Spread the love

ALSO MISSING FROM SHORT-FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE WHICH FIRST APPEARED IN JUNE 2008

by Sharon Rondeau

The image which the White House released identifies the name of the birth hospital

(May 5, 2011) — On April 27, 2011, Barack Hussein Obama held a press conference following the release of what he claimed is a copy of his long-form birth certificate on file with the Hawaii Department of Health in Honolulu.

The image does not appear to contain an embossed seal, just as that of the “Certification of Live Birth” released on the internet in June 2008 lacked that sign of authentication.  The registration number of the short-form document had also been blacked out, which, according to the statement on the bottom of the form, “invalidated the certificate.”

Obama himself claimed that the short-form certification was his “official birth certificate,” which could not have been true, given that he released something more detailed on April 27.  However, many had already labeled it a forgery.

Upon releasing the image in June 2008, the Daily KOS  stated, “In any case, here is Obama’s birth certificate.”  However, that claim was disproved by the more detailed long-form birth certificates released by Eleanor Nordyke, whose twin girls were born a day after Obama’s alleged birth at Kapiolani Medical Center in Honolulu.

One similarity between the Certification of Live Birth and the image posted last Wednesday is that neither bears an embossed seal.  However, the birth certificates released by Mrs. Nordyke do, in the bottom-middle section between the signatures of the Director of Health and the Registrar General.

The U.S. State Department has strict requirements for those applying for U.S. passports, which the images Obama has claimed are his “birth certificates” do not meet because they lack an official seal.  How, then, can these images be considered proof of anything?  Why would they not have contained a seal from the state of Hawaii?

An article describing Obama’s alleged birth and early childhood in Hawaii written by Will Hoover of the Honolulu Star-Advertiser on November 9, 2008  states that “While most Obama residences can be traced, the hospital where he was born is difficult to document.”  Why should anyone’s birth hospital be “difficult to document?”  Hoover stated that a Kapiolani spokeswoman could not confirm Obama’s birth there due to the HIPAA law passed in 1996.  He was careful to say that “according to Obama’s family and other sources, [Obama] was born at that hospital on Aug. 4, 1961.”

Perhaps that is because In 2006, the same journalist had stated that Obama had been born in Indonesia in an article comparing Obama to Tammy Duckworth, a candidate for Congress.  At that time, Hoover said that Duckworth and Obama had in common that they were both born outside the country.    After a barrage of emails “correcting” him, the story was changed to say that both Duckworth and Obama had attended Punahou School and that Obama had been born in Hawaii.  He failed to cite sources for either of the birthplaces he listed for Obama except a “Google search” and “an editor telling me about the error.”

A journalist’s job is to research various sources to find and report the truth.  Why would any good journalist change his story based on the word of an editor or a large number of emails?  Where was the verification that he was born either in Indonesia or Hawaii?

It is well-known that George W. Bush was born in New Haven, CT, and no HIPAA law seems to have prevented its discussion.  The law was passed in 1996 and Bush was elected president in 2000.

Obama’s purported long-form is missing the entire bottom section which the Nordyke documents contain, including the signatures and embossed seal.  There is a date stamp of April 25, 2011 and a registrar’s stamp, but no official signatures. According to the State Department, the document is therefore incomplete and not a certified copy of an original birth certificate.

Even after the release of the long-form image last week, Kapiolani Medical Center refused to confirm Obama’s birth there.  A long-time resident of Hawaii whose neighbor’s children were born there stated that the hospital of birth actually fills out the birth report and then sends it to the Health Department.  If that is the case, then Kapiolani should have a record for Obama, based on what Obama himself has told the public.

The Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title 11, Department of Health, Section 11-1-2, regarding the Seal of the Department of Health, state:

§11-1-3

§11-1-2 Seal of the department of health.

a) The official seal of the department of health shall be circular in shape, two and one-fourth inches in diameter. At the curve on the top portion there shall be the words “DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH” and at the curve on the bottom portion there shall be the words “STATE OF HAWAII.” At the curve on each side portion shall be a star. In the center of the seal shall be the Caduceus, a winged rod entwined with two serpents, which has long been recognized as a universal symbol of medicine. The Caduceus shall be encircled by an indentation, which shall separate it from the words “DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH” and “STATE OF HAWAII.” For illustrative purposes, a black and white drawing of the official seal is attached at the end of this section as Exhibit “A,” titled “Seal of the Department of Health,” and dated November 1, 1988, and made a part of this section.

(b) The official seal of the department of health shall be embossed near the signature of the director of health to verify commissions of appointment of deputy directors and notaries public, certificates, and other formal official documents on which the official seal has been customarily used or is appropriate to be used, as the director of health may determine on a case-by-case basis.

(c) The seal of the department of health may also be reproduced, in either an enlarged or a reduced size, on official stationery, reports, certificates, equipment, supplies, uniform insignia, and other objects and items to be used or produced by the department of health, but the reproduction and use of the seal shall always be subject to the exclusive control of the director of health.

