Obama Sycophants Desperately Try to Infiltrate The Post & Email’s Comments Section


by Sharon Rondeau

(Jan. 7, 2018) — Over the last several weeks, Obama “long-form” birth certificate investigator Mike Zullo has been releasing additional details of his observations and conclusions drawn from the five-year probe which declared the image bearing the name “Barack Hussein Obama” a “computer-generated forgery.”

Interestingly, following each interview, The Post & Email has noted a flurry of comments defending the image, attacking the messenger and feigning ignorance as to the already-released details of the numerous signs of forgery.

The comments have contained half-truths, outright propaganda and lies in an obvious and desperate attempt to continue the charade that the image posted at whitehouse.gov on April 27, 2011 is a genuine representation of a real, paper document generated by the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH).

The reactions of the birth certificate’s defenders have at times been quite visceral and at others, written in such a way as to attempt to trick the reader into believing that Zullo did not possess the credentials or experience to conduct the investigation which ultimately included the analyses of and concurrence of Zullo’s findings on the part of two well-known forensics experts.

This blatantly false assertion flies directly in the face of the research by The P&E and resulting article published in which The P&E interviewed a retired Phoenix police lieutenant who not only confirmed that Zullo was in fact a police detective in the state of New Jersey, but that Zullo was also his partner on various cases over the years.

During a December 29, 2017 interview with Carl Gallups of “Freedom Friday,” Zullo discussed four different images made available to the press on the day of the birth certificate’s posting and revealed that two “pics” which NBC reporter Savannah Guthrie said she took of the document and posted on social media contain unexplained differences.

Following that revelation, Obama supporters submitted misleading comments in a growing, and perhaps panicked, effort to convince readers that there exists a plausible explanation for the alignment of the letters in the words “East Africa” in the four images differs among them.

Approximately 2½ years ago, without having noted those anomalies, The Post & Email wrote to Guthrie, CBS News’s Stephanie Condon, and Fox News’s Steve Centanni to request a copy of the press kit they were provided on the morning of April 27, 2011, just before the birth certificate image was unveiled to the public. None responded.

On December 29 with Gallups, Zullo opined that Trump may be preparing to have his Justice Department investigate issues involving corruption which it now appears the Obama administration could have purposely overlooked or obscured. As of this writing, the DOJ has just announced that an investigation into the Clinton Foundation is under way.

After one Obama sycophant made the claim that Zullo was never a detective, The Post & Email brought the comment and several others to his attention for his response, which he prefaced by stating that he had not seen them previously and does not spend time reading comments on message boards.

His response is as follows:

These are the same tactics this coordinated group of disinformation operatives have been employing over the years, most of whom have never revealed their true identities or qualifications, trying to defend the indefensible.

I encountered them early on in this investigation and made a public offer to them: To anyone having creditable information that would clear the document, simply identify yourself, your qualifications and provide a sworn affidavit including your identity, qualifications, finding and methodology and I would fly you to Phoenix at our expense and sit down with you and you can prove your point. Not one of them took me up on the offer. Not one. Telling! From that point on I paid no mind to these people. They should have jumped at the chance.

They employ Alinsky-type tactics mixed in with old-school, Goebbels-like propaganda methods, casting aspersions and trying to assail the individuals they target as the biggest threats to their mission.  They pathetically conflate issues, feverishly attempting to confuse the proponents on the other side of the argument, hoping to goad you into a dialog, hoping you reveal vital information to them and then shut you down.

They make demands of you as if they are of some authority and therefore that you must submit to their request.  They operate by the belief that power is not only what you have, but it is what others believe you have. They falsely portray themselves as authorities on the topic, deceptively giving the illusion of superiority compared to you, when in fact they are not; they are simply purveyors of disinformation, conjecture and lies.  These actors are nobodies who have been tasked with the mission to monopolize various message boards to promote disingenuous argument for the purpose of bringing discredit to any challenge of the Obama Birth Certificate issue. Unfortunately, many have fallen into their trap over the years.

Never proving any claim by true expert analyses, these players have even gone as far as to attempt to influence and tamper with our forensic document experts, trying to sway their professional opinions after our last press conference.  This is unheard-of, but it shows the level of fear and desperation they have reached.   They have never produced one professional forensic document or digital expert to put his or her reputation on the line and assert in written form declaring that the Obama pdf file is reliable or authentic. Not one.

They work in a coordinated effort with others in their group targeting one aspect of the debate and then work together to cast doubt suggesting or even outright asserting that the other side is wrong with no real evidence to support their claim other than their own subjective contrived examples, all in an effort to cast doubt even on the most fundamentally sound position backed by credible forensic evidence.

We had received documentation that this same group was in constant contact with a local Arizona news reporter’s coordination efforts to cast doubt on the birth certificate question for years. And our left-wing reporters were more than happy to oblige them.  Don’t let them tell you this is not true. I have hard-copy evidence.

