PA Senator Relies on Forgery and a Senate Resolution to Convince Constituent Obama is Qualified

CLAIMS “HAWAII SECRETARY OF STATE” DEEMED OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE “GENUINE”

by Sharon Rondeau

In a letter to a constituent, Sen. Pat Toomey falsely claimed that the Hawaii Secretary of State, who is also the Lt. Governor, vouched for the authenticity of Obama’s long-form birth certificate.

(Apr. 2, 2014) — Last November, a group of volunteers traveled to Washington, DC to distribute “Sheriff’s Kits” produced by WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com to members of Congress about the findings of fraud and forgery of Obama’s long-form birth certificate and Selective Service registration form.

The birth certificate image was placed on the White House website on April 27, 2011, after mounting pressure from potential presidential candidate Donald Trump and others apparently compelled the White House to release what it claimed was proof of Obama’s birth in Hawaii and purported eligibility to serve as president of the United States.

Since at least 2004, various news articles and Obama himself claimed that he was born outside the country, some in Indonesia and others in Kenya.  Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires that the president and commander-in-chief be a “natural born Citizen.”

Progressive commentator Chris Matthews had stated on air in December 2007 that Obama was “born in Indonesia” and had “a Muslim background.” Obama’s official biography stated that he was “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii” from 1991 until 2007, when it was changed to say that he was “born in Hawaii” just after he declared his candidacy for the presidency.  The change in Obama’s life narrative was explained by his then-literary agent as “a fact-checking error,” although authors customarily supply their own biographies to their literary agents prior to the publication of their work.

While debate continues about the meaning of the term “natural born Citizen,” history demonstrates that the Founding Fathers wished to ensure that foreign allegiances were not permitted into the office of the chief executive of the nation.  Therefore, the citizenship of the person’s parents was as important as the birthplace, if not more so.  In the 1875 case of Minor v. Happersett, the U.S. Supreme Court stated in its opinion that “it was never doubted” that someone born inside the United States to two U.S.-citizen parents was a “natural born Citizen.”  Three other cases also from the 19th century dealt with citizenship issues.

In the 21st century, U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas told a congressional committee that the high court was “evading” defining “natural born Citizen” after questions arose about the constitutional eligibility of both Barack Obama and Sen. John McCain, the latter of whom was born in Panama to two U.S.-citizen parents, one of whom was serving as an admiral in the U.S. Navy.

While McCain’s citizenship was scrutinized by the U.S. Senate in 2008, resulting in Senate Resolution 511 “declaring” him a “natural born Citizen,” Obama’s status was not.  Obama’s claimed father was never a U.S. citizen.  In the treatise “The Law of Nations” by Emmerich de Vattel, which was heavily referenced by the Framers, Vattel states that a “natural born Citizen” is one whose “parents” were citizens of the country.

Children of foreign diplomats born in the United States are not awarded U.S. citizenship.

Since 2008, major media, “conservative” radio show hosts, and political figures refused to discuss the eligibility issue, whether by choice, coercion, or some other motive.  In concert with the media blackout, Obama sycophants and supporters have ridiculed, threatened, and hacked the websites and online accounts of anyone seeking the truth about Obama’s background and eligibility to serve.

After commentator Lou Dobbs called upon Obama to release his long-form birth certificate on air, his home became the target of a shooter, and he reported having received “threatening phone calls.”

A six-month investigation by the Maricopa County, AZ Cold Case Posse declared Obama’s two “official” documents “computer-generated forgeries” on March 1, 2012, after which the media failed in its duty to investigate and report those findings to the public.  Following a second press conference in July of that year, the media vilified the messengers, Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo and Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, asking deprecatingly, “How do you expect any of us to believe any of this?” after some of the methods and sources were revealed.

