DOES HE KNOW THE LAW, IS HE IGNORING IT, OR JUST CREATING A DIVERSION?
by Sharon Rondeau
(Jan. 19, 2011) — The following letter was sent by fax today to Governor Neil Abercrombie of Hawaii.
SENT VIA FACSIMILE
808-586-0006
January 19, 2011
The Honorable Neil Abercrombie
Governor, State of Hawai`i
Executive Chambers,
State Capitol
Honolulu, Hawai`i 96813
Dear Governor Abercrombie:
RE: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA’S LONG-FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE
On December 24, 2010, various news outlets, including The New York Times, reported that you were “so incensed over ‘birthers’ — the conspiracy theorists who assert that Mr. Obama was born in Kenya and was thus not eligible to become president — that he is seeking ways to change state policy to allow him to release additional proof that the president was born in Honolulu in 1961.”
Since that time, after refusing to cover the issue over the last two years, the “conservative” internet and print news outlet Human Events has included the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to occupy the Oval Office on the author’s list of “investigation targets” by the new House Republican majority. The questions surrounding Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief are being discussed on radio stations by mainstream journalists who have stated that the media now “privately admit a constitutional crisis” in regard to the fraud which Obama has apparently wrought upon a largely unsuspecting nation.
Since its inception in August 2009, this publication as well as others have reported numerous instances of stonewalling on the part of employees at the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) for information which by law should have been available to the public. You now provide direct oversight over the Department of Health and have appointed a new interim director. Prior to your election, The Post & Email has reported with extensive documentation that the Hawaii Department of Health has lied about the availability of birth index data or failed to answer UIPA requests at all. No one from the department has refuted our claims that they have been dishonest in dealing with the public regarding releasing information under the UIPA law.
Even former Obama supporter Chris Mathews, who in 2007 stated on air that Obama was born in Indonesia, has recently called for him to release his original birth certificate. The only information which the HDOH has released is alleged “birth index data” which proves absolutely nothing, as Hawaii has provided Certifications of Live Birth to children born out of the country.
When Factcheck.org released a “Certification of Live Birth” in August 2008, the organization did not disclose that it lacked the information present on the official long-form document which contains the signature of the doctor who delivered the child, the height and weight of the baby, and considerable personal information about the parents such as occupation and their birthplaces. An official document also would have contained a raised stamp from the Registrar of Vital Statistics. Questions directed to Factcheck.org staff members have repeatedly gone unanswered.
A researcher who traveled to Hawaii last summer documented the fact that contrary to the claims of the Hawaii Department of Health, long-form birth certificates are still available to anyone born in Hawaii who requests one for a fee of $10.00.
Shortly after you made your public statement on December 24, it was reported that you subsequently declined interviews and further commentary about your quest for Obama’s original vital records in Hawaii, and yesterday it was stated that you have been unable to locate them. However, as governor, you must be familiar with HRS 338, which states that only a person with a “direct and tangible interest” in the record may obtain a copy.
You may know that there is video proof that Michelle Obama has referred to Kenya as her husband’s “home country.” Members of the Kenyan Parliament have stated on the record that Barack Hussein Obama II was born in Kenya, as did the Kenyan ambassador to the United States, Peter Ogego. Another report emanating from Hawaii stated that he was born in Indonesia but was later changed to say that his birthplace was Honolulu. Why are there so many inconsistencies in regard to this man’s birth?
Obama himself has admitted that he was born a dual citizen due to his father’s British citizenship as a Kenyan, as Kenya had been a British colony at the time of Barack Obama Sr.’s birth. Obama also conspicuously referred to himself as “native born,” not “natural born,” on his campaign website in 2008. Why did Obama not declare himself a “natural born Citizen,” as is required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution, and then provide the proof?
There remains a question as to whether or not Obama holds Indonesian citizenship.
There is a decorated former Army flight surgeon sitting in prison at Ft. Leavenworth, KS because Obama was unwilling to provide proof of his eligibility to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief. What kind of a man would order members of the U.S. Armed Forces to enter into harm’s way and yet hide all of his personal records while occupying the most public office in the world? What kind of person would allow an 18-year, highly-acclaimed Army veteran to lose his livelihood, rank, and career because he refused to release his long-form birth certificate? And why did the defendant’s chain of command preside conduct his court-martial without allowing discovery to him to settle the matter once and for all?
What does that tell you about Barack Hussein Obama and those who are protecting him, Governor Abercrombie?