[Eff 2/14/2005 ] (Auth: HRS §§321-9, 91-2) (Imp:  HRS §§321-9, 91-2)

So where is the official seal on his “birth certificate?”

Update, May 5, 2011: The Post & Email’s photography and graphics expert, Mr. John F. Sweeney, reported this evening that there is a seal on the lower left corner of the long-form birth certificate image.  However, he stated that “there is a seal…but it gives away the forgery due to the lettering…”

Area identified by John F. Sweeney as containing a seal of some sort
Enlarged detail of area with seal indicated in red

Since Obama has officially announced that he was born at Kapiolani, why will hospital public relations staff not confirm it?  They would not be breaking any privacy laws since Obama has already disseminated the information.

The “marriage” of Barack Obama Sr. and Stanley Ann Dunham might not have any validity, as Obama Sr. already had a wife in Kenya.  He was a polygamist who, instead of “quitting” his studies at Harvard, was actually asked to leave because of his multiple wives and a situation which arose with another woman from the United Kingdom.  Is this one of the things Obama had hoped to hide from the general public?

Barack Obama Sr. was a citizen of Great Britain, and if citizenship flows from a father to his son, Obama Jr. was also born a citizen of Great Britain, regardless of whether or not he was born in the United States.

Document which appears to be a school registration form for Barack Hussein Obama in Indonesia indicating his citizenship as "Indonesian"

Following his several alleged residences in Hawaii from birth to age 6, Obama Jr. reportedly went to live in Indonesia after his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, married Lolo Soetoro, who had been a student at the University of Hawaii’s East-West Center.  It is reported that in the 1960s in Indonesia, a wife with foreign citizenship had to become an Indonesian citizen. It is possible that Obama had to  do the same in order to attend school.  If he ever had U.S. citizenship, how was it affected?

National Public Radio (NPR) had declared that Obama was born in Kenya, as did several African newspapers.  An Indonesian newspaper said the same thing, even specifying the village of his birth.  Members of the Kenyan Parliament proudly announced it on the record during a session in March 2010.

Has there ever been a person occupying the White House who had more foreign influence?  Is this the very thing which the Founders had feared when they included the term “natural born Citizen” in Article II of the U.S. Constitution?

Has the extensive foreign influence from Obama’s past manifested itself in his reluctance to take out America’s enemies with a “persistent hesitation to act”? Why was he described as “an absentee president,” having been called off of the golf course to attend a national security meeting shortly before the operation to kill bin Laden was carried out by Navy SEALS?

Has faux Secretary of State Hillary Clinton been leaking Obama’s indecision about bin Laden and other matters to the press?  Is the reason the State Department has tightened its requirements to issue U.S. passports that she knows Obama would not qualify for one?

And what about Obama’s regime awarding U.S. citizenship to three men convicted on charges which connected them to international terrorism?  What does that say about Obama’s view of U.S. citizenship?

Does Obama even possess U.S. citizenship himself?  Does an alleged birth in Hawaii automatically grant it?  Did he become a citizen of Indonesia, and if so, did he ever naturalize in the United States, renouncing that foreign citizenship?

Is foreign influence the reason that Obama made himself chairman of the United Nations Security Council?  Is that why Muommar Qaddafi called Obama “his son?”

How are these foreign influences affecting the U.S. military?  Can they follow the orders of someone who seems to favor foreign enemies over domestic strength and victory? Is foreign influence the reason that Obama has refused to release photos of the SEAL operation to kill bin Laden, stating that the photos do not indicate “who we are as a country”?

Is Obama’s Muslim background the reason he allocated, by executive order, $20.3 million for Palestinians to relocate to the United States?  Is it why he bowed to the Saudi king?

Is foreign influence and “Muslim faith” the reasons that Obama supported the Muslim Brotherhood as a force in the future Egyptian government?

Is Obama qualified to represent the United States of America?  Why did Ali Mazrui, a Kenyan historian, claim that Obama is a Kenyan citizen? Ali Mazrui incorrectly stated that Obama did not suppress the use of his middle name, Hussein, during the presidential campaign, but in an essay dated July 6, 2009, he stated that Obama possessed “triple ancestral heritage” and “underplayed his his African and his Muslim ancestry.”

Why have numerous African newspapers reported that Obama is “Kenyan-born?”

Do we not deserve a real American as our president?  When will the military decide that enough is enough?  Will the American people?

Despite the misleading title of a Fox News article, a document examiner who attempted to defend the long-form document did not rule out the possibility that it is a forgery.  If the birth documents Obama has released are forgeries, do we have a choice?

