UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRESIDENT, UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW
by Cody Robert Judy, ©2013
(Dec. 5, 2013) — A couple of days ago I had the question come into my mind, “Why have elected officials all across the Nation, Main Stream Media pundits, and so many businesses and corporation executives taken a stand so hard for Obama and so definitely against the Constitution?”
It’s actually hard for me to understand and to see the arguments of delusion when it comes to Obama emphatically not being a natural born citizen and how so many people will in their own defense of him state his mother was an American Citizen so Obama is also, denying in their own statement the fact he is not a “natural born citizen” that requires being “born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents,” and also recognizing in their own statement that U.S. Representatives, U.S. Senators and in fact the President’s office required being a “Citizen;” however, only the President’s Office required after the Constitution was signed being a ‘natural born citizen’ as was specified in the grandfather clause of Article I, Sect II, Clause 5.
‘..or a ‘Citizen’ of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution’, clearly tells us that after the Constitution was signed two full generations were required for the Office of the President known and understood to be those “Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents,” and clearly our first President, George Washington, and first Supreme Court Justice of the United States Supreme Court, John Jay, understood that.
Yet I see time and time again people make the statement that Obama’s mother was a “Citizen,” so he is, too. We’re not talking about Obama not being a ‘Citizen,’ for heaven’s sake, we’re talking about his not being a ‘natural born citizen’ and the differences are notable in the requirements for U.S. Representatives to be “Citizens” and U.S. Senators to be “Citizens,” and for those who were “Citizens” before the Constitution was signed this exemption clause was penned into the Constitution.
It’s equivalent to the “Bait and Switch” tactic any business would be ridiculed for using. For those not understanding “Bait and Switch,” let me sum it up with another word for you: “Obamacare.” Not only are we seeing the “bait-and-switch” tactic used in Obama’s identification fraud in the way I mentioned, but the same tactic is being used for Obama policies. Please consider the text definition of the Bait and Switch from Wiki if you will.
Bait-and-switch is a form of fraud used in retail sales but also employed in other contexts. First, customers are “baited” by merchants’ advertising products or services at a low price, but when customers visit the store, they discover that the advertised goods are not available, or the customers are pressured by sales people to consider similar, but higher priced items (“switching”).
How many personal accounts have you heard about people logging on the Obamacare website and finding out their insurance was much higher than their previous insurance? How many personal accounts have you heard of about people being ‘shocked’ at the price of Obamacare after being led down the path by Obama that it would be cheaper then their old insurance? How many personal accounts have you heard about people who were “told” by Obama over and over and over again that they could “keep their doctors,” ‘they could keep their insurance,” and then found out neither of those was true and they would be fined if they didn’t sign up for Obamacare and perhaps be imprisoned?
Why would you need to ‘criminalize’ someone into a plan like Obamacare that is so fabulous? The language states you can be subject of 5 years in prison and a quarter of a million dollars as stated by Representative Peter Roskam (R.-IL).
See the video and read the rest here.
Sharon Rondeau has operated The Post & Email since April 2010, focusing on the Obama birth certificate investigation and other government corruption news. She has reported prolifically on constitutional violations within Tennessee’s prison and judicial systems.