The following advertisement in The Washington Times states that Obama does not qualify as a “natural born Citizen” because of his dual allegiance:
Governor, in the midst of the overwhelming evidence that Obama is hiding something crucial to his eligibility or the claims he has made about his background, and because you most likely do not possess “a direct and tangible interest” in his birth records and therefore cannot order them released, can you compel the Department of Health to produce, through your state’s UIPA law, the letter or form which Obama would have had to have completed to obtain an official Certification of Live Birth? If Obama requested a short-form birth certificate from the department, there should be a record of it, and producing such would not violate your state’s privacy laws.
If Obama was not born in Hawaii, has parents other than whom he has claimed, or is not a “natural born Citizen” for whatever reason, he has lied to entire country and should be prosecuted, along with the hundreds, if not thousands, of operatives who aided and abetted the fraud. All of the laws Obama has signed and appointments he has made would be rendered null and void. However, would that not be preferable to allowing a usurper to act as de facto president and commander-in-chief because politicians, judges, and Supreme Court justices lack the fortitude to stand up for the U.S. Constitution, which protects all of us from absolute government tyranny?
Will you remain silent on this issue, give it lip service, or be part of the solution to answering the question once and for all if the man in the White House is qualified to be there?
Very truly yours,
Sharon Rondeau
Editor
The Post & Email, Inc.
P.O. Box 302
Stafford Springs, CT 06076
Phone/Fax: 203-987-7948
http://noiri.blogspot.com/2011/01/obama-originally-disqualified-by-hawaii.html
George W. Bush Still In Charge in 2011?
Mr. Obama’s eligibility house of cards is falling in, and all of Congress’s work the last two years now crushed, without a legitimate President’s signiture! The Country worries about what to do next. Our Constitution gives us the answers & outline as Cody Robert Judy explains in The Lion’s Den show; the Drafters anticipated this happening.
Link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpvmInRUpkI
Embed Code:
Abercrombie cannot find Obama’s BC:
Wow, breaking at http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/01/hawaii-hollywood-reporter-mike-evans.html Read the whole article and listen to the audio, here’s an excerpt:
Hollywood Reporter Mike Evans, friend of Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie, reported that Abercrombie told him that there is no birth certificate for Obama in the state of Hawaii. The clip below is from the KQRS morning show. Jack Cashil at American Thinker is now reporting the explosive details.
RAINBOW GLITTER BEAR, daily episode number 3
In today’s daily episode, number 3, the Bear from England explains Obama’s parentage to Rainbow as she continues to search for Obama’s long form birth certificate in Hawaii.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvCGJ9QMxg8
Or watch it on the home site at
http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/8287821
http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/ObamaBirthCertificate/2011/01/22/id/383582?s=al&promo_code=B860-1
“Hawaii’s privacy laws have long barred the release of a certified birth certificate to anyone who doesn’t have a tangible interest.”
The U. S. Constitution has a seriously “tangible interest” and trumps whatever rule HI’s AG comes up with.
And let’s not lose sight of: Even though the governor may not be able to legally release the birth certificate, he certainly has an obligation to verify if the COLB that zippy put out is really on file there. Obama put that out, Hawaii has to say yea or nay, it is either legal or not.
A few observations-
1. Does the BC settle anything? For example if a forged document is pulled off, so what? We still contend the violation of “natural born status” . This could be a distraction from the whole of all sealed documents. Frankly, if the school records, passports, and numerous SS#’s were unsealed and actually reported on the one BC issue would not hold as much mystique.
2. Why is Mr. Lucas so quiet? For someone that had “the smoking gun” to the issue at hand it seems rather strange to mail out copies to CONgress and then sit back. Multiple interviews across the country on whatever shows and stations that would cover it would have been a formidable battleground (oops, forgot can’t use terms like that anymore) how about playground since we are the ones being played.
3. The inward angst for most peace loving citizens is the total incompetence and lack of integrity that CONgress demonstrates through all of this. The Fox pundits are weasels, the lame stream covers it up, the politicians act like everything is in order, and the “banksta” puppet masters keep pulling the strings for liar-in-chief to just read the teleprompter at their command to financially rape the taxpayers, again.
