Spread the love


by Sharon Rondeau

(Dec. 2, 2017) — On his Friday night show, “Freedom Friday” host Carl Gallups opened by referencing an article at The New York Daily News citing an alleged “report” from an unnamed U.S. Senator of a conversation during which President Donald Trump was said to have “revived” the “birther” issue, which questioned Barack Hussein Obama’s background and birthplace.

The YouTube version of the show is here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60233wF4bnM

Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires that the president be a “natural born Citizen,” which most Americans believe means, at a minimum, “born in the United States.”  Many others contend that the term signifies a more restricted class of citizens whose parents were U.S. citizens at the time of the candidate’s birth, thereby alleviating any question as to his national allegiance.

In 1958, the World Book Encyclopedia stated that a presidential candidate must have been born in the United States.  The entry further reads, citing the other provisions of Article II, “A person born of American parents in another Country, such as Canada or France, would not be eligible for election. The candidate must be at least 35 years old, and must have lived in the United States for at least 14 years.”

Since 2007, doubts circulated about Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve given that credible reports had said he was born outside of the United States, in Kenya or Indonesia.  Once questioned as the presidential election cycle unfolded, some authors changed their work to say that Obama was “born in Hawaii.”

A second question regarding Obama’s eligibility centered on his claimed father, a Kenyan and later British citizen, who came to the U.S. on a student visa but never applied for U.S. citizenship.

Yet another concern was Obama’s reported residence in Indonesia between the ages of 6 and 10, during which several reports say that he would have had to have become an Indonesian citizen to attend school.

Gallups pointed out that like many others in the mainstream media, the New York Daily News article ignored the five-year investigation into the “long-form” birth certificate image posted on the White House website on April 27, 2011 which found it to be a “computer-generated forgery.”

Instead, the article characterized Trump’s doubts about Obama’s legitimacy, first expressed early in 2011 before the image was posted, as a “conspiracy theory.”

The investigation was launched in August 2011 by then-Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff Joseph Arpaio after 242 of his constituents expressed concern that their votes could be disenfranchised in the 2012 presidential election if reports from various experts that the image was fraudulent proved to be accurate.

Gallups then brought on his first guest, former detective Mike Zullo, who served as lead investigator for the entire length of the birth certificate probe.

Responding to Gallups’s invocation of the NYDN article, Zullo noted that left-leaning media has been quick to raise the “birther” matter despite the investigation having been concluded last December, just before Arpaio left office.  “Why do they keep bringing this up?” he asked rhetorically.

A former detective, Zullo told Gallups that while investigating the birth certificate image, “circumstantial facts,” also known as “circumstantial evidence” or “indirect fact,” were identified.

He pointed out that on April 27, 2011, Obama held a press conference and “referenced the PDF file” which had been uploaded to whitehouse.gov but “never took possession of the document.”  The PDF was reported by the White House to be a scan of a certified copy of Obama’s long-form birth certificate allegedly obtained from the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) several days before by Obama’s personal attorney, Judith Corley of Perkins Coie.

Zullo then mentioned the December 2013 death of HDOH Director Loretta Fuddy, the only casualty among eight passengers traveling in a small plane which was forced to make a water landing while returning to Honolulu from official business.

Speaking of the long-form birth certificate image uploaded to whitehouse.gov, Zullo said, “Everyone attested that this is the document that was presented to them. However, there were some problems with that.  The reality is the public has never seen an original, paper document…What they have seen is a manually-created depiction of what a genuine birth certificate should have or may have looked like, but they never saw the actual document.  So that PDF file, it has no legal authority, and no one is under any obligation to accept it as any type of legal authority.”

“It means nothing,” Gallups responded, which Zullo affirmed.

Zullo said that the image is not a scan of a real document, that the “origin of the PDF file” is not known and that investigators believe it was “computer-generated.” “They wanted the public to believe the story, the narrative, that they were floating out.  Just because they say it, you’re supposed to take it as fact, so what do they do?  They manufacture direct evidence to support a phony narrative.  They manufactured that PDF file to present it to the nation as if it was factual evidence, actually a true birth certificate.  The reality is:  it never was.”

Zullo went on to say that the “birth certificate narrative is plagued with a multitude of problems” and that in court, “circumstantial” or “indirect evidence” consists of “other evidence that supports the conclusion drawn from direct evidence.”