Jeff Harrison was one of the volunteers who went to Washington in the fall to distribute the Sheriff’s Kits, which contain a full-length presentation by Zullo of how the team arrived at its conclusion that Obama’s documentation consists of “computer-generated forgeries.”  Since that time, Harrison and others, including WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com founder Mike Volin, have followed up with those in Congress who received the kits to inquire as to their apparent lack of action on what could be the largest political conspiracy and cover-up in U.S. history.

Harrison made certain that Toomey was one of those who received a Sheriff’s Kit, having told The Post & Email, “with  delivering  3  kits,  Toomey  did  not  acknowledge  that  he  received  an Affidavit  nor  that  he  even  looked  at  it?    He  received  one  Affidavit  by  hand  and  in person.    The  other  two  Affidavits  were  given  to  his  staff  members  and  I  have a  witness  to  each  of  those  deliveries  that  they  were  delivered.”

The affidavit to which Harrison referred is one sworn to and submitted in an Alabama court case by Zullo containing more than 200 points demonstrating that Obama’s documentation is fraudulent.  zullo-affidavit AL Sup CT

On March 18, Toomey finally provided a response to Harrison on his receipt of the Sheriff’s Kit and affidavit.  Although Toomey’s letter reiterates some of the standard responses issued by many members of Congress to their constituents who have questioned Obama’s constitutional eligibility over the last five years, it contains the false statement that “the Hawaii Secretary of State has confirmed that President Obama’s birth certificate is genuine…,” while in reality, the Hawaii Secretary of State has never spoken on the authenticity of any of Obama’s proffered “documentation.”

By statute, the lieutenant governor of Hawaii also serves as the Secretary of State, while in most states, the two positions are distinct.  In fact, the former lieutenant governor under current Governor Neil Abercrombie, Brian E. Schatz, was head of the Hawaii Democrat Party in 2008 and did not sign the Certificates of Nomination certifying that Barack Obama was constitutionally qualified to seek the office of the presidency, and statutorily-required wording stating that the candidate(s) were qualified was omitted.

Abercrombie appointed Schatz to fill the remainder of the term vacated by the late Sen. Daniel Inouye, and Schatz is seeking election in his own right in November.

In his letter to Harrison, Toomey could have been referring to two statements made by then-Hawaii Department of Health Director Chiyome Fukino, who on July 29, 2009, asserted that “I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago….”

Chiyome’s later description of Obama’s purported long-form birth certificate to MSNBC does not match its actual appearance.

Toomey also referred to a Senate resolution passed in 2009 congratulating Hawaii on 50 years of statehood which tangentially mentioned that Obama was born there, although the resolution has been touted as “affirmation” of Obama’s claim.

Of Toomey’s letter, Harrison said:

Toomey‘s  letter  is  somewhat  a  standard  reply  of  talking  points.    He  states  evidence  is “purported”  yet  has  neglected  to  study  it.    Further,  he  states  that  the  courts  have  rejected  claims, but  he  did  not  state  why.    Some  of  the  ruling  have  been  for  some  of  the  most  silly  reasons  such as  lack  of  standing  and  lack  of  jurisdiction.    While  Senator  Toomey  had  stated  in  his  letter  to  me that  before  he  was  elected  the  senate  “unanimously”  adopted  a  resolution  that  Obama  was  born  in Hawaii,  however,  he  neglected  to  comment  on  whether  Obama  is  a  “Natural  Born  Citizen”  thus  being qualified.    In  response  to  Toomey‘s  verification of  the  purported  Honolulu  birth  announcement,  that  is not  verification of  a  birth,  nowhere  would  that  be  accepted  as  proof,  just  try  to  take  that  to  get  a Social  Security  Number  to  the  Social  Security  Office  for  the  birth of  a  child  or  try  to  enlist  into  the military  and  see  that  that  would  be  rejected.    I  as  an  enlisted  Marine  and  I  as  a  janitor  working for  the  government  I  was  much  more  vetted  than  the  Commander  in  Chief.    My idea  is  this,  let’s do  a  Police  Background  Check  and  an  updated  spot  Secret  Clearance  on  Mr.  Obama  and  see  what happens.    What  is  good  for  the  geese  (an  enlisted  member  of  the  military)  should  also  be  good for  the  goose  (The  Commander  in  Chief).      Toomey  and  Congress  need  to  grow  a  spine  and investigate   Mr.  Obama.    According  to  LtZullo  in  his  Affidavit,  it  states,  “beyond  probable  cause”.

