“BEING BASED ON LIES, IT IS ILLEGITIMATE”
by Sharon Rondeau
(Nov. 16, 2014) — In a Sunday column in The New York Post, author Kyle Smith states that recent revelations that Obamacare “architect” Jonathan Gruber deceived the Congressional Business Office (CBO) while being paid collectively over $1 million to act as a consultant to both the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and several states, Obamacare is “fraudulent” and “illegitimate.”
Smith reminds his readers that Obama had promised the American people, “If you like your health care plan, you can keep it” prior to the controversial bill’s passage, which millions discovered was untrue last fall upon Obamacare’s official debut.
No Republican in Congress in 2010, when the bill was passed, voted in favor of the law, and 34 Democrats opposed it when the time to vote arrived.
Last October, the launch of the individual mandate was plagued by website problems, privacy issues, and Obama’s awkward or perhaps contrived attempts to apologize after angry Americans were denied the health care plans Obama had said they could “keep.” In August of this year, former Democrat Rep. Barney Frank stated that “Obama lied about Obamacare…You shouldn’t lie to people.” His comments have become widespread on the internet.
After videos of Gruber surfaced last week revealing his role, the first of which showed him calling Americans “stupid,” Obama even lied about Gruber’s role in writing the law and said that he himself did not lie about the provisions of his “signature” health care law which a majority of citizens never supported.
On April 27, 2011, after considerable public pressure from businessman Donald Trump, the White House released what it claimed was a scan of Obama’s long-form birth certificate issued by the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) by a special exception granted by then-Director Loretta Fuddy.
Beginning in 2007, questions arose about Obama’s constitutional eligibility for the presidency given that his claimed father was never a U.S. citizen and there was no proof that Obama was born in Hawaii as he claimed. Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires that the president and commander-in-chief be a “natural born Citizen,” a term not used for any other elected office in the document.
Obama held a press conference on that Wednesday morning to confirm that it was “his birth certificate.”
Within 24 hours, the image was denounced as a forgery by computer graphics experts willing to go on the record with their findings.
In August of that year, a group of Tea Party members from Maricopa County, AZ approached their sheriff, Joe Arpaio, to request an investigation into the claims that the White House had released a forgery rather than a scan of Obama’s authentic birth record. Knowing that a probe would be considered controversial, Arpaio assigned his Cold Case Posse to examine the image to put the matter to rest and “clear the president.”
After 72 hours, the five posse members strongly suspected that the long-form birth certificate did not emanate from a real paper document. On March 1, 2012, Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo and Arpaio held the first of two press conferences during which they revealed that there was probable cause to believe that both the birth certificate and Obama’s Selective Service registration form are “computer-generated forgeries.”
Instead of launching their own investigations, members of the mainstream media ridiculed the presenters and asked, “How do you expect any of us to believe any of this?” despite the evidence having been presented in detail.
Neither Congress nor any public official has expressed concern about the posse’s findings that Obama’s only public documentation has been found to be fraudulent, although at least one congressional staffer admitted to a reader of The Post & Email that “we know the birth certificate is a fake.”
Eighteen months ago, Zullo told The Post & Email that the fraudulent birth certificate image was created “with the intent to deceive” and that if the matter had been scrutinized by Congress, the terrorist attack on the compound in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012 which killed four Americans “might never have happened.”
Pundits and former congressmen have increasingly called Obama “lawless.”
Of the end result which gave the nation Obamacare, Smith wrote, “It is fraudulent. Being based on lies, it is illegitimate.” Why has no one in the mainstream media had the courage to say the same about Obama’s “documentation?”
Given the duplicity of Obama and members of his regime, what is the likelihood that he is not lying about his birth certificate and Selective Service form?
One or more press conferences are expected to be held to release further information from an investigation Arpaio launched stemming from that of the Cold Case Posse. Zullo has described the information gathered as “gut-wrenching.”
On November 7, “Freedom Friday” radio host Carl Gallups stated that the press conferences are “getting very close” and that Zullo would be a guest on his show “next week or the week after.” Zullo did not appear last Friday; it might therefore be surmised that he will appear on Friday, November 21.
Gallups said that he believes that the “American people are ready to hear” the revelations to be made by Arpaio and Zullo.
Zullo has said that any announcement identifying a date and time for the first of the press conferences will be made through Gallups’ show or his associated website, PPSimmons.
Sharon Rondeau has operated The Post & Email since April 2010, focusing on the Obama birth certificate investigation and other government corruption news. She has reported prolifically on constitutional violations within Tennessee’s prison and judicial systems.