IDENTITY FRAUD, TREASON, FORGERY…ALL OF THE ABOVE, OR NONE?
by Sharon Rondeau
(Mar. 1, 2012) — After its founding in August 2009, The Post & Email launched an aggressive effort to obtain information from the state of Hawaii regarding any evidence of Obama’s alleged birth there in 1961. Early on, many had concluded that the short-form Certification of Live Birth posted to the internet in June 2008 was a forgery because of its lack of an official stamp and other factors.
The Hawaii Health Department refused to answer many of our UIPA requests as well as those of others, and eventually labeled The Post & Email a “vexatious requester.” Some of the documentation which was released showed apparent corroboration among members of the Health Department to ignore UIPA requests. The Department posted a link to the long-from birth certificate released on April 27, 2011 by the White House but never vouched for its authenticity. A letter was allegedly written to request the release of two certified copies which have never been released to the public. The Health Department has maintained that release of the original certificate would defy privacy laws.
The public schedule of Health Department Director Loretta Fuddy was not released to The Post & Email even though that of former Director of health Dr. Chiyome Fukino had been provided in its entirety. After filing an appeal, we were promised an Opinion Letter from the Office of Information Practices, charged with enforcing the Hawaii open records law, which was never received.
No hospital in Hawaii has claimed that Obama was born there. No hospital anywhere in the country has stated that he was born there. Could that be why both “birth certificates” purported to be certified copies of Obama’s original documents have been deemed forgeries?
At least one document analyst filed a criminal complaint with the FBI after the release of Obama’s purported long-form birth record. In September 2011, the Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff’s Department led by Sheriff Joe Arpaio undertook an investigation requested by some of his constituents into the authenticity of the long-form birth certificate as it pertained to possible election fraud in the upcoming presidential election. The long-awaited initial results will be announced later today at 1:00 p.m. MT, 3:00 p.m. ET, with live streaming over the internet available here.
In 2011, Atty. Orly Taitz filed a lawsuit against Health Director Loretta Fuddy to compel her to release the original document for Obama allegedly held by the department after Fuddy refused to respond to a federal court subpoena to do so, citing state privacy laws. Taitz met with congressional staffers and attorneys last September in Washington, DC to discuss what she claimed is Obama’s use of a stolen social security number and fraudulent birth documents.
In December 2009, former editor and founder John Charlton stated that the “Obama regime had begun to fall apart” catalyzed by the departure of David Ogden from the U.S. Department of Justice. Since then, the “Fast and Furious” investigation conducted by Rep. Darrell Issa and his committee has placed pressure on the veracity of statements made by putative Attorney General Eric Holder, and several of his underlings have already turned in their resignations. Holder had pledged to make the Obama regime transparent by employing a “presumption of disclosure.”
After Arizona resident Kenneth Allen filed a FOIA request for the travel records of Stanley Ann Dunham, Barry Soetoro, and Lolo Soetoro in March 2009, it took more than a year for him to receive anything from the U.S. State Department, which also involved attorneys from the U.S. Department of Justice.
If Obama’s birth certificates are forgeries, are the documents released by the State Department also forgeries? Is there any real evidence that someone named Stanley Ann Dunham lived? Questions about her social security number application and attendance at the University of Washington have also been raised.
Is it possible that “Barack Hussein Obama II” and “Stanley Ann Dunham” are “synthetic identities,” invented to hide real identities?
Is Obama’s biological father someone else other than “Barack Obama Sr.”?
If the birth certificate which Sheriff Arpaio was asked to investigate is proven to be a forgery, which questions will arise? For example:
- What was the motive for creating forgeries instead of releasing authentic documents?
- Why has the Hawaii Health Department refused to release the documentation it possesses, if there is any documentation at all?
- Is “Obama” his real name?
- If not, who is he, and who are his parents?
- Who knows the truth about Obama’s background?
- Would Arpaio’s investigation be the reason for Michelle Obama’s reported “panic?”
- Would it explain why the White House presidential schedule has been published only one day at a time recently, has erased activity from certain days, and at times is empty?
On February 28, 2012, The Post & Email was informed by a public information officer at the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department that the press conference is expected to last “1 hour min. (minimum)” and that several people, not one, will be giving presentations.
Tim Harrington and I, with so many others – we were working with Phil Berg in the day, and Orly Taitz and others – to find out what Mr. Obama’s bona fides were, without success. We put down a date certain, which was March 17, 2009, St. Patrick’s Day. So these two Irishmen decided that after being put off all this time, that we would put out a treason complaint on March 17, 2009. It was, if nothing else, to force a showdown between Mr. Obama and one of the officers from his military. They kept deflecting any scrutiny of this because they said people didn’t have any standing. As a military officer in Mr. Obama’s Armed Forces, I had standing, and still do. An officer standing up saying, “You need to prove yourself legitimate; in the meantime, I’m charging you with treason; either I’m right, or you are,” I gave Mr. Obama the opportunity to recall me to active duty and court-martial me for, among other things, mutiny, if he could prove my challenge was false. If what I said about him was defective in any way, he was under an obligation to punish me for accusing him falsely. It’s the military way of doing things. Obama had to answer that treason complaint. Because he never did, he accepted the complaint as legitimate. He accepted the accusation of treason as true. He needed to answer; he didn’t.
You can go back and read the words from the first complaint, but it’s exactly what we said about Obama in March 2009. We said, “You’re a fraud. You’re dissembling, you’re lying; you’ve deceived the people; you’re in here by contrivance.” And Mr. Obama never answered the complaint. We know he got it.
So here is Sheriff Joe coming out tomorrow and saying, “Yeah, that’s right.” So what’s new?