Join the Conversation

75 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Obama – Number one this is not a Birth Certificate.
    This is a certificate of live birth This form is given to people who are not born in the United States sometimes.
    I think we should see the real Birth Certificate.
    Number two if this document is correct, than Obama is admitting that his father is not a United States citizen, therefore Obama is not qualified to be the president of the United States under the United States Constitution – that requires both parents to be born naturalized citizens.
    Under the law of nations, to be a “natural born Citizen,” the child needed to be born in the United States (or what may be deemed its equivalent) to two citizen parents. This definition of a “natural born Citizen” is found in and has been confirmed by the following United States Supreme Court cases and other authorities:

    Obama, the Putative President of the U.S., was Born a British Subject
    This essay was originally posted by Atty Mario Apuzzo in this blog on 7 April 2009. An excellent piece by Atty Apuzzo and well worth reading again. And Obama being born subject to a foreign power, he is not Constitutionally eligible to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief of our military.

    In 1982, the vital records law was amended to create a fourth kind of birth certificate for children born outside of the Territory or State of Hawaii. HRS Chapter 338 was amended to add a new section authorizing the Director of the Department of Health to issue a birth certificate for a person NOT born in Hawaii either as a Territory or State, upon sufficient proof that the legal parents of such individual had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth of such child.

    1. > Number one this is not a Birth Certificate.
      This is a certificate of live birth

      Then are the Nordyke twins’ birth certificates also not legit? They also say “certificate of live birth”. Have the Nordyke twins been born abroad?

      > that requires both parents to be born naturalized citizens

      No, it requires both parents to *be* citizens (at the time of birth of the child). They need not be born citizens.

  2. if this BC is an “abstract”…compiled from the information contained inside of a file…held by the HI DOH…then it is not a copy…at all…

    the term abstract can mean a collection of information…and since this BC is NOT a true copy…which i believe has been proven beyond a doubt…then we have good reason to question its validity…if the normal, hospital delivery…of the nordyk twins…produced a BC for each of them…that was photocopied by the same HI DOH…then why would then need to “create” an abstract of BHO’s BC…certainly…if the DOH had to create an abstract…an original must not exist

  3. Click here: Louisiana governor Jindal caught in birther flap | Reuters

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/08/us-birther-jindal-idUSTRE74701F20110508?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&rpc=22&sp=true

    No one has ever said Jindal wasn’t born in the US; only that Jindal is nothing more than an ‘anchor baby’ — because NEITHER of his parents was a US citizen at the time of Jindal’s birth, and Jindal, therefore is categorically Not a ‘natural born citizen — and IS CATEGORICALLY NOT CONSTITUTIONALY QUALIFIED TO EVER RUN FOR THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND TO EVER SIT IN THE WHITE HOUSE!!!

  4. The “Key” might be the operative word-Abstract. All but the brain-dead know there is no “original” LFBC. Hawaii s running a criminal enterprise; the illegal immigrants’ dream port of entry. Too many people have confirmed there is no LFBC. Too much time went by. LTC Lakin was railroaded into prison. An Abstract fits the facts as Barry has paid for them. Abstract in the sense that if there ever was an original (there wasn’t), this is what it could look like. Above all, his father makes it impossible for Barry to qualify for our Presidency. Book him, Danno!

  5. Senate resolution 511 signed by hussein dunham says John McCain is a natural born citizen of CITIZEN PARENTS, not green card parents. Bobby Jindal should realize that the kenyan usurper disqualified him for the white house.

  6. A new definition of ‘natural born citizen’ . . .

    Copy and paste if necessary:

    http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2011/05/gov_bobby_jindal_releases_his.html

    Read this article carefully and you may believe this to be the final nail in the coffin of the ‘former’ Constitutional requirement to be a ‘natural born citizen’ to be eligible to sit in the White House.

    This move is just beginning but will fester. Already the majority of the population sees no difference between a ‘native’ citizen and a ‘natural born’ one — which is why obama sits unchallenged in the White House.

    In the campaign for the 2008 election, obama co-sponsored a resolution to determine whether John McCain was a legitimate candidate for the presidency while being born of two ‘natural born citizens’ though in the Panama Canal zone — while his Father was serving the in the U. S. Military. The resolution passed, McCain was declared to be ‘natural born,’ was cleared to run, and the attention to obama’s non-citizen father was deflected.

    Today, two rising stars on the Republican side of the aisle — Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal — were both born on US soil of non-citizen parents so they now they must be cleared to run for the highest office in the land in the very near future.

    SO, NOW IT IS OKAY FOR GREEN CARD VISA HOLDERS TO BIRTH A BABY IN THIS COUNTRY, THAT BABY IS CALLED A ‘NATURAL BORN CITIZEN’ AND THAT BABY IS ELIGIBLE TO RUN FOR THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES???

  7. If I were to make a guess, I would put my money on the idea that since he ordered 2 copies, the “other” unreleased copy in his possession is the legal one with the seal. The copy we are seeing on the internet is an uncertified copy used for genealogy research. It seems that HDoH was willing to release those, up until 2009, not because they are legal and can be used to say, get a passport, but because the long form is a must to be able to find ones ancestors.
    I can’t find a link I had saved (and I’m not into genealogy) but I saw a website once where the professional researchers that will look up your family tree were complaining about Hawaii not releasing those UN-certified long forms anymore and noting it happened sometime after 2009.

