IF RUSSIA PROBE “A DISTRACTION,” WHAT IS ON THE HORIZON?

by Sharon Rondeau

(Oct. 27, 2017) — Although not hosting his 9:00 p.m. EDT program on Friday, “Hannity” host Sean Hannity tweeted during the hour that he plans to release more information on Monday relating to the investigation led by former FBI Director and now-Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller, III seeking evidence of Russian “collusion” and alleged interference in the 2016 election.

Guest host Jeanine Pirro interviewed a number of commentators about the investigation, which has sought to verify whether or not now-President Donald Trump and/or his campaign associates worked with the Kremlin to see that he was victorious over Democrat presidential contender Hillary Clinton last November.

Trump has denied any improper communications with the Russians, as have his aides and other professional associates, including his personal attorney, Michael Cohen.

Over the last two weeks, Circa News and The Hill have revealed that “collusion” with Russia may have occurred with the DNC, Hillary Clinton and their associates in the form of hiring the political research firm Fusion GPS to produce the now-infamous “Russian dossier” to discredit Trump.

Breaking news on Friday night came from Byron York of The Washington Examiner, who reported that the owners of The Washington Free Beacon paid Fusion GPS to conduct research on Trump.

Media outlets are not expected to take part in or fund political activity, including research on political candidates, in order to maintain their objectivity.

Since 2008, Hannity has declared from his platform that “journalism in America is dead.”

Hannity tweeted throughout Pirro’s broadcast references to the week’s earlier reportage that despite a 2009-2010 FBI investigation into Russian operatives seeking to control a larger part of the U.S.’s uranium supply utilizing the techniques of bribery, extortion, and kickbacks, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, and White House occupant Barack Hussein Obama approved the sale of 20% of U.S. uranium to a Russian company through a Canadian acquisition.

Hannity began his tweets with “When will @Hillary Clinton be indicted?”

Earlier on Friday, CNN reported that a federal grand jury issued an unspecified number of indictments in Mueller’s probe which have amounted to “charges.”  The Fifth Amendment tasks a grand jury with determining whether or not enough evidence exists for the government to formally charge a suspect.

On Twitter, those who believe that there was collusion between Trump associates and the Kremlin speculated as to who would be arrested, which, according to CNN, could occur on Monday.

In recent days, it was reported that Mueller and his team have been investigating the activity of The Podesta Group, a prominent lobbying firm headed by Tony Podesta, brother of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta.

Hannity included in his tweets speculation that Mueller and the media are “working hand in hand.”  “Media to be tipped off,” he wrote.

It was not clear if Hannity was referring to the alleged grand jury indictments or another aspect of the investigation.

Pirro and several of her guests questioned Mueller’s objectivity in agreeing to conduct the probe in the first place given that he and his successor as FBI Director, James Comey, are acquainted and worked together in the past at the Department of Justice.

Sara Carter of Circa and John Solomon of The Hill have pointed out in their reports that Mueller was in charge of the FBI when the Obama regime approved the sale of uranium to Russia.

In two of four tweets during the hour, Hannity appeared to refer to the revelations of the week as “a distraction.”

Former White House Deputy Assistant Sebastian Gorka has accused Hillary and former President Bill Clinton of treason as a result of their alleged self-enrichment in the uranium scheme which reportedly resulted in at least a $145 million donation from Russia to the Clinton Foundation, which Bill Clinton operates.

The Clintons have remained virtually silent on the allegations contained in new reports unveiled over the week.

After Hannity’s show ended, Trump tweeted:

 

 

Hannity was and remains a strong Trump supporter from the early days of the presidential campaign.  On October 12, Hannity interviewed Trump one-on-one at a rally in Pennsylvania, where he mentioned the assertion made by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange that the source of thousands of leaked emails from the DNC server in 2016 was not the Russian government or any “state party.”

Join the Conversation

5 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Gary Wilmott,
    I agree with your comments about Sean Hannity.

    Below are audio interviews with Lori Roth of Canada Free Press interviewing private investigator Doug Hagmann, in Aug. of 2009. I could not locate text of the articles. They appear to have been removed.

    The discussion between Hagmann and Roth is about a well known Fox News talk show host being threatened it he talks about Obama’s eligibility. Hagmann said the talk show host signed a sworn affidavit saying he was threatened. He also said the talk show host said if he did speak about the issues he was told his life would be made “a living hell”.
    There is some interesting stuff here:

    http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour1Aug0709.mp3
    http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour2Aug0709.mp3
    http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour3Aug0709.mp3

    And here is link to an article by Hagmann explaining, years later, why he never released the name of the Fox News talk show host……who I believe was likely to have been Hannity.

    http://canadafreepress.com/article/who-is-barack-hussein-obama-or-is-it-barry-soetoro

    None of that is meant as a defense of Hannity, just information for anyone who might want to check it out. It could have been someone other than Hannity, but Hannity is my guess.

    If you have the ability to copy and store the audio above, it might be a good idea, it may still be scrubbed from the net. Again, the audio is well worth listening to.

  2. I appreciate that Hannity is hammering the Clinton (x2) – Obama – Comey – Wasserman-Schultz – FBI – Holder – Lynch – Lerner – Abedin – Mills – Power – etc. scandals every night…But geeez Sean where was your courage and integrity to blow the whistle on the fraud known as Barack Hussein Obama? At the end of the day Sean Hannity has selective outrage and can only be characterized as another media hypocrite who cares first and foremost about his job and his perceived reputation rather than the interests of the American people. A great American Hannity is not.

  3. How convenient for the charges that are being brought on Monday at a time when the Clinton Scandal needs a hu-u-uge distraction. Fox news is the only news that I watch. Thanks for getting the truth out there.