This goes back to Sarah Palin’s speech about the military standing up and doing the right thing. Well, the military called out Mr. Obama almost three years ago. This is not news. Mr. Obama was “exposed” three years ago from his own United States Armed Forces. And there have been other military men who have stood up and said, “Yes, it’s treason,” and you know about that. So Sheriff Arpaio, God bless him, and the people who have worked on this, are going to confirm what’s been on the street now for three years.
The Post & Email said, “It’s reported that the mainstream media is going to be there tomorrow after avoiding this issue for three and one-half years.”
What you know, and what they may not know, is that a treason complaint is still alive, on the street, and it’s still actionable. It hasn’t gone away. We’ve talked about the fact that it’s never been addressed. It’s been put into a state of dormancy by the federal judges who have looked at it, saying, “Well, I know, you’re right, but we’ll just file it here…” The habeas petition which was filed here a couple of weeks ago talks about the treason, and it’s on the desk of a federal judge tonight. The habeas petition is as much as a criminal complaint as it is a demand to have me released in the day when I was still incarcerated, and now to answer the question as to whether or not the jury is legitimate here or not all came about because we’ve been trying to get the treason complaint through the grand jury. They all come together. Treason was mentioned in that habeas brief, and that’s sitting in the hands of a federal judge tonight as a criminal complaint. They filed that back in January.
So it’s been “treason, treason, treason, treason, treason,” and I renewed my criminal complaint today. It’s actionable. Rep. Harry Accornero filed one. Other people have. The treason complaint has never, ever, ever been dismissed as defective, and the reason it hasn’t is that it’s not defective.
This is very important, Sharon, and it’s a military thing: You can’t stand up and challenge your commanding officer without him or her doing something about it. If you stand up and say, “Excuse me, you’re a fraud, ” in a crowd of people, that has to be answered. If I’m wrong, then I get to go to Ft. Leavenworth. If Obama is wrong, then he gets to be walked out of the White House. And that was the challenge. “It’s you or me, Mr. Obama; either I’m wrong, or you are.” That was the one challenge that nobody could state was without standing.
And all of the things that have happened since I wrote that treason complaint – and it just happens to be me; I can’t help that – we talked about Darren Huff because he didn’t have anything to do with the events of 20 April 2010; the events of 20 April were driven by a man named William Bryan. Who does William Bryan work for? Mr. Obama and his team. Mr. Obama wanted to put me down, specifically, so that he could walk away from the treason complaint…”If Fitzpatrick’s arrested on these charges, then the treason complaint goes away.”
In the meantime, we came up with these other companion issues, grand jury things, which are as significant and important, but it’s always been foremost about getting rid of the person who brought the treason complaint.
What’s about to happen tomorrow is you’re about to have one more confirmation, one more proof, that Mr. Obama is in commission of the crime of treason. He ran for office knowing that he was not eligible for office. He’s operating a government that’s not found in our United States Constitution. Well, when a member of his chain of command stood up and said, “Excuse me, you’re NOT MY president and you’re not my commander-in-chief; you’re a foreign-born domestic enemy…Holy Smokes! Those are pretty strong words!! And he said, “Well, what we’re going to do here is destroy the person who wrote these words and then the words will go away.. Well, they haven’t succeeded in destroying me, and they haven’t succeeded in making those words go away. They’re still out there, and tomorrow, other people will be invested with the courage to act against Mr. Obama on their own. It’s one more proof that Mr. Obama is really in commission of treason.
Even if Mr. Obama is not a United States citizen, because he owes an allegiance to the United States Constitution, his standing as a citizen is of no consequence. He owes an allegiance to the U.S. Constitution because of the position he’s put himself in. If Sheriff Joe comes up with stronger words tomorrow, then God bless him! But “foreign-born domestic enemy” is pretty rough language, and that was specifically the question asked of me by the Roland McAmus, the resident agent in charge of the U.S. Secret Service on the 19th of March 2009 when he and his assistant, Leslie Cochran – and by the way, John Scruggs, who is the detective I met with last Friday, was one of the patrol officers who escorted the United States Secret Service to my home on that afternoon…I said, “You were there,” and he said, “Yeah, yeah.” John Scruggs. Next time I saw him was last Friday. The first I saw him was March 19, 2009 when I was on the phone with a Sergeant of Marines named Timothy Joseph Harrington.
The Post & Email said, “And didn’t the Secret Service say, ‘We can’t arrest him, you know'”?
Yes, he said, “We know. We can’t arrest him. We can’t prosecute him’ our job is to protect him,” and I said, “I know what the Secret Service does.”
“Did he say that he knew Obama was a fraud?”
Yes, they know!! They’re a glorified babysitting service. They’re a protection agency; they don’t have a law enforcement charter. Their job is to protect anybody who is in that office or in line to succeed as commander-in chief. The FBI does have that law enforcement obligation, and the FBI, before they go into the White House and have to work with the Secret Service, will have to have cooperation before they place Mr. Obama, the fraud, under arrest. And there would be; those guys will cooperate and get this thing done.
Will the regime conclude its implosion with tomorrow’s press conference in Maricopa County, AZ?
Editor’s Note: The Post & Email has reason to believe that “William Bryan” is a synthetic identity.
In Federalist #68, Alexander Hamilton wrote, in part:
The process of election affords a moral certainty, that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications. Talents for low intrigue, and the little arts of popularity, may alone suffice to elevate a man to the first honors in a single State; but it will require other talents, and a different kind of merit, to establish him in the esteem and confidence of the whole Union, or of so considerable a portion of it as would be necessary to make him a successful candidate for the distinguished office of President of the United States. It will not be too strong to say, that there will be a constant probability of seeing the station filled by characters pre-eminent for ability and virtue.