  8. I am very pleased to see Mr. Smith’s new video appear as a response to the front page editorial on this site entitled: “Second Update: Is the Lack of an Embossed Seal the Key?”

    In the interest of wider dissemination, though, I wonder if this video would be even more widely seen if it were relocated to the home page of this site so that everyone entering the web site home page would see it?

    Mr. Smith appears to be sincere and genuine in his concerns for the future of the country and the legitimacy of the occupant of the White House and has done something quite remarkable to procure the certified documentation of obama’s birth in Kenya — which I personally believe to be legitimate — but Mr. Smith is going to have to do more to receive the attention this document deserves.

    .And the appropriate timing to do ‘more’ has finally arrived!!

    If Mr. Smith possesses, as he states under threat of perjury, a certified copy of obama’s original Kenyan birth certificate including the 2009 stamp and signature of the then chief hospital administrator, and with a 2009 raised embossed seal from the hospital, the following questions should be answered:.

    Queries:

    (1) Did Mr. Smith present his documentation to Donald Trump?

    (2) Did Mr. Smith present his documentation to Dr. Jerome Corsi whose book regarding obama’s ineligibility will be available on May 17, 2011 — I believe?

    (3) Can Mr. Smith provide an affidavit from the person who accompanied him to Mombassa?

    (4) Is there anyone in Mombassa who has the courage to speak out to confirm Mr. Smith’s story via an affidavit?

    (5) I seem to remember historically that Mr. Smith was willing to provide his travel documents to prove the dates and timing of his trip to Kenya that resulted in his acquiring the copy of obama’s Kenyan birth certificate. Has that information been released?

    (6) Has anyone ever been able to locate a second Kenyan birth certificate from this same hospital during the same time frame to check the names of the signatories, in 1961, as being in the respective positions listed on the certificate and to confirm the authenticity of the format and the sequencing of the certificate number at the top?

    (7) Has the 2009 position of the Chief Administrator of the hospital, Helton Maganga, been verified, and has the 2009 embossed seal design been verified?

    (8) Has Mr. Smith submitted his documentation to allow for computer forensic authentication to confirm its authenticity or at least to refute charges of its fraudulent creation or computer alterations?

    Some, or all, of these questions, may have been answered in the past, but if it has not already been done, the very least that Mr. Smith must do is submit his documentation for computer forensic authentication.

    Anything less than that will ensure Mr. Smith can never be never taken seriously.

    To view the certificate and the letter to Congress, I also recommend Mr. Smith’s web site: http://www.wasobamaborninkenya.com/

  9. The latest COLB has no official state seal…
    When asked about it, the response was confusing,
    “You want seals, go to Seaworld”!

  10. Scanned documents aren’t evidence of anything even if they are legitimate. The entire reason there is a professional field known as forensic document examination is that a great deal can be told from examination of the original document itself. Much, much less can be told by looking at a photocopy of a document and very little, if anything at all, can be told from looking at a digital image that purports to be an image of an original document. Too much opportunity for adulteration, no opportunity to examine the paper, the ink, any impressions made on the paper, etc. These online arguments discussing images (especially photographic images) are like people studying animals by examining imitation scat.

    1. Very true.

      Example people will scream about the lack of an embossed seal not being in an scan image….EXACTLY….by design it is not supposed to! That is the security…lack of easy copying or replication.

      I scanned my own certified copy BC. It has an embossed seal, unlike Hawaii which uses a very bad de-embossed seal. The only a very small part of the embossed seal scanned enough to be detectable. That is how it is supposed to work.

      The ACTUAL DOCUMENT is the only thing that can be held a standard. No real document, no mas!

      1. Last week I scanned the credit-card like “BC” I received from NH in 1983. It has an embossed seal. The entire seal scanned well enough to be detectable and readable as such. That is how a scanner is supposed to work…detect highs and lows and recreate them on a flat plane in various depths/shades of black/white or color.

        The entire embossed seal on the Nordyke twins BC’s scanned well enough to be detectable and readable as such.

        However, there is indeed no substitute for the real thing…a hard-copy (paper) of a hospital typewriter filled out BC with an embossed seal…as yet unseen in BHO’s case.

  11. Americans can’t even get a Post Box from the postmaster without verifiable paper identification.

    With his supposed “BC” Obama can’t even receive mail in Chicago!

  12. In order to fulfull its intended function, an official seal must be visible and readable. Since the supposed seal on the Obama April 27 document is not visible and readable, it evidences fraud, not authenticity. An unreadable seal certifies nothing but intentional deceit.

    Moreover, a certificate cannot certify anything if no one can see a certified copy of the certificate. Hawaii’s current no-see policy is patently absurd: they have birth certificates, but no one (except the POTUS, supposedly) can see a copy, only an abstract. In order to fulfill its certifying function, a true copy of the certificate must be presented, complete with a visible and readable official seal and the actual signature(s) of an identifiable certifying official or officials.

    1. Not only does the absence of a visible and legible to the naked eye official seal evidence intentional deceit but, moreover, the visable at 400% magnification remnants of what apparently once was a seal of some sort evidences intentional fraud.

