Spread the love


by Arnie Rosner

(Jul. 18, 2010) — Patriots…

The Declaration of Independence states that when a government no longer serves the people, it is the people's right to "alter or to abolish it"

Please tell me why we are being asked to pay protection to the Republican Party?  I don’t know about you, but the practice of soliciting public funds to combat “organized government crime” is disturbing.  Seems very reminiscent of the old Chicago-based protection racket.

  • Are you not offended by this arrogance?
  • Are you not offended by the failure of any member of Congress to honor his or her oath to protect the Constitution?
  • Are you not offended by the refusal of the Supreme Court to exercise its authority over the separation of powers as demanded by the Constitution?
  • Have you not been disenfranchised as a citizen by this consistent lack of accountability by all three branches of the current government?
  • Do you not see this as the current government has served us, “We the People,” with an official notice that they no longer regard us as their boss?

In my view, outsourcing our need for government, the protection of our citizens and the enforcement of our laws would be a better way to spend our money.  Perhaps it is time to consider a third-party service?

It is almost guaranteed we could exercise a lot more financial control by cutting out the middleman, Obama.  Contracting for administrative services directly from George Soros would definitely accomplish a more effective return on the investment and at a lower cost.

At the same time we would eliminate the problem of dealing with the mysterious, potentially fraud-riddled Federal Reserve System, which is in the process of receiving more authority by the Leftist sellouts in Congress to control the very area of the economy they destroyed in the first place.  Of course, we the people will once more get to provide the bailout funds, but under another name.

So let us take a few minutes to examine the current situation and why it makes sense to reconsider our options now and not wait until November:

We have an executive branch that has just about all but given up following any part of our constitution and has become totally ineffective.  It can no longer be said that the executive branch is serving the needs of the electorate.

The current conduct includes but is not limited to the following examples of illegal practices that are part of a politically-motivated agenda as opposed to maintaining a civil legal system to benefit the citizens as required under the Constitution:

  • Selective enforce of current laws
  • Initiating suits that discriminate against states that follow and enforce the rule of law
  • Illegally bribing members of the legislative branch to gain political objectives of the executive branch
  • Race-baiting
  • Religious discrimination
  • Religious persecution
  • Hiding the critical state of our nation’s finances by not producing a budget (If Americans cannot see the red ink, it does not exist). Yes…Obama has once more pulled another fast one…Americans are that dumb!
  • Invoking executive orders to circumvent Congress
  • Creating czar appointments to bypass legislative scrutiny
  • Suspended requirement of FBI clearance of staff so Obama could appoint people of questionable reputation
  • Seeking to create a division between the citizens based on race and religion
  • Seeking to destroy the nation’s financial stability
  • Seeking to destroy the ability of the nation to respond to attacks from internal and external enemies
  • Seeking to violate the Posse Comitatus Act
  • Seeking to destroy the sovereignty of the United States
  • Seeking to force citizens into armed rebellion so Obama can apply Martial Law and insure complete control

Our legislative branch, consisting of a House of Representatives and Senate, both of which no longer provide any serious accountability to the constituents by whom they were elected.  The members of these two bodies also routinely violate the Constitution and thereby demonstrate their willingness to support the illegal activities of the executive branch with little exception.  They are also engaged in a conspiracy to cover up the eligibility issue (that seems centered around U.S. Sen. Resolution 511).

Their behavior is characterized by:

Passing illegal legislation through deceptive, devious and questionable legislative practices.  This illegal legislation is enabling the executive branch to pursue completing the successful subversion of the current form of government into an illegal competing form of government, a process specifically addressed and expressly forbidden by our current constitution.

Examples are marked by such legislative abortions hailed by the majority intellectual midget, Speaker Pelosi, as milestones of legislative accomplishments:

  • Obamacare
  • TARP
  • Cash for Clunkers
  • Mortgage Modification
  • Fannie and Freddie
  • Stimulus
  • Financial Reform

We have a Judiciary that seems to be conveniently out to lunch in terms of dealing with controversial constitutional issues.