2discern says:
Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 10:49 PM
A few observations-
1. Does the BC settle anything? For example if a forged document is pulled off, so what? We still contend the violation of “natural born status” . This could be a distraction from the whole of all sealed documents.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
To answer your question above, this has been asked by many and stated a “Distraction”. First and foremost, I assure you it is not. It is absolutely critical to obtain a copy of the Long-form Birth Certificate in order to properly assert and verify Obama’s parents are whom he claims them to be. For example, prior to knowing whether or not he is in fact a Natural Born Citizen, one must eliminate that doubt. I for one do not buy Obama’s nativity story. While it may be true his parents are whom he publicly claims they are, this again needs to be legally verified, hence, this is by no means a distraction. Of course, it goes without saying that if listed as not born in Hawaii, its an end game.
The birth certificate cannot prove his eligibility, even if it shows a birth in Hawaii to two US citizen parents. The birth certificate can only further disprove his eligibility, should it show a foreign birth.
It does not make any difference as to the real parentage of Obama, because Obama Senior claimed him as a product of the marriage. In the time of our Founding Fathers, all that was necessary was for the father of record to claim he was the father in actuality, which Obama Senior did in the divorce papers. In the time of our Founding Fathers there was no way to test (such as with DNA) for paternity. If a man claimed to be the father of a son, then that was good enough for all legal purposes of identity, passing on of inheritance, land grants, and especially citizenship.
The intent of the Founding Fathers was to have Presidents who had exclusive allegiance to the US from the time of their birth. Obama grew up believing that Obama Senior was his biological father and a British/Kenyan citizen. Natural born citizen status is the “strong check” against foreign influence. This foreign influence was present from the time of Obama’s birth and in the years that followed, which included 3 trips to Kenya, the most recent one in 2006. These are all facts which will not go away should Obama’s father turn out to have been an American.
Agreed, but there is on record a divorce decree in Hi. that list BO 2 as the child of the union.
> These are all facts which will not go away should Obama’s father turn out to have been an American.
But these are all facts that have no Constitutional relevance as the Constitution does not disqualify people with “any” foreign influence, it just disqualifies those who are not natural born.
Stephen, I beg to differ. Article II Section 1 Clause 5 also requires that the President have resided the last 14 years in the US. Why would the Founding Fathers require that? I contend that it was another hedge against foreign influence. Our Founding Fathers would have understood that foreign influence (which was what John Jay was concerned about) could manifest itself in the President not just by place of birth or allegiance of the parents, but also by having recently lived in a foreign country. In those days, if you chose to reside in a foreign country, you were very much immersed into that country’s ways. There were relatively few Americans in that country to hang around with, and you had very limited contact with Americans back at home (no TV, telephone, Internet).
The intent of the Founding Fathers in the Constitution with Article II Section 1 Clause 5 is pretty clear: They were doing what they could to prevent foreign influence in the President – by birthplace, by parental allegiance, and by residency. One could also argue that the age requirement helps in this regard — being mature enough to throw off foreign ideas that may have been learned in youth.
BREAKING!
Follow the nearly daily adventures of Starz’ Little Rainbow Glitter Bear as she tries to find Obama’s birth certificate!
P&E may want to post the embed code. We can’t! ;)
http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/8284549
Thanks, that was great!!
Bob,
Thanks!
There is going to be a new 2 – 6 minute adventure EVERY DAY as Rainbow Glitter Bear continues her quest for Barack Obama’s Long form birth certificate. This morning she met with the governor bear of Hawaii! There will be another new adventure tonight and one probably every day, 7 days a week, so there could wind up being A LOT of adventures in a pretty short period of time!
I’ve made much of getting in people’s faces about this – on taking this to the street. If the post and e-mail will allow, I’ll mention it in upcoming episodes. We need to cross-pollinate our resources quickly to beat back the MSM and we can it, too. We have got to get OUT of the habit of blathering details and indignation ton each other and take our message to the street. Rainbow Glitter Bear is one way. She is almost impossible for liberals to defeat because they don;t have a handle on fighting this kind of parody, yet, plus the animation will attract kids, and that will scare them to death, because indoctrination of children is number 1 with socialists. We can turn that around.
There are many ways to fight this. Please help Rainbow Glitter bear’s adventures in obamaland go viral. When people usually say that, they’re trying to establish themselves in a business or set themselves up to be wannabie pundit stars. We have no such agenda. We just want to break this issue open. And we can do it. So please help us go viral, we’ll mention other places in the videos and we can get organized in the media sense. If we organize and be mutually promotional, we can control this issue and ride it to victory. Take my word on it.
Here’s her latest adventure!
Somehow I think they going to fudge this over again. The gov. probably already got an offer. I hope I am wrong.