      Go here…
      http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

      Set the zoom to 400%, scroll down until only the bottom three horizontal lines of the birth certificate are showing, then scroll to the right until “21” is centered — there it is, a double- circle of white “dots” centered below “21” with the top of the circle passing through the right arrow.

  13. obama has won the PR war — not just the battle. He has marginalized us, the ‘Birthers,’ beyond redemption because we raced, with our eyes wide open, into his carefully laid trap; with our concentration solely on his fraudulent birth certificates.

    Copy and paste below:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/behind-the-numbers/post/number_of_Birthers_plummets/2011/05/04/AF3GAZxF_blog.html?wprss=behind-the-numbers

    And the country, through ignorance, does not see the importance of the Constitution’s requirement to be a ‘natural born citizen,’ as opposed to being a ‘native’ citizen — because the terms themselves have become indistinguishable one from the other. Now, being born on US soil, which obama may or may not have been, is adequate to provide eligibility.

    The poll inserted above will probably also mute the voices of those few politicians that still believe it is important for a candidate to prove his/her eligibility; and who have tried to enact legislation to require proof of eligibility even though using too broadly defined criteria.

    Donald Trump, may or may not run for the presidency, but run, or not, he achieved his fifteen (15) minutes of fame and headlines on the issue. However, as the issue has been eviscerated and the support for the issue has evaporated, I believe he has moved on. Obama did miscalculate though when he attacked Donald so openly! Donald does have quite an ego, and if Donald runs he will fight obama vigorously on other issues.

    Unfortunately, with no high profile spokesperson to carry on with the message of obama’s ineligibility, and the courts working in concert against the Constitution, we all will pay the irrevocable price for obama’s masterful manipulation of us.
    ——————-
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: Remember that the mainstream media is attempting to save itself from utter destruction over its unwillingness to report the facts of Obama’s background during the campaign. I believe that people are beginning to understand that it’s more than the birth certificate. The MSM is pumping out propaganda in the hope of salvaging some of its already-questionable credibility. In my opinion, our charge is to disseminate the truth to others. Knowledge is much more powerful if shared with large numbers of people.

    1. And you, Mrs. Rondeau, are so instrumental in ‘carrying-the-water’ on this issue.

      You have our respect, admiration and gratitude for your unfailing efforts, and you have our prayers for your success on behalf of the country.
      ——————–
      Mrs. Rondeau replies: That will be “our” success. I am only one of tens of millions. Let’s get them on board!

    2. Knowledge is much more powerful if shared with large numbers of people.

      I agree with that statement 100%. I can personally attest that more and more people are learning that to be a natural born citizen, being born in the country is not enough — both parents must also be citizens at the time of the birth of the child.

  14. ObamaRelease YourRecords says:
    Thursday, May 5, 2011 at 5:32 PM
    The new fake Obama BC does have an embossed seal…

    It is just hard to see… It is located in bottom left hand corner…

    I do not see it. Can anyone else see it ???
    ———————
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: I did not see it, either, but a correction has been issued to the recent article here based on information which our photographic expert, John Sweeney, sent us last night. He stated that there is a seal but that its appearance confirms the forgery.

  15. I think all this makes no difference as it states on the BC that it is either a true copy or an abstract.
    What we need to do is figure out how to get around 0bama’s standing argument. Why has no one ever tried a class action suit? Would that not eliminate standing if everyone in America who is harmed by 0bama’s usurpation is given an opportunity to join the suit?

  16. Upon analyzing the “green” pdf in Acrobat, I have also found two “homeless” objects which contain indiscernible white specks, characteristic of the white areas which are also behind most of the black bitmapped areas. I haven’t heard anyone talk about these and haven’t figured out what they are as of yet.

  17. I dare say that Obama and his corrupted political cronies don’t care if the birth certificates are forgeries and that they don’t have the (needed) official seal. Why? Because then, the American public can endlessly speculate. It’s Obama’s liberal extremist plan to keep this nation in a state of continual flux so that he can be given time and opportunity to do America, dirty.

    Things might come to a head where a US Military take-over may have to lock up Obama, for the country’s preservation. Congress and the courts, apparently don’t have the will or the courage to effectively act and curtail Obama’s wrecking bar activities and policies. Most everything Obama has done to date, has been Anti-American and / or, anti-traditional and criminal.

    Clearly, Obama is not one of us. It is a blatant lie to say that Obama is our nation’s first black president. No! He is our first Muslim / Mulatto fake president. He needs to be under lock and key………

  18. This article statement brings up the problem with Birth certificates not being the be all and end all of the natural born question of a US President:

    It is well-known that George W. Bush was born in New Haven, CT, and no HIPAA law seems to have prevented its discussion. The law was passed in 1996 and Bush was elected president in 2000.

