DID OBAMA USE FAKE CREDENTIALS TO RUN FOR OFFICE?
by Sharon Rondeau
Project Veritas exposed “multiple campaign workers” in North Carolina encouraging people identifying themselves as illegal aliens to vote in the midterm elections on November 4. “As long as you are registered to vote, you’ll be fine,” said Greg Amick, a Mecklenberg County Sheriff campaign manager.
Another campaign worker advised an undercover Project Veritas “illegal,” “I’d go in there and vote and whatever address you used before, use it. I’d go in there and vote and let them find out if it’s wrong.”
The same scenario could take place in the state of Connecticut, where people can now register and cast a vote on Election Day. According to state law already in place at the time the law was changed in 2012 to accommodate same-day voter registration, individuals registering to vote did not have to prove that they were U.S. citizens.
Likewise, Colorado will count the votes of all individuals cast on Election Day following same-day registration. Rather than the people, the legislatures of both Connecticut and Colorado voted in favor of Election Day registration.
Voter fraud could have been widespread enough to have given Barack Hussein Obama the presidency in 2008, according to a report issued by the CCES as reported by Judicial Watch last week. The Los Angeles Times takes issue with the study, claiming that the database used by the researchers is “riddled with errors.”
Sharon Meroni of DefendtheVote.com has reported that no proof of citizenship is required to run for any public office in Illinois. Meroni has identified other irregularities in specific Illinois counties and filed a lawsuit on October 23 against the Illinois State Board of Elections (ISBE) for utilizing voting machines in Chicago and Suburban Cook County which do not meet federal guidelines.
In the 2012 presidential election, vote-flipping by touch-screen machines from Republican to Democrat was widely reported in several states. In 59 Philadelphia precincts, Mitt Romney reportedly received no votes as reported in a now-removed article in Philly.com. A study of North Carolina voter rolls performed after the 2012 election showed that 35,570 voters may have voted not only in North Carolina, but also in other states.
Had Obama not actually “won” the presidency in 2008, he would not have been in a position to be “re-elected” in 2012. But what if Obama were never eligible to have been on any ballot in the first place?
In late 2007, MSNBC commentator Chris Matthews discussed Obama’s “Islamic background” and asserted that Obama was “born in Indonesia.” The video of the broadcast has been removed from YouTube “due to multiple third-party notifications of copyright infringement.”
Multiple African newspapers reported Obama as having been born in Kenya beginning at least in 2004, when he was running for the U.S. Senate from Illinois. In Kenya, Obama is considered “a son of the soil.”
On December 22, 2010, a writer in the Kenyan Daily Nation referred to Obama as “our very gem.” The day following the 2008 election, then-Kenyan ambassador to the United States Peter Ogego affirmed that Obama’s “birthplace in Kenya” was “already well-known.”
Since 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court has “evaded the issue” of whether or not Obama is eligible to occupy the Oval Office.
Prior to his election as a U.S. Senator, Obama was an Illinois state senator, for which he would have had to have been a U.S. citizen to serve legally. But was he?
In June 2008, an image appeared at The Daily KOS website purported to be Obama’s birth certificate in response to questions which arose about his birthplace and constitutional eligibility. Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires that the president and commander-in-chief be a “natural born Citizen.” The now-defunct Obama campaign website “Fight the Smears” also posted the birth certificate image, which has a blacked-out certificate number and lacks a registrar’s official stamp.
While the origin of the image was not divulged at the time by The Daily KOS, in May 2009, then-White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs claimed that he authorized its posting at the time “on the internet” and that it was the only available birth certificate for “the president.”
In April 2013, Gibbs himself became a commentator at MSNBC, whose slogan is “Lean Forward.”
In response to questions from then-WND reporter Les Kinsolving as to why Obama had not released a more detailed birth record to the public, Gibbs said, “I certainly hope by the fourth year of our administration that we’ll have dealt with this burgeoning birth controversy.”
After potential presidential candidate Donald Trump called for Obama to release his “long-form” birth certificate early in 2011, the White House responded by posting an image on April 27, 2011 said to be a certified copy of his original birth certificate held by the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH). At the same time, the White House stated that “In 2008, in response to media inquiries, the President’s campaign requested his birth certificate from the state of Hawaii. The state sent the campaign the President’s birth certificate, the same legal documentation provided to all Hawaiians as proof of birth in state, and the campaign immediately posted it on the internet. That birth certificate can be seen here (PDF).”
The link leads to a black-and-white image of the short-form Certification of Live Birth and does not state when it was posted at the White House website.
According to Mike Zullo, lead investigator for the Maricopa County Cold Case Posse, which has conducted a more-than-three-year investigation into the long-form birth certificate image posted on the White House website, there is no proof that Obama was born in Hawaii. On March 1, 2012, Zullo and Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio held a press conference during which they announced that both Obama’s long-form birth certificate and Selective Service registration form are “computer-generated forgeries.”
In an affidavit provided to the Alabama Supreme Court in a case claiming that the Alabama Secretary of State did not properly vet presidential candidates in 2012, Zullo wrote that “Investigators have determined beyond probable cause that the computer image released on April 27, 2011 by the White House, and purporting to be a true computer copy of Mr. Obama’s long form birth certificate, is not a scan of an original hard copy document. It is, in fact, an undeniable computer generated forgery created with the sole intent to deceive the public by commission of felonious fraudulent acts.”
In an exclusive interview with The Post & Email in the fourth year of Obama’s putative presidency, Zullo reiterated that the long-form birth certificate was created “with the intent to deceive.”
Zullo has also reported that the National Archives is missing the airline manifests from overseas beginning several days before and extending to several days after Obama’s purported birth on August 4, 1961.
Is deception aimed at the American electorate not election fraud?
Atty. Stephen Pidgeon, who several months ago composed Articles of Impeachment through the North American Law Center (NALC) and urged the House Judiciary Committee to act upon them, told The Post & Email in an interview that a former CIA operative affirmed during an in-person meeting that Obama is using a manufactured identity created as a result of “an extraordinary level of scrubbing” of his background.
As The Post & Email has reported, not one member of Congress has publicly discussed Obama’s potential identity fraud, forged documents, or the all-encompassing election fraud he has perpetrated if, in fact, he is using a false identity and fraudulent documents to perpetrate the lie.
British citizen Lord Christopher Monckton has reported that every member of Congress is aware of the birth certificate forgery and questions about Obama’s “legitimacy,” yet Obama has been allowed to continue to flout the law and the office of the presidency without having to explain himself.
If Obama is eligible for the presidency and his background is exactly as he has stated, why did the White House put forth forgeries to the public of his birth certificate and Selective Service registration?
Last December, Tea Party Power Hour host Mark Gillar created a video stating that “prosecutions are coming” relating to Obama’s fraudulent documents. Along with employees at the Selective Service System, the Hawaii Department of Health, the U.S. Postal Service and Obama sycophants who may also be White House operatives, will Obama be prosecuted for defrauding tens of millions of voters?
This story was updated at 3:45 p.m. EST.
Sharon Rondeau has operated The Post & Email since April 2010, focusing on the Obama birth certificate investigation and other government corruption news. She has reported prolifically on constitutional violations within Tennessee’s prison and judicial systems.