If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!
RE: LAKIN, CAO, USURPATION…TREASON!
by Debbie St. Jean
(Mar. 17, 2011) — In December of last year, a highly-decorated, 18-year U.S. Army medical doctor was sentenced to six months in prison at Ft. Leavenworth for disobeying orders due to questions surrounding the legitimacy of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. military. Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin was denied discovery of any kind regarding Obama’s eligibility to serve, was denigrated, ridiculed and insulted on the stand during his court-martial, and refused an answer to his question which had been asked of his U.S. representatives and Army personnel more than two years prior.
This is the United States of America, where one’s constitutional rights are always expected to be protected. Or is it? What happened in the case of Lakin? Why was he denied his due process, inalienable rights to know whether or not Obama is a “natural born Citizen” and therefore eligible to order him and others into combat, possibly to lose their lives? Lakin was upholding his oath to the U.S. Constitution, but what were Maj. Gen. Hawley-Bowland, Maj. Gen. Matthew Kemkes, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mullen, and Col. Denise Lind doing? By denying Terry Lakin his right to a fair trial which would have included discovery, they violated their oaths to the Constitution and therefore committed treason against it.
What other term is there to describe what has happened? The military rules that it was “not relevant” to discover whether or not the putative Commander-in-Chief was eligible to serve?
The entire military establishment knows that Obama is not eligible to be president, yet they covered for him and send an innocent man to prison.
Is this the America we used to know? What about all of those who have made the ultimate sacrifice to uphold their oaths? Does that no longer mean anything to us?
From the Terry Lakin Action Fund website:
Since 2008 LTC Lakin has asked through his chain of command and his Congressional delegation for proof that President Obama is Constitutionally eligible to serve as his Commander-in-Chief. He has explained to his superiors that he cannot understand how his Oath of Office to protect and defend the Constitution does not allow military officers to pursue this proof of eligibility.
So what will We the People do?
Alan Keyes, a former presidential candidate who should have had “standing” in the courts to challenge Obama’s legitimacy, was denied a hearing on the merits of his case, which has now gone to appeal. But why?
If the courts, Congress, state legislators, members of the Electoral College, governors, attorneys general, U.S. attorneys, members of the FBI and Secret Service were doing their jobs, wouldn’t they have looked into Obama’s obscured history before allowing him entry into the White House? And what about the U.S. Supreme Court? Having all sworn an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution and done nothing about Obama, are they not all guilty of treason?
On January 4, 2011, Rep. Robert Goodlatte of Virginia announced on his website that he would “recommit the Congress to the text of the U.S. Constitution. As proof of this commitment to hold true to the fundamental principles upon which this country was founded, the new Rules for the 112th Congress include Congressman Goodlatte’s recommendation that the U.S. Constitution will be read aloud on the House Floor during the first week of the 112th Congress.”
That being the case, the new Congress is now bound to order discovery as to whether or not Obama qualifies under Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution to serve as the chief executive of the United States. To date, Obama has refused to produce any documentation on his background, including an original birth certificate, proof of allegiance to the United States, being at least 35 years of age, and having resided 14 years within the country.
Goodlatte’s statement continues: “One of the resounding themes I have heard from my constituents is that Congress should adhere to the Constitution and the finite list of powers it granted to the federal government.”
He stated that he would begin the reading of the U.S. Constitution at 10:30 a.m. on January 6, 2011 and that the event was “open to all Members of Congress who are interested in participating.”
When Theresa Cao shouted out “Except Obama! Except Obama!” was she not participating in the reading of the U.S. Constitution? Was she not bringing to the fore the fact that our government has refused for more than two years to answer the question as to whether or not Obama is a “natural born Citizen?” Every single member of both houses of Congress has received a letter calling their attention to abundant evidence to the contrary, so they cannot say they do not know.
If citizens were urged to “participate” in the reading of the Constitution on January 6, why was Cao arrested and charged with unlawful conduct?
Based on Goodlatte’s pledge to read and adhere to the provisions of the U.S. Constitution, is it not incumbent upon the Congress to now follow through on that pledge and launch a full investigation into Obama’s background, birthplace, citizenship, and allegiances?
Given that pledge, what reason was there to arrest Cao? She was pointing out that Obama was never vetted for the office he occupies and that Congress, the courts, and the executive branch have all failed to answer the millions of inquiries and demands which have been made for them to uphold their oaths to the Constitution and do so.
Even if Obama should prove that he qualifies for the office, what about his nationalization of the health care industry against the will of the people; his takeover of the auto industry, putting thousands of Chrysler dealerships out of business; his appointment of tax cheats, ineligible candidates (Hillary Clinton, because of the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution), his aiding and abetting of foreign terrorists, his prosecution of a state attempting to protect its own borders from the ruthless criminals which cross its borders from Mexico, and his stated refusal to uphold a law passed by Congress and signed by a former president?
Is that not treason? How many transgressions has the current regime carried out which are similar or identical to those listed in the Declaration of Independence?
Do we just take this sitting down?
People have asked what they can do.
Write the following letter demanding that the grand jury investigate the crimes committed against the Constitution of the United States. Send copies to the nearest office of the FBI, to your local grand jury, federal grand jury, your governor, U.S. attorney, and attorney general. Send it to your U.S. representatives and senators. Put them on notice that you will not tolerate treason against the Constitution. Make them aware that you know what they have done and that We the People will not stand for it any more.
Multiply one letter times 100,000,000, and there will be a force with which Congress, the courts, the military brass, and the grand juries will have to reckon.
If that was all it took to reinstitute the U.S. Constitution and all the protections it offers to us, would you do it? If not, why not?
The time is now. The time for complaining and hand-wringing is over. Write and send your treason complaint now.
The text of the letter reads:
To the Foreman and Jurors:
Accept this as a call to action in the exercise of your Great Commission!
Our Founding Fathers commissioned you as the most powerful law enforcement agency known in human history. In your Great Commission the Founders invest in you the Power of Presentment. Your Power of Presentment and Great Commission authority are reduced to writing in this day still as found in our United States Constitution.
We are arrived at a point in our Nation’s life where the life of that Nation is threatened to the very point of death. Dictatorial and tyrannical government oppressions are intolerable. Another unconstitutional, rival and competing government is installed and thriving in the place of our United States Constitution.
Our present system of government is unsound and unconstitutional. Our laws are unstable. Government functionaries appropriate your Great Commissioned using the Power Presentment against We the People. We all of us are besieged and betrayed by a terrible affliction. We all of us smell the rotten order in our Country while the judges refuse to sniff their own robes.
Reclaim your appropriated and abused Great Commission. Renew the purpose and design of your Power of Presentment.
Lawlessness begets lawlessness. Your clear and compelling duty is to see to the great work We the People bring to you. Cometh the hour cometh the man!
Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III
United States Navy Retired
Distinguished Military Graduate Class of 1975, United States Naval
The following letter can be written by any concerned citizen regarding the crime of treason:
The Founding Fathers risked their “lives, fortunes and sacred honor” so that future generations might be free. What are you prepared to do?