The tragedy of this whole affair will be that the longer the deception goes without redress the more people who are involved raise their culpability and the greater the demand for justice be meted out must become. We can not have a law which is intentionally violated for any reason. The entire basis of a civil society is built upon the idea that a crime against the public is greater than a crime against an individual simply by reason of the repercussions of it going unprosecuted. The stakes are thus high for those who entertain violating the law and it is by no means a mistake that the criminals have every intent on adding on violation after violation so long as the first act is never uncovered. What we now have is a scheme that has drawn so many into it’s offing that it has become a greater danger to the system than the public. Or so the logic applied by Judge Carter which is likely the same scare tactic going through the halls of congress and the courts. I have only one question, at some point in time the danger will either become irreversible without a great struggle or some number of conspirators are going to have to submit to the will of the people and beg their mercy. Which will it be?
Good Work, Sharon!!
The dam is beginning to leak.
I’m only sorry it took more than two years for the HOAX to begin to crumble.
no birth certificate, no obama 2012!!
Hawaii Health Director Fukino Fired. Told Americans Obama was born in Hawaii.
Describing the state Department of Health as an agency with “organizational challenges,” Gov. Neil Abercrombie yesterday named Dr. Neal Palafox as health director. Like the woman he replaces, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Palafox is a practicing physician.
Palafox, 58, is chairman of the Department of Family Practice and Community Health at the University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine. He is also the director of the school’s Family Practice Residency Program.
http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/20101219_Health_director_named.html
Report that Abercrombie claims no Obama BC in Hawaii.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/friend-says-abercrombie-told-him-there-is-no-birth-certificate/
Its time for Lucas Smith to be heard by Congress.
I agree….how could they have all ignored the individual notarized and certified copies of the Mombasa Kenya Obama BC, along with Lucus’ offer to testify in front of Congress about how he obtained it?
Worthless Congresslugs……….
Everyone needs to be very careful what this HI gov is doing… regardless, I wouldn’t be surprised to hear that THEY (meaning the gov of HI, Democrats, Obama find the certificate… they are great at re-direction & am sure they know everything that is being said or is happening… the whole issue is NOT just his Birth Certificate BUT is NOT qualified to be president because of him NOT being a “Natural Born Citizen”…
This has to be the most important issue that the people seeking the truth must focus on.
Not saying other stuff isn’t important… but if they create or make up a Birth Certificate it
may just get everyone focused on something THEY can use to dis-prove the Birthers claims…. It is time to have this fraud uncovered… ONCE-N-For ALL!!!
I also think that anyone in Congress regardless in congressman/congresswoman or senators… they MUST address this issue & if they don’t they are cowards & a disgrace to the USA & it’s citizens… they don’t deserve to be in office… NO EXCEPTIONS!!
Anyone found to be covering up or part of the fraud NEEDS to be brought to Justice & if found guilty put in prison…
AN EXCELLENT MUST READ ARTICLE!!
“IN SEARCH OF THE HOLY GRAIL OF DOCUMENTS – THE OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE”
By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
Thursday, January 20, 2011
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/01/in-search-of-holy-grail-of-documents.html
Excerpt:
“In short, should it be that difficult for Hawaii Governor Abercrombie to locate Obama’s long-form birth certificate in the records of the Hawaii Health Department or otherwise confirm with medical records from Hawaiian hospital, Kapi’olani Medical Center, that Obama was born in that hospital? Who are we kidding here?”
An Excellent Comment by Attorney Mario Apuzzo:
“Puzo1 said…
Doublee,
A “direct and tangible interest” is defined by Hawaii statute Section 338-18 the text of which you can obtain from the internet.
The Federal government or a state doing a criminal investigation does not need a “direct and tangible interest” to obtain the birth certificate or some related documents. Such a government (e.g. Congressional committee, a federal grand jury, state grand jury) can simply issue a subpoena and obtain whatever documents and/or testimony it is looking for, subject to whatever privacy rights or privilege the target may be able to assert.”
January 21, 2011 8:03 AM
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
“HAWAII GOVERNOR CLAIMS RECORDS OF OBAMA’S “BIRTH”
“EXISTS IN ARCHIVES” BUT CAN’T PRODUCE THE VITAL DOCUMENT”
By Daily Mail Reporter
20th January 2011
Excerpt:
“Governor Neil Abercrombie is facing renewed pressure over Obama’s Hawaiian origins.”