Tactically they try to find or falsely create some sense of error in your argument; they try to exploit that concern, all the while widening that gap of uncertainty by means of a pile-on method of constant pressure, having a growing number of cohorts denounce you personally or your opinion and put forth erroneous information formulated to cause even more doubt to arise in the minds of the readers. They bank on the theory that if they can cast just a little doubt, they can spin it and widen it, keeping the pressure on to such a point where the other side retreats in doubt of themselves and their position.

If their opponent doubts their position, they in turn will impugn their opponent by “doubting their opponent’s doubt.” For example, if the reader is doubting a false claim they make, they will doubt your reader’s doubt by saying something along the lines of “How can you say that?” or “How can you believe that?” They will tell you that you don’t know what you are talking about and in choreographed fashion, cohorts join them and reinforce the notion that you don’t know what you are talking about, mixing all other kinds of deceptive augments along the way.   Then they will tell you that others agree with them and not you, coupled with sarcasm or mockery, all to neutralize you. They believe ridicule is man’s best weapon.  It is all a very evil game and should be viewed as such.

They will use a technique of contrasting image and reality by taking claims you are making and contrasting them with some other manipulated information intended to conceal the truth to deceitfully depict your claims as false. They have an excuse or answer for everything, but only the points they choose to address. Anything that is too problematic for them they will deflect from.

They believe if they push a negative theory long enough it will eventually be received as a positive theory and be taken as fact.  Everything is wrapped in disguise with these people.

When they are proven wrong they will never concede the point; they will go silent on that issue and quickly move on to something else to steer the conversation in a different direction. They are always constructing an alternative to any argument you have. When they don’t have a solution they simply make one up.  These people have never conceded one point in eight years.

This type of behavior goes way beyond any reasonable skepticism. It is even beyond radical skepticism. It is just plain old-fashioned lying. People like this are highly manipulative and lack any sense of moral judgment. Jails are full of people like this.

They hate the fact that others stand up to their self-imposed authority, ask difficult questions of them, unearth true motives and challenge their unsupported claims. They can’t fight you on a well-lit playing field of solid fact; they can fight you only on the playing field of low-light, covert deception. They entire existence is to suppress the truth, to hide the truth that, if exposed, would have catastrophic results for them and the ones they protect.

They will use innuendos and arguments that are intellectually dishonest during what should be honest discourse or pose questions that are in reality cloaked attacks. These are all designed to slander targets by subtle references, which is nothing more than malicious attempts to defame their target and call into question motive or qualification. All the while, they tout but possess no actual qualifications or pure motive themselves.  They will offer up some type of unrelated qualification as a basis upon which to speak with some level of authority on the matter at hand. It doesn’t, but they want you to think it does. They even attempted to exalt themselves above real-world forensic experts, as if they are better qualified and therefore justified to point out to real experts where true professional expertise went wrong. It is just plan sick.

Basically, it all boils down to “If you tell a lie long enough and keep repeating it people will eventually come to believe it.” They sow seeds of confusion and discord. They hate not only the position you have but also you for having it. They will do and say anything to keep the lie well-hidden. Keep telling the lie, never let up, challenge everything, never concede.

And in grand Alinsky style they will pick a target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it, by any means to stifle you and your facts or ideas. They do this out of fear. You are dangerous to them…they have to silence you.

These people need to suck you into the fray…your input keeps their game going. Simply don’t do it. I haven’t for seven years. It is a waste of good time and energy. The reality is they are all irrelevant. They cannot play in the arena where this matter is now and will be advancing to.  Not one of them is going to change the facts or stop what is about to come. They are powerless.

The bottom line is they cannot prove authenticity of that pdf file document on any level; it’s as simple as that.  A pdf file, manipulated or not, simply is not a birth certificate, especially one as impugned as that one. They know it. They just don’t want you to know it.

Last week, The Post & Email banned all such disinformation agents from commenting, as their propaganda does not constitute the honest and open debate on issues we wish to promote in the public square.

14 Responses to "Obama Sycophants Desperately Try to Infiltrate The Post & Email’s Comments Section"

  1. rationalist   Friday, January 12, 2018 at 12:17 PM

    even if everything on this “birth certificate” is accurate, he was still the first socialist marxist secularist muslim president of the US.
    Sickening but true…

  2. Sharon Rondeau   Monday, January 8, 2018 at 3:50 PM

    You’re speculating. Why not contact Zullo about it directly and ask?

  3. James Brolin   Monday, January 8, 2018 at 12:23 PM

    With regard to the issues raised around Mr Zullo’s time as a detective, I believe I can throw a scintilla of light on the background.

    That Mr Zullo was a member of the law enforcement community, specifically for the township of Demarest, NJ, is, I believe, not at question. The matter that causes the additional noise is that the township does not nor it seems ever has had detectives on its roll.

    The reasoning is, I am reasonably sure, was and is that Demarest is a community of slightly less than 5,000 individuals with a municipal budget of approx 9 million dollars per year of which approximately 2 million per annumgoes in police department salary and wages.

    With 1 x chief, 3 x sergeants, 9 x patrolmen, 8 x “Special police” and 12 crossing guards to pay for, there simply is no money to pay for additional detectives.

