WHY WAS REQUIRED ELIGIBILITY WORDING OMITTED FROM THE HAWAII DEMOCRAT PARTY’S NOMINATION CERTIFICATES IN 2008?
by Arnie Rosner
(Apr. 14, 2011) — We are constantly reminded of the dignity of our fellow man. As humans the highest honor one human can pay another is the simple act of recognition. So I expect it is not surprising that, in my opinion, one of the most despicable crimes against our fellow humankind is to deprive our trusting fellow Americans of our dignity.
Throughout history many people have seen examples of where those in whom high levels of trust have been placed turn out to sadly betray that trust. In many cases the people are betrayed by those who were elevated to exalted levels of admiration.
How sad and painful it must be for many Americans to learn that indeed, once more, they must bear the sad disappointment and realization of having to ultimately acknowledge that their trust and adulation were misguided and that one more time, their trust has been abused.
In this case for many Americans, great pride had been taken that as a society we had evolved to a point where recognition for an individual was based on merit, above all other considerations, to be elected to the highest position of responsibility of the free world. It is indeed too bad this high level of human evolution, to which we had aspired, to which we had believed we had achieved, was marred by an elaborate hoax and conspiracy.
Ladies and Gentlemen of America…there appears a very strong case that indicates we have been had!
Now as to your comments, Mr. Boehner…are you still maintaining it is good enough for you?
And there is more.
QUESTIONS FOR CONGRESS
QUESTION 1: Why, after including the legally-required language for previous Democratic candidates in elections past, did chairperson Brian Schatz, acting on behalf of the Democrat Party of Hawaii, refuse to include the legally-required language upon submitting it for the approval of that state party’s 2008 Official Certification of Nomination when they submitted it to Kevin B. Cronin and the Hawaiian Election Commission?
QUESTION 2: Did Kevin Cronin, Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer in 2008, approve the placement of Barack Obama’s name on the presidential ballot for the 2008 federal election in spite of the fact that explicit language stating that Obama was Constitutionally eligible to run for president was omitted from the Official Certification of Nomination submitted by the Democrat Party of Hawaii?
QUESTION 3: Did Kevin Cronin, Chief Elections Officer, in coordination with the Hawaiian Election Commission, and HRS 11-113 (1)(d), notify Barack Obama in writing of his eligibility or disqualification for placement on the Hawaiian presidential ballot and what date did he provide this notification?
QUESTION 4: If a notice of disqualification was sent to Obama, upon receiving this notice from the Hawaiian Elections Commission, did Barack Obama file a request, per HRS 11-113 (1)(e), in writing to Mr. Cronin, and what date did he submit this request?
QUESTION 5: Did Cronin schedule Obama to a hearing and what date was this hearing scheduled?
QUESTION 6: Where was Obama between October 20th and 24th, 2008?
QUESTION 7: Was Obama present in Hawaii during the time when a hearing was conducted with the Hawaiian Elections Commission regarding his disqualification from the 2008 Hawaiian Presidential ballot?
QUESTION 8: Why did the Democratic National Committee author two separate Official Certifications of Nomination for Barack Obama, sending one version to Hawaii but not the other 49 states?
QUESTION 9: Did The DNC send two separate versions of its OCON to the Hawaiian Election Commission, and if so, why did it do this?
QUESTION 10: What secret evidence, which was obviously not accessible to the Democrat Party of Hawaii (the very state Obama was born in), did Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic National Committee acquire to determine Barack Obama’s legal qualifications to serve under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution and, thereby, include such language in its OCON?
QUESTION 11: When it was determined that the state and national party authorities of the Democratic Party did not agree on the status of Barack Obama’s eligibility, did the Chief Elections Officer of Hawaii, Kevin Cronin, determine to include Obama on the Hawaii presidential election ballot with authority provided by HRS 11-113(b).
QUESTION 12: What documented evidence was used by the DNC, which was not available to the Democrat Party of Hawaii, to determine that Barack Obama was legally qualified to serve as President under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution?
Did Brian Schatz attempt to defraud the office of the CEO and Kevin Cronin?
Did Brian Schatz attempt to slide this by Cronin? Was he hoping Cronin would ‘play ball’ and accept the incomplete and legally worthless and thus illegal document?
Brian Schatz should be investigated. But by whom? It is a state issue. The state AG should do this. But that is unlikely.
KittyKat 77 and Mrs. Rondeau: Have you ever wondered WHY — just a few months ago, The Trump gave $50,000.00 to Rahm Emanuel to ensure that he got elected to be the Mayor of Chicago? He’s also been a heavy donor to many other Democrat campaigns.