Harrison responded to Toomey’s letter with a letter of his own dated March 29 in which he stated that he is “disgusted” at Toomey’s dismissal of the “constitutional crisis” which Obama’s fraudulent documentation has perpetrated on the nation.  “Those who neglect this will be held accountable,” he wrote toToomey.

In addition to visiting Washington to distribute Sheriff’s Kits, Harrison devised a flyer which he has taken door-to-door in his neighborhood to report the findings of the posse.  After the trip to Washington, he mailed nine more kits to key congressmen.  He has appeared on several radio shows speaking on the topic and has his own page at the WheresObamasBirthCertificate website.

In the near future, Sheriff Joe Arpaio is expected to make a major announcement about a separate investigation his office launched stemming from the Cold Case Posse’s probe of the birth certificate and Selective Service form.  Last Thursday, a video was released as a prelude to the upcoming presser.

Sheriff’s Kits and stampers with “Where’s Obama’s Birth Certificate?” can be ordered here.

4 Responses to "PA Senator Relies on Forgery and a Senate Resolution to Convince Constituent Obama is Qualified"

  1. gigclick   Thursday, April 3, 2014 at 10:27 PM

    Alfred E. Newman of Mad Magazine also “vouched” for Bari Malik Shabazz’s COB. Does this creep also “vouch” for Obama’s false social security number? woopsie!

  2. gigclick   Thursday, April 3, 2014 at 10:24 PM

    I wonder if a little water boarding on this beady eyed pencil necked geek would jog his memory about this usurpation? Is he a DNC Operative?

  3. Mark Rostron   Thursday, April 3, 2014 at 2:23 AM

    The Zullo revelation is taking too long!

  4. cfkerchner   Wednesday, April 2, 2014 at 5:06 PM

    U.S. Senator Pat Toomey knows far more about the issues than he lets on in his letter. And he knew long before he got elected as a U.S. Senator. He lives about 5 miles from my home and I had met him occasionally prevously since he was a U.S. Congressman for awhile. I personally dropped off a copy of my Kerchner et al vs Obama & Congress et al lawsuit to his home at about 2 p.m. in the afternoon of 19 Mar 2009. Outline of the lawsuit can be found here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/19914488/Kerchner-v-Obama-Congress-DOC-00-Table-of-Contents-2nd-Amended-Complaint Since he was running for the Senate and Specter was his projected opposition at that time. I thought he needed to know about this, i.e., that Specter was named in my lawsuit as a person unresponsive to the electorate regarding the fraud Obama. Pat Toomey was not home at the time. He was traveling out of town she said. I gave the copy of the whole lawsuit to his wife. She said she would give it to Pat to read and that she would read it too. I asked that candidate Toomey contact me about his thoughts and opinions about the information detailed in the lawsuit. I never heard an answer back from either of them. That is their typical m.o. for all the Congresses since 2008. Duck the issue. Don’t answer, don’t address the real subject, or provide the same boiler plate false statement answers. I have written and petitioned Senator Toomey on the Obama fraud issues several times since via petitions and emails. The Post & Email published the non-responsive response letter I got the last time, just a few weeks ago. Senator Toomey continues to duck the issues of Obama’s ID fraud, forged documents, and ineligibility. This letter to Mr. Harrison is just another example of the tripe and misinformation that Toomey and other U.S. Senators and Elected Reps put out, if one gets an answer at all. They are all failing to live up to their oath of office to support and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies foreign and DOMESTIC.

    CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret), http://www.protectourliberty.org

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.