Issues like:

  1. Eligibility of the Usurper
  2. Election Fraud
  3. Civil Rights Violations
  4. Government Corruption

OK, so maybe I am just a bit dense on the implications, but would someone please tell me just what part of this current government, for which we pay handsomely, is working for the citizens of the United States?

The way I see it, this rogue government led by an illegal alien usurper has effectively:

Given notice!

This government no longer works for us and is guilty of treason against the U.S. Constitution.

They no longer work for:

“We the People.”

Consequently, “We the People” have no further obligation to deal with the current defunct government,  a government  which has been destructive to the well-being of the citizens and deprived us of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness!

The good part…now we do not even have to fire them in November.

The best option of all!

Since we can all agree we no longer have a working government, then those of us who honor the Constitution are required by law to form a new government.   This is consistent with the directives as authorized by the founding documents:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.

So as I see it, since the last government has quit,  the Declaration of Independence demands that “We the people” call for new elections.

Does Tuesday,  September 7, 2010 sound convenient?


Available 24/7 – Defending freedom has become a full-time job!

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Arnie, excellent summation but you forgot the Logan act violation currently underway in the Kenyan constitutional vote.

    Given the assaults are real and more are being unveiled almost daily, is it fair to say we the people are under assault? IMO if you kick a sleeping dog you rightfully get bitten.

  2. Arnie, you could not have explained our situation within our beloved country more clearly. Yes, Sept. 7, 2010 sounds good, or how about Sept 11, 2010?
    We would be taking back the country that these terrorists, whoever they may have been, for their have been questions raised as to who was really behind this horrific terrorist attack, have tried to destroy. The manner in which the American people have been deceived cannot go on if “WE THE
    PEOPLE,” desire our country, the United States of America to continue to
    exist. We must take our country back and renew the honor and respect due our Constitution and our heritage involving all of our treasured documents. “In God We Trust.”

  3. “So as I see it, since the last government has quit, the Constitution demands that “We the people” call for new elections.”

    But you quoted from a section of the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution. Where in the actual Constitution does it mention “new elections”?

    All I see can find is Article 1, Sec. 2:

    “The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States . . .”

    and Article 1, Sec. 3:

    “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State for six Years . . .”
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: The 20th Amendment to the Constitution states that if the president “shall have failed to qualify…” Also, “high crimes and misdemeanors” are mentioned in the Constitution, and the entire Congress, White House, and judicial system are guilty of committing those, in Arnie’s opinion. Judges serve only in times of “good behaviour,” and every single judge has refused to hear a case regarding Obama’s eligibility. Is that “good behaviour”?

  4. Question! If ARTICLE 2 SECTION 1 of the Constitution of the United States of America, a supreme law of the land, can’t be enforced by any law enforcement official in America then why are other laws enforced in America? Why is it that even when there is an obvious appearance that ARTICLE 2 SECTION 1 has been violated….why is there no investigation? What does this say about America as a whole when the government and the people too are practicing a day by day contemptuous ignorance to the gift that our Founding Fathers to us and America? What does this say about America as a whole when people are trying to tell the government that ARTICLE 2 SECTION 1 is in a state of jeopardy and the Government, the Main Stream Media and the Nation as a whole go about acting as if there is nothing wrong and go about the daily routine of business as usual without any care at all for the U.S. Constitution? Have WE THE PEOPLE actually evolved into a nation of ZOMBIES? Have we become so brain dead as a nation that all concern for America’s future has become null and void?

  5. The U.S. Constitution, as the Law, was long ago abandoned and forgotten by the majority of legal U.S. tax- paying citizens. This most recent batch of ‘elected’ & ‘appointed’ have made certain they add the final nail in the Constitution’s coffin. The DNC, RNC, Federal Courts, Joint Chiefs, Media and significant segments of Industry have proven corrupted to the core, and further, that they have no intention in adhering to [or restoring] Constitutional centered Law. The predominate majority of the so-called ‘conservative-think-tanks’ ignore (at all cost) the Eligibility issue. It is NOT plausible or in anyway believable the ‘experts’ at Heritage, and all others, don’t know or understand the facts. Few the operate in the public domain have credibility. To OMIT is fraud. To present a portion of the truth, is a lie. No gray. No middle ground. Litmus is necessary- there is NO Law that allows POTUS to expunge his/her background records.

