by Sharon Rondeau

(Mar. 22, 2017) — In a letter dated March 21, 2017, Attorney Larry Klayman told U.S. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes that an NSA “whistleblower” reported to him that the Florida vote tally in the 2008 presidential election was tampered with in order to “help” Barack Hussein Obama win that state’s electoral votes and by extension, “the White House.”

The letter, copied to all members of the Intelligence Committee, can be read here:

Klayman stated that last Thursday, he flew to Washington and met with Intelligence Committee Counsel Allen R. Souza in Nunes’s absence and informed him of the allegations made by his client, Dennis Montgomery, in testimony to the FBI “almost two years ago” about the depth and breadth of government spying, including on Donald Trump.

Since the November election, Democrats in Congress have claimed that “the Russians” committed some type of interference in the 2016 presidential election, resulting in Trump’s victory, while ridiculing and marginalizing Trump for claiming on March 4 that he was “wiretapped,” meaning surveilled, during the campaign.

House Intelligence Committee ranking member Adam Schiff claimed during an Intelligence Committee hearing on Monday:

The Russian “active measures” campaign may have begun as early as 2015, when Russian intelligence services launched a series of spearphishing attacks designed to penetrate the computers of a broad array of Washington-based Democratic and Republican party organizations, think tanks and other entities. This continued at least through winter of 2016.

While at first, the hacking may have been intended solely for the collection of foreign intelligence, in mid-2016, the Russians “weaponized” the stolen data and used platforms established by their intel services, such as DC Leaks and existing third party channels like Wikileaks, to dump the documents.

The media continues to work assiduously to convince the public that Trump or his former aides have ties to Russia and that Russia “hacked the election.”

WikiLeaks has denied that any state entity provided the thousands of emails it published last summer from the Democrat National Committee (DNC) showing the Clinton campaign in a poor light, including collaborating with members of the mainstream media to provide favorable coverage.  Also revealed was that then-CNN commentator and DNC deputy chairman Donna Brazile provided some of the topics, if not the exact questions, to the Clinton campaign in advance of townhall meetings against Bernie Sanders.

Brazile initially denied the claim but has since admitted to it, stating in a recent column that “I had been working behind the scenes to add more town hall events and debates to the primary calendar, and I helped ensure those events included diverse moderators and addressed topics vital to minority communities. My job was to make all our Democratic candidates look good, and I worked closely with both campaigns to make that happen. But sending those emails was a mistake I will forever regret.”

Having lost her position at CNN as a result of the WikiLeaks revelations, Brazile is now writing for TIME Magazine.  She, too, has blamed “the Russians” for interfering with “our democratic process.”

“For weeks now, we’ve seen a steady stream — not just leaks — of information about possible contacts between the Trump campaign and the Russians. This is after the F.B.I. and our intelligence community determined that Russia interfered in the United States election with the aim of electing Donald Trump president.

“For the sake of our country, and our democracy, this level of interference calls for a thorough and independent investigation. And that investigation needs to start now,” Brazile wrote in TIME on March 17.

Klayman’s client, Dennis Montgomery, is said to have approached at least a dozen federal-government entities, including members of Congress, in order to divest himself of the data he claimed to have gleaned while working as an NSA and CIA contractor.  Klayman’s letter cites some 47 hard drives and 600 million records reportedly in Montgomery’s possession.

According to Klayman, Montgomery later approached the ACLU and entered into an attorney-client relationship which did not achieve its goal. Following that, in late 2013, Montgomery contacted then-Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph Arpaio to relate that 150,000 bank accounts containing the names of Arpaio’s constituents were breached by a government agency.

Shortly thereafter, Arpaio hired Montgomery as a confidential informant to the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO), a role in which he worked for approximately a year. In April 2015, the project on which he was working became a flashpoint for U.S. District Court Judge G. Murray Snow, who ordered all of Montgomery’s data collected and turned over to himself and the monitor he had appointed to oversee aspects of the sheriff’s office.

Snow was presiding over civil contempt hearings stemming from a racial profiling lawsuit against Arpaio and three of his officers. Although Arpaio admitted that he did not follow Snow’s 2013 order and offered to pay $100,000 to the plaintiffs out of his personal funds, Snow chose to take the matter to trial.

In May 2016, Snow declared Arpaio in civil contempt and referred the matter to the district attorney to consider criminal charges. The DA, citing a conflict of interest, referred the matter to the U.S. Department of Justice, which announced it would prosecute Arpaio just before the 2016 election in which Arpaio sought a seventh consecutive term.

