Spread the love

BY THE MAINSTREAM PRESS

by Sharon Rondeau

Why are there four different versions of Obama’s purported long-form birth certificate?

(Dec. 31, 2017) — For the third consecutive week, Obama birth certificate forgery investigator Mike Zullo was Carl Gallups’s guest on the “Freedom Friday” show on December 29, 2017 to discuss anomalies discovered in the “long-form” birth certificate image bearing the name “Barack Hussein Obama II.”

The show is broadcast on WEBY 1330 radio, with the podcast now available at Gallups’s website and on his Facebook page.

Zullo was Gallups’s guest on December 1, when he began releasing analysis and commentary on his 5+-year investigation into the “long-form” birth certificate image released by the White House on April 27, 2011 said to represent Barack Hussein Obama’s original birth record from the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH).

On March 1, 2012, Zullo declared at the first of what would be three press conferences that his initial six months of investigation showed that the birth certificate image is a “computer-generated forgery.”

For years, doubt has swirled about Obama’s birthplace and by extension, his constitutional eligibility to serve as president given that numerous credible reports have stated that he was born in Kenya or Indonesia and not Hawaii, as he claims.

Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires the president and commander of the military to be a “natural born Citizen,” a term the Framers did not precisely define in the new nation’s founding documents.

In his opening statement, Gallups predicted that the new year will be “magnificent” in regard to the exposure by the Trump Justice Department of long-hidden federal government corruption. Months ago, Trump himself criticized Justice for having failed to launch, at least at that time, investigations into a number of high-profile events which took place during the eight-year Obama regime.

“I think he’s gearing up for something…I’m going to get the popcorn and sit back and watch it,” Zullo said in regard to Gallups’s prediction of the hypothetical unveiling of the circumstances behind the Arwan Brothers, IT employees suspected of a number of crimes while earning exorbitant salaries working for congressional Democrats; Obama’s Iran nuclear “deal,” and his reported backing away from investigating and stopping Hezbollah’s U.S. drug trafficking in order to solidify the controversial agreement with the rogue Middle Eastern nation.

Following Gallups’s introduction, the focus of discussion became then-NBC White House reporter Savannah Guthrie’s claim that on the day the “long-form” image was released and paper documents containing it purportedly distributed to the press, she held “touched and felt the raised seal” on the paper and took “pics” which she then posted on social media.

“There are a lot of problems with that story,” Gallups led into the discussion, to which Zullo responded that Guthrie was “the only journalist” who ever said she “felt a raised seal” on “a certified copy” of Obama’s birth certificate, then took “pics” and made them public.

Zullo pointed out that the two photos Guthrie posted contain differences which are problematic.  The first photo, he explained, focused on Obama’s purported father’s information, from which Zullo’s attention was drawn to “Box #11” stating Barack Hussein Obama’s country of origin as “Kenya, East Africa.” Zullo stated that the words “East” and “Africa” contain first letters which are slightly misaligned with the remaining letters of those words, an occurrence he said was “not an issue” given the manual typewriters of the day.

Guthrie’s second posted photo, Zullo pointed out, shows a wider shot of the image with “widely disjointed” letters in the same words.  “They do not conform or replicate the very closeup photo she just previously posted,” Zullo said.

“So then the problem gets even worse, because the Associated Press, the same day, released two photos of purportedly the same document:  one with a green background, and one that has some kind of clear, bluish tint. Now, the one with the bluish tint, it has a completely different letter alignment than the Guthrie photo,” Zullo said, pointing out that the word “East” is nearly horizontally aligned.  “When you go to the ‘Africa,’ the ‘A’ is a little higher, but he ‘f-r-i-c-a’ — now these are horizontally aligned.”

He then stated that another photo released by the AP with a “green safety paper background” which Zullo described as “pristine” and “looks like the Obama PDF.”  However, he said that the words “East Africa” are “now in perfect horizontal alignment to each other.”

Zullo then observed that the “a” within the word “East” resembles an “n” that he cannot explain.

“We know that the AP images were White House handouts,” Zullo said, speculating that they could have been “copies of the White House handouts” or “jpeg images placed in Photoshop.”  “Something went on with these two images,” he said.