Turning to the law firm Perkins Coie, at which Corley worked when she allegedly retrieved two certified copies of Obama’s long-form birth certificate, Zullo remarked that current high-profile Perkins Coie attorney Robert Bauer was previously Obama’s White House counsel and prior to that, his personal attorney.

Zullo referenced Bauer’s having made remarks at a “press conference” held shortly before Obama’s on April 27, 2011 during which time Bauer claimed that Hawaii officials “had to do a legal analysis to determine if there was even a legal basis for Hawaii to provide a long-form birth certificate to the president” (Zullo’s words).

Unable to locate the Bauer presser online, The Post & Email contacted Zullo, who told us that the video has been “scrubbed.”  However, he sent us a transcript of Bauer’s remarks from that day.

(“Letters” refers to Obama’s and Corley’s written communications with Fuddy to request that an exception to departmental policy be made in order to provide Obama with two certified copies of his long-form birth certificate.)

The transcript reads:

Q    Are these letters supposed to demonstrate the legal steps that were involved in releasing it to the White House counsel?

MR. BAUER:  The letters that you have, the personal request from the President, along with the accompanying letter from private counsel, is merely meant to document the legal path to getting the waiver of that policy so we could get the long-form certificate.
Q    The waiver of Hawaii state government policy?
MR. BAUER:  Right.  The non-release of the long-form certificate, which has been in effect since the 1980s — a natural question would have been, well, what did you do to obtain the waiver, and those letters represent the request.
Q    Well, isn’t it true that anybody who was born in Hawaii can write this letter?  I mean, that’s all there is to the waiver process?
MR. BAUER:  No.  Let me just explain once again because I also noticed, by the way, in one report already the wrong certificate was actually posted on the website.  The certificate with the signatures at the bottom — and that’s a key difference between the short form and the long form — the long form has signatures at the bottom from the attending physician, the local registrar, and the mother, is the original birth certificate, which sits in a bound volume in the State Department of Health.
The short from is a computerized abstract, and that’s the legal birth certificate we requested in 2008 and that Hawaiians are entitled to.  Since the mid-1980s, the State Department of Health, for administrative reasons, only provides to people who request their birth certificate the short form.  They do not provide the long form.
So in order for us to obtain the long form, we had to have a waiver.  We had to actually determine that there was a legal basis for providing it, and then ask them to exercise their authority to provide us with the long form.  The steps required to accomplish that were a letter from the person with the direct and vital interest — the President — so you have a letter from the President, and then there was an accompanying letter from counsel basically formalizing the request.  So the reason we included that is that those were legal steps we took to obtain the long form by way of this waiver.
Q    Do we have the letter from the President —
MR. BAUER:  It’s in the packet.
Q    And you went to Hawaii?
MR. BAUER:  I did not go to Hawaii.  The counsel, Judy Corley, who signed the — the President’s personal counsel at Perkins Coie, Judy Corley, whose letter — signed letter of request is in your packet, traveled to Honolulu and picked up the birth certificate.

“A simple reading of the statutes, and you know that that’s not accurate,” Zullo said, referring to when the HDOH changed its policy to release only “short-form” birth certificates routinely.  Bauer had said that the Department began its short-form-only policy in “the mid-1980s,” while Zullo said it occurred in the year 2000.

In July 2009, CNN’s then-president and CEO, Jon Klein, said in an email to staff that the HDOH had “confirmed that paper documents were discarded in 2001 when the department went paperless” and that “That reportedly includes Pres. Obama’s original birth certificate.”

On June 2, 2011, Politico reported that Bauer would return to Perkins Coie to “resume the role he had during Obama’s 2008 presidential run, serving as general counsel to the campaign and to the Democratic National Committee, and as personal lawyer to Obama,” quoting “the White House.”

Perkins Coie is now known to have been involved in procuring the Trump “dossier” through a company named “Fusion GPS” during last year’s presidential campaign.  The unsubstantiated dossier may have been utilized to obtain FISA court warrants to “wiretap” members of the Trump transition team, an item reportedly under investigation by U.S. House and Senate Intelligence Committees.

An article dated December 26, 2016 by WND’s Bob Unruh drew on a December 16, 2016 interview Zullo conducted with The Hagmann Report a day after a final press conference on the birth certificate investigation.

Zullo explained how the White House said it sent Obama’s personal lawyer to Hawaii to pick up the document to provide to the voting public.

The governor in Hawaii at the time said Obama’s records were handled no differently from others.