    With GHW Bush (German name George Scherf, Jr.) and Barbara Bush being foreigners from Germany with their Broken spoken English and with his claim to be a son of Prescott Bush (German Name George Scherf) whose name was forged into the 1900 Census in place of a actual son of Samuel Bush, the George W Bush birth certificate lacks credibility for his claimed natural born status. In essence, his parents and grandparents are foreign born and never naturalized and thus illegal aliens. George W Bush is an illegal alien.

    The full research is here:
    1900 Census Kills Fake Bush Genealogy
    http://www.hoaxofthecentury.com/CensusBushGenealogy1.htm

  19. Hey Sharon!
    You hit a home run with this one! I’ve gotten so sick of the fraud-in-chief and it’s beyond me how anyone can believe anything he says. Nothing about him (that we see) is real.

  20. The next Obama court case should go to the following judge. He should rule on our side. Read this carefully.

    http://www.adn.com/2010/10/23/1515937/judge-orders-miller-documents.html

    FAIRBANKS — A judge ruled Saturday that the Fairbanks North Star Borough must release personnel records of U.S. Senate candidate Joe Miller.

    In an unusual weekend hearing, retired Superior Court Judge Winston Burbank ruled that the public’s right to know about candidates outweighed Miller’s right to privacy.

    “I hold that although Mr. Miller has a legitimate expectation of privacy in those documents, Mr. Miller’s right to privacy is indeed outweighed by the public’s significant interest in the background of a public figure who is running for the U.S. Senate,” the judge said. He noted that U.S. senator is among the highest elected offices in the nation.

    1. Judge Decides – The Public’s Right to Know Outweighs the Politicians Right to Privacy!

      There is much of legal thinking that I don’t understand, but let me put this forward. During the 2010 electionsa judge in Alaska made a rulling about a candidate keeping things secret from the people. Here is my take on that incident: Hey Obama – The Public’s Right to Know Outweighs the Politicians Right to Privacy!

      “Mr. Miller’s right to privacy is indeed outweighed by the public’s significant interest in the background of a public figure who is running for the U.S. Senate.”

      Let’s just rephrase that a little:

      Mr. Obama’s right to privacy is indeed outweighed by the public’s significant interest in the background of a public figure who claims to be President of the United States.

      From the Anchorage Daily News, Judge orders Miller documents released:http://www.adn.com/2010/10/23/1515937/judge-orders-miller-documents.html

  21. Sharon and others- I am so sick and tired of all of this garbage! Either “Barack Obama” is CONSTITUTIONALLY QUALIFIED to be president and not a CRIMINAL and/or treasonous USURPER (especially vis-a-vis what appears to be his fraudulent Social Security number, 042-68-4425, and his lack of other verifiable credentials including a GENUINE birth certificate) or he is not! For God’s sake- what the Hell is so hard to comprehend about all of this! WHY WON’T ANYONE, DONALD TRUMP NOW ESPECIALLY INCLUDED, STAND UP FOR AMERICA AND DEMAND THAT THESE ISSUES BE RESOLVED ONCE AND FOR ALL?

  22. Time to stop – BIRTHER Motion.

    Time to Start – “Not Eligible Period” based on his own personal vetting with birthcertificate that was on file in Hawaii – says plain and clear, Father: Kenyan, East Africa and Age 25.

    New Subece line from Now on:

    “OBAMA Self Vetted, is not eligible to run in 2012”

  23. Donald Trump help fund Rahm Emanuel’s election campaign for Chicago Mayor to the tune of $50,000 and at the White House Correspondant’s dinner, Trump autographed a copy of Obama’s new “long form” for a State Department staffer.
    I worry that he’s already been co-opted.

    1. With the amount of pure propaganda disseminated from the USMediaConglomerate…why would anyone believe these “polls”? It is these very “polls” they use to convince the less-informed [ignorant] that which they should think/believe. I do not buy into the media sponsored polls.

  24. This is a note from a genealogist friend of mine:

    “What probably should be done is to contact the attorneys who are handling the case against obama.
    ***In my opinion, here is the lynchpin: Alvin T. Onaka, the Registrar who’s name appears on the certificate, should be subpoenaed to testify in court that the document that has been presented by obama is a true certificate that was issued by Onaka’s office.***
    In order to do that, I would assume that an attorney would have to submit the fake document to the court as evidence in the case against obama, or else start a new civil suit that would deal solely with the new fake certificate.
    ***Then Onaka could be called as an expert witness to testify to the fact that either the certificate is a legal, certified copy or it is not.***
    End of problem.
    As I see it, Onaka could not testify to the legality of the document without his seal being stamped on the document.
    He simply cannot.
    What this certificate is, if it has indeed been issued by Onaka’s office, is an UNCERTIFIED COPY–ONE THAT LACKS THE EMBOSSED SEAL–THAT IS NOT VALID FOR USE IN A LEGAL SITUATION, I.E., TO ATTEST TO BIRTH IDENTITY, TO OBTAIN PASSPORTS, TO OBTAIN A SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER, TO APPLY FOR ENTRANCE INTO THE MILITARY, TO OBTAIN A DRIVER’S LICENSE, ETC.
    What I believe is this: if the birth certificate document that has been released by obama as his true long-form certficate of live birth is a forgery, he is, at the very least, guilty of being party to the crime of forgery as he personally has verified that he is releasing this form of the document as a true copy.
    ***I suppose obama can always put the blame on Mr. Onaka for the document’s authenticity, but Onaka holds the trump card: his embossed seal is nowhere in sight.***
    The copy, therefore, could have been made by anyone.
    And Onaka is therefore not obliged to take responsibility for it.”