[Editor’s Note:  An AP photo archive of photographer J. Scott Applewhite depicts the long-form birth certificate images with both the blue and green backgrounds without an explanation as to why two versions of the photo exist.]

He then said that Guthrie’s two photos represent “two different documents.”

“So the question becomes:  We know that the White House claimed that they had two certified copies.  There is no way that they had two different documents certified.  Either you had one birth certificate or you didn’t.  So what does she have a picture of? Is that possibly a forerunner, a work in progress, that they showed her?”

Zullo pointed out that during the private press conference held by then-White House Counsel Robert Bauer and then-White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer just prior to the public release of the long-form birth certificate image and Obama’s claim of it as his own, reporters were told that only copies of the purported original document would be available to them.

Zullo said that Guthrie’s claim of having touched the raised seal is in contradiction to the other versions of the image which on paper bear no such seal.  “So you can’t see the raised seal that she purportedly held, and you can’t identify it in her document,” he commented.

The interview can be heard in its entirety here.

 

 

 

Join the Conversation

33 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Mark Bellison wrote:
    The problem is that what he [Mike Zullo] called an anomaly in 2012 may not be an anomaly in 2017.

    For example:
    Movable layers include Registrar stamp.
    Halos cannot be produced by scanning
    Certificate number out of sequence
    “9” means “ not stated”
    Number of 1-bit and 8-bit layers
    African as a term for race.
    Pixel identical elements on the PDF.”

    A layer of a PDF image containing individual objects like a date-stamp and/or registrar stamp which, in 2012, could be made visible/invisible and/or individually selected, re-sized, rotated, moved and placed anywhere on the main document may, in 2017, no longer be? Can you say “WHAT HAPPENED” to that PDF?

  2. T.F. Box wrote:
    “I don’t recall him [Mike Zullo] ever saying he had any formal training or experience in forensic document analysis or digital imagery.”

    I readily admit that I don’t have any formal training or experience in forensic document analysis or digital imagery. I also readily admit that I have more than a modicum of experience in computer “Desktop Publishing” and/or “Pre-Press” — including typography, font creation, image creation, text and image importation and modification, document layout, raster and vector images and text, scanning, layering, printing (proofs and finals), various file formats, cross-platform compatibility and on an on and on. My “Claim to fame”/”Piece de Resistance”, as it were, was duplicating an IRS 1040 income tax return form from scratch (rather than scan it) during a “Federal Office Systems Expo” (FOSE) in Washington DC in 1987 in order to demonstrate what could be done via “Desktop Publishing”. I cordially invite everyone reading this to guess what hardware and software I used to do that. :-)

  3. Dr. Conspiracy wrote:
    “An qualified and unbiased expert wouldn’t have made such an elementary mistake. Also a rational person would realize that Obama releasing several different versions of his birth certificate on the same day (or even making multiples in the first place) defies reason. When something is patently absurd on its face, then it’s not true.”

    During June-August of 2008 there were several desperate images of Obama’s COLB posted on five different Obama friendly web-sites (in chronological order): DailyKos, FightTheSmears, FactCheck, Politifact and Snopes. The first two showed a COLB with no indication that it had ever been folded, the third showed a COLB that had been folded in thirds (as if to make it fit in a standard letter-size envelope), the fourth and fifth showed a COLB with no indication that it had ever been folded. The first two did not source the image, the third sourced the images to Obama’s campaign headquarters, the fourth sourced the image to the first two, and the fifth sourced the image to its public comment board (the same public comment board that Obama’s White House sourced the COLB it posted on its web-site on/about April 27, 2011). When something is so ludicrous, then it’s probable fake.

  4. T.F. BOW Indeed, 2018 could be a huge development for disclosure of all Arpaio’s
    evidence and legal charges against USURPER Obama. I have sat in a few court hearing that didn’t last for very long. Those found guilty received a verdict base on the evidence. As I compare those cases with the evidence from many, many experts and several disciplines,
    against Obama, I would need at least a week’s worth of lunches. Those mentioned cases
    were quite petty compared to Obama’s. Bare in mind, my hunch is that Team Arpaio has
    kept lots of evidence close to the vest for future use.