But Zullo noted Obama’s personal lawyer made it a private matter, and White House Counsel Bob Bauer at the time said a legal analysis was required to determine whether they could get the long-form document.

“That’s not true,” Zullo insisted. “All you had to do was contact the director of health and say, ‘I’m the president of the United States and I need a copy.”

Speaking of Bauer, Zullo told Gallups, “He attests that they had to do a legal analysis to determine if there was even a legal basis for Hawaii to provide a long-form birth certificate to the president.”  However, Zullo said there have been “numerous” individuals who requested their Hawaii “long-form” birth certificates without fanfare.

Zullo reminded listeners that early in 2011, newly-elected Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie set out on a mission to locate Obama’s long-form birth certificate “and could not find it.”

“He went on an extensive search, according to him, and they eventually located a record of his birth sitting in a box somewhere in the state archives.  Well, we contacted the state archives; they have no knowledge of this, and they say they’re not in possession of any birth records,” Zullo said at 12:45 in the video.

On January 18, 2011, Dr. Jerome Corsi published an article which begins, “Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie suggested in an interview published today that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.”

Following a break, Zullo resumed his narrative in which he stated that Abercrombie’s revelations showed that Obama’s long-form birth certificate never was “in a bound volume in the State Department of Health,” as Bauer later claimed.

The Post & Email will continue its coverage of Zullo’s December 1 interview in a subsequent article.












Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. This article has produced a lot of comments. One has to ask why? The answer is simple, Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, Sobarka, Stephen Obama, Barry Obama all are fake, phony, false identities. Obama is a fake, his credentials only exist on the internet. Hawaii is complicit in all of this, anyone that thinks anything else is a fool. I am glad that people have kept this a hot topic after all these years.

    Mike Volin
    570 284 7477

  2. ZM is, of course, free to believe anything, but there’s no evidence that Obama’s father was anyone other than Obama, Sr.

    Just as there’s no evidence of an earlier widespread effort to teach a different meaning of a natural-born citizenship. Regardless of any possible earlier efforts, judges in more recent eligibility cases have all ruled that birth in the United States is sufficient to confer natural-born citizenship.

  3. Hello Thinkwell,

    I appreciate your response. It could be true Obama’s father was a US citizen, as I have read many theories regarding who his father may be. Obama does not resemble Obama Sr. but does resemble, for example, Malcolm X much more so. One person who most likely had that information, was his grandmother who lived in Hawaii, but she conveniently passed away right before the election of 2008. There are just too many mysteries surrounding his life story. And he has gotten away with multiple treasonous acts. Being ineligible for POTUS is just one of them.

    Huggy Bear, a person’s identity is much more important than his tax returns especially when they are POTUS. Unfortunately, the public was deceived during the 2008 and 2012 elections. The school systems have not been teaching the correct definition of NBC for many years, the definition that was taught in the 60s and 70s and before that time, so there seems to be much confusion.

  4. To answer Three-Pound Sledge’s question, the proposed amendments all sought to permit naturalized citizens to become the president. That is, if adopted, the proposed amendments would have permitted those who were not United States citizens at birth to become the president.

    Which is related but ultimately distinct from birth in the United States being sufficient to confer natural-born citizenship, which has been the ruling of every judge who has presided over an eligibility challenge. (And Sellin is not a judge.)

  5. “Why do you suppose these recent Congress Critters tried to omit the natural born citizenship requirement?”

    Because some wanted to make naturalized citizens like Arnold Schwarzenegger eligible.

  6. Tom Arnold is, of course, free to believe whatever he desires, but there’s no evidence that Obama wrote that 1991 biography. In fact, Obama’s literary agent said she wrote it.

    On the other hand, the State of Hawaii has repeatedly and expressly said Obama was born there. Its birth certificates are accepted by any government agency. And Obama’s birth certificate has been entered into evidence in eligibility cases.

  7. Refresher course for Howard Appel and other non-believers of the Founding Fathers.

    From the following weblink:


    To wit:
    No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

    Recognizing the Constitutional nature of the natural born citizen concept, there have been numerous attempts, in recent years, both by Democrats and Republicans, to amend the Article II “natural born citizen” clause, including:

    January 14, 1975 – Democrat House Rep. Jonathon B. Bingham, [NY-22] introduced a constitutional amendment under H.J.R. 33: which called for the outright removal of the natural-born requirement for president found in Article II of the U.S. Constitution – “Provides that a citizen of the United States otherwise eligible to hold the Office of President shall not be ineligible because such citizen is not a natural born citizen.”