    I have contacted my Representative and asked him to get this legal verification.

  25. Most everywhere you look on this ‘document’… there is a problem. Besides the ‘cannot exist’ registrar number and date… We know from the FOIA released Documents from the Hawaiian DoH.. that in or about 1966 his BC was amended. We also know that in most all occasions such amendment is the result of adoption and subsequent name change.
    That time frame correlates with his adoption by Lolo Soetoro… which would most likely entail a change in Nationality.
    Here’s the problem… any time such amendment is made… the ‘new’ amendment is documented at the bottom of the original BC with dates, official stamps and witnesses. There are none on this BC.
    So, this is not a currant rendition. I think this is for the most part… what he is hiding… the fact that he was adopted, name changed… And his Nationality changed to Indonesian… which clearly renders him ineligible to hold office… hands down, no arguments.

    See: http://www.patriotsheartnetwork.net/profiles/blogs/why-he-is-hiding-the-real-bc

  26. Re: – Why have numerous African newspapers reported that Obama is “Kenyan-born?”
    …………..

    A total of ten (10) “Obama born in Kenya” webpages can be seen here:

    When did Kenya became Hawaii?
    http://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2010/12/21/when-did-kenya-became-hawaii/

    When did Kenya became Hawaii? Pt 2
    http://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2011/01/28/when-did-kenya-became-hawaii-pt-2/

    ( Some of them were edited at a later date, to protect Chairman Obama. )

    1. I have copies of most of those that I printed out before they were scrubbed. NPR also referred to Barry as “Kenyan Born”. Most people I show them to find them convincing.

      The media, Congress, and the courts just ignore these news articles for the most part. If pressed they just say they are all mistaken. They sound downright racist when they claim so many African sources, including the Kenyan Parliament, didn’t know Obama was born in Hawaii.

      The evidence that Obama’s entire life, including his nativity story, is bogus, nothing but a major fraud, is overwhelming. It matters not because nothing will be done about it. People have tried, but the enablers have the power.

  27. I’m starting to get worried. Donald Trump hasn’t mentioned anything about the birth certificate since Obambi’s grand charade last week. He sat there and took Obambi’s taunts and insults at the correspondent’s dinner. All Trump did was take credit for forcing Obambi to show the long form which has since been proven to be a fake.

    And now I’m reading that Obambi’s poll numbers are peaking since he lyingly took credit for bin Laden’s killing. I saw a poll that says the number of people who doubt Obama was born in America has been slashed by half.

    What can we do to convince these sheeple?

    I was encouraged by Trump’s dedication to the issue, but he seems to have dropped the ball. What are his investigators turning up? Who are these people? Why can’t they come forward? Why hasn’t Trump brought up the Vattel issue? Has anyone pointed it out to him?

    I’m afraid we’re losing ground at the worst possible moment. Last week I felt we had him. Now? Not so much.

    Come on people!! Let’s ROLL!!!

    1. I think Trump is biding his time. He took it to heart from the Lame Stream Media that he was spending too much time talking about the birth certificate, and wanted to give it a little rest.

      But rest assured that “The Donald” has people looking into both the 2nd birth certificate (I know, the first one was a [fake] certification of live birth), and into the Osama Bin Laden Death Hoax.

      Trump is not stupid. He will see the glaring similarities between the two situations -including an unwillingness to release believable documents – put two and two together, and come out swinging!

      At least, that’s what I hope :-).

    2. Let’s face it folks, we’ve been played again. An election is on the horizon, states were pushing “birther” legislation and the noose was tightening around Obama’s neck. The admin needed someone to drive the issue over the top to give reason why (now) Obama needed to release another document. I believe this new document was released just the way it was to keep the focus on a birth location and not his father’s citizenship.

      Looking back on Trump’s behavior and the media’s behavior to give him airtime… it appears he was used as the “fall guy” by Rahm Emanual (longtime friend of Trump) to set the stage for political theater. It is also no accident that Bin Laden has supposedly been killed in the same week of the release. What better way to draw immediate media attention away from the release and attempt to make Obama look like some American hero?

      The government (with the help of the media) have become nothing but stage managers directing the show.

      Trump had absolutely nothing to loose in all this and his silence now speaks volumes.

    3. IMO nothing is getting done because the american ppl haven’t expressed any anger. We need to go to DC and stay there until the ursurper is handcuffed. I am starting my own campaign this weekend. I even thought about painting my car with messages. We must make our voices heard loud and clear.