“Pressure was mounting on Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie today amid increasing confusion over whether President Obama was born there. Abercrombie said on Tuesday that an investigation had unearthed papers proving Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961.
He told Honolulu’s Star-Advertiser: ‘It actually exists in the archives, written down,’ he said.
But it became apparent that what had been discovered was an unspecified listing or notation of Obama’s birth that someone had made in the state archives and not a birth certificate.
And in the same interview Abercrombie suggested that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health. He said efforts were still being made to track down definitive vital records that would prove Obama was born in Hawaii.”
Read More Here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1348916/Hawaii-governor-says-Obamas-birth-record-exists-produce-it.html#ixzz1Bi8al7nq
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
NOTICE: WE HAVE A REAL OPPORTUNITY HERE OURSELVES to put real pressure on Hawaiian governor Abercrombie who almost certainly must be keeping tabs on the comments section of the following article in the Hawaiian Sun Advertiser.
http://www.staradvertiser.com/editorials/20110118_This_is_a_collaborative_endeavor.html
This paper and its online section are local for Abercrombie in a small political environment where every voice counts. I’m there making arguments – everyone here should, also, and PLEASE do not get into debating the constitution! That’s a go-nowhere argument at this point, because it is now up to Obama to simply release the records. Whether you and I or anyone agree on the Constitution is irrelevant to that fact, now.
I suggest people post repeatedly and keep it brief with one purpose – to put pressure on Abercrombie. Something like: “Governor, please tell president Obama to release his records. Local state laws currently being enacted around the country will make it impossible for Obama to get on the ballot in several states in 2012 without releasing his records. Obama needs to do this now, before his own procrastination ruins the machinery for the 2012 election, because if he releases the records before they can be forensically verified, he’ll lose and drag the every democrat down with him”…. something like that.
DON’T get drawn into an endless vacuum of useless political/consitituional discussion. this is past that point now that Matthews and other liberals are on board. This is bi-partisan now, and that has changed everything.
We’ve made the pitch that Obama needs to release his records for 3 years. Pitching time is done. Now it’s time to close the sale. Simply demand that Obama do it.
Here’s a link to the article:
http://www.staradvertiser.com/editorials/20110118_This_is_a_collaborative_endeavor.html
ABERCROMBIE SPEAKS AGAIN
(More dancing around the subject……..Barack Obama is a 100% Undocumented Illegal Immigrant, and a 100% Illegal Alien………Just say it Abercrombie)
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/01/hawaii-governor-neil-abercrombie.html
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
A few excellent comments at the link above:
“Anonymous said…
He’s playing word games. He can’t release something that doesn’t exist.”
January 18, 2011 12:49 PM
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
“Anonymous said…
LOCK UP THE BEARDED MARXIST ALONG WITH SOETORO!!”
January 18, 2011 1:12 PM
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
“California birther/dualer/doubter said…
WND also reports on this development:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=252833
I, too, read between the lines of Abercommie’s statements and could only conclude that Barry Soetoro/Soebarkah is not a natural-born citizen as he indeed has no long-form birth certificate on file there but in Kenya, the one that Lucas Smith procured and distributed to all of Congress.”
January 18, 2011 6:17 PM
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
“Anonymous said…
Hawaii governor can’t find Obama birth certificate
Suggests controversy could hurt president’s re-election chances
Read more: Hawaii governor can’t find Obama birth certificate”
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=252833#ixzz1BS5hpCFx
January 18, 2011 8:26 PM
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
“Pamela Barnett said…
it is extremely suspicous that the reference to “obama’s birth” was “written” in. That screams that it was added to the minutes after the fact.
and the tyranny continues.
Pray for Theresa Cao tomorrow.”
January 18, 2011 10:03 PM
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
“itooktheredpill said…
Abercrombie is the man who publicly read the bogus “Obama” letter to Kapi’olani Medical Center…
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103633
And Abercrombie is the man who sponsored U.S. House Resolution 593 that tricked his peers into becoming the first government officials to say:
“Obama was born in Hawaii”
Which Government Organization Was The First To Say, “Obama was born in Hawaii”?
The vote in favor of H.Res. 593 preceeded Dr. Fukino’s second News Release. Not the other way around.”
January 19, 2011 6:04 AM
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
In Search of the Holy Grail.
