Spread the love

THE ROLE AND POWERS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF A STATE

by Gino DiSimone

Gino DiSimone is willing to challenge Obama on his eligibility, but why is Governor Brewer of Arizona silent?

(Aug. 16, 2010) — As you know, I am running for Governor of Nevada and I have a few things to say about this topic.

If elected Governor of Nevada, I got your back, Arizona.

However, WHERE IS GOVERNOR BREWER!!!  Here is the way I see it:

1. A Sheriff in a County of Arizona has been threatened with assassination by Mexican drug cartels.

WHERE IS THE GOVERNOR????? The Governor has full authority over the State National Guard. The Guard can guarantee the security of the citizens and Sheriffs against such assassination threats. WHERE IS GOVERNOR BREWER???

Why has she ignored this threat against her Sheriffs? Why won’t she stand up and back up her Sheriffs?

2. Mr. Obama has filed suit against the State of Arizona.

WHERE IS THE GOVERNOR????? The Governor is the Chief Magistrate of the State. The Governor can execute an Executive Order to inform the Federal Government and Mr. Obama that the States adopted the Resolutions of 1798 some time ago and now Arizona, by Executive Order, also adopts the Resolution whereby the State declares it is Resolved that the Federal Government has no authority over enforcement of aliens because those rights belong to the State in accordance with the Resolution of 1798 –as defined by Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and many others.

WHERE IS GOVERNOR BREWER???

3. Mr. Obama must have constitutional proof of eligibility to even request a law suit be pressed by Mr. Holder. Moreover, AND MOST IMPORTANT, the States do not have to hear the case because it is outside the “enumerated” and “limited” powers of the federal government. The federal government does not have the right to even request such a

So, again, WHERE IS GOVERNOR BREWER???

As a candidate for Governor of Nevada, I request support from everyone across America. I must win the governorship of Nevada and I need funds to get the word out.  Thereafter, America will have at least one Governor with the spine to do it the American Way. I WILL back my Sheriffs!! I WILL require Mr. Obama’s constitutional proof of eligibility, and if not provided, I WILL relieve him of command of my Nevada National Guard. I WILL immediately order those troops home and they will be directed to support local law enforcement for the deportation of illegal aliens and the security of our Sheriffs, Police, and citizens.

Finally, I ask every American to Google: “Operation Wetback” which President Eisenhower ordered. That is the lesson for us today. We need Operation Wetback2. The States have the authority to do it themselves and do not need permission or new laws. The precedent is there, the laws are there, but the backbone and resolve is missing.

America, please donate to my campaign. Time is not our friend. This request is urgent and time sensitive.

These are times that try men’s souls.” – Thomas Paine

“…we mutually pledge our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.” – Declaration of Independence

Sincerely,
Gino DiSimone
Candidate, Governor of Nevada 2010
Independent non-partisan
GIN ! (GoIndependent Nevada ! )
www.ginoforgov.com

775-544-2765

Join the Conversation

11 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Hi Sharon, is this (http://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm) the reason that this (Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 says: “In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the Supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction.”) is not being adhered to in the AZ case?

  2. Damned straight, Gino!!

    Perhaps some others with backbone and foresight will begin to speak up in other state goverment races.

    And you’re right – where is the AZ governor? Along with battling the anti-SB1070 federales she could as part of that go directly to SCOTUS and insist the issue a writ of mandamus for Presidential eligibility as part of the SC1070 legality battle.

    I can’t begin to imagine why she does not do so. It would be greatly to her state’s advantage.

  3. Donation on the way. Although I do not live in AZ it has been a recently adopted “right” for aliens to vote so with the FEC and DoJ equally behind me if AZ would kindly send me a ballot I’ll register my alien vote for Gino as well. For that matter I should be able to vote in all fiftyseven states and Mexico too. I have to get down to the DMV and demand I be registered equally.

  4. I like this idea:

    “Finally, I ask every American to Google: “Operation Wetback” which President Eisenhower ordered. That is the lesson for us today. We need Operation Wetback2.”

    It should send Obama back to Kenya.

  5. Fraudulently claimed or assumed jurisdiction comes from a misunderstanding of phrases such as “United States” and “State”.

    Congresswoman Barbara B. Kennelly, from Connecticut, sent a letter to a constituent on January 24, 1996:

    “In your letter you asked if Section 3 (a) of H.R. 97 [which she introduced] defining the word state, and 26 U.S. Code 3121 (e) are the same. I have checked with Legislative Counsel and the Congressional Research Service about the definition. According to these legal experts, the definitions are not the same. The term state in 26 U.S. Code 3121 (e) specifically includes only the named territories and possessions of the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam and American Samoa.” (Emphasis added.)”

    The Hawaii Omnibus Act (Vol. 74, Public Law 86-624) (made changes to Federal Law when Hawaii became a State of the Union)
    Section 27
    (b) striking out the words continental United States, its Territories, and possessions in section 211(j) and inserting in lieu thereof the words States of the Union, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the possessions of the United States.

    Does Obamacare mention “States of the Union”?
    Does the Civil Rights Act claimed as applicable against Arizona SB1070 mention “States of the Union”?

    If they don’t, then they don’t apply. Other than spelled out in the Constitution, federal law is for federal land and territory, not States of the Union.

    full story here:
    http://www.famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/ChallJurisdiction/Definitions/freemaninvestigation.htm

    1. Even if we don’t live in Nevada, we can still send Gino financial support to win this campaign. It is a small thing to send money; the real work will be after the election. Wish we had many, many more Ginos. Let’s get behind him folks; what’d be good for Nevada would be good for the other states also.

  6. Isn’t it time to start asking….WHO? WHO ANOINTED OBAMA THE SPECIAL ONE? Who among the democrats and the republicans was it that said this man is to be exempt? Exempt from being normal! To be granted a special status no other American Citizen in the history of the United States has ever achieved before. To be elected POTUS and yet to be allowed to covered in a cloud of secrecy about his origins and background. The American People are not allowed to know just who this guy is! He is protected! But of over 300 million people in America this obscure person has been anointed by someone to be the recipient of special treatment not ever heard of before! If you are concerned about the future of America it is then necessary that the American People rise up and start demanding not so much who Obama is, but start demanding just who it is that anointed him!