  28. There are technical issues with the April 27 document, such as layers of elements, impossible alignments (for a manual typewiter), centered vs. left-tab alignment, etc., but Sharon has stated the simple, self-evident truth:

    “Obama’s purported long-form is missing the entire bottom section which the Nordyke documents contain, including the signatures and embossed seal. There is a date stamp of April 25, 2011 and a registrar’s stamp, but no official signatures.”

    Since Congress accepted the clearly inadequate COLB without question, it will almost certainly swallow Obama’s latest ruse, to its everlasting shame. As Sharon’s article makes crystal clear, there is a mountain of evidence that cries out for investigation by Congress, but this cowardly Congress hides behind a wall of silence.

    1. What’s really bad here is that, apparently, nobody in the Federal government knows what a real birth certificate is. No one in any official capacity seems to be able to tell the difference between a document that is a real, legal, birth certificate and a document that is not. If nothing else, this rampant ignorance needs to be cured. Or perhaps they are just playing dumb for Obama’s benefit.

    2. The eligibility issue is over. It is not going anywhere, no matter the amount of forgeries are found.
      it is going nowhere in Congress. I spoke with my Congressman, Rep, Lamar Smith, about 2 weeks ago during the Easter Recess, and he told me that there would be no hearings in the House regarding Obama’s eligibility. He is Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

      Here in Texas, the eligibility bill authored by Rep. Leo Berman was defeated in Committee on 4-20-11. The Republicans have a super majority plus in the Texas House and the committees. If the bill can’t pass in the Texas House, it will not pass anywhere.

      It is time to get realistic about this issue, let’s concentrate on getting this commie out of office in 2012.
      ——————–
      Mrs. Rondeau replies: Anyone can file a criminal complaint with the U.S. attorney and the FBI against Obama for treason before 2012.

  29. The whole discussion is Moot. IF, IF we would have had LESS Voter Apathy, and would have had TRUE Patriots that would have been elected and Stood their “Constitutional Ground”, and adhered to their “Constitutional Oath”, and Most Importantly, IF we would have had a TRUE Constitutional Patriot win in the Senate, THEN the First “Order of Business”, for a Patriot Senate Leader WOULD/SHOULD have been to “The Sergent-at-Arms” of the Senate, to GO, Forth and Serve upon the USURPER the “Warrants of Arrest for TREASON and High Crimes and Misdemeanors” against “The United States of America and Her Sovereign Citizenry!!
    Unfortunately, these events did NOT occur, and “WE the People” are is acute danger of becoming “The United SOCIALIST States of America!!
    DO NOT be assured of a “Election” in 2012, IF the Usurper continues His Destruction and Socialization of America, we will have become a “COMMUNIST, SOCIALIST GULAG!!

  30. Sharon,

    It is clear that our elected officials including the courts are complicit in the cover up of what Trump calls the greatest fraud ever pulled on the world with the usurpation to the White House of our first mulatto president. Having no standing the only recourse for us citizens is through the ballot box to send these politicos packing in the next several election cycles.

    However, it is apparent that there is sufficient evidence to point to criminal acts that Obama has committed both before taking office and now (with his official release of the LFCOLB) including identity fraud, document fraud, social security fraud and election fraud.

    Trump and others of public influence should ratchet up the meme that our putative president may be a criminal (just like the press did to Dick Nixon) that was allowed unvetted to attain the presidency.

    I truly hope Trumps next comments relating to Obama deal with the fact that this latest release of his COLB contains no official state seal and therefore is not valid, and the issue of the fraudulent use of stoeln SSN and forged Selective Service Registration.

    Here’s an interview with Susan Daniels from May 3rd…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=q-9QeJqSneA#at=41

    Bill Ayres apparently is more than just an English professor who lives in the neighborhood. He may have assisted Obama with getting the stolen SSN in 1986 when he moved to Chicago.

    1. Amen to the comment about Trump, which echoes what Pro Graphics had to say in a BirtherReport.com report about the Susan Daniels video:

      “The investigator has apparently sent the material to Trump twice, and while she has not heard back, one assumes the information is being looked-into by some of the world’s most powerful investigators and legal experts. Trump easily has the money to casually hire the best at any price.

      “Mocking Trump was probably the absolute dumbest thing Obama could have ever done: you don’t screw around and, in essence, dare a guy like Trump to destroy you by belittling him in public when he already doesn’t like you – especially when you have reason to fight lawsuits for 2 years over disclosure of your citizenship records.”

      To that I say, stay tuned …

      1. I certainly hope you’re right, we haven’t heard anything on this issue from Trump in a while.
        Maybe he’s swallowed the latest “Certificate of Vile Birth”. It seems he must have more than enough documentation to proceed and yet, we haven’t heard anything from him since the “unveiling”. I hope you’re right – but I have bad feelings about Trump’s silence. He’s not known as one who is “patient” about “returning fire”. I hope he hasn’t “thrown in the towel”.
        ELmo

      2. Sooo totally true, and then preempting his show for nothing – and I mean nothing – on top of that! I hope The Powers That Be do not get to “The Donald,” and he fights this battle to the bitter end!