Will the Birth Certificate Investigation “Neutralize” the Mainstream Media?


by Sharon Rondeau

(Jan. 16, 2017) — On New Year’s Day, “Freedom Friday” radio host and co-founder of PNN News and Ministry Network Carl Gallups released a video taking aim at the U.S. media for failing to report to the public the conclusions reached by criminal investigators and professional forensics analysts of the forgery of Barack Hussein Obama’s long-form birth certificate residing as an electronic image on the White House website.

Gallups, who has followed the five-year investigation closely and provided updates through both outlets, called the media “complicit” in keeping the findings from the American people in what he termed an “eight-year cover-up,” referring to Obama’s time in the White House.

The investigation was commissioned in August 2011 by then-Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph Arpaio at the request of more than 200 of his constituents concerned that the reports of forgery of the birth certificate image would neutralize their votes in the upcoming 2012 presidential election.

Last March, Gallups was deputized by Arpaio in regard to the ongoing investigation. In 2013, Gallups accompanied lead investigator Mike Zullo to the CPAC conference in Washington, DC to reveal some of the evidence collected by the investigative team to current and former members of Congress, none of whom ultimately agreed to take action on the matter.

“I can promise you it’s not going to go away,” Gallups said in the video of what he posited was the media’s “hope” based on its unwillingness to reveal that which investigators have discovered and disclosed to the public since an initial press conference on March 1, 2012.

“They can’t report it,” he said, indicating that the media does not wish to implicate itself in the cover-up despite its central role in it.

The image, released by the White House on April 27, 2011 in response to now-President-Elect Donald Trump’s strident demands for Obama to prove he was constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President, was immediately labeled as fraudulent by several graphics and computer experts.  Nevertheless, every mainstream media outlet presented the image as proof positive of Obama’s claimed birth in Hawaii and consequently, his presumed eligibility to serve.

In a separate development, on June 15 of that year, WND reported that Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely (Ret.) related to one of its columnists that he had been told by three retired CIA agents “and some of their analytical associates” that the long-form birth certificate image was a forgery.

Given that revelation, Vallely raised the question as to whether or not Obama met the U.S. Constitution’s qualifications for president and pointed to a cowardly Congress, derelict FBI and a “corrupt” judiciary for refusing to investigate the matter further.

Even at that time, Vallely reported that the phenomenon of the “layering” of the image belied its authenticity, an item which arose over the five-year investigation commissioned by Arpaio’s office.

The March 1, 2012 press conference released evidence demonstrating that probable cause existed to believe that the electronic birth certificate mage could not have originated with a real, paper document.  In addition to the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image, investigators found that the document purported to be Obama’s Selective Service registration form is fraudulent.

With rare exceptions, the media conducted a blackout of developments in the Maricopa County probe which took investigators to Hawaii twice and to the nation’s capital on at least three occasions as well as many points in between.

Because of the inconsistent life narrative of the man who has called himself President of the United States for the last eight years, many Americans have sought to know whether or not Obama meets the Article II, Section 1, clause 5 criterion of “natural born Citizen.”

During the third and last presser held by the Maricopa County team on December 15, Zullo revealed that two well-respected forensics analysts in different parts of the world concluded, from different perspectives, that the long-form image is inauthentic based on nine points of forgery which were apparently lifted from the long-form birth certificate of a woman born in the same hospital Obama has claimed as “the place of my birth.”  Johanna Ah’Nee was born on August 20, 1961, and the nine items duplicated from her birth document appear at precisely the same angle and relative positions on the Obama image, a statistical impossibility, according to both forensics analysts.

“They can’t report it,” Gallups said of the media, which he said stemmed from their silence over the last 5+ years since the investigation was launched.

“The media wasn’t prepared for this,” he said, adding, that there are “VIPs who now get it,” perhaps a reference to Zullo’s recent revelation that certain members of Congress have expressed an interest in the issue.

“This is going to implicate a lot of folks,” Gallups concluded his presentation.

7 Responses to "Will the Birth Certificate Investigation “Neutralize” the Mainstream Media?"

  1. oldsailor84   Wednesday, January 18, 2017 at 11:45 AM

    Anybody having a brain larger than a pea, and at least a high school level education can see through all of the BS from 2008 forward by Barry Soetoro, and all of those who either assisted, and/ or still support him. This ranges right from Nancy Pelosi (who put her signature upon a legally invalid HAWAII COE which had been re written to exclude all Constitutional language) right on down to the average American halfwit walking the streets.