    Huggy Bear I am not suggesting anything you have indicated. Timing is everything, Team
    Arpaio will release info, evidence, and make statements on their time-table. I have no inside
    scoop here. I see you have placed your chips, as you know, the house is the real winner.

  5. “They are readily available through Zullo’s interviews published here and elsewhere.”

    The problem is that what he called an anomaly in 2012 may not be an anomaly in 2017.

    For example:
    Movable layers include Registrar stamp.
    Halos cannot be produced by scanning
    Certificate number out of sequence
    “9” means “ not stated”
    Number of 1-bit and 8-bit layers
    African as a term for race.
    Pixel identical elements on the PDF.

    1. The obvious desperation of those defending an obviously fraudulent government document is now generating comments so absurd and nonsensical that their authors will have to go elsewhere to post their musings. The game is up, Obots, and some of you might be facing the inside of a courtroom soon.

  6. I fully agree that Mr. Zullo’s document analysis credentials are a matter of public record. There is no public record, and he has no credentials. Real journalists ask hard questions, not just believe what they want to be true.

    If you think what I said is a bald faced lie, then all you have to is publish those public records. But you cannot do that because those records do not exist. I checked already.

  7. Thank you, Sharon, for putting your foot down on the website parasites herein who rely on lying to attempt to falsify reality in the public mind about NEVER-presIDent SOETORO-OBAMA II (SO2).

    Permanently banned from P&E for the New Year 2018 include T.F. “Obama-puke drinker” BOW, me thinks.

    We saw what happened to those who drank the Kool-Aid for Rev. Jim Jones, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMrFCwYAZxE and since 08-28-08, the Obama-puke drinkers gave us Divorcee Valerie and SOS Hillary and their complicit murders around the planet, particularly Benghazi massacre and cover-up: https://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2017/05/26/hillary-clinton-benghazi-email-suits-dismissed-238880 and http://time.com/5042560/libya-slave-trade/ and https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/22/opinion/egypts-cruelty-to-christians.html

    Those who lead by lies leave followers to die like flies (Hitler, Mao, SO2, Stalin, Lyndon Johnson and his Vietnam and LBJ-JFK death plot, Rev. Jim Jones et al).

    Who can not see on the world stage that lying leads to dying?

  8. I recall Mike Zullo saying he had worked as a police officer for a few years for a small town in New Jersey.

    I don’t recall him ever saying he had any formal training or experience in forensic document analysis or digital imagery.

    A link to such information would be most appreciated.

  9. “Because the Obama birth certificate image is a forgery, there is no “rational” explanation for its many anomalies.”

    Can you post a list of some of these anomalies?

    Just several examples.

  10. If Jeffrey Harrison’s uncritical faith in Arpaio could be harnessed, the world’s energy problems would be solved.

    But to answer his question, 2018 will be like the years preceeding: all talk, no action regarding Obama.

  11. @Jeffrey Harrison

    So you are suggesting that Arapio has waited over a year after he was no longer sheriff and the Cold Case Posse has been disbanded to do something? All evidence shows that the December 2016 not-a-news-conference (that was really comical if you think about it) was Arapio’s last foray into the birth certificate issue.

    He is more occupied with trying to get a criminal contempt conviction off his record and raising money for a run for Jeff Flake’s Senate seat than resurrecting an issue that he has pretty much abandoned that would be a loser for him to bring forward again.

    The big story in 2018 will be Mueller’s investigation of the Trump campaign and how far up the chain it goes. If anyone cares to make a small wager on whether the Obama birth certificate or Mueller’s investigation is the story of the year in 2018 I will take all bets on that one.

  12. I’m starting to feel good about the up coming year. Is this the year that Obama and Team
    Obama are truly exposed and held accountable for their great fraud? Indeed, many of us
    didn’t think it would take this long. But, perhaps we will see even more sunlight in the
    coming weeks / months to come and some hearings and arrests.

    I’ve always suspected that Team Arpaio has played their cards carefully and have held
    back lots of mind blowing evidence. In what they have done and in their moves in the
    future, even more damming evidence should be released.

    Joe Arpaio (sly old fox) is yet to bag Obama and his team members. My money is still on
    the toughest sheriff in America.