Mario Apuzzo ask some great questions of Neil, (Indian Jones) Abercrombie:
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
And here is more; also, interesting comments
Newly elected Hawaii Governor claims “glitch” in getting Obama birth certificate
http://www.ketknbc.com/news/talkback/newly-elected-hawaii-governor-claims-glitch-in-getting-obama-birth-certificate
Old media now asking where is birth certificate
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=253649
Why haven’t the Hawaii newspapers confirmed the alleged Obama birth announcements?
MSM stars claim the birth announcements in two papers prove Obama was born in Hawaii. If the Hawaii papers don’t confirm them they are forged meaning ABSOLUTELY no proof that Obama is a US citizen.
Obama Birth Announcement Forged
http://www.hoaxofthecentury.com/ObamaBirthAnnouncementForged1.htm
great letter sharon, having done the research 5 yrs ago and having voted to indict soetero & pelosi for fraud and treason at american grand jury, i can think of hundreds of questions for this man. will he produce pic’s of barrys re-patriation ceremony? a friend so close would have gone to seattle if that was where it was at. will he attack tim adams signed affidavit? will he say barry was drunk during his debate with alan keyes? many, many questions but, still a great letter. thank you for all you do sharon.
—————–
Mrs. Rondeau replies: You’re welcome.
Great letter, Sharon! I will have an update for you tomorrow on how the “Contact Your Congressmen” campaign is going. I’ll tell you this much, we’ve had readers jump right in. If any are holding back, join the party and let’s tell our Congressmen what we expect from them and that we demand to be heard on this subject.
Gracie
Issa to public: Which regs hurt?
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/139101-is%20%20sa-to-public-which-regs-hurt
How about illegal presidency?
An Excellent Comment I want to share from:
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2011/01/20/ed-koch-palin-defense-palin-highly-intelligent-we-should-denounce-unfair-false-and-wicked-charges/#comment-177760
“GORDO | January 20, 2011 at 3:58 pm |
“Jerome Corsi challenge to Governor Abercrombie: use your authority and release Obama’s typewritten hospital generated birth certificate.”
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/01/jerome-corsi-challenge-to-hawaii.html
=========
Chuck Bonniwell interviews Jerome Corsi:”
“JEROME CORSI CHALLENGES GOV. ABERCROMBIE TO RELEASE OBAMA’S LONG-FORM”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=PAaZsvGMnjk
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
American citizens, listen closely to the entire video, especially at the: 12:12 mark to the end.
That was a good letter, but I disagree with the commenter above about what is the REAL question. Which to me has been not WHERE Obama was born, as much as WHY Obama has not resolved this issue for nearly three years. Because there are no good reasons. I list the possible reasons as KISS:
1. KENYA. He is born in Kenya.
2. IGNORANT. Obama is too ignorant to think of the simple answer.
3. SNOBBY. Obama thinks Americans are too stupid to believe the REAL THING!
4. SLIMY. Obama thinks it is OK to make some Americans look crazy if it gets him votes.
As you can see, if we ever answer WHY, we will know where, and in the meantime, any of the other three reasons make a psychologically disturbed and manipulative president. Like I say, being from Kenya would be the nicest answer!!!
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
Sharon, you and your post give me hope. Thank you for all you do!
There won’t be any “unchallengeable” documentation from Abercrombie. He is definitely an Obama sycophant. He’ll most likely try a Linda Lingle “Do Over” and expect us to take his word for what he will say he’s seen. I can hear it now: “Two Governors have testified to Obama’s Citizenship – What more can we do??” Or something to that effect. (not distinguishing between “Citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” is a hallmark of his ilk).
Obama has tried it several times himself.
ELmo
Abercrombie needs to be put on notice right now that if he certifies Obama or if his state certifies O a eligible to be on the ballot that he had better hope O has released all his papers before and be actually able to prove it well in advance so that papers can be verified.
Abercrombie needs to be told that he will be prosecuted himself if he pulls any ****!
The Narcissist as Liar and Con-man
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/01/narcissist-as-liar-and-con-man.html
Great letter, Sharon! As always, you make us BIRTHERs ( Brave Individual Requesting Traitors Heed Eligibility Requirements) proud! God bless and be safe
——————-
Mrs. Rondeau replies: Thank you, sir.
Magnificent letter, but it seems to assume a level of integrity and good will on Abercrombie’s part that may not exist. If the governor’s liberal/”progressive” hide can be pierced at all, Sharon’s letter should do it–assuming he even reads it.
Is there an Obama Birth Certificate on file in Hawaii or not is the Wrong Question
The real question is; What kind of birth record is on file in Hawaii?