  2. Bob68   Tuesday, January 17, 2017 at 11:46 AM

    A.P. Henry, here is the answer to your question:

    The question is often asked, “How did Huma Abedin, Valerie Jarret, Hillary Clinton. etc., and especially Obama with his known associations with enemies of America and his hidden records, pass a security background check?” The answer is, they never had to get one.

    This is from the Congressional Research Service and is also in Executive Order 13467:
    Page 7

    Are Constitutional Officers (e.g., the President, Members of Congress) Required to Hold a Security Clearance to Access Classified Information?

    CRS answer:
    Security clearances are not mandated for the President, Vice President, Members of Congress, Supreme Court Justices, or other constitutional officers. The criteria for election or appointment to these positions are specified in the U.S. Constitution, and except by constitutional amendment, no additional criteria (e.g., holding a security clearance) may be required.
    As Commander-in-Chief, the President has the authority to establish the standards for access to classified national security information. This authority is typically exercised through the issuance of executive orders. Executive Order 13467, which covers suitability checks and security clearances for federal employees, applicants, and contractors, includes a determination of which executive branch individuals are covered and which are exempted.
    ‘Covered individual’ means a person who performs work for or on behalf of the executive branch, or who seeks to perform work for or on behalf of the executive branch, but does not include:
    (i) the President or (except to the extent otherwise directed by the President) employees of the President under section 105 or 107 of title 3, United States Code; or
    (ii) the Vice President or (except to the extent otherwise directed by the Vice President) employees of the Vice President under section 106 of title 3 or annual legislative branch appropriations acts.

    The executive order 13467 was signed by GWB on June 30th, 2008 and mandated by Congress to be in effect by January, 2009…..just in time for Obama and the enemy takeover from the inside-out.

    From the last paragraph at that link:

    “Congress mandated that a new clearance system be ready for implementation by January, 2009.”
    What a coincidence this executive order 13467 was signed by GWB in June of 2008 and mandated to be in effect by January, 2009, just in time for Barry.

    And this from Snopes in 2008 answering a question about whether Obama could pass a security background check. Snopes is correct this time:


    “No such background checks are required for Barack Obama’s current position as a U.S. Senator, or for his possible future position as President of the United States. Senator Obama already has access to a good deal of secret intelligence information as a member of Congress, and as President he would not only have access to more of it but would also have the power to determine who else within the government might see it. “

    That was how the take-over was made so easy for Barry and Company………….

  3. MarkR   Tuesday, January 17, 2017 at 10:24 AM

    The media are completely controlled by the money men and intimidation. It has been coming since the start of the War of Independence.

    There are many other secrets they have hidden over many years. Including the methods of getting the US into all their wars.

  4. A P. Henry   Tuesday, January 17, 2017 at 9:55 AM

    Stipulation of facts:
    simplicity is the refinement of complexity whereby the simple question that has not been addressed is how can soetoro/obama reside in the White House wherein he cannot get a security clearance to clean the toilets there?
    Tolerance is the last virute/sin of a dying society.

  5. Outwood   Tuesday, January 17, 2017 at 9:46 AM

    obama’s Fraudulent B.C., Bogus Social Security Number, and Fake Selective Service Card must be investigated and exposed.

    Those responsible for this evil deception, whomsoever they may be, must face Justice !

    Then and only Then can America emerge from a Shameful and disgraceful past 8 years.

  6. James Carter   Tuesday, January 17, 2017 at 6:58 AM

    Obama’s lack of eligibility and the cover-up thereof is the “Hoax to big to expose”.

  7. Bob68   Monday, January 16, 2017 at 11:36 PM

    Quote from the article:

    “They can’t report it,” he said, indicating that the media does not wish to implicate itself in the cover-up despite its central role in it.”

    Yep, the media cannot report the truth about the Obama fraud because they have been part of the cover-up for years. Where have I heard that before? The media, like Congress, can’t do anything to stop Obama and they never did try in spite of a world of evidence of his fraud and multiple violations of the Constitution. Congress, all of them, are complicit in a huge crime and its 8 year cover-up and because of that their job number 1, along with that of the Obamamedia, is to continue the cover-up forever. Nothing else is acceptable because their non-negotiable goal is to never have to suffer the consequences of the truth about Barry, which, to both Congress and the media will be devastating. This has only been obvious since immediately after nothing was done to prevent the usurper from being sworn in back in 2009. Those complicit cannot just say, “Whoops, we screwed up and we are sorry”, and erase charges of treason and covering up for the biggest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people. A crime too big to be prosecuted was committed and the cover-up continues, no matter how much evidence of the fraud in presented and/or how absolute it is.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.