PPSIMMONS NEWS EXCLUSIVE
(Jun. 1, 2013) — 10:30 am ET (Check back often – we will be adding more to this article as information breaks)
Carl Gallups is reporting that he just got off the telephone with Mike Zullo immediately after Mike made is public presentation at the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Convention in St. Charles, Missouri, this morning.
According to Carl, Mike Zullo reports that the overwhelming response of the lawmen and elected officials is that of absolute SHOCK. He said that one official came up to him and said, “I have been purposely ignoring this matter – until NOW! I will ignore it no longer.” Zullo reports that several constitutional officers, public officials, attorneys, elected officials, and others are now pledging full and personal support in moving this matter to a congressional investigation.
Remember – this movement is the result of the PUBLIC presentation only. The full PRIVATE presentation for lawmen and elected-officials-only (credentials checked at the door) will be made later on this morning. In that two hour meeting, Zullo, with full authority of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, pledges to reveal all the criminal investigation material they possess in this matter. We can only imagine the reaction and outrage that will ensue once these constitution loving, patriotic officials see the pile of criminal evidence. Mike Zullo and Carl Gallups have been promising for months that we would soon see some forward movement in this case. It is now happening.
Carl emphasized, “This Sheriffs and Peace Officers meeting was just icing on the cake. This was dropped in our laps just 5 weeks ago. We still have other VIPs and other plans being made now that are even bigger than what is happening at the Sheriffs Convention. This matter is finally going to be heard as it should have from the beginning.”
Carl continued, “Very soon, certain members of the media, the courts, and congress are going to look very silly. They have been ignoring this, sitting on it, marginalizing it, and flat-out trashing the matter for years. They will soon be seen for what they are. This matter should have been investigated by Congress years ago. It is there constitutional mandate and they ignored it – purposely. This whole thing could have been resolved one way or the other years back. The media blacked it out. But we don’t need the media anymore. We are going around the MSM. We have other venues now. More and more very important people of constitutional standing are being enlightened and coming on board. Soon, the world will know that we have been correct in this matter all along.”
When asked about those who are DEMANDING that Arpaio and Zullo “press criminal charges now” – Gallups had this to say, “Look, those people do not know what they are talking about. Most of that talk is coming out of the Obot camp – so what does that tell you? They know that would be the wrong and premature thing to do. They know that if that was done now – the case would be lost – there would be jurisdictional and prosecutorial matters at stake. Mike Zullo has explained this in detail, time and time again. If the case were to be struck down because of a blunder like that – it might never come to a congressional hearing. The detractors know that – that is why they are trying to turn public sentiment towards filing criminal charges now. Anyone who claims they know what they are talking about and they are screaming for “criminal charges to be filed now” – be wary of them. They are up to no good. They are purposely trying to derail this case. Zullo and Arpaio are not that stupid. They know what they are doing. Arpaio and Zullo have almost 80 years of professional law enforcement experience between them. This will soon be handled the way the constitution demands that it be handled. And when it is handled properly – it will stick!”
Gallups went on to explain, “These detractors who are calling for criminal charges to be filed – some of them have ‘credentials.’ Some of them claim to have their own evidence. One person claims to have amassed an entire case against Obama and even has a website touting that they are the world’s leading authority in the matter. Here is my question – Why are they pushing Zullo to file criminal charges? Why don’t they take THEIR case to THEIR Sheriff? Why don’t THEY file criminal charges? Pretty telling, isn’t it?”
————————-
Editor’s Note: Please read PPSimmons’ update to this article here.
If you want to have some fun, go to a local social security office and tell them you want a new social security number. The fire drill you will have to go through to get a new SS number, if you are actually able to get a new number, is incredible for the man in the street.
So, the issue is not only that obama is using someone else’s social security number (fraud in its own right), but that it is highly likely that fraud was committed in getting him that number in the first place.
We are dealing with a corrupt and criminal cabal that is now running this country. Anything criminal from the cabal is to be expected. These people are simply outlaws.
Sharon, Thank you for your dedication.
I listened to Mr. Jeffery this AM on Carl Gallups show and to me, there were questions that were not addressed. The following comments are with all due respect to Mr. Jeffery – (Please don’t call me an Obot because I have questions) I am just left with more questions now than I had before the interview.
1). Is Mr. Jeffery seriously accepting the idea that the Social Security admin (in an Hawaii office) assigned Obama a Connecticut SSN by accident? C’mon.
2). Mr. Jeffery stated that no law was broken as long as Obama didn’t try to assume the Identity of H.Bounel. Is Mr.Jeffery suggesting that one can use the SSN of another as long as he/she does not assume that person’s identity? Can one legally use the SSN of a living or deceased individual as long as they use their own name in connection with it (and don’t assume the valid SSN holder’s ID)? If that is the case, why do we need the SSA?
People could just make up their own SSNs and use them (Chaos would reign). It’s gotta be illegal to use an SSN that has been legally assigned to someone else regardless of whether or not you assume their Identity.
3). The question of Obama not passing “E-Verify” was never addressed at all.
With all due respect to Carl Gallups and recognizing the heavy lifting he has done, I think he could have done a better job of interviewing Mr.Jeffery and I would like to hear Susan Daniels and/or Neil Sankey’s reaction to what Mr. Jeffery said on Gallups show. Or alternatively maybe Mr.Jeffery would consent to be interviewed by P&E.
Please Advise
ELmo
———————
Mrs. Rondeau replies: It is never Obotic nor unpatriotic to have questions. I am also seeking more information on the initial Cold Case Posse report on Obama’s Social Security number.