    After some cursory checking, it appears that Bergen County provides Detective services to Demarest (amongst others) and as such maybe Mr Zullo could have been a detective in Bergen county.

    Possibly that is where the discrepancy lies..?

  4. James Carter   Monday, January 8, 2018 at 12:04 PM

    Philo Vance wrote:
    “Not true. Dr. Neal Krawetz a national known forensic digital image analyst examined the PDF and presented his findings on his website. He gave the following conclusion:

    “The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”


    From Dr. Neal Krawetz’s web-site via the above link:
    “Second, we don’t know the history of this PDF document released by the White House. Specifically, we don’t know who scanned in the paper document and turned it into a PDF document.”

    Well, Mr. Vance and Dr. Krawetz: Why don’t we know the history of the White House PDF? Certainly someone does, specifically whomever scanned the hard-copy and created the PDF.

    “The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.” — Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Soebarkah.

  5. Stephen Hiller   Monday, January 8, 2018 at 11:53 AM

    Mr. Zullo – This sounds like a perfect definition of a Democrat politician. Did they all go to the same school? Or do all schools now teach this?

  6. Gary Wilmott   Monday, January 8, 2018 at 11:12 AM

    If aka Obama had a legitimate long form birth certificate from the United States (any state) he would have produced it long before he ever ran for POTUS. He didn’t and the constitutionalists were on to him. The result is a forgery. Plain and simple. The puppet masters knew that aka Obama also needed a selective service registration card if he was to be employed by the federal government. That was the law. Obama was a foreigner at the time he was required to register according to ‘his” birth timeline of 1980 so there was never the need to register. So a registration had to be faked and forged. Plain and simple. Then of course there was the need for aka Obama to have a SSN for all his lifetime of grifting and scamming. The result was multiple SSNs uncovered by investigators Susan Daniels and Neil Sankey associated with aka Obama including one associated with the state of Connecticut where Obama had never resided or even visited at the time. More identity fraud. Plain and simple. Just coincidence? I think not. AKA Obama and his cohorts are responsible for the greatest crime ever perpetrated on the American people because their deception, deceit and lies represents a frontal assault on the very foundation and principle upon which this country was based. We cannot stop until we get justice. The truth must be revealed.

  7. Michael Volin   Monday, January 8, 2018 at 10:37 AM

    Only one logical conclusion for all the attention, still trying to cover it up! As in the comments above its well know Zullo was a detective why smear him? A lot of time is spent by the trolls. They never fully identify themselves, no contact info, no phone number, nothing. NO CREDIBILITY NOTHING JUST HIDE BEHIND A KEYBOARD. Perhaps C E Hughes can explain.

    Mike Volin
    570 284 7477

  8. Jake Martinez   Monday, January 8, 2018 at 10:34 AM

    Dear Sharon:
    I salute and thank you for your unwavering fortitude and tireless/meticulous work on this and other pertinent issues-you are a true patriot.
    God Bless-Have a great day & a Healthy and Prosperous New Year-Stay Safe.
    Thanks again.

  9. JONATHAN DAVID MOOERS   Monday, January 8, 2018 at 8:53 AM

    How important is Sharon Rondeau and The P&E 08-28-09- TODAY?

    How important is electricity?

    ANSWER: Imagine if each were instantly removed from humanity today, and imagine what the world would have to do IN THE DARK to get by without them!

    It is my hope that all of America, and the world, will know the full identity of ID Thief-in-Chief Barry Soetoro-Obama II before 08-28-18…the 10-year anniversary of Treason Queen Pelosi’s forgery of Barry and Michelle’s passports into the White House!

    Let’s KEEP THE LIGHTS ON this year with President Trump + Zullo + Rondeau + Taitz et al to end the national robbery of the fully disclosed identity of NEVER-presIDent SOETORO-OBAMA II (= SO2, a deadly toxin)!

  10. Sharon Rondeau   Monday, January 8, 2018 at 7:36 AM

    Did Krawetz present a sworn affidavit on his findings to Zullo and take him up on his offer of meeting with him in Phoenix, all expenses paid?

  11. Philo Vance   Sunday, January 7, 2018 at 11:10 PM

    “They have never produced one professional forensic document or digital expert to put his or her reputation on the line and assert in written form declaring that the Obama pdf file is reliable or authentic. Not one.”

    Not true. Dr. Neal Krawetz a national known forensic digital image analyst examined the PDF and presented his findings on his website. He gave the following conclusion:

    “The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”


    Was he ever interviewed by Zullo?

  12. Barbara Godolphin   Sunday, January 7, 2018 at 10:53 PM

    God bless you and Detective Zullo!

  13. Sharon Rondeau   Sunday, January 7, 2018 at 9:39 PM

    Thank you, but I think Mr. Zullo did the yeoman’s work here.

  14. Tim   Sunday, January 7, 2018 at 8:52 PM

    Sharon –
    For those who read your entire dissertation, this article is enlightening, if not an education in itself. I think you covered it all with this beautifully detailed explanation of left-wing tactics and strategy. I’ve watched that strategy operate for years on other forums, but have never seen it combated as effectively as you have done here.
    – Tim

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.