    June 11, 2003 – Democrat House member Vic Snyder [AR-2] introduced H.J.R 59: in the 108th Congress – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 35 years and who has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years eligible to hold the office of President or Vice President.”

    September 3, 2003 – Democrat Rep. John Conyers [MI] introduced H.J.R. 67: – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20 years eligible to hold the office of President.”

    September 15, 2004 – Republican Rep. Dana Rohrabacher [CA-46] introduced H.J.R. 104: – “Constitutional Amendment – “Makes eligible for the Office of the President non-native born persons who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years and who are otherwise eligible to hold such Office.”

    Why do you suppose these recent Congress Critters tried to omit the natural born citizenship requirement?

    Must impeach Howard Appel for walking away funny with his tail tucked between his legs.

  8. T.F. BOW submitted the below statement to the Post & Email on December 3, 2017, 3:13 pm,
    For example, what about the 1991 bio written by “Obama” himself, and put into print by a reputable publisher, which said that he was KENYAN-BORN? The claim (THIS, THE REAL AND SICK TREASONOUS TRUTH) remained intact and unchanged for 16+ years until 2007, and you know what happened then! Do you, Mr BOW, think for a minute that “Obama” neglected for those sixteen years, before deciding in 2007 to become a candidate for the presidency, to PROOFREAD HIS OWN BIO?!
    That, Sir, is total garbage!
    The fact is- THERE IS NO COMPETENT EVIDENCE, INCLUDING WHATEVER GARBAGE YOU MAY HAVE SUBMITTED, TO SUPPORT THE BELIEF THAT “OBAMA” WAS BORN IN HAWAII! There, in fact, are dozens if not hundreds of pieces of credible evidence to the contrary!
    One of these days (I hope in the not-too-distant future), you and others of the same persuasion as you will come to your senses.
    Or, do you prefer THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ITS HISTORICAL RECORD GOING ON FOREVER LIVING A LIE! And, do you and others like paying income tax for the lifetime Secret Service protection of this fraud and his family!
    Frankly, I’m thinking you do!
    Shameful, Tom Arnold.

  9. To those who comment about persons allegedly not being eligible to be president because both parents allegedly need to be citizens, I guess that means Donald Trump, Sr. is not eligible as his mother was not a citizen when Don was born. Similarly, none of his children are eligible to be president as each of their respective mothers was not a citizen when they were born.

    Must impeach Trump now, not eligible to be president.

  10. Hawaii Revised Statute 11-113 requires certification that the candidate is constitutionally eligible. So Pelosi’s certification fulfilled what Hawaiian law required.

    Of course, Obama’s Hawaiian birth was sufficient to confer natural-born citizenship, so Pelosi’s certification was accurate.

  11. To the 50 states, why did Nancy Pelloci submit two types of qualification certificates for Obama to be on the ballot, that is, to the 49 states, she eliminated the Constitutional requirement clause, but to the state of Hawaii, she included it?

  12. Of course Abercrombie was told that Obama’s birth certificate exists. Because it does exist, as the State of Hawaii has repeatedly and expressly said.

    Abercrombie’s quote in the ABC article was offered to suggest Abercrombie was referring to some archive other than the HDOH records, but there’s nothing there to support such an inference. Nor did Abercrombie ever say anything about a box, contrary to Zullo’s claim.

    But, more basically, no one is relying on what Abercrombie might have said about Obama’s birth certificate to show that Obama was born in Hawaii. Why Zullo thinks anything Abercrombie might have said is relevant is a mystery.

  13. Total Fool Bow, It would be nice if just for once you and your leftist comrades would tell the truth. Abercrombie did NOT say ” “it actually exists in the archives written down.” as you claim. What he said was “It was actually written I am told, this is what our investigation is showing, it actually exists in the archives, written down …”. Did you even catch the part where he says “I AM TOLD”? He is a typical democrap like you who makes claims without one shred of actual physical evidence!

  14. Kamala Harris is positioning herself to be a candidate for the Socialist Dumocrats in 2020 presidential election. Like AKA Obama she is an unaccomplished phony and NOT a Natural Born Citizen. She was born in California in 1964 to an Indian mother (came to USA in 1960) and a Jamaican father (came to USA in 1961). She will get push-back from constitutionalists like me. I, as are most of my friends an equal opportunity “birther”. No Cruz, no Rubio, no Harris.