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2011/01/is-there-obama-birth-certificate-or-not.html
There is no document on file anywhere which will ever show Obama Senior to have been a US citizen.
I agree Tim. HA said there was a birth cert on file but they never said it where from. They never said it was Hawaiian.
Sharon,
Thank you for your ongoing efforts to get to the truth, which journalism is all about and what journalists must strive to achieve.
Related to Hawaii is other but equally important investigative work as to how Obama managed to get on the state’s ballot in 2008 allegedly without having to provide tangible proof of being constitutionally qualified for the office he was seeking.
As a result of his investigation (and others) Pen Johannsen at The Daily Pen had some specific questions for Congress, although a lot of them seem appropriately addressed to the Big Kahuna in Hawaii.
QUESTIONS FOR CONGRESS
QUESTION 1: Why, after including the legally required language for previous Democratic candidates in elections past, did chairperson, Brian Schatz and the Democrat Party of Hawaii, refuse to include the legally required language upon submitting it for the approval of that state party’s 2008 Official Certification of Nomination when they submitted it to Kevin B. Cronin and the Hawaiian Election Commission?
QUESTION 2: Did Kevin Cronin, Hawaiian Chief Elections Officer in 2008, approve the placement of Barack Obama’s name on the presidential ballot for the 2008 federal election, in spite of the fact that explicit language stating that Obama was Constitutionally eligible to run for president was omitted from the Official Certification of Nomination submitted by the Democrat Party of Hawaii?
QUESTION 3: Did Kevin Cronin, Chief Elections Officer, in coordination with the Hawaiian Election Commission, and HRS 11-113 (1)(d), notify Barack Obama in writing, of his eligibility or disqualification for placement on the Hawaiian presidential ballot and what date did he provide this notification?
QUESTION 4: If a notice of disqualification was sent to Obama, upon receiving this notice from the Hawaiian Elections Commission, did Barack Obama file a request, per HRS 11-113 (1)(e), in writing to Mr. Cronin and what date did he submit this request?
QUESTION 5: Did Cronin schedule Obama to a hearing and what date was this hearing scheduled?
QUESTION 6: Where was Obama between October 20th and 24th, 2008?
QUESTION 7: Was Obama present in Hawaii during the time when a hearing was conducted with the Hawaiian Elections Commission regarding his disqualification from the 2008 Hawaiian Presidential ballot?
QUESTION 8: Why did the Democratic National Committee author two separate Official Certifications of Nomination for Barack Obama, sending one version to Hawaii but not the other 49 states?
QUESTION 9: Did The DNC send two separate versions of its OCON to the Hawaiian Election Commission, and if so, why did it do this?
QUESTION 10: What secret evidence, which was obviously not accessible to the Democrat Party of Hawaii (the very state Obama was born in), did Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic National Committee acquire to determine Barack Obama’s legal qualifications to serve under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution and, thereby, include such language in its OCON?
QUESTION 11: When it was determined that the state and national party authorities of the Democratic Party did not agree on the status of Barack Obama’s eligibility, did the Chief Elections Officer of Hawaii, Kevin Cronin, determine to include Obama on the Hawaii presidential election ballot with authority provided by HRS 11-113(b).
QUESTION 12: What documented evidence was used by the DNC, which was not available to the Democrat Party of Hawaii, to determine that Barack Obama was legally qualified to serve as President under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution?
Which congressmen, specifically, did Mr. Johannsen send his questions to??
I am not aware of who had submitted these questions to. I believe he is relying on us to contact our representatives to do so.
correct me if I am wrong, but I think you have this backwards. Hawaii is the only state requiring language referring meeting eligibility by the U.S. Constitution and I think the language was on the card. All the other states don’t require it. But in the past, the nomination cards had that language on there – except for bo in 2008, where that paragraph was taken out by some democrats. If I have “misremembered” this, let me know.
