Is the Mainstream Media’s Silence on Obama’s Forgeries Crumbling?


by Sharon Rondeau

(Nov. 5, 2014) — In a tweet on Wednesday night, Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly asked, “What do you want to see from #Republican lawmakers now that the #GOP has taken the #Senate? #KellyFile #Election2014,” referencing the November 4, 2014 elections returns in which Republicans will hold a small majority in the U.S. Senate and a significant one in the House of Representatives.

The Post & Email responded, “An investigation into the birth certificate forgery confirmed by the Cold Case Posse:,” referencing the more-than-three-year probe conducted by the Maricopa County, AZ Cold Case Posse which determined after six months that the long-form birth certificate posted on the White House website and Obama’s Selective Service registration form are “computer-generated forgeries.”

Earlier on Wednesday, The Post & Email asked Rep. Steve King (IA-4), who was re-elected in Tuesday’s midterm elections and has cited Obama’s “lawlessness,” if the new Republican majorities in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives would investigate who created the forgeries of Obama’s only proffered identification documents.  No response was received.

Obama’s constitutional eligibility was questioned in late 2007 when commentator Chris Matthews stated during a presidential primary discussion that Obama was “born in Indonesia.”  Later, although Matthews openly supported Obama and his policies, he called for Obama to release his long-form birth certificate to show that he was born in Hawaii to put the issue to rest.

Prior to Obama’s first presidential run, his official biography published by his literary agent stated that he was “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.”  The biography was altered in April 2007, two months after Obama declared himself a presidential candidate with his family on a cold, windy Chicago day in February.

Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires that the president and commander-in-chief be a “natural born Citizen.”  Some constitutional scholars say that the historic meaning of the term is “born in the country to parents who are citizens of the country,” or a similar paraphrase.

Obama has also been challenged to release his college and passport applications by real estate mogul Donald Trump, who played a large part in the White House’s release of the long-form birth certificate.  Early in 2011, as Trump weighed a presidential run himself, he publicly called for Obama to show the detailed birth certificate that would prove his birth in Hawaii and purportedly, his constitutional eligibility.

Just before the 2012 election, Trump challenged Obama to release the passport and college applications in exchange for a $5,000,000 donation to a charity of his choice to be made by Trump.  After receiving no response, Trump increased the offer tenfold to $50,000,000, which also garnered no reply from the White House.

On June 12, 2008, The Daily KOS produced a “short-form” birth certificate bearing Obama’s name and alleged birth information without differentiating between “short-form” and “long-form.”  In May 2009, then-White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, who is not a MSNBC commentator himself, insisted that the short-form was Obama’s only available birth record and that he (Gibbs) had authorized its release “on the internet.”  While ridiculing WND reporter Les Kinsolving, who asked why Obama had not released a more detailed birth certificate to that time, Gibbs said, “…it’s on the Internet because we put it on the Internet…I certainly hope by the fourth year of our administration that we’ll have dealt with this burgeoning birth controversy.”

In Obama’s “fourth year” in the White House, Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo and an associate, Pastor and radio host Carl Gallups, were meeting with members of Congress and other “VIPs” in Washington, DC to show them the evidence which both lead investigator Mike Zullo and Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio had compiled and said surpassed the standard of probable cause of forgery.

The mainstream media reported on two press conferences held by Zullo and Arpaio on March 1, 2012 and July 17, 2012, respectively, but only on the internet.  A major announcement of new findings may be forthcoming in the near future by Arpaio’s office, which opened a second criminal investigation stemming from the birth certificate probe begun in September 2011.  Zullo has called the revelations yet to be made public “gut-wrenching.”

Prior to Tuesday’s election results becoming available, Fox News Radio’s Alan Colmes reported half-seriously on a column published in WND by UK citizen Lord Christopher Monckton, who wrote that “If the GOP wins the Senate, and even if it does not win the Senate, let it at last find the guts to do what it should have done long before now. Let it say yes to Sheriff Joe’s request that it should initiate a congressional investigation of this affair.”

The entire article can be found here.

The Post & Email interviewed Monckton in April and has exchanged several additional emails with him.  On September 8, Monckton called out all members of the 113th Congress in an advertorial in The Washington Times titled “Wanted for High Crimes” for failing to take action on the reported forgeries of Obama’s documentation.

It is believed that major media have been threatened, intimidated or perhaps blackmailed into saying nothing about the forgeries.  In recent months, however, Colmes has hosted Atty. Larry Klayman and Dr. Ben Carson on his show, both of whom have expressed doubts that Obama’s past is what Obama has publicly claimed.  Klayman has called for a hearing to be held by federal immigration officials and, if Obama is found to be a non-U.S. citizen, for him to be deported to his country of origin.

If Obama failed to register for the Selective Service in a timely way, he is ineligible for service in the federal government.  His purported registration form has been mailed to individuals who have requested it through a FOIA filing, which include this writer.

2 Responses to "Is the Mainstream Media’s Silence on Obama’s Forgeries Crumbling?"

  1. Loggia   Friday, November 7, 2014 at 1:34 PM

    Although “IT” does seem to be happening in an organic way. Sean Hannity is reported to have stated recently that he wants to know what is in Obama’s College Records.

    Trump has been strangely silent of late (or did HE turn over his evidence to the Cold Posse and he is letting THEM take care of it?)

    It would be much better for Obama to be exposed WHILE he is in office, though a post-presidency declaration of INELIGIBILITY might have the same effect of nullification of his executive orders, nominations and other nefarious acts.

    The difference will be that if it happens DURING his presidency, many press and media outlets will have a chance at redemption.

    If it happens afterward, and it is shown that Barry’s identity and agenda were camouflaged by them, there will such a backlash that their brands will be relics of the past with many new, and better, alphabet combinations to take their places.

  2. Stephen Hiller   Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 8:04 AM

    It just ain’t gonna happen … if it was gonna happen, it woulda happened way before now. (pardon the spelling, I went to public school)


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.