  15. CRS: security clearance are not mandated for POTUS , VP, member of Congress, Scotus or other constitutional officiers.

    Look at executive order #13467 signed by GW Bush on June 30th 2008 , mandated by Congress to be fully in effect by January 2009…just in time for O.

    April 27 2011: Obama promulgated photocopy LFBC
    April 29 2011: LFBC anomalies Discovered
    May 2 2011 Osama Bin Laden killed again
    August 6 2011: Extorsion 17

  16. Hello ZM,

    It actually is slightly possible that aka obama was born in the USA and born to USA citizen parents (who really knows where, when and to whom he was born?), but there is not one shred of doubt that he is an unindicted criminal identity fraud who has been hiding something so unfavorable about his nativity story that he feared revealing it would have cost him his putative presidency. The man should be in prison.

  17. “A point I would like to make: Isn’t it vitally important that we know, without a doubt, who our candidates for President and Vice President are? There is a large percentage of US citizens who have doubts about Obama’s birth history (forged LFBC) and/or whether he is a Natural Born Citizen (one who is born in the US to parents who are US citizens at the time of one’s birth). ”

    Apparently, a majority of the American people were satisfied with what they knew about Barack Obama and Joe Biden since they easily elected them twice. As for me I would be more interested in seeing Donald Trump’s tax returns and finding out if his father was a member of the KKK.

  18. A “large percentage of US citizens” are, of course, free to believe whatever they desire. For example, a large percentage of U.S. citizens might believe Elvis us still alive, but their beliefs do not make it so.

    There is no competent evidence to support the belief that Obama wasn’t born in Hawaii. And the State of Hawaii repeatedly and expressly said Obama was born there.

    Similarly, every judge who has considered the eligibility issue has ruled birth in the United States is sufficient to confer natural-born citizenship.

  19. A point I would like to make: Isn’t it vitally important that we know, without a doubt, who our candidates for President and Vice President are? There is a large percentage of US citizens who have doubts about Obama’s birth history (forged LFBC) and/or whether he is a Natural Born Citizen (one who is born in the US to parents who are US citizens at the time of one’s birth). If we are not 100% sure of who Obama truly is, and there are discrepancies or missing facts about his life history, (as Jonathan D. M. points out in his “A through Q list”), then this is a major problem.

  20. “All of your claims of HUSSEIN Obama’s legitimacy come from a proven forged Long Form Birth Certificate (LFBC) document.”

    Proven by whom? The only evidence seems to be “Zullo says so”. The fact that he is afraid to release the experts’ reports can only mean he knows they will be ripped to shreds if he did. The old argument that he dan’t Release them because this is a criminal investigation is no longer true as that investigation is over.

  21. “You have no on-site proof of what you claim.” What does that even mean?

    Three-Pound Sledge is, of course, free to believe anything, but the State of Hawaii has repeatedly and expressly said Obama was born there. No part of Obama’s long-form birth certificate has been proven false. In fact, Hawaii verified the long form for two different Secretaries of State, and they accepted that verification. There’s also the COLB, which even Zullo says is genuine.

    Zullo’s obsession with Abercrombie’s statements is embarrassing enough. But Zullo is drawing conclusions from statements that Abercrombie never made.

  22. TF (Total Fiction) Bow, don’t put words in my mouth. I did not state nor imply anything that you gave me credit for. The data from the included weblinks of my previous entries speak for themselves.

    All of your claims of HUSSEIN Obama’s legitimacy come from a proven forged Long Form Birth Certificate (LFBC) document. You have no on-site proof of what you claim. Abercrombie is a joke and so is the LFBC that was hurriedly forged after Abercrombie’s keystone kops LFBC failed search antics.

    If any portion of a document is false, the whole document becomes false. The LFBC proffered by the Obama regime is an invention of deceit, a pathetic plagiarized phony.

    By keeping this forged LFBC active in the news, eventually people such as TF Bow will fade away. Abercrombie has faded away and only was a tool of a failed bogus presidency; his job as a useful idiot is over and so too should TF Bow job. I will give Abercrombie one star – he realized the error of his way and now refuses to show his face in public until the ‘red’ goes away from his complexion.

  23. “The eyes do not see what the mind does not know.”