On Monday, the investigator who led a more than five-year probe into the birth certificate image posted at, Mike Zullo, and writer/author Dr. Jerome Corsi appeared on Infowars with Alex Jones to report that data provided to Zullo and Arpaio by Montgomery showed that Arpaio’s office and home telephones were monitored during the trial.

In March 2012, Zullo and Arpaio declared the birth certificate image a “computer-generated forgery.”

In an article published earlier that day, Corsi wrote that “While the Department of Justice was prosecuting Sheriff Arpaio from 2008 to 2010, the NSA conducted electronic surveillance of the various Arizona judges on the case, on Sheriff Arpaio, and on the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, while the DOJ attorneys for Eric Holder maintained an on-going telephone back-channel discussion with the federal judge assigned to handle the case.”

Zullo had provided oversight of Montgomery’s project for Arpaio on an unpaid basis. During his testimony in the civil contempt hearings in late 2015, Zullo said that Montgomery had conducted a forensic analysis of the long-form birth certificate image, the results of which have not yet been made public.

At approximately the same time during which Montgomery contacted Arpaio, Zullo had told radio host Carl Gallups that the evidence gleaned from the birth certificate investigation to that point was “gut-wrenching.” A third press conference was tentatively planned for March 2014 but significantly postponed, ultimately taking place on December 15, 2016.

During that presser, Zullo revealed that two well-known forensic analysts had conducted respective examinations of the birth certificate image and reached the same conclusion as he had more than four years before: that it cannot represent a real, paper document.

In interviews on both Monday and Tuesday with Jones, Corsi stated that it is Zullo’s intent to travel to Washington, DC this week if possible to share with the White House the data Montgomery provided alleging extensive data-harvesting of Trump, his children and employees, and an ex-wife between 2004 and 2010.

On a March 10 broadcast of Carl Gallups’s “Freedom Friday,” Zullo said that government spying is “very deep” and “very bad.”

Klayman has stated in a number of video broadcasts that U.S. Supreme Court Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts and Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg were among the victims of data-harvesting as well as 156 other federal judges, Donald Trump, and himself.  In his letter to Nunes on Tuesday, Klayman recounted that Montgomery had testified privately to two FBI agents some time ago about the alleged government spying and that consequently, Comey was disingenuous when responding in the negative to questions on Monday as to whether or not he has any evidence of Trump having been under surveillance.

Both NSA Director Mike Rogers and FBI Director James Comey testified that they know of no vote-tampering by the Russians in the 2016 elections.

During testimony, Comey confirmed that the FBI is investigating possible ties which anyone in the Trump campaign might have had with the Russian government, which the media reported widely.  However, to the public’s knowledge, the FBI has never investigated whether or not vote-tampering took place in 2008 or 2012 and if so, whether or not enough votes were changed to alter the outcome of those elections in which Barack Obama was declared the victor.

A second public hearing of the Intelligence Committee is scheduled for March 28, at which time Klayman is seeking Nunes to act on the information he provided.

The FBI also has not investigated the Obama long-form birth certificate or Zullo’s findings that Obama’s purported Selective Service registration form is fraudulent.

As Trump is labeled “illegitimate” by the media and the political left, if Klayman’s account is accurate, Obama might have been illegitimate not only as a result of providing fraudulent documents to the American public “with the intent to deceive,” but also from vote-tampering.

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Every act done by Fraud is NULL and VOID
    Every law signed every executive order created.
    Every policy begun, promoted and conducted.
    ALL OF IT BY FRAUD – is VOID and
    by Law and Order The LEFT reject, despise and poison
    MUST and (eventually) SHALL Reverse and NULLIFY
    That which that Enemy of America has done!
    And that all pales in relation to his personal life
    of drugs, perversion, and debauchery.

    This is what happens when one rejects GOD for Darkness.
    That Darkness will spread in the offspring
    who will not hearken to The GOD that gave us life.
    Obama is not the worse president — for he never was.
    He is the Example of The LEFT and its All Pervasive PRETENSE
    They cannot be Good for they hate God & His Light Truth and ORDER.

