Sharon Rondeau

Obama’s purported “long-form” birth certificate has appeared in several color schemes, just one anomaly which has never been explained

(May 25, 2018) — Obama birth certificate investigator Mike Zullo will be a guest on the “Freedom Friday” radio show hosted by Carl Gallups this evening during the 6:00 PM EDT/5:00 PM CDT hour to discuss current events and how they might relate to the five-year probe Zullo conducted between 2011 and 2016.

Under the authority of then-Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio, in August 2011 Zullo began an analysis of the image posted on the White House website on April 27, 2011 purported to represent Barack Hussein Obama’s “long-form” birth record from the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH).

Along with a team of experienced legal and law enforcement professionals comprising the “Cold Case Posse,” Zullo was forced to conclude, following several days of analysis, that the image could not be considered genuine. After informing Arpaio, what would become a 5+-year probe into the origins of the image was carried out virtually single-handedly, encompassing extensive travel, including to the HDOH.

The investigation was punctuated in December 2016 with Zullo’s announcement of the findings of two independent forensic analysts who came to agree with Zullo’s conclusion that the long-form birth certificate image is a “computer-generated forgery.”

The mainstream media declined to conduct its own investigation of Zullo’s initial findings of fraud and forgery announced in a press conference on March 1, 2012, and in some cases, even to report Zullo’s conclusions accurately to the public. Many reports were laced with ridicule and accusations of racism on the part of the investigators.

Intertwined with the issue of the birth certificate forgery are questions which arose in 2007 as to Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president given that articles from NPR, MSNBC, and the Associated Press over the years had reported Obama as having been born in a foreign country and not Hawaii, as he has publicly claimed.

Zullo’s investigation also concluded that a purported Selective Service registration form bearing Obama’s name released to a number of FOIA requesters beginning in late 2008 is fraudulent. When Arpaio requested to see the original registration form or a certified copy thereof, then-Selective Service System Director Lawrence Romo, an Obama appointee, refused to make it available.

On Friday morning, Trump excoriated the “mainstream media” for being “corrupt” in its reportage of the news of an alleged “spy” dispatched to interact with members of his campaign.

On Sunday, Trump tweeted that he would “demand” an investigation into reports which stated that an “informant” was used by the FBI to interact with a number of his aides.  Within two hours, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said that he would ask the Justice Department’s Inspector General to expand his ongoing work into the Hillary Clinton private server issue and alleged political influence within the U.S. intelligence community to include the allegations of spying on the Trump campaign.

Most mainstream media outlets now refer to the retired Cambridge University professor who allegedly contacted at least three members of the campaign as an “informant” or even a “whistleblower,” but not a “spy.”  Initially, The New York Times and The Washington Post said that releasing his name would endanger lives and other intelligence operations but later released it nevertheless.

Obama’s Director of National Intelligence (DNI), James Clapper, said on “The View” on Tuesday that the “spy” was dispatched by the FBI to “protect” the Trump campaign from alleged Russian “influence” and “infiltration.”

Former Trump campaign aide Michael Caputo has said on air that more than one informant approached the  campaign, with the apparent purpose of gleaning or planting information, to include him.

As with the birth certificate issue, many in the media are now attempting to legitimize the presence of one or more informants positioned by the U.S. intelligence community into an American political campaign without the candidate’s knowledge.

At least two television pundits who were once in government — former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich and former White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer — have recently said on air that the FBI could not have carried out a counterintelligence operation against a political campaign without the knowledge of Obama himself.

Friday night’s radio show can be accessed here or through Gallups’s website’s “Freedom Friday” page.

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Dear Barry, ( just in case you’re monitoring the Post & Email),
    I’m still waiting for you to meet me in my front yard…I’ll tie BOTH hands behind my back.

  2. Dear P&E Thanks for this update and I intend to listen to the noted radio show this evening.
    As I recall Sheriff Arpaio’s team revealed that Trump was being “wire tapped” at his residency…

    Is this bubble of Obama fraud and usurperation about to burst in light of possible new info and the will of authorities?