    Since 08-28-08, some 323,000,000 American citizens have been robbed anew each day of their inalienable intellectual property of seeing-and-knowing the full identity of their nation’s ID Thief-in-Chief, NEVER-presIDent SOETORO-OBAMA II (SO2)

    NOW, 22 living adult brains must unite in 2017 to release the 17 original ID documents of SO2 (= The Toxic Odor of DC + DNC + PC + RINO = BS) for all 7,500,000,000 living brains on planet Earth to see and know for themselves:


    THE 17* in 2017 = the presidents of publically-funded colleges and heads of tax-funded agencies with unfettered access to 17 original identification documents of SO2 listed in Item 207, A thru Q herein, all as forwarded to Justice Roy Moore of the Alabama Supreme Court in 2012: http://www.carlgallups.com/zullo-affidavit.pdf
    207. Record[s] not released includ[e]ing the follow[ing]:
    A. Original, long-form 1961 Hawaiian birth certificate.
    B. Marriage license between Obama’s father (Barak Sr.)
    and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham)
    C. Name change (Barry Sotero to Barack Hussein Obama)
    D. Obama’s adoption records
    E. Records of Obama’s and his mother’s repatriation as US
    citizens on return from return from Indonesia
    F. Obama’s baptism records
    G. Noelani Elementary School (Hawaii)
    H. Punahou School financial aid or school records
    I. Occidental College financial aid records [ = Jonathan Veitch, President of Occidental
    https://www.oxy.edu/presidents-office ]
    J. Harvard Law School records [ = Drew Faust, President of Harvard University
    https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2017/06/drew-faust-to-step-down-as-harvard-president-next-june/ ]
    K. Columbia senior thesis
    L. Columbia College records [ = Lee Bollinger, President of Columbia University
    https://president.columbia.edu/ ]
    M. Obama’s record with Illinois State Bar Association
    N. Obama’s files from career as an Illinois State Senator
    O. Obama’s law client list
    P. Obama’s medical records
    Q. Obama’s passport records

    All attempts by THE 17 in 2017 to resist release of the inalienable intellectual property of some 323,000,000 fellow American citizens under the color of “invasion of privacy”, or illegal hide-behind “EO 13489”, must be repelled back into the faces of these 17 complicit knowledge thieves, and their supportive complicit U.S. Government-citizens and complicit state-licensed attorney-criminals, as “acts of piracy”!


    Knowledge is power in the minds of We the People; ignorance is power in the hands of forgers assisted by state-licensed attorney-criminals!

  24. Three-Pound Sledge is correct that Abercrombie’s statements have no evidentiary value. Which raises the question why Zullo places any value in them. Of course, those in charge of the HDOH’s records have repeatedly and expressly said its records show Obama was born there.

    Even assuming that Obama’s grandparents could have registered Obama’s birth, there’s no evidence that is actually what happened. In contrast, the State of Hawaii verified Obama’s birth in a hospital, as certified by the attending doctor.

    And Mike Evans retracted the statements that he attributed to Abercrombie. Even a Perry Mason understudy would place no value in retracted hearsay.

  25. Another opinion on Abercrumbles wild goose chase.
    Per the article from below weblink:

    1. ““It was actually written, I am told, this is what our investigation is showing, it actually exists in the archives, written down,” Abercrombie said.”

    I am only a Perry Mason understudy, but that statement sure sounds like hearsay to me.

    2. Also per the article from below weblink:

    “WND has reported that in 1961, Obama’s grandparents, Stanley and Madelyn Dunham, could have made an in-person report of a Hawaii birth even if the infant Barack Obama Jr. had been foreign-born.”

    “Similarly, the newspaper announcements of Obama’s birth do not prove he was born in Hawaii, since they could have been triggered by the grandparents registering the birth as Hawaiian, even if the baby was born elsewhere.”

    “Moreover, WND has documented that the address reported in the newspaper birth announcements was the home of the grandparents.”

    3. Lastly, from the article in the below weblink:
    “Conceivably, the yet undisclosed birth record in the state archives that Abercrombie has discovered may have come from the grandparents registering Obama’s birth, an event that would have triggered both the newspaper birth announcements and availability of a Certification of Live Birth, even if no long-form birth certificate existed.”

    Items 1 thru 3, above, courtesy of:

    T. F. (Total Fiction) can believe what he or she wants to, but coverups can and do last a lifetime.

    Obamanation: Blackmailed by a 4% black male.

  26. On the Hagmann Report last year, Zullo said,
    “All you had to do was contact the director of health and say, ‘I’m the president of the United States and I need a copy.” And Zullo said something similar in this interview.

