JUST WHO IS GUILTY OF TREASON AND SEDITION?
by Sharon Rondeau
(Mar. 14, 2011) — On Tuesday, March 15, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., a trial is scheduled for Theresa Cao, who shouted “Except Obama! Except Obama!” on January 6, 2011, when the U.S. Constitution was read aloud by the newly-sworn-in House of Representatives and Rep. Frank Pallone read the section defining requirements for the presidency.
Cao was then arrested and charged with unlawful conduct. But did she break the law? Is exposing treason against the law? Should it be?
Since Obama’s father was a British citizen, Obama was born a British citizen. Regardless of where he was born, his citizenship is British. How, then, could he possibly be considered a “natural born (U.S.) Citizen” as required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution?
Almost 100 years ago, Attorney and Ambassador Breckinridge Long cited “the laws of nature” as determining that Mr. Charles Evans Hughes was not a “natural born Citizen” because his father was a British citizen when he was born. Long asserts that “If war had broken out between this government and England this government would have had a right to interne the father, the mother and the son as subjects of an enemy power.”
Obama’s father was a British citizen when Obama was born.
Writer Jedi Pauly also relies on “natural law” and the father’s citizenship in the determination of a person’s “natural born” status.
Attorney Mario Apuzzo maintains that the citizenship of both parents and the child’s birthplace, or soil, must be consistent for the child to be considered “natural born.”
Attorney Leo Donofrio has located an article from an 1896 of the New York Tribune which states that a “native born” and “natural born” Citizen are not the same.
There is ample evidence that those currently holding positions within the U.S. government know that Obama does not meet the constitutional qualifications to serve as President, and, by their compliance with a usurper in office, are aiding and abetting treason against the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to act. A decorated Army medical doctor has been denied his constitutional right to an impartial trial and sentenced to six months at Ft. Leavenworth for simply inquiring about Obama’s eligibility.
The big media companies are guilty also. This writer has been told by two very reliable sources that members of the Secret Service are well aware of Obama’s fraud.
It stands to reason that if Obama were eligible and deserving of the presidency, he would have put the question to rest and spared an 18-year Army veteran prison time.
President Richard M. Nixon resigned from office for much less than Obama has done.
In a report dated April 3, 2009, the Congressional Research Service equated a person simply born in the United States to that of an Article II, Section 1, clause 5 “natural born Citizen” (page 4). It states that the citizenship of the parents is not a factor unless the parents are foreign diplomats:
“As such, any person physically born “in” the United States, regardless of the citizenship of one’s parents (unless such parents are foreign diplomatic personnel not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States), would appear to be a “natural born” citizen eligible to be President of the United States.”
Obama claimed dual citizenship at birth, which means he had a foreign allegiance due to his British father. Is that what the Founders intended when they included the term “natural born Citizen” in the Constitution? Even if Obama were born in the United States, he was subject to another “jurisdiction,” which would seemingly disqualify him for the U.S. presidency.
On page 11, the CRS document falsely states:
Despite the absence of any formal or administrative or legal requirement or oversight at the federal level, or specific state requirement to produce a birth certificate for ballot placement, it may be noted here briefly that the only “official” documentation on record that has been presented in the matter of President Obama’s eligibility has been an official, certified copy of the record of live birth released by the Obama campaign in June of 2008…The copy of this certificate states on its face, as certified by Hawaii health and vital records personnel, that President Obama was born in Hawaii, in the city of Honolulu on the Island of Oahu, at 7:24 P.M. on August 4, 1961. Under Hawaii law, an officially certified copy of such health record is to be considered ‘for all purposes the same as the original,’ and is “prima facie” evidence of the facts asserted…
With respect to requests to ‘evaluate’ evidence of a foreign birth, it may be noted briefly that there appear to be no official documentary records, or copies of such records, which might be subject to such evaluation…
The first paragraph above is false because:
- the image posted online was not done so by Obama’s campaign until after Politifact, Factcheck.org and The Daily Kos had posted it
- the state of Hawaii has never asserted that the image represents anything real, nor that it was issued from its office;
- there were four versions of the same document posted within a short period of time, indicating that it had been altered, rendering it invalid, as stated at the bottom of a real paper Certificate of Live Birth;
- There is no evidence that Obama ever requested the Hawaii Department of Health to release any information about his birth, as they have consistently refused to do so, citing privacy laws;
- The “Certification of Live Birth” is not an original document;
- the original image contained a blacked-out certificate number, which also invalidated it instantly.
Governor Neil Abercrombie has stated that Hawaii has no original birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama, contradicting his predecessor, Linda Lingle, who said that her health department director had “seen it.”
The second paragraph is false because last September, Mr. Lucas Smith submitted to every member of Congress a detailed letter with a copy of a document which he claimed was obtained in Kenya and which states that Obama was born at Coast Provincial Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya on August 4, 1961.
The definition of “treason” is:
disloyalty or treachery to one’s country or its government. Treason is any attempt to overthrow the government or impair the well-being of a state to which one owes allegiance; the crime of giving aid or comfort to the enemies of one’s government. Sedition is any act, writing, speech, etc., directed unlawfully against state authority, the government, or constitution, or calculated to bring it into contempt or to incite others to hostility, ill will or disaffection; it does not amount to treason and therefore is not a capital offense. 2. See disloyalty.
The U.S. Constitution is the foundation of our nation. Tomorrow, Theresa Cao will exercise her God-given constitutional right to speak out about the treason going on around her.
LCDR Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III stated of Theresa Cao’s upcoming trial, “I’m behind her 100%. I support her staunchly.”
On March 13, 2011, Maj. Gen. Paul E. Valley (Ret.) issued the following official statement regarding Ms. Cao’s case:
Ms. Cao, you are a brave woman, a true patriot, and a US citizen that has exercised her rights under the First Amendment to express her views of the ‘Natural Born” status of Barack Obama. His eligibility under the Constitution was not properly vetted during his candidacy for President, and many Americans across this great nation question his status as you did before Congress during the reading of the Constitution on January 6, 2011.
You are the only American Citizen who stood up for our rights to be heard before Congress that day. You should not have been cited for “disturbance” as the Halls of Congress belong to the “People”. Congress did have the right to remove you from the Halls of Congress as they attempted to maintain decorum, but I strongly support the position that all charges against you be dropped by the Court and that you be permitted to return to your normal life.
The statement was sent to this writer and Ms. Cao through his spokesman.
Who deserves jail time: Cao or Obama?
“Qui tactet consentire.” Audio clip from “A Man for All Seasons:” DS400171(1)