After performing a bit of research today regarding the Joint Resolution Congress passed in 2009 commemorating the 50th Anniversary of Hawaii’s Statehood which also mentions BHO’s place of birth as Hawaii, (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/27/house-to-consider-counter_n_245741.html) I noticed that all the press releases relating to Hawaii’s 50th Statehood Anniversary are “mysteriously” inaccessible on the State of Hawaii’s website, http://www.hawaii.gov. I also noticed that ALL of the press releases from 2009 and 2010 are also MIA on the HI.gov site and even the Wayback Machine can’t produce these records? Hmmm, its like they all disappeared! This led me to conduct further research about the State of Hawaii’s 50th Anniversary of Statehood Commission that was formed and the 500K Federal Grant given to the University of Hawaii to produce a documentary about Hawaii’s Statehood that aired on PBS (also funded by OUR tax dollars), (www.pbshawaii.org/ourproductions/images/STATEOFALOHA.pdf). Why is almost ALL of the info regarding the taxpayer-funded Statehood Commission and taxpayer-funded Documentary unavailable? Could it be that any information that was used is subject to the FOIA, the Sunshine Act and Hawaii’s Open Meetings Laws? What about any communications, emails or otherwise that were sent back and forth from Neil Abercrombie, his former communications spokesman, Dave Helfert, or his new Chief of Staff, Amy Asselbaye, a former legislative aide, who, according to media reports, was Abercrombie’s eyes and ears in Hawaii while he was in D.C. Did they communicate at all regarding this Resolution? I would assume so. However, even if those communications are “exempt” from FOIA, (Abercrombie was a Congressman at the time) How could all of he other communications between 50th Anniversary of Statehood Commission members be exempt? Surely someone mentioned BHO, where he was born, what hospital, etc. Someone had to ask questions. Someone had to investigate the answers. You can’t just throw something in a Resolution, Governor Abercrombie, without being certain that your facts are correct!!!
I am not a UIPA, FOIA, Open Meetings Act expert, but I know many of you who read this blog are. I believe there is definitely something “fishy” going on here. Has anyone seen the PBS Documentary on Hawaii’s Statehood? Does it mention Obama? Shouldn’t any public funds, emails, communications, meetings, festivities, etc. that were somehow related to the Congressional Resolution or that in any way dealt with Obama or his place of birth in HI be subject to public review? Your thoughts?
Great letter. Perhaps a copy should be sent to the congressman whom Theresa Cao interrupted, and to Lakin’s military court as well.
The governor says there is no long-form bc on file in HI. Therefore, there is no evidence of HI-birth. Very simple. Birthers are vindicated.
You might want to post this on http://www.facebook.com/abercrombieforgov
You can also send it to:
Contact Information for Governor Neil Abercrombie:
Donalyn DelaCruz
Press Secretary to Gov. Abercrombie in Hawaii
donalyn.delacruz@hawaii.gov
And try this link as well
http://hawaii.gov/gov/contact/contact-gov
Yes, our continued support to the P&E and Sharon’s tireless efforts to bring justice to this long overdue dilemma of fraudulent occupation of the Oval office.
Personally, I am astounded that a talking point of running in’12 and barry will need $1billion this time to make it happen. He will not make it through his first term. Just because he demanded the “cone of silence” (Maxwell Smart agent 86) in his initial scam will not give way to another silent usurping. From Wall ST. daily fraud to CONgress scamming the American people, the manure has already hit the fan. The voter has been transgressed. The taxpayer swindled. The Constitution trampled.
The new America (reviving the age old foundations) is emerging strong and clear. Get out of the country if you don’t love it especially if you can’t prove your legal status to stay here.
Sharon,
Ordinarily, I’m against very long letters to elected officials on this subject because my opinion is that they read two lines, throw the letter away and get back to work. You letter is a truly extraordinarily exception, though.
Coming as it does from a (small but legit) news source, I have little doubt that he’ll take the trouble to read it through, because it’s a compelling read. If he does, he may understand the weight that’s on him that might not otherwise have fully sunk in, because your letter is unusually persuasive.
by the way, good job for mentioning not only Lakin, but CHRIS MATTHEWS. Abercrombie and the Obots need to know that WE know that their own supporters are turning on them on this issue. My own feeling is that Matthews, perhaps like Abercrombie himself, may suspect that Obama will not be able to get on all the ballots in the US in 2012 because of the new laws being put into place, but figure Obama is just arrogant enough to try to brazen it out, destroying their party for generations. So I think it may be occurring to liberals that it may be time for Obama to clear himself or for them to politically throw him under the bus ASAP before we get too deep into the election season and Obama can still be replaced the democrat party standard-bearer.
Great work, Sharon.
——————–
Mrs. Rondeau replies: Thank you very much.
Obama is more than arrogant and brazen. He is a narcissist of the highest degree. He believes his intellectual ability surpasses that of any mere mortal American; but he is wrong and he will pay for his crimes. It’s just a question of how soon.
If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle. — Sun Tzu, “The Art of War”
See also Narcism: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/narcism