If Obama Broke the Law, What Will Congress Do About It?

“LEGITIMACY,” TREASON GROWING CONCERNS

by Sharon Rondeau

(Jun. 4, 2014) — On Saturday, following the announcement of former Army sergeant Bowe Bergdahl’s recovery from a Taliban-related terror group in Afghanistan, the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee and ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee issued a press release which stated that Obama had violated federal law in transferring five Guantanamo Bay prisoners to Qatari custody in exchange for Bergdahl.

“Our joy at Sergeant Berghdal’s release is tempered by the fact that President Obama chose to ignore the law, not to mention sound policy, to achieve it,” they wrote.

On Monday, a press release from what appeared to be the entire House Armed Services Committee titled “Fact Sheet on Guantanamo Transfers” cited three points from Section 1035 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and Section 8111 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, both for fiscal year 2014.  The entire wording of the noted section was then presented.

Point (b)(2) stipulates that any prisoner transfer is carried out “only” if the Secretary of Defense “determines that…the transfer is in the national security interest of the United States.”

Since Bergdahl’s rescue, former members of his Army unit and at least one Pentagon official have stated that Bergdahl deserted his post in a premeditated move after having become disillusioned with the U.S. role in Afghanistan.  The leader of Bergdahl’s unit, Sgt. Evan Buetow, told Jake Tapper of CNN that “radio chatter” had been detected shortly after Bergdahl disappeared with the purpose of “talking to the Taliban.”

Buetow was quoted as having said, “I heard it straight from the interpreter’s lips as he heard it over the radio. There’s a lot more to this story than a soldier walking away.”

At least several soldiers who were members of Bergdahl’s 1st Platoon, Blackfoot Company said that they were mandated to sign non-disclosure agreements in regard to Bergdahl’s disappearance and any recovery efforts that might have been launched of which they were aware.  An “old army sergeant” writing at The American Thinker characterized Bergdahl as having “deserted his platoon to fulfill what may turn out to be a family-concocted book-deal plan to undermine the mission of American troops in Afghanistan.  His recorded words and those of his father indicate their sympathies to those Islamists we are fighting.  PFC Bergdahl’s fuzzy, feel-good airs and mysterious conversations may well have been contrived to justify and camouflage his true intent to desert his post and go over to the enemy.”

In an interview with Democracy Now! radio on Wednesday, former captive in Lebanon Charles Glass stated that Bergdahl’s departure from his unit should be viewed with “compassion.”  Glass did not mention that Bergdahl reportedly sought out the enemy, but rather, considered him to have been confused and unable to carry out the duties of war.

National Security adviser Susan Rice went on two Sunday talk shows to say that Bergdahl had “served with honor and distinction,” sidestepping George Stephanopoulos’s question as to whether or not Bergdahl is “a deserter.”

On September 16, 2012, Rice had appeared on five Sunday talk shows and falsely reported that an internet video had been the cause of a deadly terrorist attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya.  Hillary Clinton had stated the same to grieving family members after the caskets of the four Americans killed in the attack arrived at Joint Base Andrews with the certain knowledge that she was lying.

Former congressman Allen B. West stated following Bergdahl’s release that Obama committed an impeachable offense.  However, West was not willing to examine or publicize evidence presented to him in March of last year regarding the forgery of Obama’s identification documents.  Whether or not

On Monday, The Post & Email contacted the House Armed Services Committee Communications Director, John Noonan, by phone and also by email to ask what the committee planned to do about its claim that Obama broke federal law in releasing the detainees as he did, without the necessary 30-day notice to Congress.  Departing White House Press Secretary Jay Carney had told reporters at the daily White House briefing that observing the “30-day window” “was not an option.”

An issue which no one in Congress has been willing to address is the forgery of Obama’s long-form birth certificate and Selective Service registration form.  With no authentic documents to prove his identity, Obama has been issuing executive orders, appointing federal judges and two U.S. Supreme Court justices, commanding the U.S. military, signing laws which he later unilaterally changes at will, and suing states which have passed laws on illegal immigration and voter identification.

Many believe that Obama has “shredded the Constitution.”  On Tuesday, Atty. Matthew Staver, speaking for his organization, Liberty Counsel, issued an email which stated, “…there’s little doubt the President of the United States has given aid and comfort to the enemy by releasing five al-Qaeda leaders. It’s another lawless act that violates the sacred trust of the people and should give rise to for every American demanding Barack H. Obama’s immediate impeachment!”

The Post & Email has rhetorically asked why Obama’s political opponents are fighting him on policy issues when it is his legitimacy which is the underlying question.  Based on historical precedent, a person whose father was a citizen of another country at the time of his or her birth is not considered “natural born,” which Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires of the president.

A criminal investigation carried out by the Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff’s Office led by Sheriff Joe Arpaio is preparing to release information which it has hinted will reveal the identities of the creators of Obama’s fraudulent documentation.  Forgery of a government document is a felony.  The White House has never responded to the many document experts who have staked their reputations on declaring the birth certificate a forgery composed of irregular “layers,” although virtually no journalists have had the courage to ask.  For six years, a media blackout about Obama’s past has ensued, although a radio host close to the initial investigation conducted by the Maricopa County Cold Case Posse has stated that “major media” plan on reporting Arpaio’s news when it is released.

Whether Obama is covering his birthplace, history, family background or his true identity which would speak to his constitutional eligibility is as yet unknown.

There is awareness on the internet that Obama’s only publicly-available “documents” were declared “computer-generated forgeries,” although misinformation still exists, and major media have failed to report it on television and radio with rare exceptions.

Lord Christopher Monckton, who will be a guest on the WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) radio show on Wednesday evening, has reported that a congressman admitted that every member of Congress is aware of the forgery of the birth certificate but is not willing to pay the political price of coming forward to voice objections or launch an investigation.  However, WOBC founder and host Mike Volin has stated that he has met with a number of congressmen who support informing the public about the forgery and singled out one, Rep. Cory Gardner of Colorado, as having met with a private investigator about it.

Our email to Noonan reads:

To: john.noonan@mail.house.gov (john.noonan@mail.house.gov)

Regarding the most recent newsletter from the HASC in which the case is made that Obama broke the law he signed stipulating that a 30-day notice to Congress is required before any detainees from Guantanamo Bay can be relocated, what can be done?

Is he also guilty of treason for aiding and abetting the enemy, as Judge Andrew Napolitano and others claim?

There is also the matter of his fraudulent documentation, which, if proven to the American people, would jeopardize any actions Obama has taken over the last six years:

http://www.mcsoccp.org/joomla/

in the event that he took office by fraud and forgery.

What does the HASC plan to do about its findings in the Bergdahl matter and other violations of law Obama may have committed?

Thank you.

Sharon Rondeau, Editor
The Post & Email
www.thepostemail.com
P.O. Box 195
Stafford Springs, CT  06076
203-987-7948
editor@thepostemail.com

As is typical of congressional staffers, there has been no response.

Obama was named in the commission of treason for the first time on March 17, 2009 by CDR Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III (Ret.) with the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Tennessee, the FBI Director, and later, with the U.S. District Court in Washington, DC.  No action was apparently taken by the FBI or the Secret Service to investigate Fitzpatrick’s claim of Obama being a “foreign born domestic enemy.”  When the Secret Service visited Fitzpatrick several days later, one of the agent’s admitted in a private moment, “We can’t arrest him, you know.”

Over the last six years, many others have accused Obama of committing treason against the United States as a result of various decisions he has made or actions he has taken, in particular, “supporting our terrorist enemies.”