Obama Appointee Declares Chicago Gun Ban Unconstitutional

JUDGE UNCONVINCED OF “GENUINE AND SERIOUS RISK” TO PUBLIC

by Sharon Rondeau

The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution, including the right to bear arms

(Jan. 7, 2014) — A Chicago city ordinance which prohibited the legal sale of firearms and gifting among relatives has been declared unconstitutional by an Obama-appointed federal judge.

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Judge Edmond E. Chang ruled that in order to uphold the Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights, Chicago citizens must be allowed access to purchasing firearms.

Legal firearms ownership was banned in Chicago until 2010 after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the prohibition was unconstitutional in McDonald v. City of Chicago.  The plaintiff had claimed that the ban had exposed him and others “vulnerable to criminals.”

The state of Illinois had banned concealed-carry completely until the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals declared the law unconstitutional in December 2012.

Chang’s ruling also applies to the operation of gun stores in Chicago.

Chicago Mayor and former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel reportedly opposes Chang’s ruling, and a spokesman indicated in a statement that the city might appeal it.  Chang issued a stay of his ruling until January 13 in the event that the city moves forward with an appeal.

In 2008, 510 people were murdered in Chicago, 408 of which occurred by gunfire.  In 2007, total murders were reported at 445.  A report on youths and gun violence completed by the University of Chicago Crime Lab quoted a Chicago mother as having stated:

We have to drive our kids everywhere. We can’t go to work full time because we worry about how are our kids gonna get to and from school? I mean how are they gonna go to the corner store? We can’t send one 15-year-old girl down to the corner store three houses down from ours because there are too many kids hanging around on the corner. There are grown men hanging on the corner. We know they’re packing. We know they’re selling. . . . The hardest part is that it’s an everyday struggle and it’s exhausting and it’s infuriating because when you want to build a successful future for your children. . . .

The Crime Lab study also reported that “Shootings are disproportionately concentrated in our most disadvantaged neighborhoods, a pattern that is common to all big cities in the United States.”

Gun violence in Chicago made headlines last year when eight people were killed in a single day in May and included a 15-year-old boy and an 18-year-old man.  Last January, a 15-year-old honor student who had performed at Obama’s second putative inauguration was killed while spending time in a park a mile from the Obamas’ home in the Kenwood section of Chicago.

Other Chicago gun ordinances remain in place, including a ban on assault weapons.

Chang stated in his opinion that he was not convinced by the city that gun sales and ownership pose a “genuine and serious risk” to the public.

The Second Amendment reads:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

2 Responses to "Obama Appointee Declares Chicago Gun Ban Unconstitutional"

  1. ipod45   Thursday, January 9, 2014 at 1:23 PM

    You nailed it! One of the best comments about this subject that I have ever read!

  2. John Sutherland   Tuesday, January 7, 2014 at 10:48 AM

    “The Crime Lab study also reported that “Shootings are disproportionately concentrated in our most disadvantaged [Chicago] neighborhoods, a pattern that is common to all big cities in the United States.”

    Does anyone but me see the irony here? The government and the banks, while looting and defrauding the people of their wealth, drive more and more Americans into poverty, violence increases, and the defenseless are then denied the ability to defend themselves. The elites, who are gathering all of the stolen wealth never have to worry. Their kids are OK and well protected. Their schools have well armed guards and their homes are well protected with high fences. But the poor kids are at the mercy of jungle law, and if they make it to adulthood, they are scarred for life.

    So, what’s the problem and what is the solution? The problem is that government’s first purpose is to defend and protect our freedoms and liberties, and the federal government and their sycophant governments in the large cities like Chicago are failing miserably. There is no freedom and liberty in Chicago except for the elites.

    The solution for many will be to vote with their feet and just move, as our pioneers did, away from the abusive governments. Others will stay in the big cities and suffer. Others will join the corruption and criminality and make the problems in places like Chicago even worse.

    The ones we are looking for are those who are mad as hell and who will just not take it anymore – the same ones described in the movie Network. Where are they? Where are the people who demand government abide by the system of laws established to control people in government. Sadly, now that the FBI and other agencies are primarily concerned with ‘national security’ and NOT with crime control, the law enforcement agencies will be of no help. But the people in Chicago, and Detroit, and New York City already know that.

    So, that leaves crime control in the hands of the people. Perhaps that’s where it belongs anyway. But if the people shut down the unwilling criminals on the streets and in the government, the solution will be messy and there will be blood.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.