  6. Another excellent, thought-provoking letter … thank you, Arnie!!

    You’re quite right that the government is no longer accountable to the citizens. None of the three branches. And the contract between these three branches and the citizens, the United States Constitution has been (as the main character in the old McCloud TV series used to say) “rode hard and put away wet”. It has been almost totally warped, corrupted, and misused or ignored. And whose fault is that???

    The founders of this country could certainly tell us all … WE HAVE BEEN SLUMBERING while our country is being perverted and stolen from us by politicians filled with avarice as politicians almost universally are these days (and the founders knew that even in their time so it is hardly a newly uncovered secret). But at least then there were a good number of them more principled than, say, Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi, Orrin Hatch, Arlen Specter, Lindsay Graham – just to pick a few names out of the had from each political persuasion. We have not been alert to this theft of our country by the oligarchy and make no mistake; they are ALL in it together. We really have a “2 party system” in name only but in fact such is meaningless since they ALL collude every few years to fool us into putting them back into such positions of power where they can continue to enrich themselves.

    That is our fault – yours, mine, and all the rest of us no matter the political “party” (and I use that term in a pejorative sense since the “party” comes at our expense – financially and otherwise). The trouble is that most of those who are oh-so-eager to get themselves a new enriching, lifetime job in Congress are no – or not much – better than those being replaced and if they are originally, they soon enough become corrupted by the siren song of political power and unearned wealth and perquisites offered under the present “two party system” which is in reality not that at all.

    I believe that what is needed is a return to some of the fundamental principles that have been subverted even before WWI. And the crimes were committed by each of the 2 “parties”; not just one. For example, the Income Tax Amendment (#16) was followed in quick succession by the Senators by Popular Vote Amendment (#17) and if you look at history you will see that Taft (a Republican) was the President who allowed and backed the Income Tax which, of course, gave the government overriding police powers via the tax laws (and even more so with the tax regulations emplaced therefrom). The 17th was something that both parties pretty much were in favor of as it removed the political clout of the States holding the Senate beholden and turned over to a manipulative pair of parties in the political oligarchy who quickly moved to use that body for their own purposes rather than as required by the states thereby moving accountability away from the States as the founders intended as a check and balance for very good reason and into the “political process” and reducing accountability to those closer to the people (the State legislators elected by the people of those states).

    This gave the oligarchs much of the needed power but when you look at Public Law 62-5 (also before the First WW), you see that that law gave them the ability to move even the accountability to the voters even further away from the intentions of the founders who had wished a relative small number of constituents electing a Representative (something like 50-60,000 IIRC with 34,000 being the original target) so that the people would be likely to know a good bit about the man and his views – and vice-versa since it was much like living in a small town. More information here – http://www.publiclaw62-5.org/ and especially the link therein to http://www.thirty-thousand.org

    Contrast that to the present where that law set a limit of 435 on the House members (but made no limit on staff) which meant that each Representative now has something like 1,750,000 constituents and truly massive staff budgets – all highly susceptible to lobbyists and “enticement” money with the “folks back home” being never the wiser – unless they woke up. Is it any wonder that they don’t give a real rat’s ass WHAT you or I think??? Why should they – we’ve allowed them to get completely away from the precepts originated in the Constitution which had these things intentionally as checks and balances so that oligarchys could not easily be formed as we see them today. The better thing would be to reduce the Congressional districts to MUCH smaller sizes so that townhall meetings, Congressional local offices, etc. allowed meaningful contact with the politician as today they are pretty much a sideshow.

    Do you not think that a pol representing, say, 50,000 of us would be more attuned to our complaints and desires?? His DC staff should also be drastically limited to 3 or 4 so that the politicians can get back to being responsive to the voters. At present, going through the charade of “voting” every few years when you may be only one of over a million people trying to get the guys attention to be heard, is really a futile exercise as many are beginning to realize.


    Repeal the 16th and 17th Amendments, repeal Public Law 62-5 and let’s get back to healing our country from this current National Nightmare. NONE of the present incumbents deserve to be reelected.