    What Zullo describes sounds like what Bauer actually did: after reviewing Hawaiian law, his office wrote a letter to Hawaii requesting a copy of the long form, and a staff member went to Hawaii to retrieve it.

    Not only is there nothing nefarious about that, it sounds like Bauer acted exactly as Zullo thought they should.


    Obama May be Breaking the Logan Act by Conniving with Foreign Governments Behind President Trump’s Back

    The Logan Act (18 U.S.C.A. § 953 [1948]) is a single federal statute making it a crime for a citizen to confer with foreign governments against the interests of the United States. Specifically, it prohibits citizens from negotiating with other nations on behalf of the United States without authorization.


  28. “Unable to locate the Bauer presser online, The Post & Email contacted Zullo, who told us that the video has been “scrubbed.” However, he sent us a transcript of Bauer’s remarks from that day.”

    There never was a video of the press gaggle from April 27th, 2011. But the entire transcript is on line.


    There is this exchange:

    Q You’ve got two certified copies, according to this study. You have these physical —

    MR. PFEIFFER: Yes. I showed you one. Just one.

    Q You showed us a photocopy of one.

    MR. PFEIFFER: No, I showed you —

    Q Does that have a stamp?

    MR. PFEIFFER: It has a seal on it.

    So the press was shown one of the certified copies and of course Savannah Guthrie posted two photos of it on line.

  29. Nowhere in that January 2011 ABC article did Abercrombie ever say that he “could not find” Obama’s birth records.

    In fact, Abercrombie said “it actually exists in the archives written down.”

    That Zullo or anyone else interpreted “archives” to mean anything other than the bound volumes of the Hawaii Department of Health is just the listener’s imagination hearing what they want to hear.

    (And, again, Abercrombie said nothing about “a box.” A wholly unnecessary detail that Zullo invented.)

  30. Beware of Greeks bearing gifts. Also, beware of traitors saying on one side of their mouth that a person only needs to be born in the USA to be eligible for the POTUS (Re: “1958, the World Book Encyclopedia”, this article), then state out of the other side of their mouth their support of a Rafael E. Cruz presidential candidacy. If Cruz is a U.S. Citizen, he is only a statute U.S. Citizen, but never a natural born U.S. Citizen.

    How convenient these traitors pushing ineligible presidential candidates (Jindal, Cruz, Rubio come-to-mind) who soon forgot about the futile attempts by several Members of Congress to modify the natural born Citizenship requirement as listed in the following article:


    Since Congress could not modify Article II, Section I, Clause 5 by eliminating the natural born Citizenship clause through a Constitutional Amendment, they – with the help of the CIA – forced it illegally by installing HUSSEIN Obama in 2008 using blackmail and the race card.

    In summary, I say let the afterbirthers have their Hawai’ian Long Form Birth Certificate. When the shouting is over, we birthers can use it against them when a Trump U.S. Supreme Court finally determines that a natural born U.S. Citizen is a person born on U.S. soil to two U.S. Citizen parents, just as the Founding Fathers intended and knew through Vattel’s Law of Nations guidance.

  31. In other words, Perkins Coie has been the PO (TU) S Vehicle that was used to get the two greatest Fraudulent Documents, in Obama’s LFBC and the Trump Dossier , down America’s Windpipe.

    Thank you for that Report .. very difficult to stomache at times what these Lawyers get away with when you start to factor in the ramifications and comprehend Motive.

    These actions if theirs seem to spell out Domestic Terrorism upon our Republic and Citizenery.

    I can just hear them unscrupulously squeeling.. ” but we only Represent our Clients best interest”.

    And what of the Trillions spent on the National Debt with the sinking Titanic Obama care? The blow to U.S. History? And the terrorism of the Trust of the American People?

    Just sickening

  32. Zullo stated that Abercrombie “went on an extensive search, according to him, and they eventually located a record of his birth sitting in a box somewhere in the state archives.”

    Except there’s no evidence that Abercrombie ever said that. Why did Zullo state otherwise?

    There is also no evidence that Abercrombie ever said that he “could not find” Obama’s birth certificate.

    In fact, the person whose job it is to maintain Hawaii’s birth records has expressly and repeatedly stated the state has Obama’s birth records.

    Zullo’s overstating Bauer’s explanation of his office’s actions also does not enhance Zullo’s credibility.

    Perhaps it is these kinds of lapses in veracity that cause people to discount Zullo (and Arpaio).