Methinks that he will be running — one way or another, to split the conservative/independent/constitutionalists from the NOMINATED candidate of the Republican Party. He’d be more successful in getting aka Obama relected if he ran as an independent. America’s gonna drown if it grabs a ‘lifepreserver” that won’t support the load. BEWARE of wolves in sheep’s clothing.
When Trump initially said that he’d only run if on the Republican ticket, I would have said that he donated to Rahm’s campaign because he has properties in Chicago and in corrupt Chicago, one pays to play. And with Rahm’s brother Ari Emanuel being Trump’s talent agent, the donation was good for that business relationship, too. And since I’d also heard that Rahm didn’t leave the White House a happy camper, I wasn’t concerned about any loyalties to the usurper. Maybe Rahm even let Trump in on some inside information.
Since Trump told the Wall Street Journal that it’s possible he’ll run as an independent, however, I’m not so sure that the Demonrats are running the Perot play against the Republicans.
Trump told Hannity this evening that he would run as an independent only if he thought he could win, because otherwise an independent run would result in Obama winning a second term — something that he says he is very much against.
I think our country is being held hostage in some way. I said that from day 1. There is no way they couldn’t have known Obama was anti American and had criminal friends.
But, could the repubs have had any recourse themselves in letting him run or was it only up to the dems who fixed it. I would like to know what could the repubs have done to stop it?
Arnie;
You should also comment on the April 3rd 2009, CRS Maskell document which whitewashes the issue to suggest to the House and Senate that Obama is eligible through the osmosis of lies. The document is a disgrace to any research analyst. Left out vital references that would clarify eligibility (Page 1 and Page 10-11). And, to add more insult to “WE THE PEOPLE’S INTELLIGENCE”, the House and Senate both issued simultaneous resolutions on July 27 2009 that “Obama was born in Hawaii.” So, who really gives a billy-be-damed, that doesn’t qualify him as a “natural born citizen” only a “native born” and that is even questionable.
Read related:
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/01/o-con-had-legal-help-from-non-partisan.html
New analysis of Democrat Party’s official 2008 Certification of Nominations for Obama reveals that reasons for his sudden trip to Hawaii in October, 2008 were to visit more than just his sick grandmother. Hawaiian election laws, media accounts and post-dated documents reveal he may have attended a private hearing with the Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer regarding his disqualification from the Hawaiian ballot due to lack of certified Constitutional eligibility.
Oh, yes, he had to desert his campaign just to visit with the gravely ill grandmother who was so precious to him that he didn’t the wife and kids, or even just the wife, along with him or hold funeral/memorial services for in a timely manner.
“QUESTION 7: Was Obama present in Hawaii during the time when a hearing was conducted with the Hawaiian Elections Commission regarding his disqualification from the 2008 Hawaiian Presidential ballot?”
Furthermore: Was Obama/Soetoro present in Hawaii at the time of his birth, and can he verifify it with credible evidence?
The four visably desparate online images of Obama’s COLB are credible evidence of something…of what I’m not sure but at least three of them have to be fake.
Clearly these are rhetorical questions on Mr. Rosner’s part. It is evident to all that the Hawaiian Democrat Party did not want to certify Obama (or whatever his real name is) because their people have personal firsthand knowledge that he is an ineligible usurper fraud. As hard as they no doubt tried, they simply could spin no “plausible deniability” get-out-of-jail-free card had they gone down that road. Hawaii is amazingly insular. They weren’t willing to fall on their swords for the mainland’s “messiah.”
My guess is that Boehner knows this. He may not like it, but he simply is a coward.
Obama (or whatever his real name is) is a usurper. He knows it and Boehner knows it, too. He just cares more about his own cushy job than he cares about the Constitution or We the People. When all is said and done, he will be lucky to stay out of jail himself and get off with just a political tar and feathering and a free trip out of Washington on a rail.
Sharon, do you know if Trump was sent copies of this as well? It would be good for him to know about those certificates.
———————
Mrs. Rondeau replies: I believe he has, I will inquire.
Lacking substantive verified/verifiable answers to all 12 questions…
QUESTION 13: What in the heck gave you the impression that “We the people…” would never catch on to your elaborate election fraud conspiracy/hoax?
Answer: The supportive Liberal Press.
My would-be Question 13: Why were the DNC’s problems with the Hawaii ballot kept from the public?
Your would-be Question 13 and mine sort of answer each other or cancel each other out, don’t they?
They do indeed. :-)