  2. All of a sudden, it is starting to come out that Obama was born in Kenya. My neighbor just brought one of the “rags” (the Globe) and the cover story is about “OBAMA’S PRESIDENCY WAS ILLEGAL”. It shows a picture of his real birth certificate that was provided by his brother Malik. Very interesting…

  3. There were 156 federal judges under surveillance, some of those likely ruled “no standing” on the 200 plus lawsuits against Obama for his ineligibility and identity fraud. IMO the judges knew they were being spied on and that eliminated any possibility of actually looking at the evidence presented against Obama.

    What is happening now is HUGE and if we don’t win now I fear the battle is completely lost.

    Notice the Drudge red letter headlines are on stuff nowhere near as important as this?

  4. Aka obama is a proven criminal identity fraud whose life’s story is more mixed up than a fresh load of wash at the end of the spin cycle (in fact, his background is one ginormous spin cycle). Lying comes as easily to him as breathing. An earthworm has more moral backbone than our sexually deviant, drug-using, anti-American ex putative president. One must always assume that aka obama is lying unless proven otherwise.

    Aka obama’s deception of the American public is absolutely the biggest scandal so far that, by rights, should have been the news story of this century and is certainly bigger than all the leftist fake news nonsense.

    The list of aka obama’s known identity crimes is long — his social security number is recycled and likely is stolen; the pdf of his birth certificate that was posted on the White House website is an obvious electronic forgery with its number likely stolen from dead baby Virginia Sunahara; his purported draft registration is bogus; when checked by the feral government’s own e-verify, he was flagged as a probable criminal identity fraud; he claimed in his own biography via his own publicist for more than fifteen years (and through several revisions) to have been born in Kenya. These are undeniable facts and have been proven and thoroughly documented by Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his cold case posse as well as others.

    So who is our putative president anyway? No one really knows. What we do know is that it is very unlikely that he was born when and where he claims and that even his true parentage is in doubt. Is he Barack Hussein Obama or is he Barry Soetoro (or Soebarkah) or is his true name something else altogether? Was he the baby that passed through his Kenyan “step grandmother’s” hands or did he assume that identity, too? It is entirely possible that he may actually be an illegal alien, never having become a legitimate citizen (he certainly acts more like a citizen of the world rather than a true American).

    Even if we are to believe his given life story, since his claimed legal father was a citizen of Kenya, aka obama was born with dual citizenship and does not meet the founding definition of a natural born Citizen, that is, from birth on, one must have had exclusive allegiance to the USA (never at any point to any other country). The only thing that is certain is that the man who is passing himself off as B. Hussein Obama is an illegal usurper who by rights should arrested, tried and convicted of criminal identity fraud and high treason, then be punished to the full extent of the law, stupidly misplaced white guilt notwithstanding.

  5. When, when, when will our Whore House of Representatives and Sinners Senate get the political will to arrest Barry Soetoro-Obama for tax-paid-for ID-felony and treason?


    Can anyone confirm how many tax dollars were extorted by millions of minions called “U.S. Government” to pay-to-delay Obama’s full identity? ” over $33 million”?

    When, when, when will criminal polluticians go to jail for their crimes in the illegal Sanctuary City of Washington, Deceit?

    The TRUTH of Barry Soetoro- Obama II: America’s first caliphate candidate and Muslim Brotherhood president and seditious islamic insurgent ex-president robbed millions of tax dollars to pay for the robbery 320,000,000 citizens of something that was always rightfully theirs, namely, the full identity of any presidential candidate and any incumbent president and any ex-president at any time! PROVE me wrong or accept this REALITY!

    There is no distinctly American criminal class – except Congress. – Mark Twain

    I HAVE A DREAM in 2017 (will you share it with me?):

    OJ beat the murder rap, then went to prison for robbing his own memorabilia!
    BO beat the national rape rap, then went to prison for robbing his own identity!

  6. Trump has a choice. He can allow himself to become complicit in his own destruction by this shadow government or direct AG Sessions to utilize the full powers of his office to complete the Arpaio/Zullo investigation and prosecute Obama and his partners in crime. I pray and believe Trump will make the right decision.

  7. Of course hussein obama was an illegitimate president. He should still face jail for treason or be deported. He spent over $33 million taxpayer dollars trying to cover it up!

  8. Boy! This surly goes deeper than one could image. Indeed, this data collection and spying
    also includes average joe citizen. Talking about a Police State. What a waste of public
    funds, time, and effort.

    This should be cleaned up. Trump, indeed put an end to this. After you drain the swamp,
    eradicate unwarranted and illegal snooping, tracking, and collection of data of lawful

    Sharon, perhaps this is an item you could expand on. Thanks.