Spread the love

by Sharon Rondeau

(Apr. 25, 2024) — Fox News’s Thursday edition of “The Five” opened with a discussion of the U.S. Supreme Court’s hearing of oral argument in a case appealed by leading 2024 Republican presidential candidate Donald J. Trump from the DC District Court of Appeals claiming his actions while in the Oval Office should be protected by presidential immunity.

Trump was indicted for the “crimes” of allegedly attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election through a conspiracy and retaining “classified” documents the National Archives and Justice Department claimed he should have relinquished after he left office on January 20, 2021.

Trump denies all of the charges.

Each co-host of the program spoke briefly on his or her thoughts on the high court’s hearing earlier today. When it was Jesse Watters’s turn, he remarked that if the court did not uphold the concept of presidential immunity, he would “get a lawyer” and sue Joe Biden for the reported deaths of thousands of birds from wind turbines and other perceived transgressions since Biden took office, adding, “…and then I’ll sue Obama for forgery because we all know the birth certificate wasn’t real.”

Watters was referring to the “long-form” image released nearly 13 years ago to the day said to represent Obama’s original birth certificate held by the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH). However, investigators conducting a 5+-year probe of the image later declared it a “computer-generated forgery,” with lead investigator Mike Zullo stating its release was made “with the intent to deceive.”

The uploading of the image to the White House website took place on the morning of April 27, 2011 and was immediately seized upon by the mainstream media as proof Obama was “born in Hawaii” and, by extension, was allegedly eligible to serve as president per the “natural born Citizen” requirement of Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution.

At the time of this writing, The Post & Email‘s account derives from the writer’s direct observation and memory of the exchange approximately 45 minutes earlier; a video of the episode to confirm Watters’s exact words will be added upon its availability.


Update, 7:48 p.m. EDT: A video of Watters’s and the other co-hosts comments is here, with Watters referring to Obama and “forgery” at 7:26.

Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

19 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Saturday, April 27, 2024 12:35 PM

Why don’t they get that Obama has been using a stole social security number? I can prove it with multiple documents that I include in my book “The Rubbish Hauler’s Wife versus Barack Obama: A True Story.”

Jonathan J.
Reply to  Susan Daniels
Saturday, April 27, 2024 1:02 PM

How did that story end?

James Carter
Reply to  Jonathan J.
Monday, April 29, 2024 9:55 AM

Buy her book and find out for yourself!

Jonathan J.
Reply to  James Carter
Monday, April 29, 2024 7:00 PM

Spoiler: The Secretary of State moved to dismiss, and that motion was granted. The end.

Jonathan J.
Thursday, April 25, 2024 6:34 PM

Sue for what? How will standing be established?

Pete
Reply to  Jonathan J.
Thursday, April 25, 2024 8:24 PM

Forgery. It’s a crime actually on the books. Amazing. Huh?

Jonathan J.
Reply to  Pete
Friday, April 26, 2024 12:17 AM

Forgery isn’t a tort, and private citizens can’t initiate federal criminal proceedings.

Bob68+
Reply to  Jonathan J.
Thursday, April 25, 2024 8:49 PM

Please define “standing” and how it applies to Obama and his claimed birth certificate……….

Jonathan J.
Reply to  Bob68+
Friday, April 26, 2024 12:18 AM

That’s a question for Watters because private citizens can’t initiate federal criminal proceedings.

Thom
Reply to  Bob68+
Friday, April 26, 2024 1:30 AM

In law, standing or locus standi is a condition that a party seeking a legal remedy must show they have, by demonstrating to the court, sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party’s participation in the case.

Reply to  Thom
Saturday, April 27, 2024 12:43 PM

When I sued the OH Sec. of State in 2012 to keep Obama off our ballot, I got certified as a Write-in candidate for president which gave me standing.

Jonathan J.
Reply to  Thom
Saturday, April 27, 2024 1:04 PM

Standing to sue in ballot challenges has nothing to do with presidential immunity (the topic of the FOX discussion).

Thom
Reply to  Bob68+
Friday, April 26, 2024 1:36 AM

I am convinced that a court would deny any single private citizen would have “standing” in that type of legal action.
More likely a state or group of states. But we have already had “standing” denied by states in a case involving voter fraud which I think was an incredibly wrong denial since the states were definitely affected by the dilution of their legal votes. Such is our current situation sadly.

  • (The party is directly subject to an adverse effect by the statute or action in question, and the harm suffered will continue unless the court grants relief in the form of damages or a finding that the law either does not apply to the party or that the law is void or can be nullified. In informal terms, a party must have something to lose. The party has standing because they will be directly harmed by the conditions for which they are asking the court for relief.)
Bob68+
Reply to  Thom
Friday, April 26, 2024 9:31 AM

Thank you for that explanation. Seems to me that “standing” is an easy way to evade making a decision a court does not want to make. If citizens do not have standing in the case of the fraud Obama there is no such thing as “standing” …….Standing is in the case of Obama, being used to protect the court by protecting Obama……….”direct harm” is everywhere as a result of the installation of Obama…..What the party lost is America……….The court should have prevented this, but.they are afraid to do the right thing………….

