Why is the Social Security Administration Commissioner Stepping Down?

BUREAUCRAT NAMED AS DEFENDANT IN TWO FEDERAL LAWSUITS QUIETLY RETURNS TO MASSACHUSETTS

by Sharon Rondeau

(Feb. 4, 2013) — Obama’s Social Security Administration Commissioner, Michael Astrue, has announced that he will “return to his home in Massachusetts” sometime this month.

No specific reason was provided for Astrue’s departure other than that he had served for a six-year term under a “holdover provision” which expired on January 19, 2013.

Astrue holds a J.D. degree from Harvard Law School.  He was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2007 and has reported directly to Obama since Obama took office in January 2009.  Astrue has worked as a law adviser to the Social Security Commissioner and an associate counsel to President Ronald Reagan.

In a case which has reached the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, Atty. Orly Taitz named Astrue as a defendant and on January 11, 2013, requested a default judgment against him for failing to respond.  In her pleading, Taitz contended that Barack Hussein Obama has been using a false identity and Social Security number which had been assigned to someone else prior to 1977.

Taitz had originally filed the case in Mississippi, representing several defendants from various states, including Mississippi, claiming racketeering on the part of Astrue, Rep. Nancy Pelosi, officials at the Hawaii Department of Health, Obama for America, and the Democrat Party of Mississippi.  In her complaint, Taitz alleges that the defendants attempted to “defraud the nation” by placing a foreigner into the office of president with “a stolen Connecticut Social Security number.”

Taitz is aware that Astrue is leaving his government position.

In another case, Grinols et al v. Obama, which gained a hearing on January 3, 2013 by Judge Morrison England in California, Astrue was issued a subpoena to appear, although he ultimately did not.  England refused to grant Taitz’s request for a temporary restraining order of the certification of the Electoral College votes the following day in Congress.

Taitz has requested an expedited default judgment in the Grinols case, which also named Astrue as a  defendant.

Astrue had defaulted in 2011 for the first time in Taitz’s case involving the Social Security Administration which is now awaiting a hearing in the Fifth Circuit.

Attention was called to Obama’s Social Security number as it appears on publicly-available tax returns after it was observed that the prefix, “042,” indicates that it was issued in the state of Connecticut.  In June 2011, the Social Security Administration changed its policy for assignment of numbers to one of “randomization” to reportedly “help protect the integrity of the SSN.”  The agency claimed that randomization “eliminated the geographical significance of the first three digits of the SSN, referred to as the area number, by no longer allocating the area numbers for assignment to individuals in specific states.”

It has been reported that a man apparently born in 1890 whose name appears in a database used by data industry professionals is associated with Obama’s Chicago address and the same Social Security number Obama is using.  Two private investigators and a man who had been employed as a skip-tracer reported finding the year “1890” in various database searches when seeking information on “Barack Hussein Obama.”

The name “Harrison J. Bounel” is reportedly connected to the number and Obama’s Chicago residence.  The year “1890” also appears in at least one record with Obama’s name and a Massachusetts address.

The 1940 census shows a “Harry Bounel” with a birth year of 1890 living in New York City.  Taitz believes that Bounel moved to Connecticut later in life and has reportedly contacted several people who might have heard of him.

According to the database searches, other Social Security numbers appear with Obama’s name in addition to the one which appears to have had a Connecticut origin.  Private Investigator Neil Sankey told The Post & Email that the results he obtained after performing a search “need to be looked at.”  Private Investigator Susan Daniels had contacted the Social Security Administration in the spring of 2011 to related that the number Obama was using could not have been his.  A letter received from the administration stated that the SSA “disagreed” with Daniels’s contention that the “number depends upon the address of residence.”

In a 16-page affidavit issued by Maricopa County, AZ Cold Case Posse Lead Investigator Mike Zullo, he reaffirms the findings of the posse’s months-long investigation which concluded that Obama’s Selective Service registration card and long-form birth certificate are “computer-generated forgeries.”  Zullo also acknowledged the claim of forgery regarding Obama’s short-form birth certificate and Social Security number.

Zullo told Mark Gillar of the Tea Party Power Hour that he is not sure that Obama’s birth date is August 4 or that Obama’s parents are those he has publicly identified.

A British subject and former adviser to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, Lord Christopher Monckton of Brenchley, who has reported on the Obama eligibility/identity controversy stated on Election Day last year that Obama’s purported long-form birth certificate “is as phony as a 3-dollar bill.”  Lord Monckton provided an affidavit to an unknown party which contends, in his experience as a mathematician, that the image could not reasonably be authentic.

Monckton also predicted that prosecution would follow of individuals involved in acting as “accessories after the fact of forgery, fraud and – let us not mince words – high treason.”  Several days ago, political activist Lyndon LaRouche released a video in which he claimed that multiple indictments have been issued accusing Barack Obama and Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, of crimes not yet divulged.