  13. I know Mr. Zullo desperately wants to find something wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, but I would have thought that after so many misfires, he would get the message that he’s wasting his time. Zullo is not an trained investigator, he is not a forensic expert, and he is not competent to do the work he is trying to do. It’s obvious from his consistent failure.

    In this instance, he falls for an optical illusion. If you rotate the close-up Guthrie photo so that the lines are horizontal, then it is obvious that the “frica” are aligned the same. It’s only when viewed at an angle that the eye tries to interpolate the image and makes the “f” appear higher.

    An qualified and unbiased expert wouldn’t have made such an elementary mistake. Also a rational person would realize that Obama releasing several different versions of his birth certificate on the same day (or even making multiples in the first place) defies reason. When something is patently absurd on its face, then it’s not true.

    1. What you have posted is a bald-faced lie. Zullo’s training and credentials are a matter of public record, and the excuse you make for the “optical illusion” of the “Guthrie photo” is completely unacceptable in the world of real, paper documents. Would any authorities accept that explanation in the presentation of your own paper birth certificate?

      Because the Obama birth certificate image is a forgery, there is no “rational” explanation for its many anomalies. You and several others here appear to have a deep, vested interest in continuing this ridiculous charade.

      This is a final warning to all commenters: Anyone posting knowingly false information will be banned permanently. While intellectually-honest discourse in search of the truth is encouraged, flagrant dishonesty is not.

      https://www.thepostemail.com/about/

  14. Lucas Smith lives in the Dominican Republic. His web site is still online, but there’s very little original content — mostly just reposting other’s articles. (Just like Orly Taitz’s site.)

    There’s no indication that Smith will publicly present evidence that he ever went to Kenya.

  15. This article, like most, gets the main fact wrong. It isn’t about where he was born, but about this document constituting felony fraud, and it does that. I myself know it, but for those that aren’t graphics professionals, just consider this: Savannah Guthrie, as all reporters of her stature, doesn’t go anywhere without an entourage of professional still photographers and videographers at her heels. Think about that for a while…

  16. Doug Sterling presents an image peddled by convicted forger Lucas Smith, who can’t even prove that he ever went to Kenya. In contrast, the State of Hawaii has repeatedly and expressly said Obama was born there. Doug Sterling is, of course, free to believe a convicted forger, but he should not be surprised that no one else does.

    And Three Pound Sledge is, of course, free to believe anything, but every judge who has considered the eligibility issue has ruled birth in this United States is sufficient to confer natural-born citizenship. Mario Apuzzo has brought numerous cases with his two-citizen-parents beliefs, and Apuzzo lost every single case.

  17. “[Editor’s Note: An AP photo archive of photographer J. Scott Applewhite depicts the long-form birth certificate images with both the blue and green backgrounds without an explanation as to why two versions of the photo exist.]”

    Just my own opinion but I believe the blue tinted background is the photo Applewhite says he took and the green one is not a photograph by Applewhite but the White House PDF converted to a jpeg and cropped. Some photo editor left the same caption on it.

    It makes no sense to analyze the various AP image posted by various news sites. They took his image and altered by cropping, changing the resolution, adjusting the color and format (for example ABC News and the Muscatine Journal converted the jpeg to PDFs).

    Zullo shouldn’t even waste his time on the Applewhite images but should focus on obtaining the actual paper handout given to reporters on April 27th, 2011. In that case at least he would be only one generation away from the certified copy. And he wouldn’t have all the digital artifacts to deal with. Has anyone contacted Les Kinsolving to see if he still has his copy?

    My prediction for 2018 – Zullo/Gallups will tell us that 2019 will be a great year ahead for the investigation.

    Happy New Year.

  18. “Could” is doing all the work there, as there is no indication that Zullo will ever publicly release Montgomery’s data or the experts’ reports.

  19. Didn’t Zullo say earlier this month that Montgomery said the CIA hacked into the HDOH’s database and inserted false data? If that’s true, why also forge a birth certificate? Why not just request the HDOH to print a birth certificate based on the HDOH’s data?

  20. So this episode was Zullo looking at years-old images and seeing things that no one else does.

    And last week’s episode was Zullo listening to years-old recordings and hearing things that no one else does.

    And no supporting evidence; just Zullo’s imagings.

    Yet 2018 is supposed to be the year it all cracks open?