Last edited 9 days ago by Bob69
Jonathan J.
Reply to  Bob68+
Friday, April 26, 2024 12:26 PM

Standing isn’t a way to avoid issues, but an acknowledgement of the courts’ limited jurisdiction. Jurisdiction that can be expanded by legislatures. Watters’ remarks didn’t touch on this.

Ted
Reply to  Jonathan J.
Friday, April 26, 2024 3:33 AM

He had standing as a taxpayer whose tax dollars fund his post presidency perks.

Jonathan J.
Reply to  Ted
Friday, April 26, 2024 12:27 PM

That’s not accurate, but even if it was, a SCOTUS ruling on presidential immunity wouldn’t change that.

JONATHAN DAVID MOOERS
Reply to  Jonathan J.
Friday, April 26, 2024 12:00 PM

NATURAL REALITY (eyes): due to FEAR of Obama’s “black male blackmail” of possibly unleashing his army of young-black-Burn/Loot/Murder-males if any federal soul raises ID questions about FRAUD presIDent Obama, our nationally syndicated/”sindicated” court system has been instructed to impose JUDICIAL OMERTA all as covered up by the nation’s compliant MEDIA MAFIA =
100% DIMISSAL of ALL Obama court inquiries  http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/birther%20case%20list.pdf

VS

NARRATIVE REALITY (lies): courts simply could not enter Obama cases because they were lawfully obligated to respect the high bar of “standing”

All just cartoon justice in my observations of natural reality, because: when did ALL 50 STATES ever agree 100% over time on any controversial issue brought before them (like segregation, gay marriage, marijuana use, women’s right to vote, sanctuary cities, abortion practices, etc.)?!

16 YEARS OF 100% JUDICIAL OMERTA’s “UTILITY OF FUTILITY” (all the way down from the U.S. Supreme Court to all local courts in USA): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUcyb5pmUKI

Reply to  JONATHAN DAVID MOOERS
Friday, April 26, 2024 8:10 PM

Hello Jonathan Mooers:

When you wrote:

“due to FEAR of Obama’s “black male blackmail” of possibly unleashing his army of young-black-Burn/Loot/Murder-males if any federal soul raises ID questions about FRAUD presIDent Obama, our nationally syndicated/”sindicated” court system has been instructed to impose JUDICIAL OMERTA all as covered up by the nation’s compliant MEDIA MAFIA …”,

that is so very true now and was also very true back in late 2008 and in 2009.

That veiled threat cloud of extreme violence in the streets by leftist radical goons acting when called to at the secret behest of the Communist DSA leadership wing of the socialist controlled Democratic Party, that is hanging over the country if anyone seriously gained traction in the courts or Congress to really dig into Obama’s forged and fraudulent life narrative and documents, was brought up on the Bill Cunningham Radio Show, when he had me on the air back in Aug 2009.

See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmZpwcRf3FQ

Nothing much has changed since then with that veiled threat of violence cloud hanging over the country other than the far-left has proved that to them — any MEANS justifies their END goal — to change the USA from a constitutional republic to a socialist totalitarian puppet state of the New World Order of “Wokestan”, where the native language is not common sense English but “Newspeak”.

That was the hoped for change that Obama really meant when he talked about “hope and change”. It was a bait and switch slogan that unfortunately worked with enough people to allow that the cold-hearted and ruthless “snake” Obama to gain access to the warmth of the Oval Office. And then like Donald Trump’s often stated “snake” story, the snake did what it does best. And in Obama’s case that was to start implementing his “Dreams From My Father”. And his father was an anti-America communist sympathizer. And the snake Obama and his team are still at it in his behind the scenes in Obama’s ideal 3rd term controlling Biden. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JI2Xtqd4Mts

It was true back in early Aug 2009 when it was discussed in that radio show interview and it is even more true now. The far-left deep-state in the DC swamp will lead the country into extreme street violence in my opinion, like occurred in the summer of 2020 but even worse, and this time in 100 cities, rather than give up the power they have now, and their goal for even more absolute power, if Trump wins the election.

Pray that Donald Trump wins the election and then at that time that the country has the guts to do what needs to be done, that is strongly and forcefully enforce the laws against violence, if and when the far-left radical violent thugs try to burn down 100 cities in protest against the will of people to get their Constitution and the Rule of Law back in full force.

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.ProtectOurLiberty.org

Last edited 8 days ago by CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)