Mainstream Media Accuse Obama of Lying…Finally

REPORTERS ADMIT ROLE IN PROMOTING OBAMA DURING 2008 CAMPAIGN…AND AGAIN IN 2012

by Sharon Rondeau

(Aug. 22, 2012) — An editorial writer at The New York Daily News has accused Barack Obama of “lying” and keeping his college records “hidden.”  A federal employee within the regime has accused the Obama campaign of lying about the tax structure and deficit if Republicans’ ideas are advanced and become law.

A blogger is “exposing the lies” attributed to Obama and his associates.  Three years ago, Obama was lying, and although the mainstream press did not always call it that, others did.  According to the First Amendment, the purpose of a free press is to watch and report on the activities of government.  However, the media is viewed by many as having forgotten its role in finding the truth without political bias.

ABC News had said in March 2009 that Obama had presented a “mischaracterization of data” regarding the health care bill which had not yet been passed.

Obama’s first presidential campaign had carefully controlled the media as admitted to by communist sympathizer and former Obama communications director, Anita Dunn.  Is the media beginning to see through the Obama regime’s propaganda, or will it continue to allow itself to be filtered?

In 2007, how could Obama’s admitted cocaine use “add to Obama’s unconventional appeal?”  NPR reportedly did not play an audiotape in its possession with revealing information about Obama during 2008, nor did the Los Angeles Times air the Rashid al-Khalidi tape, which reportedly shows that “Barack Obama lavished praise on the guest of honor, Rashid Khalidi — former mouthpiece for master terrorist Yasser Arafat.”

It has recently been exposed that Obama is dictating the topics of interviews with the press and has been seen holding cue cards with pre-planned questions distributed to reporters.  Much of what Obama does during the week is “closed press” and unannounced ahead of time.  With which “senior advisers” does Obama meet, and what are the results of such meetings?

Mainstream journalists Mark Halperin and Jake Tapper are now admitting that many in the media report information favorable to the Obama campaign. Tapper, a member of the White House Press Corps, told radio show host Laura Ingraham that “the media is failing the country.”  The “hope and change” of 2008 appear to have changed into something else.

Early on, the Obama regime had indicated that it wished to control information on the internet.  Last January, it was reported that the Department of Homeland Security had begun to monitor “who is saying what.”  One report states that Obama has a “history of manipulating the Internet for political gain.”

Like Obama, websites which appear to have been established with the sole purpose of watching what others are reporting are also making false statements, such as:

Since the P&E has previously announced that they have the full audio tape of the traffic stop, can we expect them to make the tape publicly available as it surely will show Huff to be innocent?

The Post & Email never claimed to have “the full audio tape of the traffic stop;” Darren Huff did.  What we said was that we have interviews of Huff on tape denying any plan to commit violence.   Why are Obama’s supporters, or Obama himself, paying such close attention to what The Post & Email writes?  We must be hitting a nerve for them to be reading so carefully that they misstate what we say.

Obama’s minions are therefore not only lying about what he is doing; they lie about what others have reported and steal others’ copyrighted material without attribution, for which there is a remedy.

Obama has been described as using race-baiting and “misdirection” in an attempt to win the next election.

In Saul Alinsky fashion, Obama’s sycophants “pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”  Is that what the “Sovereign Citizen” campaign is all about?  Can any honesty be found in Obama’s associates and cabinet members?

There are many inconsistencies in Obama’s life story which have led some to believe that it was completely fabricated.  Joel Gilbert believes that Obama’s father was Frank Marshall Davis, while blogger Martha Trowbridge believes the father was Malcolm X.  Is that why Malcolm’s phrase “by any means necessary” repeatedly arises during discussions about Obama?

If Obama can lie about his health care bill, Mitt Romney’s responses, and his birthday party which was announced as planned for August 4, could he be lying about his birthday? his parentage? his background?  Detective Mike Zullo appears to believe so.

Perhaps the Obama propaganda machine is running out of participants.  Whether or not Obama was born in Hawaii matters not when criminal complaints of treason, identity fraud, election fraud, and forgery have been alleged.

Isn’t it time for the lies and cover-ups to stop?  And how about the static on the telephone during conversations with a certain person?